Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSULATING PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD FROM RUC CAPACITY SHORT CHARGE Mark W. Smith J. Kay Trostle August 2008 DSWG.
Advertisements

NPRR 532 Performance Measurement & Verification and Telemetry Requirements for Load Resources providing Non-Spin David Kee CPS Energy Energy Supply & Market.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 9 April, 2010 Report to WMS 21 April, 2010 David Detelich - Chairperson.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
DSWG Update to WMS May 17, DSWG Goals Update.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
ERCOT Tool to manage unexpected incremental load November 16, 2006.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Market Based Solutions for Demand Response Providers Today and the Future Alice Jackson Occidental Energy Ventures Corp.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
ERS Procurement Methodology 09/04/2013 ERS Workshop Presented By: ERCOT Staff.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Mary Anne Brelinsky Eagle Energy Partners.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION
QSE Managers Working Group Meeting Notes 7 November, 2008 Report to WMS 19 November, 2008 David Detelich - Chairperson.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
1 ERCOT Wholesale Settlement Module 3. 2 BENA iq = -1 * (Σ (RI iz + LI iz + URC iz + MISD iz + MISR iz ) z + TCRPAY Bei + Σ CSC Bei ) * LRS iq Can you.
GENERATION PROTOCOL AND SETTLEMENT TODAY COMET WG / RMS Workshop Electric Reliability Council of Texas May 2, 2007.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
1 WMS Report TO TAC January In Brief Two Working Group Reports Two Working Group Reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports One PRR.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Market Participant Experiences with Demand Side Bidding and Future Direction Linda Roberts, EA Technology Richard Formby, EA Technology.
Graph Trend Definitions Telemetered SCE: Sum of all QSE’s Telemetered SCE (uses “Left” scale). Regulation Deployed: Sum of all Regulation Ancillary Service.
DAM Overview: Processes & Tools in the DAM Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) April 2, 2008.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Load Resources Negative RRS Bidding in the Nodal Market Credit Working Group January 30, 2008.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
2003 State of the Market Report ERCOT Wholesale Electricity Markets.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
ERCOT Public 1 Overview of ERCOT Concept Paper on Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services & Multi-Interval Real-Time Market.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April In Brief Two Working Group reports Two Working Group reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports BENA presentation.
14 Minute Ramp Period Testing Workshop June 30, 2009.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
Frequency Control Task Force Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 8 th Should all capacity resources be paid the same? -Demand Response operational deployment.
© ERCOT and 2004 Fleet Deployment and Settlements WMS Meeting August 19, 2004 Ino Gonzalez ERCOT Settlements
Role Of ERC in the WESM To enforce the rules and regulations governing the operations of the WESM and monitors the activities of the Market Operator and.
Third Party DR Self-Deployment Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Sept. 18, 2015.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Integrated ERCOT Readiness and Transition (IRT) TPTF – December 4 th, 2006 ERCOT Qualification.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
OOMC and Local RPRS Settlement Alignment January 2007 WMS Meeting Ino Gonzalez ERCOT Settlements.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
Settlement of Ancillary Service Infeasibility ERCOT QMWG April 15, 2016.
PRS Workshop- NPRR755/NOGRR154 WAN communications of Critical Market Data and Agency-Only QSE Feb 29, 2016.
Long-term Solution Task Force Ellis Rankin & Bob Wittmeyer Co-Chairs.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
Alerts & Reserves. December, Objectives Maintain reliability –Ensure that adequate reserves are available Market Clearing Price of Energy is synchronized.
ROS Presentation: Dynamic Scheduling and EEA Austin, TX September 10, 2009 Steve Isser Vice President and General Counsel Good Company Associates
Market Notice Regarding Off-line Units
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Txho/10627 HLP089.PPT DSWG LaaR Update May 13, 2005.
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
The New Texas Wholesale/Retail Market
The Future of Demand Response in New England
CPDe Event The Changing Value in Flexibility 19th April 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs Keith E. Emery Tenaska Power Services Co. Director, ERCOT

