Redeveloping Saint Michael’s Drive in Santa Fe, NM Nghia Hoang Kristen Leigher John Mulhern Xiying Zhang and the City of Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Module 2: Bioretention Area Siting and Design Andy Rowe, PE, LEED AP, QSD Cannon.

Advertisements

Presentation Outline What is a Healthy Neighborhood? Planning Trends and Impacts on Health Planning Tools for Healthy Communities.

Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.

Riding a Bike for Transport 2011 Survey Findings.

Walnut Creek Pedestrian Master Plan Summary of results of April–May 2014 online survey June 9, 2014 E ISEN |L ETUNIC.

The Downtown Area NOW: Demographics confirm: Opa-locka’s population is aging, becoming poorer. It means disastrous fiscal consequences for the city if.

February 6, 2008 Phase 2: Achieving our Visions of 2050 In cooperation with:

Assessing Walkability in College Park: A Six Week GIS Internship Investigation Sarah Bender, Xavier Benjamin, Quentin Davis, Iko Esemoto, Albert Jiang,

 Awarded Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) Grant for integrated land use and transportation planning efforts ( )  Consultant.

Dowling Associates, Inc. Combining Pedestrian Plans & ADA Transition Plans Combining Pedestrian Plans and ADA Transition Plans Gail Payne Dowling Associates,

San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit Oriented Development Plan ABAG/MTC/ULI Workshop September 29, 2006.

MapABILITY.ca. Interactive Map Engage Platform Accessibility Search Engine Custom Route Generator Information from users (Crowd- Sourcing) Information.

Residential Streets Overall Residential Street Image Residential Streets - Planting Strips Residential Streets - Sidewalk Width Next, participants assessed.

Slide 1. Slide 2 Introduction How did you get to school as a child?

How Walkable and Bike-able Is UCLA ? Multi-Modal Level Of Service Analysis in the UCLA Campus HYERAN LEE CLASS OF 2014 MASTER OF URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING.

Midtown Alliance Capital Improvements Program

Clinton Street Bridge over the Maumee River ODOT Project DEF April 1, 2015 Stakeholder’s Meeting.

Redeveloping Saint Michael’s Drive in Santa Fe, NM Nghia Hoang Kristen Leigher John Mulhern Xiying Zhang and the City of Santa Fe.

Accessible Mt. Baker Integrated Multimodal Plan Seattle Planning Commission Michael James, SDOT January 8, 2015.

Plan Purpose:  To provide pedestrian environments that are safe, attractive, and accessible to community institutions, employment and retail services.

VISION FOR A KEARNY TOD February 27, 2008 Rob Lane Regional Plan Association.

Going Grey in Mississauga Evaluating the Older Adult Plan using Quality of Life as a Measure of Success.

Town Core Streetscape and Accessibility Design Study  Elabd Architectural Illustration  Kathleen Ryan, Landscape Architect, ASLA Questions for Milton.

Fundamental Methods for Building More Walkable Communities Mark Fenton Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center University of North Carolina.

1 City of Rapid City and Rapid City Community Planning RAPID CITY BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN in collaboration with: Kadrmas, Lee and Jackson RDG.

Mission Statement To develop a vision of how we, the citizens of Folly, want Center Street to be transformed into the “Gateway to our city.” Then deliver.

Neighborhood Walkability and Bikeability Andrew Rundle, Dr.P.H. Associate Professor of Epidemiology Mailman School of Public Health Columbia University.

Revitalizing Saint Michael’s Drive in Santa Fe, NM Nghia Hoang Kristen Leigher John Mulhern Xiying Zhang.

1 ACCESS to QUALITY CULTURAL, RECREATIONAL, EDUCATIONAL and LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES Collaboratively encourages and supports opportunities to focus on the.

George Street ETRO Visitor Research Quarter 1 Findings September to November 2014 Key Findings Presentation December 2014.

