201 529 5151 www.hydroqual.com SJR DO Depletion Modeling: Model Calibration, Adaptive Management, User Guidance Andy Thuman, P.E. (HydroQual) Laurie De.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Carbon Cycle 9 Carbon cycle is critically important to climate because it regulates the amount of CO 2 and CH 4 in the atmosphere. Carbon, like water,
Advertisements

Geographical Information System & Modelling LIFE02/ENV/P/
JSSBIO1Huttula Lecture Set Sediment transport models.
Introduction to the WASP Interface
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 The Utility of the Bays Eutrophication Model in the Harbor Outfall Monitoring Program James Fitzpatrick HydroQual,
Questions to answer What is the overall modeling approach (after calibration and background scenarios)? What are the WLA assumptions? How will Avista’s.
Development of DRAIN-WARMF Model to Simulate Water Flow & Nitrogen Transport From an Agricultural Watershed: “ Subsurface Flow Component” Shadi Dayyani.
Recent enhancements of the OTIS model to simulate multi-species reactive transport in stream-aquifer systems. Ryan T. Bailey 1 Department of Civil & Environmental.
The ChesROMS Community Model
Autochthonous Salt Deformation Integrated with Basin Modeling Example on a GulfSpan Dip Line.
WP12. Hindcast and scenario studies on coastal-shelf climate and ecosystem variability and change Why? (in addition to the call text) Need to relate “today’s”
About Estuarine Dynamics
Temperature and Flow Dynamics of the Klamath River Technical Memorandum 7 Leon Basdekas Mike Deas Watercourse Engineering, Inc nd Street, Suite B.
Effective Policy Based on Sparse Data TMDLs in the San Joaquin River Basin, California Leslie F. Grober.
Introduction to the WASP Interface. Watershed & Water Quality Modeling Technical Support Center Introduction to WASP Interface Input File Control Run.
Nam Songkhram model application and field work National consultation with TNMC 20th of April 2006, Bangkok MRCS WUP-FIN.
A T HREE- D IMENSIONAL W ATER Q UALITY M ODEL OF S OUTHERN P UGET S OUND Greg Pelletier, P.E., Mindy Roberts, P.E., Skip Albertson, P.E., and Jan Newton,
Virtual Weir Phase 5 Investigations (Preliminary Results) Canberra 29 September, 2009.
Oct-03Learning to Use FOFEM 5: Advanced Lesson Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management Learning to Use FOFEM 5 Volume II:
Neuse Estuary Eutrophication Model: Predictions of Water Quality Improvement By James D. Bowen UNC Charlotte.
Lower Cape Fear River Estuary Model Progress Report Jim Bowen, UNC Charlotte October 11, 2007 Charlotte, NC (via Centra)
Lesson 2 How To Create a MOHID Project 19 Março 2013
Water Quality Data, Maps, and Graphs Over the Web · Chemical concentrations in water, sediment, and aquatic organism tissues.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Model Upgrade Projects Blue Plains Regional Committee Briefing November 30, 2004 Presented by: Steve Bieber Metropolitan Washington.
Building a model step by step. MIKE 11 requires information on : Catchment data (Surface- root- and groundwater zones). River Network i.e. Branches; Nodes;
Draft Recommendations of the San Joaquin Water Quality Management Group Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron and DO Objectives Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron.
SJR DWSC DO Modeling HydroQual, Inc. Andy Thuman, P.E. Laurie De Rosa SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006.
SJR DO Depletion Modeling Progress Update Andy Thuman, P.E. (HydroQual) Laurie De Rosa (HydroQual) Russ Brown, Ph.D. (Jones.
Downscaling Future Climate Scenarios for the North Sea 2006 ROMS/TOMS Workshop, Alcalá de Henares, 6-8 November Bjørn Ådlandsvik Institute of Marine Research.
PROJECT OBJECTIVE To identify and evaluate a suite of management scenarios to address the Old Tampa Bay issues using integrated modeling tools.
Water Quality Modeling of Bonnet Carré Freshwater Flows in the Pontchartrain Estuary Rachel Roblin Alex McCorquodale Ioannis Georgiou.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
Review of DWSC Modeling- what should we do next? Russ Brown, Jones & Stokes DO-TMDL Technical Work Group May 16,2006.
 Instrumentation  CTD  Dissolved Oxygen Sensor  ADCP/ Current Meters  Oxygen Titrations  Nutrient Concentrations Circulation and Chemical Tracer.
Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Hydrodynamic, Water Quality, and Ecological Modeling to Assess System-wide Impacts.
NWQMC San Jose, CA May 8, 2006 Combining Dynamic Assessment with Traditional Monitoring Approaches to Improve Understanding of NPS Pollution Impacts William.
Applying WARMF to the SJR Replaces DSM2 from Bear Creek to Mossdale Replaces DSM2 from Bear Creek to Mossdale Offers expanded model domain, including tributaries.
Development of the Neuse Estuary Eutrophication Model: Background and Calibration By James D. Bowen UNC Charlotte.
Bradshaw Model. Upstream Downstream Discharge Occupied channel width Channel depth Average velocity Load quantity Load particle size Channel bed roughness.
HEC-RAS Version 3.1 Overview
Flux of mass in (kg/s) = Flux of mass out (kg/s) = Net Flux of mass in ‘x’ = Net Flux of mass in ‘y’ = Net Flux of mass in ‘z’ =, u, w, v Mass per volume.
Development, Testing and Application of the Multi-Block LTFATE Hydrodynamic and Sediment Transport Model Earl J. Hayter See instructions for customizing.
Page 1 CONSULTANCY AND RESEARCH IN AQUACULTURE AND THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT A Company in the NIVA-group Modelling of environmental impact of aquaculture.
Focus Group Meeting: November 12, 2013 Truckee River Water Quality Standards Review.
1 INTRODUCTION TO “Stratigrafia” The code in the workbook “stratigrafia” computes - longitudinal profiles; - water surface elevation; - sediment transport.
Regional Hydro-Ecologic Simulation System (RHESSys) Christina Tague Bren School of environmental science and management University of California, Santa.
San Joaquin River Water Quality Modeling- A Beginning SJR-DO TMDL Technical Work Group Presentation Russ Brown- Jones & Stokes January 20, 2005.
Technical Support in Engineering Construction Phase of Craney Island Eastward Expansion Mac Sisson, Harry Wang, Jian Shen, Albert Kuo, and Wenping Gong.
Atmosphere-ocean interactions Exchange of energy between oceans & atmosphere affects character of each In oceans –Atmospheric processes alter salinity.
Modeling phytoplankton seasonal variation and nutrients budget of a Semi-Arid region ecosystem in the Southern Mediterranean Sea: -Case of the Bizerte.
What is the Bradshaw model?
Sources of Oxygen Demand in the Lower San Joaquin River, California
Development of a HAB Model for the James River Estuary
DHI Water and Environment
Light and Primary Production in Shallow, Turbid Tributaries
Dave Clark and Michael Kasch
AQUATOX v. 3.1 Host Institution/URL
San Luis Drain Shutoff Simulations and Link-Node Recalibration
Elizabeth River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Denitrification in an Urban Tidal Freshwater Wetland of the Delaware
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
James River PCB TMDL Study: Numerical Modeling Approach
Beta Release of Delta Channel Depletion Model (DCD v1
EC Workshop on European Water Scenarios Brussels 30 June 2003
Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation
SJR Technical Working Group March 25, 2004
Environmental Time Functions & Segment Parameters
Introduction to the WASP Interface
Validation of Trading Program: Scenario Simulations
Presentation transcript:

