Development of Pressure Penetrating Pipe(PPP) Pile for Enhancement of Bearing Capacity 2013.04.17 Do, Eunsu Seoul National University Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cofferdam.
Advertisements

Helical Piles Defined Presentation by: Howard A. Perko, Ph.D., P.E. Magnum Geo-Solutions, LLC Copyright 2011 – Magnum Piering, Inc., All Rights reserved.
2009 PDCA Professor Pile Institute
PILE FOUNDATION.
STEEL COST WEIGHT BENDING DENSITY MAGNETISM ALUMINIUM CORROSION FORMABILITY HARDNESS DURABILITY SIMILARITIES METALS CONDUCT ELECTRICITY AND HEAT PRESSURE.
Concrete Fooring & Roofing System
Load Cell &DP Cell 2007-CHEM-17.
Iglide All Polymer Bearings USP’s Competition New products.
Wave Equation Applications 2011 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
CONSTRUCTION OF SOIL NAILING WALLS
INTRODUCTION Session 1 – 2
New England Soils 101 October 8, 2009.
Northwest Copper Works, Inc. Disc Spring Technology, LLC – Presentation DST Members: Bart Makadia, P.E. James Taylor Klaus Redmann Portland, Or August.
Large Diameter Open-End Pipe Piles for Transportation Structures Dan Brown, PhD., P.E., D.GE.
Foundations Excavations
Micropiles Save Drilled Shafts
Foundations. Feature common to bridge and building structures Deep vs. shallow Safely transfer dead and live loads with acceptable levels of settlement.
Pile Testing and Evaluation for the Sand Creek Byway, Sandpoint, Idaho Presented by Dean E. Harris, P.E., CH2M HILL.
15-Jun-15Joe Eastman Load Cells. 15-Jun-15Joe Eastman Background Devices that translate force or weight into an electrical signal Constructed from high.
Increased load capacity of arch bridge using slab reinforced concrete T.G. Hughes & M. Miri Cardiff School of Engineering Arch 04, Barcelona, Nov ,
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS Spread footings Mat (Raft) foundations Square
Reinforced Concrete Design II
Pile Foundations پي هاي شمعي.
Introduction to Deep Foundations.
Session 17 – 18 PILE FOUNDATIONS
CE 120 Introduction to Civil Engineering
Rock Coring Obtain undisturbed samples of solid, fractured, or weathered rock formations.
TOPIC 2: TYPES OF FOUNDATION
Foundation Engineering CE 483
1 Field Approach A Test pile of required dimensions is constructed in the field and a load test is conducted to assess the capacity of the pile. This approach.
Introduction Advantages Dis-advantages Methods of Pre-stressing Mix Design Curing Laboratory Test Visit Report.
CHAPTER 4 CPB 20004: Plant Utility n Maintenance
Institute for Steel Construction – Leibniz University of Hannover 2. PhD Seminar on Wind Energy in Europe October 4th and 5th 2006 at Risø National Laboratory,
IWM 2004 Jouko Lehtonen Jouko Lehtonen Quality Assurance of Drilled Micropiles in Finland.
Ground Improvement Issues & Techniques
Abstract *Our project is about ( Foundation Design of Al- Maslamani Mall) which is located in the village of Beit Eba – Nablus governorate. *The total.
UAS Universal Anchoring Solutions The Helipost™ An environmentally friendly engineered alternative to expensive concrete anchors and piers, the Helipost.
Bridge Engineering (3) Foundations – Pile Foundations (1) 1. *Types of foundations 1.1 Shallow foundations (buried less than 5m deep) Spread (isolated)
An-Najah Nationa Unuversity Faculty Of Engineering Civil Engineering Department Nablus-Palestine Foundation Design of Multy story building Suprevisors:
OMAE 2009 Honolulu, HI - May 31 to June
A Better Foundation Alternative DESIGNING METAL FOUNDATIONS Shaner Industries |
Wave Equation Applications 2009 PDCA Professor Pile Institute Patrick Hannigan GRL Engineers, Inc.
Research at Northwestern University: End-bearing Micropiles in Dolomite.
Bulb Piles –Franki Piles or pressure injected footings –Special form of cast in place pile with an enlarged base for increased load bearing F 10-4 Minipiles,
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-II (CE 311)
GLE/CEE 330: Soil Mechanics Introduction to Foundation Engineering
BULDING CONSTRUCTION ( )
SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING-III (CE 434)
WELCOME.
Deep Replacement Presented by: M. Taromi
Prepared by:- Barham Jalal
AN OVERVIEW OF SHALLOW AND DEEP FOUNDATION SYSTEMS
Concrete Repair.
TOPIC 3: DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION
Deptt. of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Dr. PDKV, Akola
Sardar Patel Institute Of Technology
TECHNICAL BRIEFING ON PROOF CORING WORKS FOR MICROPILES
Quality Assurance of Drilled Micropiles in Finland
Outline Introduction Test section details Axial load test results
SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS BY, Babariya Ashish Gondaliya Ronak Gondaliya akshay Javiya hardik
DARSHAN INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
{Graduation Project} An-Najah National University
INTEGRAL BRIDGES Guided by: Dipu.V.S Lecturer Civil Engg Dept
PREPARED BY SK SOHEL, CE-3RD YEAR GUIDED BY JAYASHREE SENGUPTA
S S SUBMITTED BY:- CHARU BHARDWAJ civil engineering
Foundations.
Experimental study of shaft resistance of energy pile
CONSTRUCTION METHODS & TECHNOLOGY
Project Purpose & Description
Thought for the day “Engineering is the art of modelling
Presentation transcript:

Development of Pressure Penetrating Pipe(PPP) Pile for Enhancement of Bearing Capacity Do, Eunsu Seoul National University Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering Lab

1. Introduction Contents 2. Durability Performance Test 3. Load Test Plans 4. Summary & Further Study

Introduction 3/14 Concepts of PPP Pile  Method using hydraulic jacking device to penetrate pipe piles by pressure  Able to check bearing capacity by pressure of hydraulic jacking device  High workability in narrow areas (0.6m x 0.6m x 2m)  Small and light penetrating equipment (4 small hydraulic jack + guide steel bar + pressure plate)

Grouting Introduction 4/14 Advantages  No vibration or noise  No need to clear near pile after construction  Compact jacking devices  Construction possible for limited areas  Checking of correct pile bearing capacity possible Disadvantages  Not many construction cases  Difficulty in penetration when amber or boulders exist Research Plans  Estimation of pile bearing capacity through load tests – Load transfer analysis, base & shaft resistances  Assessment of penetration availability according to soil conditions – Check the applied load through load cell Vibration, Noise, Dust

Durability Performance Test Certification of Test 5/14  Test object: Hydraulic jacking device(50Ton)  Test method 1) Method: operate jacking device so a load of over 500kN is induced 2) Target lifetime: 6,667 cycles 3) Velocity: within 30 seconds per cycle 4) Load drop under 500kN or oil leaking should not happen after target lifetime  Environment of Laboratory: 25±5 ℃, 50±25%  Test equipments Test equipmentsModelManufacturer 5MN Compression testerCCH-5000KNISIMADZU/JAPAN Static data loggerYCAM-500AKYOWA/JAPAN

Durability Performance Test Test object installation 6/14 Hydraulic Pump 500Ton Load Cell Test Object Data Logger

Durability Performance Test Test Results 7/ Load(kN) Repeat Count Load(kN) Repeat Count 500kN 6,667Times Test objectHydraulic Jack(50Ton) Repeat count6,667(cycles)>>1,000 Results - No oil leaking - load of over 500kN induced

Durability Performance Test After test completion 8/14

Load Test Plans Purpose of Load Test 9/14  Load-settlement relationships  Bearing capacity of pile  Load transfer analysis Test# of pileTimes Load test18 times Plans of Load Test  Weathered rock placed in relatively shallow depths(5~8m)  Test pile installation depth: 10~15m

Load Test Plans Plans of Load Test 10/14

Load Test Plans Considering Factors – Strain gage 11/14 Strain gage Concrete Soil Welding Plate(Aluminum) Welding Spacer Connecting lines Plan 1 Plan 2Plan 3 Φ t, L=1m Pipe pile Φ t, L=1m Pipe pile Φ t, L=1m Pipe pile

Load Test Plans Considering Factors – Strain gage 12/14 Plan 1Plan 2Plan 3 Detailed Plan Price of strain gauge400,000 won25,000 won200,000 won Processing cost of pile25,000 won40,000 won20,000 won Damage from weldingLittle Heat transfer by bolt Advantages & Disadvantages - Minimize damage - High cost - Limited depth(30cm) - Many similar cases - Able to cut and process surface - Low reliability of data - Minimize effect of stiffness - High cost - Limited depth(30cm)

Load Test Plans Considering Factors – Load Cell 13/14 Hydraulic Jack (50.0tf) Concrete Soil Pressure Plate Install Plate Pipe Pile Plan 1 Plan 2Plan 3 Pipe Pile Φ t

Summary & Further study  The PPP pile method has many advantages compared to the existing construction method. However, there are disadvantages and not many construction cases.  According to a result of the durability performance test, When a load of 500kN in the hydraulic jack was induced, there are no oil leaking after test completion.  Load test plans were made considering the economic feasibility of strain gage and the installation of load cell. Analysis on load transfer and bearing capacity of piles will be conducted after completion of load test. Summary Further study 14/14  Estimation of pile bearing capacity through load tests – Load transfer analysis, base & shaft resistances  Assessment of penetration availability according to soil conditions – Check the applied load through load cell