Virginia Street Bus RAPID Transit Extension Presentation to RTC July 17, 2015 Project Purpose Extend RAPID to UNR Improve pedestrian safety & access Create.

Southern Nevada Strong Consortium Committee Meeting April 18, 2013.

August 2004 Hickory by Choice Linking Land Use and Air Quality Planning.

Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency Kamm’s Corners Development Corporation.

Multimodal Corridor Plan BCC Discussion Item Transportation Planning Division August 19, 2014.

Public Comment Mobility Vision Plan 2035 MVP Website 2035 MVP Brochure and Survey. Provides specific information on the Plan Update. Survey – your opinion.

AUSTIN STRATEGIC MOBILITY PLAN

JAMESBURG, NEW JERSEY Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy.

Design Regina Land Use and Transportation This Citizen Circle is represented by John Klein (AKA Saskboy) of the Regina Car Share Co-operative.

The Platinum Triangle Anaheim, Ca Michael Sahimi – Kevin MacDougall – Katy Escobar.

1 Item 12: Report on Draft Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan for the National Capital Region Michael Farrell TPB Staff Presentation to the Transportation Planning.

9 TH STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN Corvallis Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) Ali Bonakdar.

On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.

Outdoor Learning Area School Parking School Playground Existing Recreation. Facilities School Parking Neighborhood Tree Buffer Basketball Courts Abandoned.

TDM and Health Melinda Norris Project Manager - Walkabout October

City of Palm Coast EAR Public Input Process Update Prepared for the Palm Coast City Council By The FCRC Consensus Center November 24, 2009 Update Prepared.

ST. LOUIS STREETCAR. St. Louis Streetcar Goals and Objectives Increase population and employment in the corridors Increase.

ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION Saint John. ATSJ VISION A City that supports a high quality of life where calm and friendly streets encourage the connection between.

Using Planning and Zoning to Promote Healthy Living.

Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Assessment Tool. Background Pedestrian Safety Impact Statement requested by Citizens’ Advisory Committee January 2010 Intended/Potential.

Complete Streets Training

Urban Land Use Chapter Major Land Uses 1. Residential (40%) 2. Transportation (33%) 3. Commercial (5%) 4. Industrial (6%) 5. Institutional and Public.

University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County Potential Neighborhood Development Strategies 158 acres Close.

Union Park District Council Ayd Mill Road Task Force St. Paul Capital Improvement Budget Proposal

CPPJ Meeting January 27, 2014 Project Team. Lake Charles MPO - Calcasieu Parish Chapters: 1.Introduction and Transportation Planning Process 2.Regional.

Martin J. Walsh Mayor Michael Dennehy Commissioner Public Hearing January 20, 2015.

Urban Design and Livability Bruce Monighan AIA Urban Design Manager, City of Sacramento City of Sacramento Planning Academy March 16, 2016.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity through Comprehensive Planning Dream San Marcos - Citizen Advisory and Steering Committee Joint Meeting June 13, 2012.

Elliot Road Extension design critique and recommendations Petition to the Town of Chapel Hill Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Board March 25, 2014 Geoffrey.

University Drive Road Diet September 8, Goals and Objectives A. Reduce vehicular speed in the corridor. B. Provide an attractive bicycle accommodation.

City of Belmont Comprehensive Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Parks and Recreation Commission Meeting 11/4/2015.

Nixon Road Corridor Study: Findings & Options

Project Management Team Meeting #3

The City of Colorado Springs Recognized a Unique and Powerful Window of Opportunity: Linking Expansion of its Knowledge and Innovation Capacity (UCCS)

Pamlico Neighborhood of Norfolk, VA

Nolanville Main Street Sidewalk & Bicycle Connectivity

9th & Colorado Redevelopment Impacts Denver Public Works - Traffic Safety recommendations Community feedback Survey Results Conducted by: Colorado.