SJR DO Depletion Modeling: Model Calibration, Adaptive Management, User Guidance Andy Thuman, P.E. (HydroQual) Laurie De Rosa (HydroQual) SJR Technical Working Group May 16, 2006

2 2 Water Quality Modeling  Adaptive Management Strategy Simulations oDissolved Oxygen Unit Responses oStockton RWCF Ammonia, Algae, Upstream Carbon, SOD oVariable Flows & Stockton RWCF Nitrification oO 2 Injection oMud Slough Flow Reduction  User Guidance oGIS Based Post Processor for Users oWeb Viewer oECOM, RCA Structure

3 3 DO Unit Response, Stockton RWCF Ammonia  Base Model Simulation  RWCF Ammonia Discharge Conc = 0 with base 2001 flow

4 4 DO Unit Response, Stockton RWCF Ammonia  Summer Avg Q=900 cfs in 2000, 600 cfs in 2001  Higher summer ammonia discharge conc in 2001  About 1mg/L difference in DO in 2001

5 5 DO Unit Response, No Algal Processes  Growth, death, grazing, settling = 0  Algal processes provide a net oxygen source of up to 1.0 mg/L

6 6 DO Unit Response, Upstream Non-Algal Carbon  Upstream DOC & NA POC=0 Vs base DOC = 3.0 mg/L, NA POC <1.0 mg/L  Non-Algal Carbon Adds up to 2.5 mg/L DO Deficit in summer

7 7 Summer DO Deficit Contributions  DO Deficit contributions: oNet chl-a -1mg/L oStockton RWCF < 1 mg/L oUS nonalgal carbon 2.5 mg/L oSOD < 1 mg/L

