NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Seismic & Gravity Load Analysis and Design Zhiyong Chen University of New Brunswick www.NEWBuildSCanada.ca.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Codes and Standards Future Work
Advertisements

Design of Steel and Composite-Structures for Seismic Loading – Safety Requirements, Concepts and Methods – Prof. Dr.-Ing. Ekkehard Fehling, University.
Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
FRAMED STRUCTURE Students: Yoryelina Moreno Mairim Zapata.
Passive Vibration Control
2.2 STRUCTURAL ELEMENT BEAM
Mechanics Based Modeling of the Dynamic Response of Wood Frame Building By Ricardo Foschi, Frank Lam,Helmut Prion, Carlos Ventura Henry He and Felix Yao.
An-Najah National University
Hybrid Wood and Steel System: Overstrength and Ductility
Reinforced Concrete Design-8
Lecture 9 - Flexure June 20, 2003 CVEN 444.
ETABS Three Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design of Buildings.
CEE Capstone II Structural Engineering
Structural System Overview
Lecture 33 - Design of Two-Way Floor Slab System
Structural Bracings Presentation by V. G. Abhyankar
Horizontal Diaphragms
Beams and Frames.
CEA UNIT 3 TERMS & DEFINITIONS. BEAM A structural member, usually horizontal, that carries a load that is applied transverse to its length.
Structural Principles and Landscapes Over Structure GSD 6242 Ecologies, Techniques, Technologies IV Spring 2015Niall Kirkwood FASLA Alistair McIntosh FASLA.
Second order effects.
LECTURE SERIES on STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION Thanh X. Nguyen Structural Mechanics Division National University of Civil Engineering
Building Systems (Seismic)
Instrumented Moment Frame Steel Buildings Models Erol Kalkan, PhD California Geological Survey PEER-GMSM First Work Shop, Berkeley Oct
CTC / MTC 222 Strength of Materials
Prof. Sarosh H Lodi NED University of Engineering and Technology What Works and Does not Work in the Science and Social Science of Earthquake Vulnerability,
for Earthquake Resistance
COLUMNS.
Dr. Ali I. Tayeh First Semester
Introduction to composite construction of buildings
COLUMNS. COLUMNS Introduction According to ACI Code 2.1, a structural element with a ratio of height-to least lateral dimension exceeding three used.
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF HYBRID WOOD STEEL STRUCTURES
Static Pushover Analysis
NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Structural Design and Analysis Zhiyong Chen & Minghao Li University of New Brunswick, University of British.
Frames and Walls Lateral Stability
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
Zheng Li PhD, Assistant Professor Department of Structural Engineering Tongji University Seismic Performance of Timber-Steel Hybrid Structures The Fifth.
DESIGN FOR BODY BENDING
1 NEESR Project Meeting 22/02/2008 Modeling of Bridge Piers with Shear-Flexural Interaction and Bridge System Response Prof. Jian Zhang Shi-Yu Xu Prof.
Building Fun You will have 30 minutes to build the strongest structures you can with only the materials you are provided with. Explain to the class the.
CTC 422 Design of Steel Structures Introduction. Steel as a Building Material Advantages High strength / weight ratio Properties are homogeneous and predictable.
Presented by: Sasithorn THAMMARAK (st109957)
6/25/20081 Soil-Structure Interaction Analysis of a Composite Structure on a Backfill Hilltop WSRC-STI Rev 0 Lisa Anderson, Bechtel National,
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
STRUCTURAL MECHANICS. MECHANICS  Mechanics is the branch of science concerned with the behavior of physical bodies when subjected to forces or displacements,
Steel Timber Hybrid Structures: Problems and Solutions
IN MODULAR CONSTRUCTIONS
 Building Background  Building Structural System  Problem Statement  Proposed Solution  Structural Investigations  Architectural Impact  Sustainability.
Mechanical Concepts. Basic terms and concepts Force - a push or pull has magnitude, direction, and point application Weight - gravitational force exerted.
BEAMS: Beams are structural members that can carry transverse loads which produce bending moments & shear force. Girders: Main load carrying members into.
SCHEDULE 8:30 AM 10:30 AM Session I 11:00 AM Break 12:15 PM Session II 1:30 PM Lunch 2:45 PM Session III 3:15 PM 4:30 PM Session IV.
CESL Hotel Unique – Toronto Chris O’Brien Eric Fraser Scotia Mabury
PCI 6 th Edition Lateral Component Design. Presentation Outline Architectural Components –Earthquake Loading Shear Wall Systems –Distribution of lateral.
Structural Elements.
Structural Systems Design of the Lincoln Fire Department Headquarters Michelle Burback Structural Engineering Capstone and Senior Honors Project.
Building Construction
DESIGN OF AIRPORT TERMINAL AND CONTROL TOWER
INTRODUCTION Due to Industrial revolution metro cities are getting very thickly populated and availability of land goes on decreasing. Due to which multistory.
Divisional Engineer/East/Ranchi South Eastern Railway
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis, 3/e By Kenneth Leet, Chia-Ming Uang, and Anne Gilbert Lecture Outline.
Deform -  What it means to change shape.
Structures Agenda: Forces & Architectural Form - review
GUIDED BY, MS. D. DARLING HELEN LYDIA M.TECH., PRESENTED BY,
1C2 Conceptual Design of Buildings
Model Updating of a Nine-Story Concrete Core Wall Building
DEFINITION OF TALL BUILDINGS From the structural design point of view, it is simpler to consider a building as tall when its structural analyses and.
DEFINITION OF TALL BUILDINGS From the structural design point of view, it is simpler to consider a building as tall when its structural analyses and.
Earthquake resistant buildings
Fire Resistance of Steel Structures
Faculty of Engineering Civil Engineering Department
Presentation transcript:

NEWBuildS Tall Wood Building Design Project – Seismic & Gravity Load Analysis and Design Zhiyong Chen University of New Brunswick

1. Introduction

1.1 Customer Demands & Challenges on Structures  Taller Buildings  Structural systems: Ductile  Connection systems: High strength & Ductile  Larger Open Space  Floor systems: Long span & Vibration We are trying to address these issues !!!

[Yes] 1.2 Flow Diagram Checking on Structural & Fire Issues using FEA Suitable Structural Assembles & Connections Structural System Material, Structural Assembles & Connections Site & Loads (Dead, Live, Wind, Snow and Seismic) Structural Sketch & Report [No] 1~3 Iteration s

2. Structural Design

2.1 Concept Design  Structural System  Post-beam system  Shear wall system  Shear wall + core system  Shear Wall Construction  Platform framing: Easy to be built storey by storey  Balloon framing: Reduce the storey joints Possible storey number + -

2.1 Concept Design  Stiffness, Strength & Ductility Core Shear Wall Steel Beam Vertical Joints (Dowel Type) Shear Connector Hold-Down (1) (2) (3)

2.2 Lateral Load Resisting System Shear Connector LLRS The typical storey HSK System (Wood-Steel-Composite) Hold-Down

2.3 Gravity Load Resisting System GLRS The typical storey Beams are divided by column / wall

2.3 Gravity Load Resisting System GLRS The typical storey Floor

2.3 Gravity Load Resisting System GLRS The typical storey Roof

2.4 Design Assemblies and Connections MaterialTypeCompany RoofCLT panelSLT9STRUCTURALAM Floor Glulam-concrete composite deck HBV-Vario Floor (125mm Concrete + 175x532mm GL 800mm) TICOMTEC GL BeamGlulamD.L.F. 24f-E (215x532mm) Steel BeamSteelG50 (S5x10) GL ColumnGlulam D.L.F. 24f-E (730x418=2-365x418, 365x418mm) Core & WallLSL2.1E LSL (3-19x2.44x0.089m )TIMBERSTRAND Hold-DownSteel and GlueHSK systemTICOMTEC Shear Connector Steel and GlueHSK systemTICOMTEC Vertical Joint SteelDowel type connector

2.5 Sketch List  GENERAL G-01: PROJECT DECRIPTION AND SKETCH LIST  STRUCTURAL S-01: STRUCTURAL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION S-02: TYPICAL FRAMING PLAN S-03: TYPICAL BUILDING SECTIONS S-04: TYPICAL DETAILS S-05: TYPICAL DETAILS S-06: CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS

3. Structural Analysis

3.1 Massive-Timber-Panel Moment Frame Steel Beam Vertical Joints Shear Connector Hold-Down (1) (2) (3) MTPMF

3.1.1 Influence of Hold-Down

DeformationHysteresis loops The ductility of the hold-down affects the system ductility.

