WORLDWIDEHANDICAPSYSTEMMEETING AAG’s outlook on a new system.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland ISPA Partners Meeting April 2003 Laurie Russell Strathclyde European Partnership.
Advertisements

Royal Queensland Golf Club.  Players obtain a personalised competition card which contains details of the specific course in use, tee times, competition.
BD Finance Training. Table of Contents:  The BD Bible  Stages of working with the Bible  Your KPIs  Napoleon Tools  Cash Flow  The Next Step Dream.
CONGU UNIFIED HANDICAPPING SYSTEM (UHS) ‘2012 Changes’
Michigan Bowling Training Guide. Singles Doubles Team Bowling Ramp Bowling Singles Ramp Bowling Doubles Unified Doubles Bowling Unified Team Bowling 2.
Freedom – the client and business management system for IFAs Main Menu Access all areas of Freedom simply with the buttons on this screen.
Fouth Annual Redstone-Huntsville Chapter Air Defense Artillery Association Organizational Challenge Golf Tournament 11 OCTOBER 2013 Followed by the Fall.
UH ROTC GOLF SCRAMBLE INFORMATION: 1. Each team (4 Players) will register upon arrival. 2. There will be one division. Coed teams are permitted, but there.
Global Handicap System Acceptable / Unacceptable Scores.
EWGA GN21 Handicap Training Seminar Thursday, May 8, :00 to 7:00 PM EWGA Fox Cities/Green Bay Chapter Kim White, Handicap Chair.
Welcome by Alan Harrison, Chair Golf NSW Match Committee Handicapping and Course Rating – Lynne Ritchie Guidelines for suspension of play and cancellation.
“The USGA Handicap System” The answers to all your handicap questions are in this manual. Competing from different tees Use of “T” Scores Most likely score.
DELAMERE COMBOY SCRATCH TROPHY Ladies 36 hole scratch competition. 1st prize—£300, 2nd prize—£150, 3rd prize—£50 Handicap prize—£50 (Vouchers) SUNDAY 29th.
February / March / April 2015 Handicap Workshop The Annual Review.
Officiating Program Presentation Designed by Gary D. Robinson Tulsa, Oklahoma (Revised November 2010)
Worldwide Handicap System Practical Implementation Difficulties
NATA Foundation Deloss Brubaker, EdD, ATC Undergraduate Student Writing Contest (USWC) Process The NATA/NATA Foundation Undergraduate Student Writing Contest.
Golf for Your Facility Presented by Dan Harrington, PGA February 2013 “Little League” Family connections + Fun for all + Facility revenues = Good Business.
© 2005, U.S. Soccer Federation Page : 1 United States Soccer Federation 2004 Law Changes.
Page : 1 United States Soccer Federation 2004 Law Changes.
EWGA GN21 Handicap Training Seminar Wednesday, May 9, :30 to 6:30 PM Keller, Inc. in Kaukauna, Hwy 55 EWGA Fox Cities/Green Bay Chapter Tanya DeBoth,
IPPA EUROPEAN TEAM CHAMPIONSHIP March 11th-13th, 2011 C O N D I T I O N S Venue: Masía de las Estrellas Golf Club Camino Santa Ana – Paiporta s/n
USA GYMNASTICS MASSACHUSETTS Meet Director’s Meeting June 9, 2011.
IGrafx – General Terms of Use. Trial Software Licenses For test purposes only Not for normal business use Training based on the trial software is also.
UYSA Region II Coaches Meeting Player and Coaching Development Initiatives 2015 UYSA CONFIDENTIAL – Not to be shared without UYSA approval.
Equation Warm Up 9/30/14. The membership fee for joining a sports center is $30. To have a personal trainer, members pay $40 per session and non- members.
B-STRAT Presentation Mr. Tariel Zivzivadze Tariel ZIVZIVADZE
Royal Belgian Golf Federation USGA Course Rating 1.Correct measured Course 2.Distance point well placed 3.Normal Course Condition 4.Every 10 years.
Tournament Chairperson Tournament Director Golf Course Prize/Voucher Chairperson Treasurer Ditty Bag person Web Page curator Down payment Contract T-1.
WGAP Member Survey Results Survey Specifics  Survey sent via to WGAP members on January 20,  Survey posted on WGAP website.
The IAHSGCA presents the high school boys and girls golf ranking system Eric Perry (Clear Lake HS)
The IAHSGCA presents the high school boys and girls golf ranking system Eric Perry (Clear Lake HS)
GOLF RULES, ETIQUETTE, & EQUIPMENT. USGA GOLF RULES n MATCH PLAY WIN OR LOSE THE HOLEWIN OR LOSE THE HOLE n MEDAL PLAY TOTAL STROKESTOTAL STROKES.
SPORTS DEVELOPMENT EXECUTIVE Daisy Clarke. What is my role at CSSC? To review the overall provision of sport at CSSC Provide recommendations on how CSSC.
Executive Women’s Golf Association Handicaps and how they can help you enjoy the game of golf.
ParaVolley Europe 2014 / mcz European Sub-Zonal Championships in Sitting Volleyball Prospectus.
CLUB PASS POLICY GUIDELINES. SECTION 1 PURPOSE SECTION 1: PURPOSE TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITIES FOR PLAYERS TO BE MOVED TO HIGHER LEVEL COMPETITIVE TEAMS.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 9: Employment protection and non-discrimination Maternity.
1 APNIC Membership Fees APNIC September 2006.
REGISTER EARLY TO SECURE YOUR TEAM THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT
Northamptonshire Golf Northamptonshire Golf Union (NGU) Northamptonshire Ladies County Golf Association (NLCGA) Northamptonshire County Golf Partnership.
OPTIONS Create a Group Create an Event Mobile App Scoring Verify Results View Results Posting Scores (automatic) Getting Started – Dashboard Features.
USGA Rules USGA Rules. Show Consideration to the Others.  No disturbance or distraction by moving, talking or making unnecessary noise.  On teeing ground,
NORTH AMERICAN ROTARY EMERGENCY DISASTER INITIATIVE DECEMBER 14 – 15, 2007 FRANK BRADSHAW, PDG, D6200.
Desert Springs Cimarron Granite Falls. WEEKEND GUEST SPECIAL Guest can golf for $10 less than the weekday rate. For more information and to book your.
Handicap Primer New Member Orientation Handicaps and how they can help you enjoy the game of golf.
Rules & Procedures i) Must be a bona-fide amateur member of club. ii) Must be a member as at 1 st January. iii) As of October 1 st in preceding year.
February / March / April 2015 Handicap Workshop Conditions of Competitions.
The Houston Army-Navy Scramble Army Alumni; West Point Society of Greater Houston vs. Navy Alumni; USNAAA Gulf Coast Chapter Golf Tournament / October.
Rules of Golf for Club Managers Don Cook, PGA PGA Education Faculty PGA of America.
CAPACITY BUILDING & INFORMATION SHARING [ SETUP OF NATIONAL WEBSITE ] – FIJI ISLANDS Ajnesh Chandra Area Organizer – NUFCW Fiji Trades Union Congress Suva,
Licensing Rules for Communications Networks and Services CONSULTATION DRAFT FEBRUARY 2014.
(Draft Report) Data Exploration Actionable insights from data collected for Benchmarking DRAFT.
SYSTEM CHANGES DATES The handicap year will now follow the calendar year 1 January to 31 December (already in operation in Ireland) A player’s.
The Golf Club Club Rules & Membership Details. Club Rules  Members may obtain starting times 14 days in advance  Guests may obtain starting times seven.
Chat with Matt Campbell PGA Head Golf Professional “Rules of Golf”
Welcome to the 2016 Open Day Regional Meeting
Eric Perry (Clear Lake HS)
Air Defense Artillery Association
OPTIONS Post a Score Players Events Last 20 Profile
Bennett Valley Women’s Golf Club
Perspective Interview: Sofia Perez
Prepared by Wimpie J du Plessis August , 2018
PEER REVIEW "Peer review" is the ability of golfers to gain an understanding of a player's potential ability and to form a reasonable basis for supporting.
FBLA Competitive Events Update
2018 Ambrose (2 Person) Championship
Presenter: Diana Castillo
ARRIS Lisle Golf League
APNIC Members Meeting, APNIC 22 8 September 2006
Air Defense Artillery Association (ADAA) The Links at Redstone
Presentation transcript:

WORLDWIDEHANDICAPSYSTEMMEETING AAG’s outlook on a new system

CONTENTS  Handicaps in Argentina  AAG Handicap System ©  General characteristics  Valid scores – loading, processing and information  Determining AAG Handicap  Club Handicap Committee faculties  AAG’s outlook on a new Worldwide Handicap System (WHS)  Implementing the USGA Course Rating System  Facilitating the submission of scores electronically  Updating of handicaps immediately or as soon as practicable  Mechanism for peer review  Calculation of adjustment for playing conditions  Conclusions

HANDICAPS IN ARGENTINA  52,628 registered AAG handicaps, 44,978 men (85.5%) 7,650 women (14.5%)  303 clubs affiliated to AAG, includes all clubs in the country, most operate as semi-public courses  There is a strong tradition of playing competitive golf almost every week- end during the year, and many clubs organize midweek competitions as well.  General average and distribution of handicaps according to range: Gral. Hcap. Avg. MEN19.6 WOMEN26.2 Handicap range MEN3.6%16.1%24.1%24.9%32.2% WOMEN1.6%5.0%10.3%18.6%64.5%

AAG Handicap System General characteristics  The AAG has exclusive copyrights as well as administering and processing all registered handicaps in the country.  Handicaps are collected through the clubs, players aged 25 to 75 pay a fee of approximately u$d 80 per annum. Players aged pay 50% of total, players over 70 and under 14 get handicaps free of charge.  All handicaps are used for all courses in the country, no index or slope rating implemented.  All courses are rated by a system inspired loosely on USGA Course Rating System for a scratch golfer.  Clubs with a large membership will usually play segmenting handicap cate- gories and play off different tees; smaller clubs will favour one category, one tee. Course setting should accommodate to course conditions/climate.

