James A. Hokanson, Ph.D. Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health University of Texas Medical Branch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to write a study protocol Hanne-Merete Eriksen (based on Epiet 2004)
Advertisements

Research Curriculum Session II –Study Subjects, Variables and Outcome Measures Jim Quinn MD MS Research Director, Division of Emergency Medicine Stanford.
Study Size Planning for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
Elements of a clinical trial research protocol
Critiquing Research Articles For important and highly relevant articles: 1. Introduce the study, say how it exemplifies the point you are discussing 2.
Announcements ●Exam II range ; mean 72
How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.
Writing a Research Protocol Michael Aronica MD Program Director Internal Medicine-Pediatrics.
Biostatistics. But why? Why do we read scientific litterature? How do we read scientific litterature?
Sampling and Experimental Control Goals of clinical research is to make generalizations beyond the individual studied to others with similar conditions.
EXPERIMENTS AND OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES Chance Hofmann and Nick Quigley
Guidance for Industry Establishing Pregnancy Registries Pregnancy Registry Working Group Pregnancy Labeling Taskforce March, 2000 Evelyn M. Rodriguez M.D.,
Cohort Studies Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff, Research Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
FINAL REPORT: OUTLINE & OVERVIEW OF SURVEY ERRORS
Critical Appraisal of an Article by Dr. I. Selvaraj B. SC. ,M. B. B. S
Part 3 of 3 By: Danielle Davidov, PhD & Steve Davis, MSW, MPA INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH: SAMPLING & DESIGN.
Reading Science Critically Debi A. LaPlante, PhD Associate Director, Division on Addictions.
Lecture 8 Objective 20. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case reports/series.
Reading Scientific Papers Shimae Soheilipour
Research Report Chapter 15. Research Report – APA Format Title Page Running head – BRIEF TITLE, positioned in upper left corner of no more than 50 characters.
Methodology Describe Context & setting Design Participants Sampling Power Analysi s Interventions Outcome (study variables) Data Collection Procedures.
Study Design. Study Designs Descriptive Studies Record events, observations or activities,documentaries No comparison group or intervention Describe.
Research Design. Research is based on Scientific Method Propose a hypothesis that is testable Objective observations are collected Results are analyzed.
Study design P.Olliaro Nov04. Study designs: observational vs. experimental studies What happened?  Case-control study What’s happening?  Cross-sectional.
Lecture 6 Objective 16. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: (current) cohort studies (longitudinal studies). Discuss the advantages.
Andrea M. Landis, PhD, RN UW LEAH December 7, 2012.
Evaluating a Research Report
Evidence Based Medicine Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Ross Lawrenson.
Systematic Review Module 7: Rating the Quality of Individual Studies Meera Viswanathan, PhD RTI-UNC EPC.
Placebo-Controls in Short-Term Clinical Trials of Hypertension Sana Al-Khatib, MD, MHS Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Cardiology Duke University.
Consumer behavior studies1 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR STUDIES STATISTICAL ISSUES Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr. Boston University Harvard Clinical Research Institute.
Scientific Method for a controlled experiment. Observation Previous data Previous results Previous conclusions.
1 f02kitchenham5 Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering Barbara A. Kitchenham etal IEEE TSE Aug 02.
Appraising Randomized Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews October 12, 2012 Mary H. Palmer, PhD, RN, C, FAAN, AGSF University of North Carolina at Chapel.
Successful Concepts Study Rationale Literature Review Study Design Rationale for Intervention Eligibility Criteria Endpoint Measurement Tools.
Critical Appraisal of the Scientific Literature
Landmark Trials: Recommendations for Interpretation and Presentation Julianna Burzynski, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS Heme/Onc Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 11/29/07.
Lecture 7 Objective 18. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case ‑ control studies (retrospective studies). Discuss the advantages.
Scientifically-Based Research What is scientifically-based research? How do evaluate it?
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Hilary Rhodes, PhD Ellen Bobronnikov February 22, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
TUJUAN MEMONITOR HASIL KERJA MAHASISWA (MEMBACA ARTIKEL) MENJELASKAN BAGIAN-BAGIAN KERTAS KERJA UNTUK MENELAAH ARTIKEL DAN KRITERIA PENILAIAN KUALITAS.
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
The Discussion Section. 2 Overall Purpose : To interpret your results and justify your interpretation The Discussion.
Anatomy of a Research Article Five (or six) major sections Abstract Introduction (without a heading!) Method (and procedures) Results Discussion and conclusions.
Guidelines for Critically Reading the Medical Literature John L. Clayton, MPH.
Establishing Efficacy through Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials Ernst R. Berndt, Ph.D. MIT and NBER.
1 Study Design Issues and Considerations in HUS Trials Yan Wang, Ph.D. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics IV OB/OTS/CDER/FDA April 12, 2007.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
PTP 661 EVIDENCE ABOUT INTERVENTIONS CRITICALLY APPRAISE THE QUALITY AND APPLICABILITY OF AN INTERVENTION RESEARCH STUDY Min Huang, PT, PhD, NCS.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :呂宥達 Date : 2005/10/27.
EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.
Design of Clinical Research Studies ASAP Session by: Robert McCarter, ScD Dir. Biostatistics and Informatics, CNMC
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
How to Read a Journal Article. Basics Always question: – Does this apply to my clinical practice? – Will this change how I treat patients? – How could.
Manuscript Review: A Checklist From: Seals, D.R and H Tanaka Advances in Physiology Education 23:52-58.
Research proposal (Lecture 3) Dr.Rehab F Gwada. Objectives of the Lecture The student at the end of this lecture should Know Identify Target Population.
Source: S. Unchern,  Research is not been completed until the results have been published.  “You don’t write because you want to say something,
Purpose of Epi Studies Discover factors associated with diseases, physical conditions and behaviors Identify the causal factors Show the efficacy of intervening.
Table 1. Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research (MORE) – observational studies of incidence or prevalence of chronic diseases Tatyana Shamliyan.
CRITICALLY APPRAISING EVIDENCE Lisa Broughton, PhD, RN, CCRN.
Rigor and Transparency in Research
Critically Appraising a Medical Journal Article
Components of thesis.
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
Project Title Subtitle: make sure you specify it is a research project
Critical Appraisal วิจารณญาณ
Development Plans: Study Design and Dose Selection
Introduction to Research Romulo S. de Villa, MD, PhD, Cert. Biochemistry Molecular & Nutritional Oncologist Professor of Biochemistry & Nutrition Molecular.
Presentation transcript:

James A. Hokanson, Ph.D. Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health University of Texas Medical Branch

Questions to ask of every paper you are willing to read 2

کیفیت شواهد پزشکی !! 3

آیا وقت من ارزش خواندن این مقاله را دارد؟

States the Purpose of Article, Major Procedures and Methods, Main Findings, and Conclusions بکارگیری خلاصه مقاله های دارای ساختار (Structured) درحال همه گیر شدن توسط مجلات علمی است. 5

Objectives Study Design Methods Results Conclusions 6

designed analyzed If properly designed and analyzed, is this study, important and worth knowing about? 7

statistically If the results are statistically significant significant, do they also have clinical significance? not statistically detect If the results are not statistically significant, was the sample size sufficiently large to detect a meaningful difference or effect? 8

Why is this study needed ? purpose What is the purpose of this study? known before Was purpose known before the study or a chance finding discovered as part of ‘data dredging? ’ 9

done before What has been done before and how does this study differ?  Places study in proper context such as  Inadequacies of earlier work  Next step in an overall research project DISCUSSION May also be found in DISCUSSION 10

location study Does the location of the study have Relevance Relevance (TO ME)? population What is the population to which the study findings apply? 11

time period Is the time period covered by the study Appropriate Appropriate (TO ME). censoring  Long studies may have informative censoring.  Short studies may not have adequate follow-up follow-up time. 12

snap-shot A snap-shot in time for the study population sample selected Was the sample selected in an appropriate manner (random, convenience, etc)? 13

efforts Were efforts made to ensure a good minimize response rate or to minimize the missing data occurrence of missing data? reproducibility Were reliability (reproducibility) and validity reported? 14

Prospective, expensive (Framingham ) representative Are the subjects representative of the population population to which the findings are applied? volunteer bias 1. Is there evidence of volunteer bias? follow-up time 2. Was there adequate follow-up time? drop-out rate 3. What was the drop-out rate? 15

few cases, cheap Retrospective, often few cases, cheap Were records of cases and controls blindly reviewed blindly? selection biases How were possible selection biases controlled (Prevalence bias, Admission Rate bias, Volunteer bias, Recall bias, Lead Time bias, Detection bias, etc)? 16

inclusion Were the criteria for inclusion and exclusion exclusion of studies clearly stated? If significant findings were determined, did the authors specify the number of negative additional negative studies that would be needed to eliminate the observed significance? 17

How chosen How were subjects chosen or recruited? If not random, are they representative representative of the population? 18

Blinding Types of Blinding (Masking) Single, Double, Triple. control group Is there a control group? How was it chosen? 19

followed up How are patients followed up? Who dropouts are the dropouts? Why and how many are there? How is the data quality insured? Response rates? Reliability? Independent review of data? Compliance? 20

independent Are the independent (predictor) and dependent dependent (outcome) variables in the study clearly identified, defined, and Measured Measured ? 21

Do the authors explain or reference any unusual methods? statistical methods Are statistical methods specified in sufficient detail (If I had access to the raw data, could I reproduce the analysis)? 22

Is there a statement about sample size statistical power issues or statistical power ? multicenter study If a multicenter study, what quality assurance measures were employed to consistency obtain consistency across sites? 23

If a study involves human subjects, human tissues, or animals, was approval from appropriate institutional institutional or governmental entities obtained? 24

relate Do the results relate to research questions and the purpose of the study? Statistical tests answer Do Statistical tests answer the research question? 25

Are actual values reported Are actual values reported (Means, Standard Deviations, Frequencies, etc) and not just the results of statistical tests? 26

Are groups similar at baseline Are groups similar at baseline? If not, were appropriate adjustments made? Are informative and appropriate graphics graphics used to present results clearly ? 27

questions Are the questions posed in the study addressed adequately addressed? Are the conclusions justified by the data? Do the authors extrapolate beyond the data? Are shortcomings of the study addressed and constructive suggestions given for future research future research? 28

Do the citations follow one of the Council of Biological Editors Council of Biological Editors’ (CBE) standard formats? Several ‘dialects’ exist, but in general, can you find the cited paper or book? 29

Is the list of contributors reasonable? disclose financial Do authors disclose financial product relationships for product endorsement, consulting arrangements, etc? 30

31