Critical Appraisal Library and Information Service Southmead Ext 5333 Frenchay Ext 6570.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence into Practice: how to read a paper Rob Sneyd (with help from...Andrew F. Smith, Lancaster, UK)
Advertisements

What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic.
Using evidence in practice Nick Price 4 th April 2006.
WoSCAN CPD GROUP CRITICAL APPRAISAL RESOURCE GUIDE JULY 2007.
Introducing... Reproduced and modified from a presentation produced by Zoë Debenham from the original presentation created by Kate Light, Cochrane Trainer.
Systematic Reviews Dr Sharon Mickan Centre for Evidence-based Medicine
Critical Reading VTS 22/04/09. “How to Read a Paper”. Series of articles by Trisha Greenhalgh - published in the BMJ - also available as a book from BMJ.
What is going on with psychotherapy today? Carolyn R. Fallahi, Ph. D.
8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies
Critical Appraisal Dr Samira Alsenany Dr SA 2012 Dr Samira alsenany.
Introduction to Critical Appraisal : Quantitative Research
Evidence-Based Medicine Week 3 - Prognosis Department of Medicine - Residency Training Program Tuesdays, 9:00 a.m. - 11:30 a.m., UW Health Sciences Library.
How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.
Getting Started: Research and Literature Reviews An Introduction.
Evidence-Based Practice for Pharmacy Y2 Pamela Corley, MLS, AHIP Joe Pozdol, MLIS Norris Medical Library 2003 Zonal Ave. Los Angeles, CA
Statistical presentation in international scientific publications 5. A statistical review (group work) Malcolm Campbell Lecturer in Statistics, School.
Introduction to evidence based medicine
Critical Appraisal of an Article by Dr. I. Selvaraj B. SC. ,M. B. B. S
PPAS 3190: Introduction to Library Research Timothy Bristow – Scott Library Political Science & Public Policy Librarian.
An Introduction to Systematic Reviews Shakila Thangaratinam Professor of Maternal and Perinatal Health Women’s Health Research Unit R & D Director of Women’s.
Developing Research Proposal Systematic Review Mohammed TA, Omar Ph.D. PT Rehabilitation Health Science.
How to Write a Scientific Paper Hann-Chorng Kuo Department of Urology Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital.
Are the results valid? Was the validity of the included studies appraised?
Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
Critical Reading. Critical Appraisal Definition: assessment of methodological quality If you are deciding whether a paper is worth reading – do so on.
EBD for Dental Staff Seminar 2: Core Critical Appraisal Dominic Hurst evidenced.qm.
Operational Obstetrics & Gynecology · Bureau of Medicine and Surgery · 2000 Slide 1.
Health Information on the Internet Sabelo Mapasure SCHT Library & Knowledge Services Manager
Miguel Bussière With a little help from Dr. Jenkins and Dr. Burneo July 12, 2005 Introduction to UWO Evidence-Based Neurology.
“Knowing Revisited” And that’s how we can move toward really knowing something: Richard Feynman on the Scientific Method.
Evidence Based Practice
Introduction to Central Lab Journal Club 21 November 2013 by Asieh Azarm.
Systematic Reviews.
How to Analyze Systematic Reviews: practical session Akbar Soltani.MD. Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) Shariati Hospital
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.
POLS 2300: Introduction to Library Research Timothy Bristow Research & Instruction Librarian, Scott Library.
Evidence-Based Medicine Presentation [Insert your name here] [Insert your designation here] [Insert your institutional affiliation here] Department of.
Objectives Describe how validity, relevance and work impact the usefulness of information for clinicians Recognize when to search for original research.
Clinical Writing for Interventional Cardiologists.
Session 1 Review. 1. Which is the last of the four steps in the EBM process? Apply evidence to your patient Evaluate evidence for validity Formulate a.
Presented by Assoc Prof Gavin D Leslie February 2008 Using the RAPid critical appraisal tool with students.
Evidence Based Practice RCS /9/05. Definitions  Rosenthal and Donald (1996) defined evidence-based medicine as a process of turning clinical problems.
به نام او که انسان را به زیور « اندیشه » و « تفکر » آراست.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
LITERATURE REVIEW ARCHELLE JANE C. CALLEJO, PTRP,MSPH.
Evidence-Based Medicine: Tools, Techniques, Results Balakrishnan S.
Validity and utility of theoretical tools - does the systematic review process from clinical medicine have a use in conservation? Ioan Fazey & David Lindenmayer.
Protocol Launch Meeting and Research Skills Course September 16 th 2015, RCS England Searching the Literature.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when and how to do them Andrew Smith Royal Lancaster Infirmary 18 May 2015.
Is a meta-analysis right for me? Jaime Peters June 2014.
Corso di clinical writing. What to expect today? Core modules IntroductionIntroduction General principlesGeneral principles Specific techniquesSpecific.
Evidence-Based Dentistry Presenter’s Name. What does EBD mean?
Journal Club <Insert topic> <Insert presenters name>
Critical Appraisal of a Paper Feedback. Critical Appraisal Full Reference –Authors (Surname & Abbreviations) –Year of publication –Full Title –Journal.
Evidence-Based Mental Health PSYC 377. Structure of the Presentation 1. Describe EBP issues 2. Categorize EBP issues 3. Assess the quality of ‘evidence’
Ghada Aboheimed, Msc. Review the principles of an evidence based approach to clinical practice. Appreciate the value of EBM Describe the 5 steps of evidence.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. EVIDENCE-BASED TEACHING IN NURSING – Chapter 15 –
Critically Appraising a Medical Journal Article
Evidence-Based Practice I: Definition – What is it?
Research and Evidence Based Medicine
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
Literature review Lit. review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. Mostly it is part of a thesis.
Alison Day Lead Librarian Grand Round
Sign critical appraisal course: exercise 2
What Really is Evidence Based Medicine?
Questioning and evaluating information
What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic. Ask What is a review?
Presentation transcript:

Critical Appraisal Library and Information Service Southmead Ext 5333 Frenchay Ext 6570

What is critical appraisal? …. process of weighing up evidence to see how useful it is in decision making

Why critically appraise? Supports sound decision making based on best available evidence Helps us determine: –How rigorous a piece of research is –What the results are telling us –How relevant it is to our patient

How to critically appraise? Many different tools But what are the three main things we are looking for?

Three R’s Rigour - how good is the study Results - what is it actually telling us Relevance – is it relevant to our patient

Levels of Evidence 1a A systematic review of 2 or more randomised control trials (RCTs) 1b an RCT 2a a cohort study 2b a case control study 2c a dramatic uncontrolled experiment 3 Respected authorities, opinions etc 4 …someone once told me

Sources of Evidence Primary sources –Based on experiments and published research Secondary sources –Systematic reviews –Clinical guidelines –Journals of secondary publication e.g. Evidence Based Medicine

Getting Started Formulate PICO question Search appropriate sources Obtain article (s) Read to suit you!

Statistics If in doubt ask a statistician Key points to look for –95% confidence limits used –If p <0.05 then result is statistically significant –Any anomalies discussed –All subjects accounted for even if dropped out

Reading for Critical Appraisal Introduction –Logical and knowledgeable Aim/research question –Clearly stated Methods –Fully described Analysis –Appropriate statistics used, all subjects accounted for

Conclusions –Justified and valid –Cost/benefits discussed Can I make a clinical decision based on what I have just read?

Practical Exercise Appraise the paper given to you and be prepared to share your comments with the group

Appraising Web Sites Authority Currency No advertisement/sponsorship.org,.ac,.gov better than.co.uk/.com

Practical Exercise In groups comment on the webpages given and be ready to feedback