Seismo-acoustic analysis for series of ammunition demolition explosions at Sayarim, Israel Vladimir Pinsky 1, Yefim Gitterman 1, Yochai Ben Horin 2, Stephen Arrowsmith 3 1 –Geophysical Institute of Israel, 2 – Israel NDC; 3 - Los Alamos National Laboratory,, USA Sayarim explosion series Seismo-acoustic Array Study We analyzed detection and location capabilities of a seismo-acoustic network using records of explosion series conducted recently at Sayarim Military Range (SMR), Israel, for demolition of outdated ammunitions. The signals from the explosions have been recorded at local distances by the Israel Seismic Network (ISN), two single infrasound sensors co-located with ISN stations and two infrasound arrays deployed by Israel NDC: 5-element IMA (at Mt. Meron), co-located with IMS seismic array MMAI, and 4-element test temporary array in Northern Negev. All shots (each one with nominal explosives weight ~10-15 tons, detonated simultaneously) were located at the same small area ~0.5x0.5 km, in some cases placed in several grooves, separated by km. Some shots were divided in time by only sec, facilitating analysis of the source variability under about constant atmospheric conditions. The following preliminary results were obtained: 1) the accuracy of seismo-acoustic source location, provided by 5 seismic stations and 2 acoustic receivers was within ±1 km of the SMR explosion site; 2) the analysis of acoustic phases recorded at ISN seismic stations at different azimuths showed a clear correlation of the phase peak amplitude with the wind direction; 3) infrasound signals from the explosions were clearly detected at IMA array at 340 km, whereas seismic signals were attenuated below the background noise after km; 4) the frequency band occupied by the signal is estimated within Hz, and the f-k analysis, applied to the infrasound array recordings, provided azimuth of 184 , compared to the true azimuth 190 , and apparent velocity of 344m/s. The azimuth bias could be explained by the prevailing strong south-western winds ~80 knots observed at the shot time at assumed propagation heights); 5) spectral analysis of infrasound signals provided determination of the dominant period used for rough estimating of the source yield based on an empirical relationship. The research was supported by the Bi-national (US-Israel) Science Foundation. For the study of the infrasound propagation effect in complex topography conditions on the we have installed array of the infrasound receivers in Araba Desert 10 km to the south of the Dead Sea. The site is 230 meters below the Ocean level, surrounded by the hills and scarps formed by alluvial sediments. The infrasound sources expected are located at Phosphates mines Zin and Oron ~20 km away, Sayarim military range ~120 km away and the Jordan mines ~90 km and 150 km away. The 12 sites of the array were located within a square 100 m2 area coincident with four 3C seismic stations, put for the site-effect measurements at a basement of a high-way bridge under construction. Just after the array set up on the we have got a clear signal from the 9.5 ton explosion at Zin mine recorded both by the infrasound and the seismic arrays. Next, an hour later the 800 kg experimental explosion from the Sayarim military range was detected at the infrasound array and next on the the small signal from the Oron mine 20 ton explosion was detected at the infrasound array. After that no sign of explosion signal was ever seen in spite of the fact that there was a lot of strong (10-20 ton) explosions at the phosphates mines. No one of the Jordan mines explosions were detected though there were several strong explosions (10-20 tones) a day. The array was demolished on the Ex. # DateOrigin Time, GMT Magni- tude M d CoordinatesCharge, tons Latit.Long. 17/1114:29: ~2*5 214:30: ~2*5 38/1111:36: ~2*5 411:45: ~2*5 59/1111:31: ~2*7 611:32: ~2*7 714/1111:16: ~10 815/1110:48: ~2*7 916/1114:11: ~3*10 Parameters of ammunition surface shots at SMR, Nov Origin Time and coordinates are estimated from location procedure using ISN records. (oblique) walls. Map of explosion sites, seismic and acoustic stations ISN vertical seismograms of ammunition shots, Nov The series of two pairs of shots detonated in different days and at different day time, were delayed by 40&25 sec and separated by several hundreds meters. They