DS2 - Faculty Preparation Overview of UGA Policies and Procedures in complying with OMB Circular A-21.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Sponsored Projects Administration COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS.
Advertisements

Office of Management & Budget
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
Basic Understanding of A-21, CASB, and DS2
The University of Texas at Arlington Office of Research and Office of Accounting and Business Services Brown Bag Training Session Two: Indirect Costs.
MARCH 26,2013 PRE-AWARD MATTERS THAT AFFECT POST-AWARD COMPLIANCE MODULE SERIES 3, SESSION III AAPLS (APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES)
Documentation, Cash & In-Kind Match. Session Objectives Gather information on proper documentation Allowable, allocable & reasonable costs Gain knowledge.
Sponsored Programs How to Budget. BUDGETING BASIC CONSIDERATIONS  Benefit the Project  Allowable Costs  Total Cost Concept  Direct Costs  Indirect.
Cost Sharing Date Presenter Name Presenter Phone Number Presenter .
Effort Report Certification 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 COST SHARING.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Effort Certification and.
Effort Reporting What is it and how is Effort determined? Presented by Sponsored Programs Accounting.
Principal Investigator Effort Training Created 07/2010 by Sponsored Projects Administration.
Overview of Labor Distribution, Certification Reporting and Management Reports Presented by: HRS/Payroll Staff January 7, 2009 Professional Development.
Cost Accounting Standards -Policies and Procedures-
Financial Policies Training: Effort Reporting on Sponsored Projects (2.1.21) Effective Date: July 1, 2009.
Cost Accounting Standards -Policies and Procedures-
Project Management: Post Award Policies, Procedures and Guidelines A Tutorial for New Principal Investigators.
Staff Timesheets 2014 Project Director Training & Annual Meeting1.
Effort Certification Reporting System (ECRS) University of North Texas Health Science Center.
Instructions for VCU’s Internal Approval Form Form is required to obtain Authorized Official’s signature on proposals and awards OSP – 8/2006.
What You Really, Really Need to Know About Effort Certification Office of Research & Sponsored Programs.
Presented by Melissa Cope Manager of Financial Accounting BAS Forum June 9, 2010.
1 COST SHARING CReATE ver. 04/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved Objective: To understand the requirements related to cost sharing.
Personnel Activity Reports The why, who, where and how of PARs.
Financial Management How Can I Spend Award Dollars.
EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF GRANTS AND CONTRACTS Effort Reporting System Departmental Coordinator Training Updated 01/11/2012.
ECERT Electronic Certification of Effort and Reporting Tool Presented by Donna Smith and OPAFS.
Indiana University East March 10, 2009 Teresa Miller, Manager Office of Research Administration – Grant Services.
Segregation of Duties– Sponsored Programs APM
“Grants Boot Camp” Workshop Series January 9, 2014 Creighton University Sponsored Programs Administration 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE  Phone:
Hartford Hospital Research Institute Time and Effort Reporting Prepared By: HHC Office of Compliance, Audit and Privacy Angelo Quaresima, Research Compliance.
Effort Reporting: Back to the Basics NCURA FRA 2013 New Orleans Patrick Fitzgerald Associate Dean for Research Administration Harvard University Faculty.
HSC and Main Campus Presentation December 4 & 5, 2012 Financial Services Center.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrators Forum May 2002.
The Management of Service centers NCURA REGIONS VI and VII CONFERENCE April 7, 2009.
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY IN TITLE III AND OTHER SPONSORED PROGRAMS AND GRANTS ADMINISTRATION Presented by Sharon S. Crews, M.Ac., CPA Vice President for Administrative.
Time with Office of Sponsored Programs April 4, 2011 Topic: Cost Share.
Task Force on Federal Grant and Contract Compliance: Implementation Activities Dr. Jack Finney and Dr. Bill Knocke.
FY2008 Service Center Billing Rate Proposal Training Dates:Monday, February 26, 2007 Friday, March 2, 2007 Presented by: Rick Keller, Director – Cost Accounting.
Managing Your Grant Award August 23, 2012 Janet Stoeckert Director, Research Administration Sr. Administrator, Basic Sciences Keck School of Medicine 1.
10/13/20151 What You Really, Really Need to Know About Effort Certification University of Massachusetts Dartmouth Office of Research Administration.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Cost Policy Training Sponsored Project Training Program April 30, 2012 Beverly Blakeney & Jennifer Gagnon April 30, 2012Sponsored Project Training Program1.
Kansas State University – Sponsored Programs Accounting Last updated March 2015.
New NSF Awardee Checklist Requirements: WHY? November 19, 2014 joyce y. JOHNSON POST-AWARDS COORDINATOR OFFICE OF SPONSORED PROGRAMS.
Overview of Labor Distribution, Certification Reporting and Management Reports Presented by: HRS/Payroll Staff January 8, 2010 Professional Development.
Cost Sharing James Trotter Quality Standards Manager Sponsored Projects Administration.
The Basics of the Effort Certification and Reporting Technology (ECRT) System.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Cost Sharing The Double Edge Sword 1 Dennis J. Paffrath – University of Maryland, Baltimore Executive Director, Sponsored Programs Administration
“Surviving an Audit” Al Willie, Office of Internal Audit
Star Course #8 Part B Financial Management. Topics I. Effort Reporting II. Cost Sharing/Project Contribution Reports III. Award Close Process.
First Year Assistant Professor Grants Workshop EFFORT REPORTING May 7, 2015 Kaytee Fletcher, SRA.
Carilion Clinic, Office of Sponsored Projects Frequently Asked Questions Pre-Award Procedures For Principal Investigators.
1 Effort Reporting APM Effort Verification Reports Missouri University of Science and Technology January 29, 2009.
Prepared by the Office of Grants and Contracts1 INDIRECTS vs. REDIRECTS.
 What is a Salary Transfer? Why do we do them?  What are best practices?  What makes a good justification?  Resources.
Main Campus Presentation December 5, 2012 Financial Services Center.
1 Service Center FY2006 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation.
UGA Restricted Account Management and Closeout May 10th, 2007.
EFFORT CERTIFICATION AND THE PERSONNEL ACTIVITY REPORT WHY AND HOW.
FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation (Part I)
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Effort Certification and Cost Sharing
EFFORT REPORTING TRAINING
Uniform Guidance and Grants Accounting
University of Pittsburgh
Presentation transcript:

