Professional Development and Appraisal System

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guiding Principles for Evaluating Teachers of Students with Autism Using the PDAS Dr. Jan Butz, BCBA Collaborative Autism Resources & Education, (CARE)
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Performance Appraisal Systems
The Teacher Work Sample
Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.
PORTFOLIO.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Professional Development and Appraisal System Teacher Orientation.
Professional Development and Appraisal System. Rules To Know From Commissioner’s Rules Chapter 150.AA Subchapter  Each teacher must be appraised.
PDAS Update Training “The goal of PDAS is to improve student performance through the professional development of teachers.” Review the Slide: Have participants.
History and Overview of the PDAS Jay Dawson Cassie Fredendall Molly Schroepfer October 20, 2005.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
Teacher Evaluation Model
Welcome to PDAS Domains V-VIII Orientation ►Please help yourself to the drinks and snacks provided for you in the hallway ►Take a minute to look through.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Appraisal Process and Forms Probationary – first 3 years of employment Permanent – tenured On or before Oct. 1 – meet, In person, with appraiser to review.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Professional Development and Appraisal System
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
Observations A Mirror of the Classroom. Objectives  Gain specific strategies for communicating with teachers to promote successful teaching and learning.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
PDAS Overview La Porte ISD
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT APPRAISAL SYSTEM TEACHER ORIENTATION UPDATE POWER POINT PRESENTATION Developed by Carlene Lenox Division of Administration Region.
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
John Drugan School July 19,  PDAS remains in place as the State of Texas’s approved instrument for appraising its teachers and identifying areas.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For Whom TPGES/OPGES Does NOT Apply Certified Evaluation Orientation For Staff Who Are NOT Administrators & For.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher Orientation August, 2011 Brazosport Independent School District Professional Development and Appraisal System
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
Certified Evaluation Orientation August 19, 2011.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Student Achievement Through Teacher Evaluation Presenters Dr. Jane Coughenour Dr. Karen Chapman Mr. Michael Matta.
Teacher Orientation August, 2012 Brazosport Independent School District Professional Development and Appraisal System.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS
Pre-Evaluation Conference Conducted August 18, 2015 STING Schedule.
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM. A school district shall ensure that all teachers are provided with an orientation of the Professional Development.
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PDAS) TEACHER ORIENTATION This orientation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and.
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
Presentation transcript:

Professional Development and Appraisal System Teacher Orientation To access the T.E.A. PDAS Teacher manual: http://www5.esc13.net/pdas/manual.html

PDAS Teacher Orientation A school district shall ensure that all teachers are provided with an orientation of the Professional Development and Appraisal System (PDAS) no later than the final day of the first three weeks of school and at least three weeks before the first observation. Your understanding of the information in this orientation will be greatly enhanced by your active participation.

Overview of the System This presentation provides an overview of the elements of the PDAS system and its goal: “…to improve student performance through the professional development of teachers.” Chapter 1 – 6:42 Minutes

PDAS Characteristics Learner Centered Aligned High Standard of Proficiency Teacher Growth and Teacher Improvement Collaboration

Appraisal Process Steps Teacher Orientation Teacher Self Report (TSR) Formal Classroom Observation Walkthroughs Student Performance as seen in Campus Performance Rating and AYP Summative Annual Report/Conference

APPRAISAL PERIOD TIME LINE SCHOOL CALENDAR YEAR First 12 Weeks Second 12 Weeks Third 12 Weeks Last 15 Days of INST. Teacher Orientation Within 1st 3 weeks Observations no earlier than 3 weeks after this orientation Teacher Self Report, Part I No later than three weeks after orientation Teacher Self Report II & III At least two weeks prior to Summative Conference Formal Observation Minimum of 45 minutes or shorter segments Written summary within 10 working days Advanced notice may be given/NOT REQUIRED. Follow district APPRAISAL CALENDAR May have pre- or post-conference at request of Teacher or Appraiser. WALKTHROUGH VISITS To be used at the discretion of the appraiser Documentation shared with teacher within 10 days SUMMATIVE ANNUAL REPORT 5 working days before conference No later than 15 working days before last day of instruction Observation Summary Walkthrough documentation Third party/Teacher documentation Completed TSR ADDITIONAL TIME LINE ISSUES Teacher Response Within 10 working days (Appraiser may extend to 15) May rebut in writing or request 2nd appraisal within 10 working days after receiving the OSF or Summative Annual Appraisal Report SUMMATIVE CONFERENCE No later than 15 working days before last day of instruction May be waived in writing by Teacher, NOT APPRAISER If Appraiser is not administrator on campus, principal/asst. or designated supervisory staff will participate.

