What To Expect Under Personal Reemployment Accounts (PRAs): Predictions and Procedures Presenter: Irma Perez-Johnson USDOL Workforce Innovations Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Topic 2 :: Business Strategies Mrs. Schroeder
Advertisements

ACCESS TO RECOVERY (ATR) Mady Chalk, Ph.D. Director, Division of Services Improvement Center for Substance Abuse Treatment SAMHSA.
1 Preliminary Analysis: First 2000 Survey Respondents Workforce Innovations 2005 Research Showcase Jacob Benus, Project DirectorSheena McConnell, Principal.
Health Enterprise Zone Workforce Incentives Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Maryland Community Health Resources Commission.
4/21/ Mentoring Students Where They Are: Using E-Mentoring as a Retention Tool
Criteria for High Quality Career and Technical Education Programs National Career Pathways Network Orlando, FL November 14, 2014.
Contamination Cleanup Grant Program Implementation Workshop.
Stephen A. Wandner Senior Economist U.S. Department of Labor Michael Wiseman Research Professor George Washington University.
GRANTS AND INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT LAURA QAISSAUNEE, DIRECTOR DINNEEN JACKSON-PELESKEY, COORDINATOR.
Sam Lopez, NPD Program Manager, OELA
FAMILY LAW ADVISORY COMMITTEE December 1, EMERGING THEMES Compensation for lawyers is inadequate Financial eligibility thresholds are too low.
Delivering Advanced and Higher Apprenticeships under the Loans System in 2013 Skills CFA National Conference 29 th November Terry Fennell.
W-2 Program – Procurement for 2013 Scope of Work, Required Systems and Monitoring Janice Peters, Director Bureau of Working Families.
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
Unemployment Insurance Innovations Session Topics:  Workforce Development Policy Drivers  Unemployment Insurance and Change... Program Impact Services.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Priority of Service for Veterans and Eligible Spouses Southern California TAT Forum May.
Local Welfare Schemes: what have we learnt so far?
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
Pay-for-Performance Plans
The Challenges of Implementing Health Reform Through the Tax System Janet Holtzblatt Congressional Budget Office February, 2008.
WIA REAUTHORIZATION Nancy W. Hawkins October 7, 2003 Florida Workforce Summit Meeting Lake Buena Vista, Florida.
National Academy of Social Insurance Cheryl Atkinson January 2006.
Contribution Analysis A different approach to measurement of impact.
THE SUPPORTED EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMME OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES TOM RONAYNE WRC SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSULTANTS IASE Conference
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
The Net Impact Initiative Pilot Evaluation Findings Spring 2015 See presenter notes for annotations.
Valparaiso University New Paid Time Off Leave Policy October 2013.
National NCP Employment Demonstration Grant Jackie Scharping, Director Bureau of Child Support.
Illinois Network for Advanced Manufacturing TAACCCT Round 2 Awardee Overview of Grant Evaluation.
March 2009 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY (Social Services)– KENYAN EXPERIENCE March 2009 PERSPECTIVES ON IMPACT EVALUATION Presenter:
Implementing State Health Reform: Lessons for Policymakers Webinar for State Officials April 8, 2010.
DELiVER coalition meeting AGENDA 5th May 2010 Ashden Awards.
Voucher Reassessment Management Project Fiscal Committee October 3, 2011.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
Redevelopment Grant Program Implementation Workshop Spring 2010.
Julie R. Morales Butler Institute for Families University of Denver.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
NYS Swipe Card 0 Common Intake and Case Management New York State Swipe Card Technology by Anthony Joseph Workforce Development & Training Division,
Public Water and Sewer Affordability Meg Neafsey American Water April 30, 2015.
Gifted Advisory Council Meeting School Board of Hernando County, FL Challenger K-8 School of Science and Math – Room 505 September 3, 2015 David Katcher,
HRSA Frontier Community Health Integration Project (FCHIP) Technical Assistance, Tracking and Analysis Program Guidance Overview Sarah Bryce July.
0 Emerging Findings from the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Evaluation Gayle Hamilton, MDRC Workforce Innovations 2005 Conference.
Eta Personal Reemployment Accounts. eta President’s Growth and Jobs Plan – January 7 th, 2003 ■ Encourage consumer spending to boost economy ■ Promote.
District Assembly Rotary District 5450 Grants June 2, 2012 Presented by Carolyn Schrader Chair, District Grants Subcommittee.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA 1 Program Performance Accountability Requirements under the American Recovery and Reinvestment.
1 The Effects of Customer Choice: First Findings from the Individual Training Account (ITA) Experiment Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. Social Policy.
Impact Assessment Indicators for Administration of Public Transportation Grants NCHRP Task 49 Viktor Zhong Scott Baker Dec 3, 2015.
Keeping Up With Demand: Measuring Labor Market Alignment in TAACCCT Programs Michelle Van Noy and Jennifer Cleary TCI Research Symposium: Evidence of What.
Personal Reemployment Accounts: Simulations for Planning Implementation Christopher J. O’Leary and Randall W. Eberts W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Priority of Service for Veterans and Eligible Spouses – Discretionary Grantees Pacific Northwest.
SPED 494/594 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
Employment and Training Administration DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ETA Priority of Service for Veterans and Eligible Spouses Pacific Northwest TAT Forum April.
Chapter 3: Purchasing Research and Planning Strategic Planning for Purchasing Strategic planning for purchasing involves the identification of critical.
BUS 226 ASSIST Peer Educator/ bus226assist.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Arizona’s Shared Work Program. The Shared Work Program:  Is an alternative to employers who are facing reduction in the work force.  Allows employers.
The State of Ohio is an Equal Opportunity Employer and Provider of ADA Services Using CDBG and HOME for Housing March 14, 2016 COSCDA Program Managers’
Veteran Programs & Procedures. 1. State Employment Agencies – 11i Roles of Veteran’s Representatives 2. American Job Centers– 11i (1) 3. Workforce Investment.
Understanding Health Insurance Jody Blanke Distinguished Professor of Computer Information Systems and Law Mercer University.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: April 6 th, 2015 Presented by: U.S. Department.
Deconstruction: Funding & Federal Rules Andrea Phillips, Consultant.
Effective Job Search Michelle Beebe, UI Director
#44/A, 3RD FLOOR, GEETHANJALI APARTMENTS, OPP. BAHAR CAFE
CareerSource Chipola Performance Overview
Improving Employment Outcomes for Disadvantaged Groups: The Irish Context Philip J. O’Connell Pobal Conference: Creating an Inclusive Labour Market 9th.
Creating a P.L Plan.
Dual Eligibles Across the States
Georgia Frontline Decision Support System Pilot
Apprenticeship and the DSP: Growing Opportunity for Frontline Workers
Presentation transcript:

What To Expect Under Personal Reemployment Accounts (PRAs): Predictions and Procedures Presenter: Irma Perez-Johnson USDOL Workforce Innovations Conference Philadelphia, PA – July 11-13, 2005

Key Elements of PRA Programs Targeted at UI recipients likely to exhaust their benefits Targeted at UI recipients likely to exhaust their benefits Contain up to $3,000; amount set by states Contain up to $3,000; amount set by states As voucher, can be used to pay for range of intensive, training, and supportive services As voucher, can be used to pay for range of intensive, training, and supportive services Bonus eligibility based on reemployment within 13 weeks of UI receipt and 6-month retention Bonus eligibility based on reemployment within 13 weeks of UI receipt and 6-month retention Bonus paid in 2 installments; amount based on unspent PRA funds Bonus paid in 2 installments; amount based on unspent PRA funds

Key Questions Addressed What are the predicted impacts of the PRA reemployment bonus? What are the predicted impacts of the PRA reemployment bonus? What are likely customer responses to the bonus and voucher components of PRAs? What are likely customer responses to the bonus and voucher components of PRAs? What challenges may states and local areas encounter in implementing PRAs? What challenges may states and local areas encounter in implementing PRAs? What resources exist to support, facilitate PRA implementation? What resources exist to support, facilitate PRA implementation?

Information Sources Reemployment bonus demonstrations Reemployment bonus demonstrations Evaluation of the ITA Experiment Evaluation of the ITA Experiment Research on Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services (WPRS) Research on Worker Profiling and Reemployment Services (WPRS) Research on UI population Research on UI population

Predicted PRA Bonus Impacts Bonus receipt rates expected to vary by PRA amount Bonus receipt rates expected to vary by PRA amount –$3,000 PRA  % bonus receipt rate –$1,000 PRA  % bonus receipt rate UI impacts also expected to vary by PRA amount UI impacts also expected to vary by PRA amount –$3,000 PRA  – 1.66 weeks per PRA recipient –$1,000 PRA  – 1.09 weeks per PRA recipient Predicted PRA impacts larger than in prior demonstrations Predicted PRA impacts larger than in prior demonstrations –PRA bonuses more generous –First PRA bonus installment paid immediately Impacts on aggregate UI payments could be greater at Impacts on aggregate UI payments could be greater at lower PRA amounts –$3,000  –1.66 weeks per PRA recipient –$1,000  –1.09 weeks per PRA recipient, but 3 times the number of PRA recipients (–3.27 weeks )

Other Considerations in Setting PRA Amount Tradeoff between PRA amount and number of offers Tradeoff between PRA amount and number of offers Tension between bonus and service voucher features of PRAs Tension between bonus and service voucher features of PRAs Variation by local areas Variation by local areas

Likely Customer Responses Expect PRA customers to attempt to qualify for bonus first Expect PRA customers to attempt to qualify for bonus first PRA customers unlikely to purchase substantial counseling assistance PRA customers unlikely to purchase substantial counseling assistance Customers interested in training likely to purchase it Customers interested in training likely to purchase it Extent of PRA use for support service purchases is unknown Extent of PRA use for support service purchases is unknown Expect PRA expenditures close to award amount Expect PRA expenditures close to award amount

Key Challenges in PRA Implementation PRA concept is new PRA concept is new Uneven experience and awareness of resources Uneven experience and awareness of resources Desire to keep procedures simple Desire to keep procedures simple Requires coordination across distinct workforce development functions Requires coordination across distinct workforce development functions

Building Blocks Exist to Support, Facilitate PRA Implementation PRA Program FunctionsOne-StopEquivalent Identify and call-in PRA eligibles Identify and call-in WPRS eligibles Review and approve bonus claims None but done under prior bonus demonstrations Review and approve PRA expenditure requests Review and approve ITA expenditure requests Process payments and track PRA balances Process payments and track ITA balances

PRA Demonstration Seven states (FL, ID, MN, MS, MT, TX, WV) Seven states (FL, ID, MN, MS, MT, TX, WV) Two-year implementation period Two-year implementation period Programs launched in spring 2005 Programs launched in spring 2005 Expect about 2,200 total PRA recipients Expect about 2,200 total PRA recipients PRA award set at $3,000 by all states PRA award set at $3,000 by all states

Evaluation of PRA Demonstration Examine implementation process Examine implementation process Identify successful strategies and likely replication challenges Identify successful strategies and likely replication challenges Examine patterns in acceptance and use of PRA funds Examine patterns in acceptance and use of PRA funds Describe UI, employment, and retention outcomes for PRA recipients Describe UI, employment, and retention outcomes for PRA recipients