DS2 - Faculty Preparation Overview of UGA Policies and Procedures in complying with OMB Circular A-21

DS2 - General Information Disclosure Web Site: All Policies and Procedures related to the University Disclosure Statement may be found under the Disclosure Policies and Disclosure Procedure links Policies are effective January 1, 2006 Substantial Changes must be approved by our Cognizant Federal Agency

DS2 - Meeting Agenda What is a DS2? How was the UGA DS2 developed? Policy and Procedures - overview Additional References Conclusion Questions

What is a DS2? Documents and discloses University cost accounting practices Required to be submitted to cognizant agency and cognizant audit agency. Policies and procedures, instructions, and guidelines for individual investigators, department heads, and administrators need to be made available because it is their responsibility to understand and know them. Provides Guidelines for “charging costs to sponsored awards” Defines University direct costing policies and procedures Cost-sharing policies Time and effort reporting policies and procedures Policies on “Service Centers”

DS2 – How was it Developed Three working group committees were formed comprised of College and Departmental Business Managers and Faculty representatives Steering Committee comprised of Associate/Assistant Deans, Department Head, and Center Director representatives

DS2 - Policies New Policies – Cost Transfer – Program Income – Service Center Existing Policies – Revised – Cost Share – Direct Cost – Personnel Activity Report

DS2 – New Policies Cost Transfers Cost Transfer – movement of expense(s) between two different university account numbers Charges should be moved within 90 days of initial charge Charges moved after 90 days require PI signature All transfers must have adequate explanation/justification No transfers allowed to a restricted account if expense is more than a year old

DS2 – New Policies Cost Transfers Appropriate Justification Includes: – When the error, or need for a transfer was discovered – What the charge was for – Why the charge was identified with a different project originally – How the charge relates to the project that it is being transferred to

DS2 – New Policies Cost Transfers Conditions for not Allowing Cost Transfers – No benefit to the project can be demonstrated – Cost overruns are being transferred to an account with budget available – Charges are being “parked” on one account with the intention of being moved to another

DS2 – New Policies Program Income Program Income is gross income earned by the recipient that is directly generated by a supported activity or earned as a result of the award. Principal Investigator must: – Identify potential sources at proposal stage, note on transmittal and application – Plan for use, prepare budget for program income accounts – Verify program income on reports – Address account balance issues at project termination

DS2 – New Policies Program Income Federal Sponsors – Use program income funds before sponsor funds. – If funds remain in the project or program income account after the project has terminated, balances will revert to sponsor. – If the PI wishes to retain these funds, he or she must write a letter to the sponsor requesting to use these funds, and outlining a plan for their use. – Letter must be sent to OSP for endorsement and forwarding to the sponsors for approval. Non-Federal Sponsors – In many cases, the sponsor does not have an established program income policy. If the sponsor is silent on this issue, the income is not reportable and is handled as a departmental sale or recharge activity.

