Networking the World TM 86 Leon Kempner, Jr., P.E. Bonneville Power Administration February 6, 2000 IEEE Three Second Gust Extreme Wind Speed Map, CP2363.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[ ] Preliminary Results of Full-Scale Monitoring of Hurricane Wind Speeds and Wind Loads on Residential Buildings Peter L. Datin Graduate Research Assistant.
Advertisements

Florida Coastal Monitoring Program Hurricane Wind Data Collection Kurt Gurley – University of Florida Forrest Masters – Florida International University.
Wind Loads: The Nature of Wind
Wind Loads: The ASCE 7 Provisions
Modeling to Revise Coastal Inundation and Flooding Estimates in Georgia and Northeast Florida Association of State Flood Plain Managers Conference May.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Great Lakes Flood Hazard Mapping Project - Data Development (Lake Michigan) Bruce Ebersole USACE Engineer.
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Lecture 9 - Flexure June 20, 2003 CVEN 444.
1 DG-1247: Design-Basis Hurricane and Hurricane Missiles for Nuclear Power Plants Brad Harvey, CCM Senior Physical Scientist (Meteorology) U.S. Nuclear.
Engineering Design Issues for Essential Facilities and Shelters.
Wind loading and structural response Lecture 19 Dr. J.D. Holmes
Prutkova Eugenia and Ryabchenkov Sergei Represent Report on the theme: JASS-2006.
National Best Practices Conference Covered Bridge Preservation Analyzing Covered Bridges for Live Loads Covered Bridge Preservation National Best Practices.
Atmospheric boundary layers and turbulence II Wind loading and structural response Lecture 7 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
Engineering Design Issues for EOC’s, Hurricane Shelters and other Essential Facilities.
& CRITERIA FOR MAXIMUM ELEVATION OF RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS IN FLOODPLAINS William L. Coulbourne, P.E. Applied Technology Council
Wind Load Factor Analysis: An Exploratory Approach Snohomish Wind Group Alexi Curelop, Kofi Petty, Sonya Prasertong Geography 469 Spring 2010.
Operational Quality Control in Helsinki Testbed Mesoscale Atmospheric Network Workshop University of Helsinki, 13 February 2007 Hannu Lahtela & Heikki.
1 Integrating Wind into the Transmission Grid Michael C Brower, PhD AWS Truewind LLC Albany, New York
CHAPTER 6 Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data
Rotary Sprinklers – uniform application over entire area – lawns.
2010 Florida Building Code Wind Standard
LDG: Lateral Design Graph - tutorial LDG: Lateral Design Graph Copyright Prof Schierle LDG is an Excel program to design and visualize design for.
Unit 8 POE Ballistic Device
A CSP ARA Assessment of Wind Borne Debris Criteria for the Florida Panhandle February 2006 ARA Progress Report.
Presentation of Wind Data  The wind energy that is available at a specific site is usually presented on an annual basis.  There are several methods by.
Michael L. Dyer PE Executive Engineer. Electrical component Movement component.
Experience you can trust. Hurricane Hardening Commission Staff Workshop on Electric Utility Infrastructure Richard E. Brown, PhD, PE Tallahassee,
Wind Turbine Support Structure
THE BUILDING ENVELOPE: Lecture 4 Designing the Building Envelope.
Southern Taiwan University Department of Electrical engineering
University of Palestine
A 1 ASCE 7-10 Wind Speed Map Peter J. Vickery Applied Research Associates, Inc Six Forks Road, Suite 600 Raleigh, NC,
Classification: Statoil internal Status: Draft WIND LOADS Wind phenomenology Wind speed is experienced essentially at two different time scales:
Wave Height Estimate for Multi- Frequency Flooding Events Elena Drei-Horgan, PhD, CFM Darryl Hatheway, CFM Paul Carroll, PE May 24, 2012.
ECE 7800: Renewable Energy Systems
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE 2007 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL SAFETY CODE.
Experience you can trust. 1 Electric Infrastructure Hardening Rebuilding Utility Infrastructure LSU Center for Energy Studies Bill Snyder
Problem 1a The table on the right shows the results of a formation sample hypothetical sieve analysis. (Grain sizes listed in the table are conjecture,
1 The trend for international standards is to adopt and adapt the ASCE-7 approach for primary systems.
Binomial Distribution Derivation of the Estimating Formula for u an d ESTIMATING u AND d.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING. What Does a Structural Engineer Do?
Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbines
Unit 8 Section 8-3 – Day : P-Value Method for Hypothesis Testing  Instead of giving an α value, some statistical situations might alternatively.
1 National Wind Technology Center Wind Turbine Design According to IEC (Onshore) and -3 (Offshore) Standards Overview for NWTC November 8, 2005.
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Systems: Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms J. Y. Grandidier, Valorem, 180 Rue du Marechal Leclerc, F B ´ Begles,
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
Effective static loading distributions Wind loading and structural response Lecture 13 Dr. J.D. Holmes.
Chapter # 8 Mechanical Design of Overhead Lines.
ASCE Wind Loads SESSION 5 EXAMPLE HIGH-RISE BUILDING Session 4.
Structural Loads.
Consequence Analysis Robert Wu South Coast Air Quality Management District.
What do all these symbols mean? Reading a weather map.
ARMA Spring Committees Low-Slope Committee March 24, 2009 Codes Steering Group Report Aaron R. Phillips, CSG Chair Staff: Michael Fischer, John Ferraro.
The Course of Synoptic Meteorology
Comparing Load Profiles: Art or Science?
What do all these symbols mean?
Impact of C&C loads due to ASCE/SEI 7-16
The Index and Payment Solutions of Typhoon Index Insurance for Rubber Trees in Hainan Province of China Xinli Liu1, Tao Ye2, Jing Dong1 , Miluo Yi2, Shuyi.
Speed and Velocity.
The influence of wind load on a suspended fiber optic cable
Effect Of Wind Load On High Rise Buildings PRESENTED BY, SRUTHI SIVAKUMAR ROLL NO : 20 SECM,S3, M TECH SJCET,PALAI GUIDED BY, Mrs.MARIAMOL KURIAKOSE ASSISTANT.
Aircraft Performance Charts Private Pilot Ground School
30 miles in 1 hour 30 mph 30 miles per hour
Use of Lightning Data for Electricity Transmission Operations
LDG requires Excel and macros enabled.
Industry Presentation on Water Penetration Testing
Representing Climate Data
THE HISTORY OF TIA-222 Dave Brinker 4/30/2019.
Presentation transcript:

Networking the World TM 86 Leon Kempner, Jr., P.E. Bonneville Power Administration February 6, 2000 IEEE Three Second Gust Extreme Wind Speed Map, CP2363

Networking the World TM 87 Why Change Rule 250C? Ü Current Extreme Wind Map, Based on Fastest Mile Wind Speed Ü New wind data and engineering wind maps are based on Three (3) Second Gust extreme Wind Speed Ü Fastest Mile wind speed, no longer collected Ü Three Second Gust speed collected at more stations Ü The Three Second Gust Wind Speed was first presented in ASCE 7-95

Networking the World TM 88 Ü The Three Second Gust Wind Speed represents a better database and analysis of available data Ü The NESC should be consistent with other Engineering Loading Standards, Guides and Codes such as, ASCE-7, EIA/TIA-222, ASCE-74, IBC, etc. Ü This change is the right thing to do, Standard/Engineering Creditability Why Change Rule 250C? (Continued)

Networking the World TM 89 Database/Analysis Continental Winds: è 485 weather stations, min. 5 years of data è Data was assembled from a number of stations in state-size areas to reduce sampling errors è Fisher-Tippett Type I extreme value distribution, 50 year return period è Insufficient variation in peak gust wind speeds to justify contours è 33 ft. above ground, Exposure C

Networking the World TM 90 Database/Analysis Hurricane Winds: è Based on Monte-Carlo simulations è The coastline was divided into discrete points spaced at 50 nautical miles. è Hurricane contours over the Atlantic are provided for interpolations and represent values for Exposure C over land. è Importance factors are accounted for in the map wind speeds, >1.0 at the coast to 1.0, 100 miles inland.