3.1.2 Influence of Steel Beam

DeformationLoad-deformation curve Steel beam increases the system stiffness and ductility.

3.1.3 Influence of Vertical Connections

3.1.3 Influence of Vertical Joint Vertical joint affects the performance of the system. DeformationLoad-deformation curve

(1) Stiffness of Vertical Joint (2) For a denser fastening case, the system derives a higher stiffness in the rigid case. (1) The ratio system stiffness increases with increasing the stiffness of the vertical joint.

(2) Strength of Vertical Joint (2) The first turning point of the curves from the infinite-connections- strength to zero-connection-strength cases increases with increasing the connection strength. (1) The curves of the two extreme cases form the boundaries of the other intermediate strength cases.

(3) Ductility of Vertical Joint - Static The first yield point increases with increasing ductility ratio of the connection.

(4) Ductility of Vertical Joint - Cyclic The system ductility and energy dissipation ability are improved by the ductile connections.

3.2 FEA Model of Tall Wood Building  Geometrical Model and Elements  LSL core, shear wall & diaphragm Shell element – S4R  Steel & glulam beams, columns Beam element – B31  Material Models  Timber – Elastic  Steel – Ideal Elastic-Plastic Strain Stress Strain Stress

3.2 FEA Model of Tall Wood Building  Connection Models  Vertical joint & shear connector – Ideal Elastic-Plastic with ductility  Hold-down connection – Ideal Elastic-Plastic with ductility under tension & without movement under compression Deformation Force Deformation Force

3.2 FEA Model of Tall Wood Building  Connection Models  Steel beam & GL column – Rigid connections  GL beam to beam, column, wall & diaphragm – Hinge connections  Contact Models  Steel beam to Wall – Tie  Panel to panel – Frictionless (in tangential direction) – Hard contact (in tangential direction) Strain Stress

3.2 FEA Model of Tall Wood Building  Numerical Simulation Problem 3-Dimentional Non-linear  Problem Size Number of elements is 90,834 Number of nodes is 154,592 Total number of variables 585,762 (Degrees of freedom plus any Lagrange multiplier variables) It is a huge & complex computational task with convergent problems

3.3 Frequency Analysis  Sub-Space Method In Y (N-S) directionIn Z (rotation) direction In X (E-W) direction

3.3 Frequency Analysis  Influence of joint stiffness T1T1 T2T2 T3T3 Rigid1.04 (Torsional)0.88 (N-S)0.64 (E-W) Semi-Rigid1.66 (N-S)1.46 (Torsional)0.94 (E-W) NBCCShear wall: 1.04; Moment Frame: 1.90 The fundamental period of this building with semi-rigid joints in the East-West direction is close to that estimated by NBCC. Semi-rigid FEA should be used, else the periods of the building would be under-estimated.

3.3 Frequency Analysis 0.94S 1.66S 1.46S (1) Wind would control the structural design in the North- South direction, while seismic would control it in the East- West direction. (2) Some external walls at axis 1 & 7 should be considered to address the torsional issue and the stiffness in N-S direction. (L= =67.3m) (L=60.5m)

3.4 Gravity Loading Analysis

In X (E-W) direction In Y (N-S) direction The differential shortening is not significant.

 Risk method 3.5 Pushover Analysis In X (E-W) direction In Y (N-S) direction

 Seismic response of the high-rise wood building is crucial in the ultimate limit state.  Investigation method: Nonlinear time history analysis  22 “Far-Field” earthquake records will be scaled at the corresponding fundamental period of the building model to match the spectral acceleration, S a, of the Vancouver design spectrum. 3.6 Seismic Analysis

Thank you! Yingxian Wood Pagoda (67.31m) Tall Wood Building (66m)