Revenue Example for LaaR Providing RRS (A) Capacity Revenue (ERCOT buys RRS for 24 hours) 10 MW x $6.25 per MW/hr x 24 hours = $1,500 (B) Energy Revenue (ERCOT Deploys RRS for 4 hours) 10 MW x $50.00 per MW/hr x 4 hours = $2,000 (C) Resource-Specific Premium (ERCOT OOMs LaaR) 10 MW x $45.00 per MW/hr x 4 hours = $1,800 Revenue available for one Operating Day: $1,500 + $2,000 + $1,800 = $5,300 Equivalent revenue per MWh: $5,300 ÷ 10 MW/hr ÷ 24 hrs = $22.08/MWh

The Old World – Load participation under interruptible tariffs  Loads had one “choice” (host utility)  One size fits all - no customized terms  Limited ability to switch between tariffs  Compensation not matched to the benefit being provided by the load:  Discounted energy rates, not payment for services  No additional economic incentive to participate during system crisis

The New World – Load participation under the ERCOT Protocols  More Level Playing Field for Generators and Loads  ERCOT’s new “Resource” definition: Includes both Generation Resources AND Loads acting as Resources (LaaR)  Resources are represented by QSEs  Multiple service provider choices  LaaR can utilize the QSE representing their LSE  LaaR can utilize any QSE offering LaaR services

The New World – Load participation under the ERCOT Protocols  Customized terms available  LaaR can negotiate customized terms directly with a QSE or LSE  LaaR may control its participation level  Selective participation in the market  LaaR may sell AS to Third Parties (Bilateral)  LaaR may sell AS to ERCOT (Day-Ahead)

The New World – Load participation under the ERCOT Protocols  Compensation can be commensurate with system benefit provided  AS prices move with supply and demand (fluctuate with system needs) LaaR may participate in AS market price movements (depending on contract terms) AS capacity price Resource-specific premium (OOM) Payment for deployed energy (Unused energy)

The New Service Providers (QSEs representing LaaR)  Services Provided to LaaR  Communications (7x24) ­ QSE provides 7x24 point of contact for LaaR and ERCOT (Voice & Data)  Telemetry (varies depending on services provided to ERCOT) ­ Real time telemetry is required ­ Requires hardware at customer site

The New Service Providers (QSEs representing LaaR)  Services Provided to LaaR  Data circuit / path from LaaR to QSE ­ Real time data path from LaaR to QSE is required  Control (automatic or manual) ­ Implement ERCOT directives to reduce load with 10 or 30 minute notice ­ Implement OOM directives

The New Service Providers (QSEs representing LaaR)  Services Provided to LaaR  Resource Plan ­ QSE constructs and maintains accurate Resource Plan with ERCOT ­ LaaR maintains accurate projection of load and availability -Can affect LaaR qualification and payment

The New Service Providers (QSEs representing LaaR)  Services Provided to LaaR  Settlement ­ Between ERCOT and QSE • QSE collects payment from ERCOT • QSE validates payment from ERCOT • QSE disputes payment errors with ERCOT ­ Between LaaR and QSE or LSE • LaaR is paid under terms of its contract with the service provider

Risks of LaaR Participation in ERCOT  Limited market size Responsive Reserve Market -Currently 805 MW from LaaR (35%) -Proposed increase to 1150 MW (50%)  Non-Spinning Reserve Service – infrequent procurement  Replacement Reserve Service – infrequent procurement  Regulation Service – future capability

Risks of LaaR Participation in ERCOT  Effect on LaaR from AS deployments  Deployment occurrence varies between ancillary services  QSE representing LaaR is obligated to perform if providing AS service to ERCOT  Changes in ERCOT market rules  Market rules continue to evolve  Technical requirements could change

Compensation for Balancing Up Load (BUL) A BUL is a portfolio deployment of all the loads that make up the BUL. An individual load’s response should be defined between the Load, LSE, and the QSE.  Energy Payment for load reduction  An energy payment based on the QSE’s overall reduction in load as compared the the load level scheduled during the deployment interval  Capacity Payment  A capacity payment based on the Market Clearing Price of Capacity for Non-Spinning Reserve Service (MCPCNS). The Capacity payment will be paid only if the BUL response (reduction of load) is 100 % of the instructed value