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Cost Share The policy of the University of Georgia is to limit its cost sharing on externally funded projects to the amount specifically mandated in the application guidelines of the sponsor. The University of Georgia will support committed cost share that is either voluntary or mandatory by the sponsor when :

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Cost Share All cost shared amounts are specified on the Office of Sponsored Programs Transmittal Form, and Each cost shared amount is approved on the OSP Transmittal Form by the relevant dean, director, or department head. Approval signatures are binding and indicate a willingness to provide cost share resources in support of the proposed project.

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Cost Share Example of committed cost sharing and how it should be tracked: PI stated in proposal narrative that they would spend 10% of their time on project. PI’s monthly academic salary is $7,000. Cost Share Not TrackedCost Share Tracked (PAR not issued)(PAR required) Type of Account Percent EffortSalary Percent EffortSalary Instruction (1011GH) - state25%1,75025%1,750 Dept. research (1025GR) - state75%5,25065%4,550 Cost Share (1021CR) - state 10% %7,000100%7,000

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Cost Share Alternative: PI stated in proposal narrative that they would spend 10% of their time on project and asks sponsor to fund this effort. PI’s monthly academic salary is $7,000. PAR not issuedPAR required Type of Account Percent EffortSalary Percent EffortSalary Instruction (1011GH) - state25%1,75025%1,750 Dept. research (1025GR) - state75%5,25065%4,550 Sponsored research (1021RR) - grant 10% %7,000100%7,000

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Cost Share Cautionary Notes – Cost share commitments can be stated in several places within a proposal. – When faculty time is contributed as cost share in support of a project, it is expected that budgeted research time be utilized for cost share before instructional time is considered. Whenever cost share involves instructional time, the faculty member's department head and/or dean must be notified so that approval can be obtained. – In all instances where cost sharing is described, the institution is committed to account for these expenditures. The budgetary unit of record is responsible for documenting and tracking all commitments made on a project, whether made by that department or not, unless subaccounts are established so that the responsibility can flow down to other units.

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Cost Share Principal Investigator: – Carefully consider cost share before including in proposal – Identify source of cost share funds and ensure they are not federal (unless authorized by statute) – Monitor budget and expenditures on cost share account – Ensure accuracy of cost sharing/matching

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Direct Cost Policy Major Changes – More specific in order to address consistency – Determination factors defined: Allowable, Allocable, Reasonable – Determination Strategy – Treatment of direct and facilities and administrative (indirect) costs – Unallowable Costs

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Direct Cost Policy Principal Investigator – Development of proposal budget, and financial management of project, consistent with UGA’s Direct Cost Policy & Procedures – Allocation of costs to benefiting projects – Review of project budgets and actual costs to ensure timely correction of any errors

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Direct Cost Policy Examples of Problematic Costs: – Administrative and Clerical Costs – Cell phones – Routine Postage – Individual Professional Memberships – General Office Supplies and Equipment Printer Toner, Copy Paper Computers (unless scientifically justified) PDAs/Blackberries – Submission of technical/final reports

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Direct Cost Policy Example of appropriate use of different funds: 1011GH – Instruction salaries & materials 1025GR – Dept. or general research salaries & materials 1011GJ – Dept. admin. salaries, general office supplies, paper, basic telephone, routine postage, computers 102xAR – Same as GJ, but another funding source or use to supplement research costs 1021RR – Organized research salaries & materials -- charges that directly benefit aim of project

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Direct Cost Policy Major Projects and Exceptions: -Modular Grants rarely qualify for major project status. -To qualify for a Major Project you must apply - Large, complex programs, such as general clinical research centers, primate centers, program projects, and projects requiring managing teams of investigators from other institutions. Projects which involve extensive data accumulation, analysis and entry, surveying, tabulation cataloging, searching literature, and reporting, such as epidemiological studies, clinical trials, and retrospective clinical records studies. Projects that require making travel and meeting arrangements for large numbers of participants, e.g. conferences or seminars.

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Direct Cost Policy Major Projects and Exceptions (Continued) – Projects where the principal focus is the preparation and production of manuals and large reports, books and monographs – Projects that are geographically inaccessible to normal departmental administrative services, such as seagoing research vessels, radio astronomy projects, and other research field sites that are remote from the campus – Individual projects requiring project-specific database management; individualized graphics or manuscript presentation; human or animal protocol; IRB; or multi-faceted coordination. – Extraordinary and extensive administrative support, significantly greater than the routine level provided by academic department staff may be budgeted and charged to sponsored projects including research data gathering, computer programming, research training,developing materials for presentations, etc...

