CLRN Evaluation Update Educational Support Systems May 28, 2009

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Quality Liaisons April 10th, Every table needs representatives from each level. Elementary-Middle- High.

Advertisements

Learning Objectives Understand the Mission of Pharmacy Benefits Management Understand the Background on Pharmacy Re-Engineering Project (PRE) including.

1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.

Welcome Assessing Your Activity Insight Implementation Kate Kaczmarczik, Client Relations Team Lead.

Where Innovation Is Tradition Payroll Certification on Federally Sponsored Projects FDP Update September 15, 2011 George Mason University Pilot.

Indistar: Updates, Additions, and Coming Soon Stephanie Benedict, ADI.

1 © 2006 by Smiths Group: Proprietary Data Smiths Group Online Performance Review Tool Training.

Screen 1 of 24 Reporting Food Security Information Understanding the User’s Information Needs At the end of this lesson you will be able to: define the.

Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.

Position Questionnaire Supervisor Training ND Renew Agenda  Overview  Objectives  Supervisor Role and Responsibilities  Position Questionnaire.

1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction.

MAC Committee Update Robert Kondziolka, MAC Chair.

Use of OCAN in Crisis Intervention Webinar October, 2014.

Seevic Performance Appraisal

United Nations Statistics Division

AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.

2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 1. LAHC 2012 Self-Evaluation Report Update 7/27/11 All Accreditation Commission recommendations successfully.

TEMPUS IV- THIRD CALL FOR PROPOSALS Recommendation on how to make a good proposal TEMPUS INFORMATION DAYS Podgorica, MONTENEGRO 18 th December 2009.

9 Closing the Project Teaching Strategies

OntarioMD’s EMR Maturity Model Advancing Optimization and Use Ontario College of Family Practice Annual Scientific Assembly Presented By: Darren Larsen,

Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.

Camille Kandiko, Indiana University Bloomington Jon Acker and William Fendley, The University of Alabama Lawrence Redlinger, The University of Texas at.

V 2.1 Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems and Action Planning.

Collaborative Programmes Annual and Periodic Quality Assurance Arrangements Rebecca Broome Quality Management Division November 2007.

School Improvement Planning and Reporting for Cohort 2 and Cohort 3 Schools June 8, 2015June 8, 2015.

ASSESSMENT. Assessment is the systematic and on-going process of collecting and reviewing evidence about the College's academic and administrative programs.

On-line briefing for Program Directors and Staff 1.

EEC Board Preliminary Recommendations Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Provisional Standards Study.

2008 FAEIS Annual Longitudinal Assessment With a Comparison to the 2007 Survey Results The purpose of the FAEIS annual evaluation is to develop longitudinal.

V 2.1 TFI Wordle. V 2.1 Objectives of Session: 1.Not bore you to sleep 2.Types of PBIS Data 3.pbisapps.org 4.PBIS Evaluation Tools 5.Action Planning.

Goals Achievement Partnership (GAP) Survey Why the GAP survey was administered.

Coordinated Entry.  A system-wide process that evaluates households for the best housing fit - rather than ‘are you eligible for services here’ it asks.

Taking the Compliance Out of Improvement Planning David Cook, Cheri Meadows, & Erin McGee KDE.

Session II.I Improvement in economic surveys Workshop on national accounts for Asian member countries of the organization of Islamic Conference Ankara,

Tulane Effort Reporting-Systems, Policies, Procedures ERS (Effort Reporting System) From paper to web based, remove from PAF Move from planned/confirmation.

1 A new resource for the identification and utilization of E lectronic L earning A ssessment R esources Overview for CTAP Staff September 21, 2005 Presented.

August 30, 2011 Overview & Update: SSA’s Activities for the Occupational Information System Project “You are the “ Sylvia E. Karman, Director Office of.

Practice Education Facilitators. Quality Standards for Practice Placements (NES 2003)

LINKS Evaluation. Why evaluate? Evaluation of the LINKS Advising Program is particularly important in this pilot year. It gives participating staff, students.

Annual CUE Conference 2013 Kelley Day

LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration LibQUAL+® Exchange Northumbria Florence, Italy August 17, 2009 Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics.

The California Learning Resource Network. Trainer of Trainers.

The Accessible Social Computing Policy Jude Pineda CMPT480 December 5, 2015.

What is a Performance Audit or Performance Auditing?

HR Leadership Forum August 9, Career Advisory Program (CAP) “PILOT” PLAN, PROGRESS AND RESULTS.

1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.

Staff Updates Regional Technical Forum May 21, 2013.

Responding to Institutional Audit Recommendations.

Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.

QAA COLLABORATIVE PROVISION AUDIT DRAFT REPORT. QAA CPA Process Submission by the University of Self Evaluation Document (SED) (December 2005) Selection.

Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.

Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.

Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.

Student Partnership Agreements: Impact and Change

NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar

Performance Management Cycle

Critical Element: Faculty Commitment

District Office, Room 200 October 28, :30 PM

Annual Longitudinal Assessment

Performance Measure Recommendations

Strategic Planning Final Plan Team Meeting

AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT

How Do I Write a Good Technology Plan?

Unit 4 - A06 – Review Grade Criteria To get a c

Value-added Teacher Evaluation

PHMSA Update for the API RP1162 Rewrite Team

Marine Strategy Framework Directive reporting: progress and next steps

Roles and Responsibilities of the tutor

Presentation transcript:

CLRN Evaluation Update Educational Support Systems May 28, 2009

Evaluation Data Sources CLRN User Survey results as of 5/15/08 WIL User Feedback Implementation ELAR User Feedback Implementation Other data sources (for the final report) Implementation of prior year recommendations Progress toward annual benchmarks Input from CLRN Advisers & Staff Potential new services

CLRN User Survey Two versions of the survey based on frequency of use of CLRN - (preliminary data as of 5/15/09, n=378) Abbreviated survey completed by “Non” / “Infrequent” users n=261 (No longer use it or Less than 3 times per year) Detailed survey completed by “Frequent” users n=117 (3 -5 time per year or More than 5 times per year)

Frequency of CLRN Use Frequent Users Infrequent Users

Current CLRN Use - all respondents

Reason for Infrequent use

Website Features

CLRN Benefits

Potential Services

User Recommendation to Colleague

WIL Feedback

WIL User Feedback 422 (17%) of the 2,547 posted WIL resources have user feedback A total of 738 feedback responses have been made as of 5/15/ (70%) of resources with feedback had one feedback response 3 WILs received 72 (17, 21 & 34) feedback responses 124 WILs received a range of 2-8 feedback responses

WIL User Feedback

ELAR Feedback Only 23% (27) of frequent users responding to the survey were administrators and 17 (63%) indicated they used the ELAR section of CLRN

ELAR User Feedback 14 (36%) of the 39 posted ELAR resources have user feedback A total of 422 feedback responses have been made as of 5/15/09 6 (43%) of resources with feedback had one feedback response 8 (57%) of resources with feedback had 7 or more feedback responses with the greatest having 34 responses

ELAR User Feedback Based on your experience, select the most appropriate uses of this ELAR for analysis of student assessment data. You may select more than one.

ELAR User Feedback