provided a clear acoustic phases at many seismic stations (20-70 km). The phase amplitudes are found very different for northern and southern stations, indicating appropriate wind direction affecting infrasound propagation during the explosions. Recording of Ex1&Ex2 at infrasound 5-element array IMAR deployed by Israel NDC at Mt. Meron (342 km) Different signal spectra are found, indicating a source (charge design) variability; most of energy in the range Hz, used in the broadband F-K analysis. Results of F-K analysis for Ex1&Ex2 Ex1Ex2 Ex1 Ex2 The F-K analysis provided azimuth of 184º, compared to the true azimuth 190º Recording of Ex1&Ex2 at single infrasound station MZDA (Chaparral&Microphon sensors) (158 km) Spectral analysis of infrasound signals provided determination of the dominant period T0 used for rough estimating of the source TNT yield W based on empirical relation: W = 5.26*T03.34 Then Wex1 = 6.7 tons, Wex2 = 8.7 tons Ex1 Ex2 Chaparral Micro- phone f m ~0.93Hzf m ~0.86 Hz 275 m/s Infrasound array IMAR (  ) co-located with IMS seismic array MMAI (  ), and Infrasound array IOBR Recording of Ex9 at IOBR (118 km), spectra and F-K analysis The F-K analysis provided a very accurate azimuth estimation 195º, compared to the true azimuth 196º, despite a rather bad correlation of long waveforms at array elements, and a vague decision function maximum, that significantly increased after applying a narrow band Hz, found from spectral analysis. Conclusions Seismo-acoustic array IZA comprised 4 seismic 3C stations S13 and 12 microphones placed at alluvium terraces of Zin creak. Recordings of the seismo-acoustic array, Chaparral and microphone at MZDA station and seismic stations MZDA, ZFRI and PRNI from a 20-ton blast at phosphates quarry Zin Infrasound signal are clearly seen at seismic and acoustic channels. Waveforms and F-K analysis of IZA recordings for the Sayarim 830 kg (hemispherical TNT) explosion on (distance km). The estimated azimuth is 206.6º, compared to the true azimuth 202º, the estimated apparent velocity 370 m/s. Weather and wind information for computation of pressure amplitudes Weather for Ovda Airport hourly on Weather for Ovda Airport hourly on Waveforms, spectra and F-K analysis of IZA recordings for the Zin 9.5-ton quarry blast on The estimated azimuth is 247.9º compared to the true azimuth 248.3º, the estimated apparent velocity 357 m/s. Waveforms and F-K analysis of IZA recordings for the Oron 20-ton quarry blast on The estimated azimuth is 254.3º compared to the true azimuth 248.3º, the estimated apparent velocity 376 m/s. Wind direction for Wind speed for Celerity for Recordings of the same stations from a similar 20-ton blast at quarry Zin The infrasound signal is clearly seen only at acoustic channels of the MZDA station. At the acoustic array the infrasound signals are not observed. Theoretical pressure amplitudes vs distance and height for 7 (left) and 9 (right) of November 2011 on direction from Sayarim to PRNI station (see more details to the right). The color scale in the figures represents amplitude in dB relative to 1 km from the source at 0 height. Computations are based on sounding profiles of the day. Theoretical (via Parabolic equations) amplitude attenuation vs distance and height for 11, 12, 15 and 19 of March 2012 on direction from quarry Zin to the IOBR array using balloon data of the day. The color scale in the figures represents amplitude in dB relative to 1 km from the source at 0 height. 1)An extensive database of ground-truth data was collected from different explosion sources: borehole blasts from localized phosphate quarries, several military on- surface series of ammunition demolition explosions (some with sec delay) in a small area and experimental identical shots at the same point; 2) Seismic waves, seismi-acoustic phases and infrasound signals from these sources were recorded at numerous local seismic stations, single infrasound sensors and portable and permanent infrasound arrays of small and large aperture; 3) The collected seismo-acoustic database facilitates analysis of source and weather (wind) variability factors affecting detection and location capabilities, accuracy estimation of different location algorithms, verification of infrasound propagation models, thus contributing to improvement of nuclear monitoring procedures.