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Personnel Activity Reports (PARs) OMB Circular A-21 (Section J.10) contains requirements for procedures and documentation to support the distribution of salaries and wages charged directly to an award or through Facilities and Administrative (indirect) activities. The employee’s salary must follow consistently applied institutional policies regarding compensation and be allocated through an official payroll system that ties with the financial records of the institution.

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Personnel Activity Reports (PARs) The payroll distribution must reasonably reflect the activity for which the employee is compensated. The method must recognize the principle of after-the-fact confirmation so that costs distributed represent actual costs. The main objective of A-21 is verification that compensation charged is appropriate to the activity performed.

DS2 – Existing Policies-Revised Personnel Activity Reports (PARs) Our verification method is in the form of Personnel Activity Reports (PARs). PARs are used to confirm that the distribution of activity represents a reasonable estimate of the work performed by the employee during the period. University wide, only 5% of PARs are adjusted. For the majority of employees, the review and certification of a PAR is not a burdensome task.

Personnel Activity Reports (PARs) Who receives a PAR? In any of the following situations an employee will receive a PAR: 1. A portion of their salary charged directly to restricted accounts or cost sharing accounts. 2. A portion of their salary charged to a major function and an indirect cost activity. 3. A portion of their salary charged to more than one indirect cost activity.

Personnel Activity Reports (PARs) How do I verify and submit a PAR? A PAR will be generated for each pay period for which an employee is paid. To confirm that the distribution of activity represents a reasonable estimate of the work performed by the employee during the period, each PAR must be reviewed for accuracy and approved by the employee or by a responsible official having first-hand knowledge of the work performed.

Personnel Activity Reports (PARs) How do I verify and submit an e-PAR? When PARs are generated, an notification will be sent to employee’s registered address and to their home departmental administrator. The electronic PAR system can be accessed at You will log on to the electronic PAR system using your MyID and password.

Personnel Activity Reports (PARs) How do I verify and submit an e-PAR? If the PAR reflects accurately the time expended on a project tracked by a University account number, you will check the “Check here to return this PAR without any changes” check box. Next, you will click the “Save and Submit” button to transmit the approved document to the Accounting Department.

Personnel Activity Reports (PARs) How do I verify and submit an e-PAR? In those situations where the “current distribution” does not reflect the time actually expended on a project for the period covered by the PAR, your department administrator should be notified of the necessary changes. Your department administrator will be able to enter the changes and submit the revised PAR to the Accounting Department.

DS2 – New Policies Service Centers A departmental sales unit established for the purpose of providing goods and services to university departments, and only incidentally to customers outside the university. Service centers offer goods and services that are unique, benefit the effectiveness of the University when conveniently available, may require special controls, are subject to federal and/or state regulations, or are not readily available from external sources. Service Centers that generate revenues greater than $100,000 per year need to prepare business plan.

DS2 – New Policies Service Centers Billing Rates Departments are responsible for the development and review of Service Center billing rates. The billing rate should be calculated to break even at the end of a fiscal year (accounting period). The billing rate should only include costs to be recovered (no profit margins). The same billing rate must be used to charge all UGA accounts (internal customers).

DS2 - Policy Summary Effective January 1, 2006 Cost Transfers (JV’s) Must be performed within 90 days of charge. Otherwise will require PI signature Must have adequate explanation/justification No transfers to a restricted account more than a year old Program Income Used before sponsored funds or must have approved authorization Must have approval from sponsor for UGA to retain any funds Cost-Share Try to limit and specify on Sponsored Program Transmittal Form

DS2 - Policy Summary Direct Cost Can not routinely charge cell phones, routine postage, membership dues, general office supplies and equipment to sponsored awards (exceptions may be granted by justification through Sponsored Programs. General Federal Funded Research projects seldom qualify for such an exception) PAR’s Electronic PAR’s will be implemented by July 1, 2006 Everyone will be able to certify with no changes Departmental administrators will be only ones that can make changes Service Centers Departments must develop billing rates Must break-even (no profit) Must charge same rate to all UGA customers

DS2 – Additional Training Faculty Preparation Course will be offered at Training and Development on an ongoing basis. Business Manager, Departmental Administrators and Office Manager training will be offered either on request and/or at Training and Development (Six Courses lasting approx. two hours per course).

DS2-Faculty Presentation Questions???