Karen Swan, Scott Day, Leonard Bogle & Traci van Prooyen University of Illinois at Springfield Exploring MOOC Pedagogies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cognitive-metacognitive and content-technical aspects of constructivist Internet-based learning environments: a LISREL analysis 指導教授:張菽萱 報告人:沈永祺.
Advertisements

Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Iowa Assessment Update School Administrators of Iowa November 2013 Catherine Welch Iowa Testing Programs.
Part II Sigma Freud & Descriptive Statistics
AzMERIT Arizona’s Statewide Achievement Assessment for English Language Arts and Mathematics November 20, 2014.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Assessment in the MYP CENTURY MIDDLE SCHOOL. What is Assessment? Assessment is integral to all teaching and learning. MYP assessment requires teachers.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
EQuIP Rubric and Quality Review Curriculum Council September 26, 2014.
The EQuIP Rubric ( Formerly the Tri-State Rubric) A Tool To Align Lesson Plans and Units to the Common Core State Standards Illinois State Board of Education.
Using Pedagogy Workshops as a Catalyst for Curricular Change at 2-Year Colleges Karen Singer-Freeman, Joseph A. Skrivanek, & Ronnie Halperin, Purchase.
Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Learner-Centered Paradigms George Watson Institute for Transforming Undergraduate Education
Improving Online Course Retention Highlighting practical ways to improve online course retention Presenter: Vincent Schreck, Ed.D.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
Milorad Tosic, Nadezda Stojkovic, Valentina Nejkovic University of Nis, Faculty of Electronic Engineering OPEN ONLINE ENGLISH FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES.
Critical Thinking, Cognitive Presence, and Computer Conferencing Norm Friesen May 6, 2006.
Computational Thinking Related Efforts. CS Principles – Big Ideas  Computing is a creative human activity that engenders innovation and promotes exploration.
Interactive Science Notebooks: Putting the Next Generation Practices into Action
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
Digital Texts and the Future of Education: Why Books? A Critique of Mayrath, M., Priya, N., & Perkins, C. (2011). Digital Texts and the Future of Education:
Dr. Marie Lasseter Office of Faculty Development Department of Faculty Affairs University System of Georgia.
WIP – Using Information Technology to Author, Administer, and Evaluate Performance-Based Assessments Mark Urban-Lurain Guy Albertelli Gerd Kortemeyer Division.
Designing Science Units Chapter 7 Designing Science Units and Courses of Study
MOOCs: More Questions Than Answers ASERL April 23, 2013 Catherine Murray-Rust.
Evaluation Process/Requirements for CAPP Algebra Project.
Πολυμεσικό Υλικό στο Internet: Συγχρονισμός, Επεξεργασία και Διακίνηση Multimedia content delivery in the Internet: examples in MOOCs 11/12/2014 Β. Μάγκλαρης.
“Teaching Electricity and Circuits Through Inquiry” Shawna Young EdTech Leaders Online.
Authors Toni Pippola, Tampere University of Applied Sciences Timo Poranen, University of Tampere Matti Vuori, Tampere University.
TECHNOLOGY WITH MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE BY: BRITTANY OWENS & NATHAN JACKSON.
Inquiry-based Learning and Digital Libraries in Undergraduate Science Education Xornam Apedoe Learning & Instruction University of San Francisco November.
Introduction  Teaching social studies as an interdisciplinary approach has resulted in increased instructional time at the Elementary level as teachers.
Getting More Students to Meet Standards: Research-based Practices That Work Southern Regional Education Board.
System Level Design (CPRE 588)
Education in a Global Context February 28, 2008 William H. Schmidt University Distinguished Professor Michigan State University.
Departmental Overview. History Interdisciplinary Roots Created from two historically successful programs –Applied Technology, Training and Development.
Project Director – Dr. Mark Lung Dept of Natural & Environmental Sciences Western State College of Colorado Project Evaluator – Dr. Dave Shannon Educational.
CS 352 Introduction to Usability Engineering Class Size: Winter 2014: 53 Spring 2014: 89 Summer 2014: 72.
The Analysis of the quality of learning achievement of the students enrolled in Introduction to Programming with Visual Basic 2010 Present By Thitima Chuangchai.
LECTURE 2 EPSY 642 META ANALYSIS FALL CONCEPTS AND OPERATIONS CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS: HOW ARE VARIABLES DEFINED? Variables are operationally defined.
Evaluating Teachers Across Content Areas. School Accountability Growth.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
The Evolution of ICT-Based Learning Environments: Which Perspectives for School of the Future? Reporter: Lee Chun-Yi Advisor: Chen Ming-Puu Bottino, R.
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
Best Practices for Higher Education and K-12 Distance Education Programs Aubrey D. Crook, M.Ed. © 2006.
Enhanced Learning Through Web-Based Team and Individual Projects.
Redesign of Precalculus Mathematics Joe Benson College of Arts and Sciences The University of Alabama.
Susan Elrod, Project Kaleidoscope at AAC&U FIPSE Project Director’s Meeting November 7, 2011 Washington, DC
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
Effective Teaching Strategies Day 2
Session 4 Performance-Based Assessment
University of Colorado, Boulder
Towards a Reference Quality Model for Digital Libraries Maristella Agosti Nicola Ferro Edward A. Fox Marcos André Gonçalves Bárbara Lagoeiro Moreira.
A Framework for Integrating Technology Mark Grabe.
Professional Development How to improve teaching skills.
The relationship between hypermedia producers’ preferred learning styles and the motivational aspects of their productions Presenter: Che-Yu Lin Advisor:
New Curricula Proposal at FSMN by Miroslav Ćirić & Predrag Krtolica.
Educational Technology and Science Teaching. Reading Assignment Chapter 13 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
Grading based on student centred and transparent assessment of learning outcomes Tommi Haapaniemi
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. COMMON.
Improving Courses Across an Online Program: A Design-Based Approach Leonard Bogle, Scott Day, Daniel Matthews & Karen Swan University of Illinois Springfield.
What is RBHS’s four by four mathematics sequence of courses possibly going to look like? Possible courses recommended for next Fall term. What is next?
Mansureh Kebritchi, Atsusi ‘‘2c” Hirumi Computers & Education 51 (2008) 1729–
EVALUATING A MIDDLE SCHOOL MATH M.ED. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Knowledge, Pedagogy, Practice or Student Achievement:
The impact of inquiry-based instructional methods in improving pre-service K-5 teachers’ self-efficacy Cinzia Cervato and Charles Kerton Geological & Atmospheric.
Essential Attributes of Faculty Professional Development: The Excellence in Online Education Initiative Carol McQuiggan, D.Ed. Senior Instructional Designer,
Math Curriculum “The philosophy of the Core Plus Mathematics Program is that students are working in groups to identify, investigate, and explore the.
Initial Findings about Graduate Teaching Assistants’ Training Needs to Foster Active Learning in Statistics Kristen E. Roland and Jennifer J. Kaplan.
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Presentation transcript:

Karen Swan, Scott Day, Leonard Bogle & Traci van Prooyen University of Illinois at Springfield Exploring MOOC Pedagogies

American Council on Education’s (ACE) College Credit Recommendation Service is evaluating MOOCs for content and approving them for specific college credits if students pass ACE CREDIT tests ($150). ACE CREDIT evaluates MOOCs for their content; we are reviewing MOOCs for their pedagogical approaches. CONTEXT

We developed an instrument to characterize the pedagogical approaches taken in MOOCs -- modeled on a similar instrument proposed by Tom Reeves (1996) for describing the pedagogical approaches found in computer-based instruction -- “ Pedagogical dimensions are concerned with those aspects of design and implementation... that directly affect learning.” AMP (Assessing MOOC Pedagogy) tool

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) AMP TOOL

METHODS By Fall 2013, ACE evaluated and approved 5 Coursera, 1 EdX, and 7 Udacity MOOCs -- College Algebra, BioElectricity, Genetics, Pre-Calculus, and Single Variable Calculus, Circuits, Introduction to Artificial Intelligence, Introduction to Computer Science, Introduction to Physics, Introduction to Statistics, Introduction to Parallel Programming, 3-D Modeling and HTML 5 Game Development We reviewed the same 13 MOOCs and four other Coursera MOOCs that covered non-STEM courses.