AAG Handicap System Valid scores - Loading, processing and information  Only rounds valid for handicap are 18 hole stroke play rounds played in competition under the Rules of Golf.  Club is responsible for loading all scores, be it for members or guests.  Scores registered are sent digitally to AAG Processing Centre at annually pre determined dates. Once processed (usually between 22 nd and 27 th day of each month) resulting handicaps are published monthly, every first Monday.  Handicaps are posted on AAG website and sent via to each player.  During 2012; 692,500 scores were processed, an average of 57,700 per month.  Average scores posted by players with one or more scores during 2012 was 20.5; total average was 13.3.

 Percentage of golfers with scores posted during 2012: Number of scores posted Percentage of golfers with scores posted Percentage breakdown by gender MenWomen scores posted4.6%86.5%13.5% scores posted7.2%87.8%12.2% scores posted9.1%88.5%11.5% scores posted10.2%88.5%11.5% scores posted10.5%86.6%13.4% 26 + scores posted58.4%87.3%12.7% AAG Handicap System

 Average number of scores posted by handicap range during 2012: Handicap Range Average number of scores posted Average number of score posted by gender MenWomen < AAG Handicap System

Determining Handicap  8 best score differentials (gross score minus course rating) of last 16 scores entered.  8 best differentials are added and total number resulting is tallied against a table that assigns handicaps between +3 and 36. Resulting handicap is 86-87% of the average 8 best differentials.  Entry of scorecard to the Committee after a round is mandatory, even if incomplete. Equitable Stroke Control not implemented.  No stroke limit enforced and no limit on how many times you lower your handicap; though system only allows 6 increases through 12 month period, one stroke at a time.  Maximum handicap allowed for men and women is 36, player is given an initial handicap of 25, after first 16 scores are processed, the system recalculates players handicap, this is only occasion a player is allowed an increase in excess of one stroke.

AAG Handicap System Club Handicap Committee’s faculties  Club Handicap Committee is responsible for proper application of AAG System:  Verifies all posted scores and checks unusual results returned to the Committee.  Controls abuse of system resulting from infrequent return of score- cards to protect handicap.  Offers initial handicap to new golfers after they can prove basic knowledge of Rules and Etiquette and reasonable ability to play a round, albeit for a beginner.

AAG Handicap System Club Handicap Committee’s faculties (cont.)  The Committee is the only recognized authority to modify a players handicap:  Handicap reduction through anticipated calculation.  Handicap reduction as a result of perception of players ability.  Use of penalizing score to adjust to players ability. At all times these methods of reduction must be used sparingly and only under exceptional circumstances.

AAG’s outlook on a new WHS Implementing the USGA Course Rating System  Before the announcement of WHS, the AAG was evaluating adopting the USGA Course Rating System.  Although the current course rating system used by the AAG is satisfac- tory, we feel the moment is ripe to upgrade and re rate all courses in the country under more modern parameters.  The AAG has only one qualified course rating team, it rates new courses and re rates those in need of updating.  If a new system were to established, we would need to train new staff and establish teams in our regional federations, making it more cost effective.

AAG’s outlook on a new WHS (cont.) Facilitating the submission of scores electronically  Undoubtedly the most important change to the AAG system would be to allow players to enter their own scores.  Entering scores by players would require a programme enabling clubs to have their own terminals for players to post their scores.  Initially we foresee a phasing in period, that would require clubs to assist and control process.  If a new system favoured players entering their own scores when not competing, it would differ with how handicapping has been administered so far in the country. It would be advisable the new system enabled the governing body to determine what scores are valid for handicapping (perhaps limited to scores posted when playing formats with own ball).

AAG’s outlook on a new WHS (cont.) Updating of handicaps immediately or as soon as practicable  With so many tournaments (36/54 holes stroke play) being played in Argentina every weekend it would not be advisable to adjust on less than a weekly basis.  That said some clubs with small budgets could struggle to incorporate necessary technology, making it difficult to move away from current system of monthly adjustments.  The handicap review period (day-week-month) should be a decision best left to each national governing body. Mechanism for peer review  Handicap Committees at clubs would be instrumental to any system operating in Argentina.

AAG’s outlook on a new WHS (cont.) Calculation of adjustment for playing conditions  Current system, which does not allow post play adjustments, is observed as unfair by players in our country.  Our system is based on Captains´ adjusting course set up to conditions, this happens infrequently and creates inconvenience when rating does not match playing conditions.  It would be useful to incorporate a mechanism that allows/enforces Captains discretion to adjust rating to course conditions/climate, e.g. a scale from 1 to 7, with 4 being normal conditions.

CONCLUSIONS  Rating over 300 courses is expensive and slow, but the AAG had decided to proceed. Decision put on hold since WHS proposal.  A strong communication plan, on the benefits of a new WHS by national and international governing bodies, would be advisable.  Economic disparity (exchange rate, domestic costs) would result in an enormous spread in fees for the same system around the world, an issue that should be addressed.  The AAG strongly supports a WHS, the benefits of consistency and universality should attract people to keep/adopt WHS and offset any initial difficulty of implementing the system.