Emily Guenther Zach Olson Laura Scott Cameron Wein

Old Palm Avenue and 2nd Street

American Planning Association APHA Built Environment Institute

Presentation transcript:

Redeveloping Saint Michael’s Drive in Santa Fe, NM Nghia Hoang Kristen Leigher John Mulhern Xiying Zhang and the City of Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Introduction Pre-Statehood History Post Statehood History Recent Redevelopment Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Pre-Statehood History

1598: Location of Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute San Juan Pueblo Capital Santa Fe Santa Fe River Rio Grande El Paso, TX

: Moving to Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute San Juan Pueblo Capital Santa Fe Santa Fe River Rio Grande El Paso, TX El Camino Real

1610: Founding of Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute More defensible Close to water No direct conflict with the local Pueblo Indians

1680: Pueblo Revolt Worcester Polytechnic Institute Religious Conflict Native American Victory

1821: Santa Fe Trail Worcester Polytechnic Institute San Juan Pueblo Capital Santa Fe Santa Fe River Rio Grande El Paso, TX El Camino Real Santa Fe Trail

: Mexican American War Worcester Polytechnic Institute

1880: Rail in Santa Fe Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Worcester Polytechnic Institute Post Statehood History

1912: New Mexico’s Statehood Worcester Polytechnic Institute

1950s: Modern position of trade routes and roads Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Worcester Polytechnic Institute14 St. Michael’s Formation Agua Fria St. Cerrillos Rd. St. Francis Dr. 1.The city’s corridors Interstate 25 Old Pecos Trail

Worcester Polytechnic Institute15 St. Michael’s Formation 1.The city’s corridors 2. St. Michael’s Drive as a bridge St. Michael’s Dr. Agua Fria St. Cerrillos Rd. St. Francis Dr. Interstate 25 Old Pecos Trail

Worcester Polytechnic Institute Recent Redevelopment

Santa Fe Railyard Redevelopment Worcester Polytechnic Institute Early 1900’s

Santa Fe Railyard Redevelopment Worcester Polytechnic Institute Early 1900’s 2000

Santa Fe Railyard Redevelopment Worcester Polytechnic Institute Early 1900’s

2007: Santa Fe Downtown Vision Plan Worcester Polytechnic Institute

2009: Saint Michael’s Drive Charrette Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Mission Statement The ultimate goal of this project is to assist the City of Santa Fe in establishing baselines of the current state of Saint Michael’s Drive and providing tools to visualize the future redevelopment of the area. Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Collect, organize, and integrate data GIS Layers Traffic Data Census Data Survey Results

Previous City Survey and Results Worcester Polytechnic Institute26 What do you like about St. Michael’s Drive as it is today? What would you change about St. Michael’s Drive? What are design aspects presented that you liked? What are design aspects presented that you disliked? Nothing (12) Access/Speed (8) Parking (5) Pedestrian Friendly (7) More Trees and Landscape (7) Bicycle Friendly (6) Pedestrian/Bike Friendly (14) Greenbelts/ Landscaping (6) Multiuse Buildings Near Road (5) Roundabouts (8) Too Contemporary (3)

Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

28 Our Survey Results Demographics n= large age range -mostly employed -despite range of demographics thoughts are similar

Worcester Polytechnic Institute29 Our Survey Results Frequency & Use -Most live near and frequent the area at least once a week -Most come with a purpose and aren’t in the area for leisure or browsing purposes. Demographics

Worcester Polytechnic Institute30 Our Survey Results Saint Michael’s Drive has an appealing landscape. Somewhat Disagree -commercial feel -could use more trees -busy road Frequency & Use Demographics

Worcester Polytechnic Institute31 Our Survey Results Saint Michael’s Drive is pedestrian friendly. Somewhat Disagree -few walk street -concerns with large number of students Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape

Worcester Polytechnic Institute32 Our Survey Results Saint Michael’s Drive is bicycle friendly. Somewhat Disagree -few bike -bikers expressed dangers Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly

Worcester Polytechnic Institute33 Our Survey Results Saint Michael’s Drive has all the retail I desire. Somewhat Agree -more entertainment -more restaurants Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly

Worcester Polytechnic Institute34 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Saint Michael’s Drive is easily accessible without a car. Somewhat Disagree -lack of convenient, reliable public transit -not easily walkable

Worcester Polytechnic Institute35 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Saint Michael’s Drive has enough community space. Strongly Disagree -small parks with picnic tables -dog park -trash bins and benches

Worcester Polytechnic Institute36 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Community Space Saint Michael’s architecture is visually consistant with the rest of Santa Fe. Somewhat Agree -modern look

Worcester Polytechnic Institute37 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Community Space Architecture Redeveloping Saint Michael’s Drive is a good idea. Somewhat Agree -more parks and small improvements is well accepted -concerns with money and priorities of city

Worcester Polytechnic Institute38 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Community Space Architecture Redevelopment Additional Comments -work on housing in area -train stop -like traffic -more street frontage -elderly accessible -student friendly -clean graffiti

Worcester Polytechnic Institute39 Our Survey Results Demographics Frequency & Use Landscape Pedestrian Friendly Bicycle Friendly Business Availability Accessibility without car Community Space Architecture Redevelopment Additional Comments

Our Survey Summary Lack of community space Not pedestrian friendly Not enough entertainment & restaurants Keep road traffic like it is Not Bicycle Friendly Worcester Polytechnic Institute40

Worcester Polytechnic Institute41 Profile Businesses in the Area Saint Michael’s Drive Commercial Profile Map #____ Business Name: ____________________________________________________ Address:__________________________________ ____________________________________ Frontage Measurement (appx feet) : ____________________________ Business Type:___________________________________________________ If retail, what do they sell?:_______________________________________

Worcester Polytechnic Institute42 Profile Businesses in the Area Saint Michael’s Drive Commercial Profile Map #_4__ Business Name: __KMart_____________________________________________ Address:__1712 Saint Michaels Drive__________ __Santa Fe, NM 87501______________ __(505) ___________________ Frontage Measurement (appx feet) : __310 yards_________________ Business Type:___Retail (NAICS code )________________________ If retail, what do they sell?:___food,home,garden,office,apparel,beauty___

Retail

Accommodations & Food Retail

Accommodations & Food Education Retail

Accommodations & Food Education Finance/ Insurance Retail

Accommodations & Food Education Finance/ Insurance Public Administration Retail

Accommodations & Food Education Finance/ Insurance Rental and Leasing Retail Public Administration

Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Common Themes From Survey More Parks! Not Enough Entertainment! Bike Path! Train Stop! Trash Bins!

Common Themes From Survey

Common Themes From Charrette Trees! Parking On Street! Medians! Bike Lanes! Street Frontage!

Common Themes From Charrette

Trash Bins Dog Parks Not Easily Walkable Poor Public Transit More Parks More Modern Train Stop Elderly Housing Grouping Themes To Make Indicators Survey Charrette Medians Landscaping Trees Intersection Treatment Parking On Street Bike Lanes/ Paths Roundabouts/ Traffic Circles Open Building Facades Architectural Step-Backs Arcaded or Covered Walkways Courtyards/ Patios/ Walkways Backstreets/ Alleyways Narrower Driving Lanes Multi-story Buildings Fewer Driving Lanes Parking On Street Street Frontage Sidewalks Density Commercial Feel More Trees Busy Road Many Students Few Walk Few Bike More Restaurants Dangerous More Entertainment Benches Clean Graffiti

Vehicular Mobility Medians Intersection Treatment Roundabouts/ Traffic Circles Narrower Driving Lanes Fewer Driving Lanes Busy Road Grouping Themes To Make Indicators