METHODS We iteratively revised the AMP tool as we tested its efficacy on the approved MOOCs, first by reducing the scale of each dimension from ten to five, and then by establishing specific criteria for each dimension, to improve inter-rater reliability. We reviewed all the approved MOOCs using the revised instrument. Four researchers reviewed each MOOCs. Inter-rater reliability was >80% on all the reviews before meeting to achieve consensus on the ratings.

The approved COURSERA courses followed a format that resembled the traditional lecture/text/testing routine of traditional university courses, including cohorts and weekly hard deadlines.

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) college algebra

bioelectricity pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) genetics & evolution

pre-calculus pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

single variable calculus pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) college algebra bioelectricitygenetics & evolution pre-calculus single variable calculus

circuits pedagogical categoryratings epistemology (objectivist)12345(constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) 12345(student-centered) focus of activities (convergent)12345(divergent) structure (less structure)12345(more structure) approach to content (concrete)12345(abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported)12345(integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported)12345(multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial)12345(authentic) user role (passive)12345(generative)

The Coursera courses approved for ACE credit, as well as EdX’s Circuits, tended to be objectivist, teacher- centered, convergent, highly structured, more abstract than concrete, with minimal feedback. The courses tended to fall somewhere in the middle between supporting and not supporting cooperative learning, accommodating and not accommodating individual differences, artificial and authentic activities/assessment, and passive and active user roles.

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) college algebra bioelectricity genetics & evolution pre-calculus single variable calculus circuits

UDACITY courses followed a format that resembled programmed learning, including self-pacing and embedded quizzes.

interactive 3-d graphics pedagogical categoryratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

html 5 graphics pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

pedagogical categoryratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student-centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) introduction to artificial intelligence

introduction to computer science pedagogical categoryratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student-centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

introduction to parallel processing pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

introduction to physics pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

introduction to statistics pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

Udacity courses tended to be neither objectivist nor constructivist, slightly less teacher-centered and convergent than Coursera courses, highly structured, halfway between abstract and concrete, with immediate, clear, and constructive feedback. They also tended not to support cooperative learning, but because of their self-directed approach were quite accommodating of individual differences. Udacity also made an effort to develop authentic activities, and perhaps because of the large number of CS courses, supported a more generative user role than the ACE- approved courses from Coursera and EdX.

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) interactive 3-d graphics HTML 5 graphics intro to artificial intelligence intro to computer science intro to parallel processing intro to physics intro to statisics

EDX COURSERAUDACITY epistemology role of teacher focus of activities structure approach to content feedback cooperative learning accommodation of individual differences activities/assessment user role average ratings across platforms

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) Coursera EdX Udacity comparisons of ACE approved courses across platforms

art & inquiry pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative)

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) comic books & graphic novels

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) jazz improvisation

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) the music of the Beatles

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) art & inquiry comic books & graphic novels jazz improvisation the music of the Beatles non-stem

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) art & inquiry comic books & graphic novels jazz improvisation non-stem

STEMBEATLESNON-STEM epistemology role of teacher focus of activities structure approach to content feedback cooperative learning accommodation of individual differences activities/assessment user role average ratings across domains

pedagogical category ratings epistemology (objectivist) (constructivist) role of teacher (teacher- centered) (student- centered) focus of activities (convergent) (divergent) structure (less structure) (more structure) approach to content (concrete) (abstract) feedback (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) cooperative learning (unsupported) (integral) accommodation of individual differences (unsupported) (multifaceted) activities/assessment (artificial) (authentic) user role (passive) (generative) STEM Beatles non-STEM

(objectivist) (constructivist) (teacher- centered) (student- centered) (convergent) (divergent) (less structure) (more structure) (concrete) (abstract) (infrequent, unclear) (frequent, constructive) (unsupported) (integral) (unsupported) (multifaceted) (artificial) (authentic) (passive) (generative) two metaphors for learning (Sfard, 1998) acquisitionparticipation

CONCLUSIONS AMP tool can effectively characterize MOOC pedagogies At least two distinct pedagogical approaches can be distinguished Future research will explore these distinctions, as well as MOOCs offered on different platforms & differently organized Future research will try to link pedagogical to learning outcomes