G. Velev 1/24/ 2011 1 Ferrite Tests for Mu2e Beam- Line Extinction Uses G. Velev Technical Division Magnet Systems Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
5 Current Field Measurement 5.1Alternating Current Field Measurement 5.2Direct Current Potential Drop 5.3Alternating Current Potential Drop.
Advertisements

Performance Limitations of the Booster Cavity Mohamed Hassan, Vyacheslav Yakovlev, John Reid.
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
Masahito TOMIZAWA and Satoshi MIHARA Accelerator and proton beam.
SESAME – TAC 2012: M. Attal Maher Attal SESAME Booster Characterization.
Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
PLANS JINR PARTICIPATION for JINR PARTICIPATION FAIR PROJECT: in the FAIR PROJECT: - ACCELERATOR TECHNOLOGY A.Kovalenko 103 session of the JINR Scientific.
Mike Jenkins Lancaster University and The Cockcroft Institute.
WBS 2.08 Extinction Independent Design Review of Mu2e 5/3/11 Eric Prebys L3 Manager for Extinction.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Experimental Study of the Inductance of a Toroidal Ferrite Core at High frequencies Michelle Walker North Carolina A&T State University Supervisor: Dave.
11 December 2011 Holger Witte Brookhaven National Laboratory Advanced Accelerator Group A Dipole with Grain Oriented Steel.
, WP1 Meeting, RAL J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs for the NF J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
RFQ Thermal Analysis Scott Lawrie. Vacuum Pump Flange Vacuum Flange Coolant Manifold Cooling Pockets Milled Into Vanes Potentially Bolted Together Tuner.
PET-PHD project Project title: Design and Optimization of RFI Filter for DC to DC Converters.
Mu2e Extinction and Extinction Monitoring (2.09) Lehman CD-1 Review of Mu2e June 6-7, 2012 Eric.Prebys Extinction L3 Manager Dr. Smith: We’re doomed! Maureen:
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Fermilab I. Terechkine1 RF Phase Shifter R&D Proton Driver Review March 15, 2005 T. Barrak, B. Foster, I. Gonin, M. Huening, V. Kashikhin, T. Khabiboulinne,
SIS 100 main magnets G. Moritz, GSI Darmstadt (for E. Fischer, MT-20 4V07)) Cryogenic Expert Meeting, GSI, September 19/
Mu2e Experiment and Issues Rick Coleman, Fermilab RESMM’12, February 2012.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
Muon Beams for Particle Physics Ajit Kurup Winter Seminar March 2010.
Eric Prebys, FNAL HB2012, Beijing, China.  Representing the Mu2e Collaboration  24 Institutions  ~120 Collaborators  This talk has direct contributions.
1 Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility M. Palmer & D.Rubin November 8, 2005.
Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
Eric Prebys Accelerator Physics Center Fermilab *Very much a work in progress 7/24/09.
Eric Prebys Accelerator Physics Center Fermilab 7/30/09.
Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova Magnet design issues & concepts for the new injector P.Fabbricatore INFN-Genova,
2 nd harmonic RF perpendicular biased cavity update C.Y. Tan, W. Pellico, G. Romanov, R. Madrak, and D. Wildman 02 Apr 2014.
Mu2e Mu2e CD-2 Review Template Eric Prebys Extinction October 21-24, 2014.
EMMA: Pulsed magnets Kiril Marinov MaRS group, ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory 1.
COMET. μ-e conversion search from muonic aluminium J-PARC pulsed proton beam to produce pulsed muon beam Forbidden in the Standard Model  clue to the.
Hysteresis When we increased the current we observed, saturation. What would happen if I decrease the current after saturation? The flux for a given H.
ESS | A Preliminary Feasibility Assessment of Power Converters and Magnets for Beam Raster System| | Carlos A. Martins, ESS Preliminary Feasibility.
Booster Losses Keith Gollwitzer PIP and MI 700 kW review January 2015.
SY120 to the Meson Test Facility (and KTeV?) - Chuck Brown – 23Feb04 – June/08 P2 P1 MI52 MCenter MTest 3 km beam line from MI52 to MT6 and MC7 2.5 km.
 A model of beam line built with G4Beamline (scripting tool for GEANT4)  Simulated performance downstream of the AC Dipole for core of beam using  x.
Update on TCTP heating H. Day, B. Salvant Acknowledgments: L. Gentini and the EN-MME team.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
SPring-8 upgrade : a fast kicker system for beam injection Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) SPring-8 T. Nakamura CFA Beam Dynamics.
F D F November 8, 2006Alessandro G. Ruggiero1 of GeV 10-MWatt Proton Driver Target 200-MeV DTL 1.0-GeV FFAG H – Stripping Foil Injection Energy,
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
Magnet and ferrites tests Luciano Elementi Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Ferrite measurements of Mu2e AC dipole Summer Student Meeting August 25, 2010 Student: Evgeny Bulushev, NSU Supervisor: George Velev, TD\Magnet Systems.
Experience with the ferrite tuner for LEB ( ) Slava Yakovlev 15/04/2016.
Simulation of Extinction Channel Eric Prebys Mu2e Extinction Technical Design Review 2 November 2015.
Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
F Sergei Nagaitsev (FNAL) Webex meeting Oct ICD-2 chopper requirements and proposal #1.
Construction and working of TRANSFORMERs
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
Baseline Injection/Extraction Configuration Aimin Xiao and Louis Emery, September 12th 2006.
TPS pulse magnet measurement
Some Design Considerations and R &D of CEPCB Dipole Magnet
XFEL beamline loads and HOM coupler for CW
Thermal-Structural Finite Element Analysis of CLIC module T0#2
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
The COMET Experiment Ajit Kurup, Imperial College London, on behalf of the COMET Collaboration. ABSTRACT The COherent Muon to Electron Transition (COMET)
Maxwell and Ansys simulations for the CAPP detector
Optimization design of the vibration isolation of AC magnet girder
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
Applications 14.
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS/i-RCS
Physics Design on Injector I
What are these kinks on dipole ramp and the associated beam loss?
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
Proposal for a CESR Damping Ring Test Facility
Electric Machine Design Course
Electric Machine Design Course
Presentation transcript:

G. Velev 1/24/ Ferrite Tests for Mu2e Beam- Line Extinction Uses G. Velev Technical Division Magnet Systems Department

G. Velev 1/24/ Introduction Ferrite pulsed magnets are commonly used in the accelerator applications –kickers – injection, extraction, gap clearing (recently MI) –Orbump – beam orbit manipulation All of them have a low operational duty cycle, practically <1-3% For Mu2e, an experiment which searches for a μ-e conversion with an unprecedented sensitivity of ~ a new type AC dipoles are needed These dipoles will be used to extinguish the protons at the level of between the bunches. They should work continuously at 300 kHz ( B max = 160 G) and possibly at 5.1 MHz (B max ~ 10 G) at 100% duty cycle In 2009, we started a R&D to select suitable ferrites for these dipoles Collaboration with Japan, COMET experiment needs similar technology.

G. Velev 1/24/ Beam cleaning The idea is to synchronize the beam bunches and AC magnetic field 100 ns bunches separated with 1.7 μs gap ~ 600 kHz The bunches are moving on the nodes kHz More information – Eric Prebys note: bin/RetrieveFile?docid=709 bin/RetrieveFile?docid=709 Collimator Out of time beam In time beam dipole

G. Velev 1/24/ Beam cleaning: current version Time Dipole Field (G) Collimator Out of time beam In time beam dipoles 300 kHz 5.1 MHz

G. Velev 1/24/ B-H curve B =  H, in ferrites  =  (H,T(C), …) The losses in ferrite core ~ area under the B-H curve At low frequency - hysteresis loss At high frequency - eddy current loss B H P total

G. Velev 1/24/ Ferrite samples Ferrite types: MnZn, NiZn Frequency: 300kHz, 5.1MHz FerritesGeometry ferrite 10 mm «1 plate» geometry ferrite 10 mm isolator «2 plate» geometry Eddy Currents Material Properties · MnZn NiZn 25 C Resistivity (  -m) Thermal Conductivity (W/K/m) Sample plate 10 RTDs 200x200x10 mm 3 200x200x5 mm 3

G. Velev 1/24/ Test system

G. Velev 1/24/ ANSYS simulation Magnetic flux directionTemperature Distribution

G. Velev 1/24/ B-H curves - MnZn

G. Velev 1/24/ Heating comparison: 1 plate vs 2 plates MnZn Low eddy currents High eddy currents

G. Velev 1/24/ kHz MnZn, 300 kHz, 1 plate Current A-turns B max (G) B begin (G) B end (G) T max (C) MnZn, 300kHz, 2 plates

G. Velev 1/24/ MnZn, 5.1 MHz, 2 plates Current A-turns B max (G) B begin (G) B end (G) T max (C) Current A-turns B max (G) B begin (G) B end (G) T max (C)

G. Velev 1/24/ B-H curve - NiZn

G. Velev 1/24/ NiZn, 5.1 MHz, 1 plate Current A-turns B max (G) B begin (G) B end (G) T max (C) NiZn, 300 kHz, 1 plate

G. Velev 1/24/ Ferrite selection Both materials satisfy the criteria for magnet strength Due to the low resistivity and large eddy current effect, the thickness of MnZn ferrite plates should be ~ 5 mm. At such high frequencies and power, for MnZn plate we need good insulator between ferrites and power bus - problem with insulation due to corona discharge

G. Velev 1/24/ Magnet design - x-section Two designs were considered – magnet with C and H shape of the ferrite plates. IEEE Applied Superconductivity, v. 20, p

G. Velev 1/24/ Current Model Design Beam direction NiZn Ferrite plates

G. Velev 1/24/ Summary We measured MnZn and NiZn ferrite samples at 300 kHz and 5.1 MHz. Both materials will satisfy the AC dipole requirements. Building a magnet prototype based on the selected NiZn ferrites – simple design due to the high resistivity of the material and no-insulation between the ferrites and copper bus This summer – we plan to test the prototype, including 5.1 MHz Depending on the result an iteration may be needed. Contributions: V. Kashikhin, S. Makarov, D. Harding, E. Prebys and PARTI students: I. Iedemska and E. Bulushev.