Public Mobility Green Public Space Business Vitality Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance Housing Availability Walkability Vehicular Mobility Medians Landscaping Trees Intersection Treatment Bike Lanes/ Paths Roundabouts/ Traffic Circles Open Building Facades Architectural Step-Backs Arcaded or Covered Walkways Courtyards/ Patios/ Walkways Backstreets/ Alleyways Narrower Driving Lanes Multi-story Buildings Fewer Driving Lanes Parking On Street Street Frontage Sidewalks Density Commercial Feel More Trees Busy Road Many Students Few Walk Few Bike More Restaurants Dangerous More Entertainment Benches Not Easily Walkable Poor Public Transit More Parks Dog Parks Clean Graffiti More Modern Trash Bins Train Stop Elderly Housing Street Frontage Multi-story Buildings Multi-story Buildings Backstreets/ Alleyways Grouping Themes To Make Indicators

Indicators From Groups INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance

Factors of Indicators INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level

Factors of Indicators WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level

Measuring Walk Score WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security Level Noise Level

Measuring Curb Cuts WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: cuts/path segment Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security Level Noise Level

Measuring Path Width WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: avg. width/path segment Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security Level Noise Level

Measuring Traffic/ Pedestrian Buffer WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: avg. width/path segment Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 3 Security Level Noise Level

Measuring Security Level WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: number of crimes in area Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 3 Security Level 5 Noise Level

Measuring Noise Level WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Unit: decibels (db) Walkability1-10 Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 3 Security Level 5 Noise Level 4

Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability 1-10 ScoreWeightFinal ScoreGoal Score “Walk Score” 8 Curb Cuts 5 Path Width 4 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 3 Security Level 5 Noise Level 4 TOTAL

Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability 1-10 ScoreWeightFinal ScoreGoal Score “Walk Score” 82 Curb Cuts 52 Path Width 41.5 Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width 31.5 Security Level 51.5 Noise Level 41 TOTAL

Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability 1-10 ScoreWeightFinal ScoreGoal Score “Walk Score” 8216 Curb Cuts 5210 Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security Level Noise Level 414 TOTAL48

Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level Walkability 1-10 ScoreWeightFinal ScoreGoal Score “Walk Score” Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security Level Noise Level TOTAL4895

Project Objectives 1.Collect, organize, and integrate St. Michael’s Drive data 2.Identify relevant issues and local preferences 3.Identify measurable indicators to assess current & future designs 4. Visualize impacts of current and future design choices Worcester Polytechnic Institute

Walkability Worcester Polytechnic Institute72

Walkability Worcester Polytechnic Institute73 INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance WALKABILITY “Walk Score” Number of Curb Cuts Path Width Traffic/Pedestrian Buffer Width Security level Noise level

Eliminating Curb Cuts X X X X 1 10 Walkability

Widening Sidewalks X X X X 1 10 Walkability

Buffer Between Pedestrians and Traffic X X X X 1 10 Walkability

Green Public Space Worcester Polytechnic Institute77

Green Public Space Worcester Polytechnic Institute78 INDICATORS Walkability Green Public Space Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance Public Space Availability Accessibility Distance from location Park Amenities Security Level Noise Level Availability number feet 2 /person

Parks around Saint Michaels

Parks and City Owned Land

Possible Addition of City Parks 1 10 Community Space Availability

Vehicular Mobility Worcester Polytechnic Institute82

Vehicular Mobility Worcester Polytechnic Institute83 INDICATORS Walkability Public Space Availability Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance Vehicular Mobility Level of service Safety Level

Current Levels of Service 1 10 Intersection # 1 Mobility 1 10 Intersection # 3 Mobility 1 10 Intersection # 4 Mobility 1 10 Intersection # 2 Mobility 24 0 Hours Time of Day: :00 AM 5:00 PM 11:00 PM

Business Vitality Worcester Polytechnic Institute85

Business Vitality Worcester Polytechnic Institute86 INDICATORS Walkability Public Space Availability Vehicular Mobility Business Vitality Public Mobility Housing Availability Job Availability Parkability Visual Appearance Business Vitality Number of Businesses Number of Each Type