Workshop Part II: Subgrantee Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Advertisements

Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
1 Workshop Part I: Federal Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
Arkansas Department of Education Division of Public School Accountability.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community 21 October 2014.
1 Gold ND Community Call October 7, Agenda “That Time of Year”: Data Team Updates A Closer Look: Subgrantee Monitoring Review of Recent TA Requests.
Strategies for Developing Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes Stephanie Lampron, DeAngela Milligan, and Marcia Calloway.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting Human Subjects Research Non-Compliance September 15, 2005.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
Reporting & Evaluation Workshop Lauren Amos, Liann Seiter, and Dory Seidel.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Taking the Fast Lane to High-Quality Data Sarah Bardack and Stephanie Lampron.
1 Salmon ND Community Call March 12, Agenda – Roll Call – Upcoming NDTAC Webinar Series Guest Speaker: Nick Read – Promising Practices: Youth.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
1 Gold ND Community Call June 3, Agenda Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Adapting to the 2014 GED “That Time of Year”: Subgrantee Monitoring A Closer.
Welcome To the Objectives Pillar Workshop Introduction Business need Target Audience - technical and professional staff who support decision maker.
1 Gold ND Community Call October 1, Agenda A Closer Look: Community Day Programs –How prevalent are they in your State? –How do your SAs count.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
BRIDGET BULLARD PROGRAM ADVISOR, CENTRAL ARKANSAS REGION REGINIA S. KIMBROUGH PROGRAM ADVISOR, NORTHWEST ARKANSAS REGION Adult Education Program Reviews.
Innovative Approaches to Offsite Monitoring and TA Provision Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
1 Gold ND Community Call February 3, Agenda “That Time of Year”: CSPR Data Submission Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Questions from Community Members.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
1 ND Communities Meeting. 2 Agenda Activity: Planning training and technical assistance Compelling technical assistance requests NDTAC has received Activity:
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students (Call 1) January 14, 2015.
VIRTUAL monitoring What is Virtual Monitoring EXAMPLES:  STAR SYSTEM – Vehicles Cell Phones – I phones or Smart Phones used as a security system detector.
Making Sound Use of Funds Decisions for Title I, Part D Nicholas Read and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC Jeff Breshears, California Department of Education.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Making the Most of Your Data: Strategies for Evaluating Your Program Greta Colombi, NDTAC; and John McLaughlin, ED.
A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May
Overview of the Counting Process DeAngela Milligan.
Annual Count for Local Agency Programs (Subpart 2) Greta Colombi.
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
1 Introductions Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3x5.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction English Learner Program Categorical Program Monitoring Bilingual.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
Subgrantee Compliance February 27, 2013 Preparing TPPS Subgrantees for Monitoring Shelby County Grants Office presents:
Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
CDBG Disaster Recovery Overview U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
ESEA Consolidated Pre-Monitoring Meeting
ND Teal Community Call February 18, 2014.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 2
2019 Spring & Fall Timeline May 10, 2019
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1
Presentation transcript:

Workshop Part II: Subgrantee Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC

2 Workshop Agenda Brief Overview of Subgrantee Monitoring –What it is and why it is important Small Group Activity Resources for Coordinators

3 What Is Monitoring Review? Program monitoring involves the regular and systematic examination of program implementa- tion and administration. Monitoring of Title I, Part D (Part D)-funded programs is conducted to ensure compliance with applicable State and Federal laws.

4 Where Does Monitoring Occur? Monitoring reviews occur at three levels: The U.S. Department of Education (ED) monitors SEAs that receive funds (Federal monitoring). SEAs monitor their SA and LEA subgrantees (subgrantee monitoring). SA and LEA subgrantees monitor the facilities and programs to which they allocate funds (facility monitoring).

5 Subgrantee Monitoring Review Per the Federal statute and regulations, State educational agencies (SEAs) represented by State coordinators are required to: –Monitor State agency (SA) and local educational agency (LEA) subgrantees’ implementation of Title I, Part D (Part D)-funded programs. –Implement a monitoring process that involves conducting reviews on a set schedule and developing related monitoring protocols and tools. In turn, SAs and LEAs are responsible for monitoring the facilities and programs to which they allocate funds.

6 Conducting Subgrantee Monitoring Reviews Coordinators often conduct monitoring through: –Offsite review  Review documents (e.g., desktop review)  Administer self-assessment –Onsite review  Review documents  Interview SAs, LEAs (if SEA administers Subpart 2), and facilities  Conduct onsite reviews at facilities (e.g., classroom observations)

7 Conducting Offsite Monitoring Two primary methods: –Desktop monitoring  SEA requests information/data, subgrantees submit, and SEA determines compliance. –Self-assessment  Subgrantees complete and inform SEA of compliance.

8 Steps for Offsite Monitoring Process 1.Set your offsite monitoring schedule. 2.Develop your tools/protocols. 3.Gather information/data. 4.Review information/data. 5.Respond to information/data provided.

9 Checklist for Subgrantee Monitoring

10 Onsite monitoring reviews tend to be short and infrequent. Staff turnover tends to be high. Title I, Part D, requirements can be challenging to understand. Offsite monitoring is often necessary, but can be challenging without effective communication and tools that help to –Coordinate the receipt of appropriate materials –Coordinate between your team of reviewers –Address issues as they arise Subgrantee Monitoring Challenges

11 Questions About Subgrantee Monitoring? ?

12 Resources for Coordinators NDTAC’s Guide to Meeting Compliance Requirements for the Title I, Part D, Program ( delinquent.org/nd/topics/index2.php?id=6) delinquent.org/nd/topics/index2.php?id=6 ND Communities’ Monitoring and Compliance topic page for examples of subgrantee monitoring forms and protocols topics-resources-revised/monitoring- compliance/#subgrantee) topics-resources-revised/monitoring- compliance/#subgrantee Your NDTAC State Liaison!

13 Small Group Activity In small groups, discuss findings that would result from your scenarios and explain why (see handout) Choose someone to report out for your group Discussion