The New Uniform Appraisal Rating Periods Union Brown Bag Lunch Series: Wednesday, October 2, 2002 Noon, Lecture Room D.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Planning, Feedback and Merit Allocation TMG Open Meeting May 1, 2008.
Advertisements

Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Performance Management Process
FDA Performance Management Program (PMP)
NFFE Local 1998 “ passport employees union ” est. October 19, 1981 Welcome to the New Employee Orientation.
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
1 PULASKI TECHNICAL COLLEGE Classified Staff Performance Evaluation To insert your company logo on this slide From the Insert Menu Select “Picture” Locate.
Review Period: January 1, 2014 – December 31, STAFF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS.
+ NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS March 2010-April 2011 and January 2011-December 2011.
Completing this module The goal of this module is to prepare you to submit an application for Sabbatical Leave at ACC. At the end of the module, you will.
Reduction in Force Overview. Revised June 15, January 28, 2009 Overview  Why is a RIF being considered  Points to Consider  Agency Requirements.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
Performance Appraisal System Update
Performance Management DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (ED) OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT (OM) Human Capital and Client Services (HCCS) ED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM.
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Who Should Be Evaluated? All HEO EMPLOYEES  13.3b  One year appointment  Two year appointment  Substitute.
Agenda  Eligibility for performance ratings  Preparing the appraisal  The electronic form  Conducting the appraisal  Consequences of rating  Elements.
Five-Level Performance Management System. Caveat for Bargaining Unit Employees The following presentation is intended for: – Non-bargaining unit employees.
NON-UNIT EMPLOYEE EVALUATION PROCESS
INCENTIVE AWARDS The National Guard Incentive Awards Program is designed to motivate technicians of the National Guard to increase productivity and creativity.
People First Performance Management Process Data Analysis.
Presented by: Cecelia Largo-Nez, Community Involvement Specialist Local Governance Support Center Fort Defiance Agency March 25,2 009 “Essential Tools.
A Performance Management and Evaluation System.  Compliance with BHECM Guidance  Identification of “Best Practice Standards”  A Job Description Review.
Completing this module The goal of this module is to prepare you to submit an application for Sabbatical Leave at ACC. At the end of the module, you will.
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
Financial reporting Elise Oukka, Head of Finance, FMO Riga.
PMAP: Your Rights Under the HHS- NTEU Contract Sarah Riger.
CONFIDENTIAL REPORTS Purpose Of Session
Agency Risk Management & Internal Control Standards (ARMICS)
Methods of Administration MOA Element 1 Designation of State and Sub-State Level Equal Opportunity (EO) Officer.
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
AFGE Local 1858 Presents. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROPOSED N.S.P.S. NATIONAL SECURITY PERSONNEL SYSTEM.
Administrative Professional Annual Review Process Administrative Professional Advisory Council – November 13, 2008.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 6-1 Chapter 6 CHAPTER 6 INTERNAL CONTROL IN A FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Writing Performance Elements and Standards. What is Performance Management?  It is the systematic process by which an agency involves its employees,
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
Agenda Welcome & Introductions Process Overview Preparation Submission Evaluation Considerations Resources Q&A Clinic.
Introduction to SEPAP: An Explanation of the Program  Importance of employee participation in the appraisal process  Learn the three phases of SEPAP.
Mid-Year Performance Review Process University System of New Hampshire System Office | 5 Chenell Drive, Suite 301, Concord, NH
Part 29 CFR 1960 is not Optional Madison, Wisconsin June 9, 2010.
2014 – 2015 EVALUATION PERIOD KCTCS ePerformance Training.
The VCCS Administrative & Professional Faculty Development, Evaluation, and Recognition System Task Force Report March, 2016.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals and Merit-based Salary Program ANR Town Hall July 29, 2016 Dial-in for audio Access code:
2017 Performance Management Changes
System Office Performance Management
TOPS TRAINING.
Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources
TOPS TSA HANDBOOK MD
Performance Development Plan (PDP) Training
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
TOPS TSA MD
Five-Level Performance Management System
T.O.P.S
Monitoring Performance
Performance Management System
Lesson 6: Evaluating Performance
2018 UCPEA One-time Performance Awards
Performance Review for County Educators
Performance Review for County Educators
Human Resources Office, Naples
Presentation transcript:

The New Uniform Appraisal Rating Periods Union Brown Bag Lunch Series: Wednesday, October 2, 2002 Noon, Lecture Room D

Objectives 4 New Uniform Performance Appraisal Rating Periods 4 Transition to Uniform Appraisal Rating Periods 4 Procedures for Applying the Performance Appraisal System 4 Grieving Your Rating of Record

Performance Appraisal 4 A Performance appraisal is the process of comparing actual job performance against performance standards, rating each critical element, and assigning a summary rating. National Agreement, Article 15, Sec. 2(A) (2002).