Classroom Centered Domains Domain I “Active, successful student participation” in Domain I Title. “Engaged in learning” Criterion 1. This is a critical attribute. “Successful in learning” in Criterion 2.

Classroom Centered Domains Domain II Domain II- Learner Centered Instruction. Highlight the domain title and criterion. Chapter 2 – 8:00 Minutes

Classroom Centered Domains Domains III, IV, and V Domain III- Evaluation and Feedback on Student Progress Domain IV- Management of Student Discipline, Instructional Strategies, Time, and Material Domain V- Professional Communication Highlight the domain title and criterion. Chapter 3 – 19:00 Minutes

Classroom Centered Domains Domain V It is unlikely that appraisers will observe all of the criteria in Domain V in the classroom. Identify which criteria are likely to be seen in the classroom and which are not.

IMPORTANT TO KNOW Your appraiser may not have evidence to rate every criteria in Domain V on the OSF. In the formal observation, some of the criteria may not have been observed in the classroom.

Professional Development Domain VI Domain VI- Professional Development Inference cannot be used in Domain VI. Remember, “The goal of PDAS is to improve student performance through the professional development of teachers.”

“Just Do It” Domain VII Domain VII- Compliance with Policies, Operating Procedures, and Requirements In Domain VII, inference can be used to score “Proficient” only if there is no evidence of non-compliance with policies. Chapter 4 – 13:13 Minutes

Improvement of Academic Achievement of All Students on Campus Domain VIII Domain VIII- Improvement of Academic Achievement of All Students According to state law, student performance must be included in each teacher’s appraisal.

Criterion 10 Domain VIII PLUS 10. Campus Performance Rating of: A . Exemplary = 4 ______ Recognized = 2 ______ Academically Acceptable = 1 ______ Academically Unacceptable = 0 ______ B. Meets AYP = 1 ______ *Needs Improvement = 0 ______ Total A + B________ *If needs improvement, list in the spaces below Indicators from page 6. ____________________ __________________ Final Total Domain VIII Participation Performance ____________________ __________________ Graduation Rate/Attend Participation & Performance (Sum of 1-10) Teacher’s 1st Year on Campus Teacher’s Subsequent Years on Campus Total: 37 to 45 Exceeds Expectations 40 to 50 23 to 36 Proficient 24 to 39 7 to 22 Below Expectations 8 to 23 0 to 6 Unsatisfactory 0 to 7

Continuous Improvement Process Needs Assessment Data collection Analysis Summative Evaluation Goals & Objectives Quality Ongoing Formative Evaluation Strategies & Activities Student Performance Implementation Who? What? What do we need? Professional Development & Sustained Support

Teacher Self Report (TSR) The TSR: Gives you an opportunity to have input into your appraisal process. Serves as a platform to align instruction. Is a reflective tool.

Classroom Observation The formal observation will take place between 9-12-11 and 11-4-11, is arranged with the teacher in advance, and is a minimum of 45 minutes. New to IISD Teachers will have two formal Observations, one by their Principal, and one by Cara Cooke, IISD Curriculum Director. Walkthroughs can take place any time during the year and may be any length the appraiser feels is necessary. Expect Walkthroughs by the Principal, Curriculum Director, and Superintendent.

Scoring Factors and Performance Level Indicators Critical Attributes Quality Quantity

Quality Scoring Standards (See Scoring Standards Handout) S trength I mpact V ariety A lignment

Strength Thinking at high cognitive levels Depth & Complexity Significant Content Connecting within/across disciplines & work/life applications Effective, clear & substantive

Impact Promotes student success Effective use of assessments Data-driven decision making Responsibility Reflection Challenging

Variety Varied student characteristics Differentiated instruction Support strategies & services

Alignment Curriculum, instruction and assessment aligned with TEKS & district objectives Targeted instruction Congruent

Quantity Can you see it? Did it happen? How often? How many students?

Teacher Self Report Parts II and III Parts II and III of the TSR give you an opportunity to give your appraiser additional information about your efforts to improve your students’ performance.

Summative Annual Conference Your summative annual conference will occur within the required timeline, and “…shall focus on the written summative report and related data sources.”* *from §150.1003. Appraisals, Data Sources, and Conferences of the Commissioner’s Rules

All that’s left . . . PDAS Teacher Checklist Campus completion of orientation TSR, Section I by 8-26-11. Observation and other data - walkthroughs Conference(s) TSR, Sections II & III by 5-4-12. Summative Annual Conference by 2-24-12. Questions today? Questions later? Please ask!

Professional Development and Appraisal System Remember, “The goal of PDAS is to improve student performance through the professional development of teachers.” To access the T.E.A. PDAS Teacher manual: http://www5.esc13.net/pdas/manual.html