Critical Appraisal Quiz! P(There will be prizes) <0.05.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Step 3: Critically Appraising the Evidence: Statistics for Diagnosis.
Advertisements

Divisional Meeting 15 th January 2009 Streptococcal Pharyngitis: A Systematic Review of the Predictive Value of Signs and Symptoms and the External Validation.
Making evidence more accessible using pictures
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
1 Case-Control Study Design Two groups are selected, one of people with the disease (cases), and the other of people with the same general characteristics.
Developing an Answerable Question
Introduction to Critical Appraisal : Quantitative Research
CRITICAL APPRAISAL Dr. Cristina Ana Stoian Resident Journal Club
Biostatistics ~ Types of Studies. Research classifications Observational vs. Experimental Observational – researcher collects info on attributes or measurements.
Interpreting Basic Statistics
Concept of Measurement
Evidence-based Medicine Journal Club Khalid Bin Abdulrahman Director of Medical Education Center King Saud University.
Statistics for Health Care
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
BC Jung A Brief Introduction to Epidemiology - XI (Epidemiologic Research Designs: Experimental/Interventional Studies) Betty C. Jung, RN, MPH, CHES.
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
Inference for proportions - Comparing 2 proportions IPS chapter 8.2 © 2006 W.H. Freeman and Company.
 Mean: true average  Median: middle number once ranked  Mode: most repetitive  Range : difference between largest and smallest.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
 Be familiar with the types of research study designs  Be aware of the advantages, disadvantages, and uses of the various research design types  Recognize.
Critical Reading. Critical Appraisal Definition: assessment of methodological quality If you are deciding whether a paper is worth reading – do so on.
Stats Tutorial. Is My Coin Fair? Assume it is no different from others (null hypothesis) When will you no longer accept this assumption?
DEB BYNUM, MD AUGUST 2010 Evidence Based Medicine: Review of the basics.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Understanding real research 2.
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE Effectiveness of therapy Ross Lawrenson.
Risk Concepts and Glossary. Cross-sectional study The observation of a defined population at a single point in time or time interval. Exposure and outcome.
SCREENING Asst. Prof. Sumattna Glangkarn RN, MSc. (Epidemiology), PhD (Nursing studies)
Research Study Design. Objective- To devise a study method that will clearly answer the study question with the least amount of time, energy, cost, and.
Evidence Based Medicine Workshop Diagnosis March 18, 2010.
Introduction To Evidence Based Nursing By Dr. Hanan Said Ali.
Understanding real research 4. Randomised controlled trials.
EBCP. Random vs Systemic error Random error: errors in measurement that lead to measured values being inconsistent when repeated measures are taken. Ie:
Systematic Reviews By Jonathan Tsun & Ilona Blee.
CRITICAL READING ST HELIER VTS 2008 RCGP Curriculum Core Statement Domain 3 AS.
Clinical Writing for Interventional Cardiologists.
Appraising A Diagnostic Test
How to find a paper Looking for a known paper: –Field search: title, author, journal, institution, textwords, year (each has field tags) Find a paper to.
Statistical test for Non continuous variables. Dr L.M.M. Nunn.
Wipanee Phupakdi, MD September 15, Overview  Define EBM  Learn steps in EBM process  Identify parts of a well-built clinical question  Discuss.
Statistics for the board September 14 th 2007 Jean-Sebastien Rachoin MD.
Critical Reading of Medical Articles
Critical Reading. Critical Appraisal Definition: assessment of methodological quality If you are deciding whether a paper is worth reading – do so on.
Study designs. Kate O’Donnell General Practice & Primary Care.
Organization of statistical research. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and.
Evidence based medicine Diagnostic tests Ross Lawrenson.
humor me by drawing this picture ……………………
Chapter 4 Probability and Counting Rules Section 4-2
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Health Research. What is the placebo effect? An expectation of an effect gives that effect.
Research Design Evidence Based Medicine Concepts and Glossary.
Types of Studies. Aim of epidemiological studies To determine distribution of disease To examine determinants of a disease To judge whether a given exposure.
Levels of Evidence Dr Chetan Khatri Steering Committee, STARSurg.
PTP 560 Research Methods Week 12 Thomas Ruediger, PT.
CRITICAL APPARAISAL OF A PAPER ON THERAPY 421 CORSE EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE (EBM)
Critical appraisals: Treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL = a prospective study comparing the effect and value of intervention(s) against a control in human beings.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Evidence-Based Mental Health PSYC 377. Structure of the Presentation 1. Describe EBP issues 2. Categorize EBP issues 3. Assess the quality of ‘evidence’
A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE PREVENTIVE EFFECT OF ORAL HYGIENE ON PNEUMONIA AND RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION IN ELDERLY PEOPLE IN HOSPITALS AND NURSING HOMES:
Measures of disease frequency Simon Thornley. Measures of Effect and Disease Frequency Aims – To define and describe the uses of common epidemiological.
“Reading and commenting papers” (Scientific English) Alexis Descatha INSERM, UMS UVSQ- Unité de pathologie professionnelle, Garches.
Journal Club Curriculum-Study designs. Objectives  Distinguish between the main types of research designs  Randomized control trials  Cohort studies.
Diagnostic studies Adrian Boyle.
HelpDesk Answers Synthesizing the Evidence
How to read a paper D. Singh-Ranger.
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE
Chapter 7 The Hierarchy of Evidence
Basic statistics.
Presentation transcript:

Critical Appraisal Quiz! P(There will be prizes) <0.05

Which one of the following best describes absolute risk increase? A.Control event rate (CER) – experimental event rate (EER) B.CER + EER C.EER – CER D.The likelihood of a positive result E.The proportion of positives accurately diagnosed with a disorder C

Which of the following best describes the term external validity? A.The agreement between two raters using the same test at the same time B.The consistency of a measure used on two separate occasions C.The extent to which one can appropriately apply the results to other populations D.The level of agreement between two or more raters using the same test on two or more occasions E.The level of consistency between two separate halves of the same test C

Which of the following describes a cohort study? A.A study that aims to establish the normal height of 4yr old children by measuring height as school entry B.A study that compares a group of children who’s heights are below the tenth centile with a group of matched controls of normal height aiming to identify possible causative factors C.A study that compares two groups of 4yr olds with similar characteristics: one group is given a drug and the other a placebo and the growth of each group is measured following this intervention D.A study that compares the height of a group of 4yr olds living near a nuclear plant with the height of a group of 4yr olds who live elsewhere E.A study that looks a all children born at one hospital in one year and measures their height at intervals up to four years of age Cross-sectional Case-control Cohort Controlled Trial Longitudinal Longitudinal; case-control; controlled trial; cross-sectional

A hierarchy of quality in evidence based medicine exists, with study types ranked according to the strength of their data Which one of the following correctly ranks the study types with the most robust first and the least robust last? A.RCT, CR, CC, MA B.MA, RCT, CC, CR C.RCT, CR, MA, CC D.CR, CC, MA, RCT E.RCT, CC, MA, CR Case report (CR) Randomised double-blind placebo controlled trial (RCT) Case-control study (CC) Meta-analysis (MA) B

EMQ – Study types A.Case-control B.Case report C.Cohort Study D.Double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial E.Meta-analysis F.Qualitative Study G.Single-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial 1.The Framington Heart study 2.The Cochrane Collaboration 3.The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study 4.A trial of sham acupuncture for period pains in which patients are allocated randomly to treatment or placebo 5.A study of patient’s experiences of berevement

A new test to screen for CF carriers is being considered. Preliminary results for the test in 100 children, in comparison with the gold standard of chromosome analysis, are shown below A.The accuracy of the test is 91% B.The new test is better than the GS C.Positive predictive value is 80% D.The sensitivity is 80% E.The specificity is 87% positive chromosome analysis negative chromosome analysis New test positive48 New test negative187 T F F T F

That last slide explained… Accuracy – proportion of tests with correct results = a+d/a+b+c+d = 91/100 = 91% Sensetivity – the true positive rate = a/a+c = 4/5 = 80% Specificity – the true negative rate = d/b+d = 87/95 = 92% Positive predictive value – the probability of having the condition once test is +ve = a/a+b = 4/12 = 33% Negative predictive value – probability of having condition once test is –ve = d/c+d = 87/88 = 99% positive chromosome analysis negative chromosome analysis New test positive4 (a)8 (b) New test negative1 (c)87 (d)

A trial is conducted to determine which symptoms and signs have the most impact on the diagnosis of pneumonia in patients with resp symptoms in primary care. Results are presented below: Symptom/SignLikelihood Ratio for diagnosis Fever0.94 Cough1.00 Abnormal chest examination1.25 Tachyponoea1.34 Otalgia0.07 A.Abnormal chest exam increases probability of pneumonia by 25% B.Tachypnoea has a negative association with diagnosis of pnuemonia C.The presence of cough increases probability of pneumonia by 100% D.The presence of fever makes the diagnosis of pneumonia less likely E.These results allow the diagnosis to be made without examining the patient T F F T F