Networking the World TM 91 Fastest Mile Vs. 3 Sec. Gust FASTEST MILE SPEED 3 SECOND GUST SPEED

Networking the World TM 92 Gust Response Vs Gust Factors l GRF - Accounts for Dynamic effects of gusts on the response of T-line components - Gusts may not envelop the entire span between T-line Structures - Values can be Greater than or Less than Represents the ratio of peak gust load effect to the selected mean extreme load effect

Networking the World TM 93 Gust Response Vs. Gust Factors l Gust Factor - The Ratio of the gust extreme wind speed at a specified averaging period, e.g. 2 seconds, to the selected mean extreme wind speed, e.g. 10 minute. - Used as a multiplier of the mean extreme wind speed to obtain the gust wind speed. - Values Greater than 1.0 (Typ )

Networking the World TM 94 NESC Extreme Wind Format Equations l Figures l Tables CP2363

Networking the World TM 95 Gust Response Factor, G RF l Davenport Equations, “Gust Response Factors for Transmission Line Loading,” Proceeding, 5 th International Conference on Wind Engineering, 1979 l ASCE 74, “Guidelines for Electrical Transmission Line Structural Loading,”1991 l ASCE 7, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,” 1995 l IEC 826, “Loading and Strength of Transmission Lines,” 1991

Networking the World TM 96 3 Second Gust Wind Pressure Where: k Z - Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficient, C, as defined in Rule 250C.1, Table V - Basic Wind Speed, 3-second gust wind speed, miles per hour, at 33 ft. above ground, an annual probability of 0.02 (50 year return period), Figure s I - Importance Factor, 1.0 for structures, wires, and their support facilities. G RF - Gust Response Factor, as defined in Rule 250C.2. C d - Shape Factor, as defined in Rule 252B. q Z = * k Z * V 2 * I * G RF * C d

Networking the World TM 97 K Z Parameter

Networking the World TM 98 G RF Parameter

Networking the World TM 99 Table Values Represent a Uniform Change 3% 7% 4% 3% 4%

Networking the World TM 100 Tables of Factors 1. Recommend General Equation for height greater than 250 ft. Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficients Structure/Wire Gust Response Factors 1. Recommend General Equations for tower height, h, greater than 250 ft. and span length, L, greater than 2000 ft.

Networking the World TM 101 General Equations Structure k Z = 2.01*(0.67*h/900) (2/9.5) Wire k Z = 2.01*(h/900) (2/9.5) (for 15 ft.  h  900 ft.) Velocity Pressure Exposure Coefficients Structure G RF = ( *E S (B S ) 0.5 )/k V 2 Wire G RF = ( *E W (B W ) 0.5 )/k V 2 E S = 0.346*(33/(0.67*h)) 1/7 E W = 0.346*(33/h) 1/7 B S = 1/( *h/220) B W = 1/(1+0.8*L/220) Structure/Wire Gust Response Factors E = Exposure Factor B = Dimensionless response term corresponding to the quasi-static background wind load k V = 1.430

Networking the World TM 102 Example q Z = *k Z *V 2 *I*G RF *C d q Z = *V 2 *C d CP2363 C q Z = *k Z *V 2 *G RF *(I*C d ) q Z = *k Z *V 2 *G RF *C q Z = *V 2 *C 70 mph À 12.54C 80 mph À 16.38C 90 mph À 20.74C 9Ì 75Ì 25Ì 7Ì 10Ì Wind in Tower (Height 141 ft.) 141 ft Kz Twr GRF Wind in Wire (1000 Ft. Span) Kz Wire GRF 74 ft ft ft ft Note: No Gust Factor

Networking the World TM 103 Example (Continued) 141 ft. = *1.3*(90mph) 2 *0.859*C = 23.2C psf Wire Wind 74 ft. = *1.2*(90mph) 2 *0.712*C = 17.7C 99 ft. = *1.3*(90mph) 2 *0.698*C = 18.8C 124 ft. = *1.4*(90mph) 2 *0.687*C = 19.9C 141 ft. = *1.4*(90mph) 2 *0.687*C = 19.9C psf Tower Wind Pressure

Networking the World TM 104 Example (Continued) C2 20.7C á CP 23.2C á C2 20.7C á CP 17.7C á CP 18.8C á CP 19.9C á C2 20.7C á C2 psf CP psf

Networking the World TM 105 Review of CP2363 l Presents the 3 second gust extreme wind speed approach l Updates the NESC extreme wind speed map to current wind engineering knowledge l Presents statistically better wind speed data l Technically correct/consistent approach for determining wind loading