8 8 Simulations for DWSC Flows of 250, 750, 1,250, 1,500 & 1,750 cfs  Five Summer Flow Scenarios were run from June 1 to Sept 30 o250 to 1,250 cfs simulate varying diversions to the Old River based on summer 2001 average 1,400 cfs flow at Vernalis and approx 85% of SJR flow into DWSC at RRI split o1,500 & 1,750 cfs simulations increased flow at Vernalis to 2,100 cfs, adjusted boundary concentrations  Comparative Base Model is Summer 2001 with average flow of 425 cfs June to September  Five Flow Scenarios were run with the Stockton RWCF 2001 flows and concentrations and RWCF ammonia discharge concentrations = 2.0 mg/L

9 9 SJR DWSC Model Base & Five Simulated Flow Scenarios Near Sample location R3

10 Relationship of Summer Chl-a, Carbon & TSS to Flow at Vernalis for 1,500 and 1,750 cfs Scenarios  Chl-a adjusted in proportion to USJR average inflow concentrations  TSS=TSS + 20% TSS  DOC=3.0 mg/L, POC=0.5-Algal C Data: Data Atlas, Dahlgren, 2004, Kratzer, et al., 2004

11 Relationship of Summer Nutrients to Flow at Vernalis for 1,500 and 1,750 cfs Scenarios  Ammonia and DON about the same  Nitrite+Nitrate decrease at higher flows  Changes won’t effect algal growth-still enough nutrients  Phosphorus levels about the same-not shown Data: Data Atlas, Dahlgren, 2004, Kratzer, et al., 2004

12 Variable Flow Scenarios-TSS  As flows increase there is an approximate 28% increase in load to the DWSC for each 500 cfs increase: o Receiving Vol = 4.4MCM o Incremental Load: 1 mg/L*500cfs=1,200kg/d o Conc change for 1 mg/L: 1,200kg/d / 4.4MCM =0.28mg/L-d  TSS moves downstream at higher flows-less time for settling

13 Variable Flow Scenarios-Chl-a  750 & 1,250 cfs: Chl-a increases at R3 due to increased load  1,500 & 1,750 cfs: Chl-a load increase is offset by decreased chl-a at Vernalis and less time for algal processes at higher flows

14 Variable Flow Scenarios-DIN  Peak concentration from Stockton RWCF ammonia is reduced

15 Variable Flow Scenarios-DO  DO at R3 increases with increased flow due to higher USJR DO  Max DO Deficit moves downstream at higher flows  Less DO violations at higher flows

16 Number of DO Violations at Variable Flows  Base Model & 250 cfs-DO violations occur almost daily from June 1 to Sept 30, R3 to R7  As flows increase, # violations decrease, R3 to R6 but increase at R7 & R8  Violations tend to be closer to 5 or 6 mg/L at higher flows

17 Variable Flow Scenarios & Stockton RWCF Nitrification  Ammonia Discharge = 2.0 mg/L  NH 3 reduced from maximums of 0.75 mg/L to 0.1mg/L  Still enough DIN to have no effect on algal growth so DO difference is due to nitrification

18 Variable Flow Scenarios & Stockton RWCF Nitrification  Compared to simulations without nitrification there is little additional improvement in DO except at low flows

19 Number of DO Violations, Variable Flows With & Without Stockton RWCF Nitrification  Number of DO violations are somewhat reduced with Stockton RWCF NH 3 =2 mg/L

20 Impact of 10,000 lb/d O 2 Injection in the DWSC near Rough & Ready Island-June 1 to Sept 30  O 2 Injection greatest benefit is at R5 to R7 at 425 cfs  Greatest benefit might be to maintain flows above 750 cfs coupled with O 2 injection

21 Upstream SJR – Study Area for 1D DSM2 Model SJR at Stevinson, Salt & Mud Sloughs, Merced, Orestimba, Tuolumne & Stanislaus Drains (SLD), diversions, creeks, Modesto WWTP, groundwater & “add-water”

22 50% Reduction in Mud Slough Flow  Average Mud Sl. Q of 130 cfs is 4% of final average Vernalis Q  Mud Sl. summer NO 3 =15 mg/L, Chl-a=40 ug/L, TSS=55 mg/L  Mass balance US of Merced R. results in 1 mg/L reduction in TSS so no change in algal growth due to light regime change  Model results show no water quality impact at Vernalis DSM2 US of Merced R.DSM2 at Vernalis

23 Adaptive Management Summary  DWSC DO Deficit contributions: US nonalgal carbon 2.5 mg/L, SOD & Stockton RWCF NH 3 < 1mg/L, net chl-a –1 mg/L  Less DO violations at greater than 1,250 cfs DWSC flow  Regulating Old River Barrier to increase flow to the DWSC in the summer could improve DO  As flow increases maximm DO deficit moves downstream  Stockton RWCF nitrification will help DO somewhat  O 2 Injection will increase DO between R4 and R7, less at R3 & R8  50% Reduction of Mud Slough Flow to SJR will not improve SJR water quality at Vernalis