Performance Standards 4 Performance standards include objective measures of performance such as quality, quantity, cost efficiency, timeliness, and manner of performance, and may include other measures of performance as appropriate. National Agreement, Article 15, Sec. 2(C) (2002).

Critical Element 4 A component of a position consisting of one or more duties and responsibilities that contribute toward accomplishing organizational goals and objectives and which is of such importance that unacceptable performance on the element would result in unacceptable performance in the position. National Agreement, Article 15, Sec. 2(D) (2002).

Performance Review 4 Two performance reviews of the employee's performance on each critical element are conducted each year: a midyear progress review of the employee's progress toward achieving the performance standards established in her or his performance plan which is not in itself a rating and a final review at the time the rating of record is issued. National Agreement, Article 15, Sec. 2(E) (2002).

Rating of Record 4 The rating of record is the official written summary of an employee's performance given at the end of the rating period and is determined by evaluating the employee's performance against the employee's written performance standards. National Agreement, Article 15, Sec. 3 (2002).

Rating Periods 4 Beginning fiscal year 2003, the annual appraisal period for all NARA employees, except those identified below, is October 1 through September 30 of each year. 4 Beginning fiscal year 2002, for employees in the Office of Administrative Services (NA) and the Office of the Federal Register (NF), the rating period is April 1 through March 31 of each year. National Agreement, Article 15, Sec. 2(B) (2002).

Minimum Rating Period 4 The minimum appraisal period is 90 days. In order to review an employee's performance and assign a summary rating and rating of record, the employee must have held a position under a performance plan for this minimum appraisal period. To prepare a rating, the rating official must have held a supervisory position over the employee for the minimum period or otherwise have sufficient information about the employee's performance during the appraisal period. NARA Personnel 300, Chpt. 430, Part 2 (19).

Transition to Uniform Rating Periods 4 All Offices except NA and NF: If the employee’s rating period began in October June 2002 the rating period will end September If the employee’s rating period began in July September 2002 the rating period will end September National Agreement, Article 15, Sec. 2(B) (2002); Interim Guidance (5) and Appendix A.

Transition to Uniform Rating Periods 4 NA and NF: If the employee’s rating period began in April December 2001 the rating period will end March If the employee’s rating period began in January March 2002 the rating period will end March National Agreement, Article 15, Sec. 2(B) (2002); Interim Guidance (5) and Appendix B.

Procedures 4 The employee will receive, in writing, the critical elements and performance standards for her or his position. 4 During performance reviews, the supervisor will answer any questions the employee may have concerning what is necessary to improve performance. 4 The employee may submit written comments regarding the review that will be retained by the supervisor.

Procedures 4 When the performance rating is issued, a meeting with the employee will be held to discuss the rating. 4 Employees will receive their ratings normally within 60 calendar days after the end of the Uniform Performance Appraisal Rating Period.

Procedures 4 The supervisor will make appropriate allowances at the annual rating for work-related factors that were beyond the control of the employee which may have made it more difficult to meet the written performance standards. 4 Normally, an employee should be notified of performance deficiencies before receiving a lower rating on an element than they received for the previous annual rating period. The notification should be made as soon as practicable after deficient performance is noted.

Within-Grade-Increases 4 Employees are eligible for WGIs after completing the required waiting period since their last WGI or promotion. Instead of using the performance appraisal to grant a WGI, office heads and staff directors must certify that employees are performing at an acceptable level of competence by completing NA Form 3042, Supervisory Certification for WGI.

Grieving Your Rating of Record 4 National Agreement, Article 23 (2002) 4 Timeline: 20 days after your receive Rating of Record. 4 Written Grievance filed with Office Head or Staff Director 4 Basis: –Procedural –Substantive

Questions 4 PETER J. JEFFREY President Council of National Archives and Records Administration Locals, Council 260 American Federation Government of Employees, AFL-CIO 8601 Adelphi Road, RM 1920 College Park, MD Office: (301) Mobile: (301)