24 Additional Recommendations  Combination of increased DWSC flow and DO Injection would provide best improvement to DO in the DWSC  Lower flow scenarios – need data at lower flows for upstream boundaries  Use new upstream data/model results to drive boundary at Vernalis

25 Viewing RCA Output  Web based viewer can be linked to the SJR DO TMDL Website ohttp://  HydroQual Integrated Modeling System Viewer (HIMSv) for user oStand-alone executable program that displays HydroQual model results in a GIS environment oPlan view, time series & vertical slices with animation

26 3D Model Space (168 rows, 15 cols)

27 Model Folder Structure  HYDRO  Codes/Executable  Inputs – Base & Projections  Outputs – necessary files for RCA (Base Only, to large for all)  QUAL  Codes/Executable  Inputs – Base & Projections for BCs, PSs, parameters/constants, ICs  Outputs-Base only  HIMS-V – GIS Post Processor  RCA Output, shapefile, executable  ECOMSED, RCA, HIMS-V Users Manuals

28 ECOMSED/RCA Modeling Framework Transport Module Processes: Advection Dispersion Products Water Column Conc. Sediment Conc Water Quality Model RCA Processes DO, Algal, Carbon Sediment, TSS, nutrients: Hydrodynamic Model ECOM Processes: Water Movement Physics Temperature/Salinity Conservative Substances Particle Tracking Forcing Functions Tides Winds Rivers Products Water Levels Currents, Mixing Temperature/Salinity Conservative Substances

29  Surface Forcing Wind Stresses (Speed and Direction) Atmospheric Pressure Heat Fluxes  Lateral Boundary Tributary Inflows (Rivers, CSO, WWTP) Temperature and Salinity Sea Surface Levels (Tides, Low Frequency WL) Hydrodynamic Data Requirements

30 Input Files  ECOMSED executable codes o run_data o model_grid  Optional: o init_tands: spatially varying IC* o bfric2d.inp* o restart: for hot start*

31 ECOMSED outputs  For post processing: o gcmprt: standard output (ASCII) o gcmtsr: time series data at selected locations o gcmplt: grid-wide hydrodynamic information  For water quality modeling: o gcm_tran: hydrodynamic info o gcm_geom: geometric info (grid size, depth…) o wet_grid: active grid cell info o gcm_qdiff: CSO/SW/STP flows

32 RCA Model Input Structure  Main input file – contains general information for RCA run o Run/print options o Model systems o Integration type, time step, run length o Names of hydrodynamic transport files o Names of input files  Calls other input files-ECOM, PS, BC, IC, Constants

33 RCA Input Files  ECOMSED files needed o gcm_geom – model segment geometry info (DX, DY, land mask, etc) o wet_grid – water segments in grid o gcm_tran – flow, dispersion, volume info o gcm_qdiff – flow from diffuser inputs  Transport files are developed in 30-day periods for the full 2-yr model calibration /validation period

34 RCA Input Files  rca.inp – main input file  bcinp.a – time-variable BC file  psinp.a – time-variable PS file  pcinp.a – parameters/constants file  icinp.1 – IC file  sedinp.1 – sediment model input file  RCAFIC, RCAFICSED-Initial conditions for hot start

35 RCA Main Input File

36 RCA Main Input File

37 RCA BC input file

38 RCA PS input file

39 RCA PC input file

40 RCA PC input file

41 RCA IC input file

42 RCA Sediment input file

43 Running RCA Model  Models are compiled with Fortran77 to run on any PC  Most input files are created from stand alone Fortran programs that read data and format to RCA input structure  Once created they can be edited with a text editor (Notepad, GVIM) for minor edits or to view inputs

44 Running RCA Model  Create script so that required inputs and executable are linked or copied to run folder  Open DOS or CYGWIN window  Move to run folder  2-year calibr/valid period ~18 hours on mainframe

45 RCA Binary Output Files  RCAF10 – model info & global print times  RCAF11 – global output at all segments  RCAF12 – detailed dump print times  RCAF13 – detailed output at specific segments plus additional model output  RCAF14 – sediment global output  RCAFIC & RCAFICSED – water column & sediment IC (end of run for hotstart)

46 Viewing RCA Output  Takes a little time for output processing  Requires a number of programs: o GDPME – HQI in-house data processing and graphics program (reads RCA binary output files) o Requires Ghostscript and Ghostview for viewing Postscript files created by GDPME  RCA binary output files: RCAF*

47 Viewing RCA Output  HydroQual Integrated Modeling System Viewer (HIMSv) for user oStand-alone executable program that displays HydroQual model resultsint GIS environment oPlan view, time series & vertical slices with animation  Web based viewer can be loaded to the SJR DO TMDL Website ohttp://

48 Questions & Answers Contact info: Andy Thuman Laurie DeRosa HydroQual, Inc. Mahwah, NJ (201) x7184

49 Downstream – Study Area