TURKEY IN THE ACCESSION NEGOTIATIONS Nilgün ARISAN ERALP Secretariat General for the EU Affairs 28 April 2006 TURKEY IN THE ACCESSION NEGOTIATIONS Nilgün.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Reflections on the future Cohesion Policy DG Regional Policy European Commission.
Advertisements

Annual Growth Survey What is the AGS? A communication, which sets out the economic and social priorities for the EU in 2013 Launches the next European.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
EaP Platform 2 – Discussion on WP Presentation to Civil Society Forum Michaela Hauf, DG ENTR, Unit for International Affairs and Missions for Growth Brussels,
NMP-NCP meeting - Brussels, 27 Jan 2005 Towards FP 7: Preliminary principles and orientations… Nicholas Hartley European Commission DG Research DG Research.
Cyprus Project Management Society
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
COMPETITION POLICY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PRESENTATION AT CUTS-ARC CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP, LUSAKA 7 TH MARCH, 2011 BY SAJEEV NAIR, COMPETITION POLICY.
IMPROVEMENT OF INVESTMENT ENVIRONMENT & IMPACT on FDI April 2009 Mehmet Dündar Department Head Undersecretariat of Treasury Prime Ministry Undersecretariat.
TOWARDS A SINGLE ECONOMY AND A SINGLE DEVELOPMENT VISION Norman Girvan.
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
Montenegro and European Integration Process Olivera Dimic and Dragan Djuric Capacity Development Programme.
1 Economic Aspects of Enlargement Brussels, 1 February 2005 Dirk VERBEKEN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Economic and Financial Affairs Directorate General What’s.
EFTA Seminar on the EEA Agreement – 4 February 2015 The EEA Agreement – Background, Developments and Challenges Tore Grønningsæter Senior Information and.
The Stabilisation and Association Agreement between Montenegro and the EU signed in October 2007, entered into force in May Montenegro has been.
Case of Serbia: Relations between EU integration process and judiciry reform Dušan Brajković Between Transformation and Integration – South-East Europe’s.
The Treaties, Institutions and Policies of the EU
The EU Constitution - a more social Europe? Kathleen Spencer Chapman, 26 th October 2004.
The Three Theoretical Models for Turkish accession Prof.Dr.MELTEM MUFTULER-BAC* Sabanci University December Presentation at Center for European.
3rd Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable Shareholder Rights, Equitable Treatment and the Role of the State April 17-18, 2002 hosted by Securities and.
GHANA’S AGENDA FOR SHARED GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT,
STARTING NEGOTIATIONS – THE EXPERIENCE OF BULGARIA 7 November 2005 ZAGREB Vladimir Kissiov.
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Halldór Grönvold Deputy General Secretary Icelandic Confederation of Labour – ASI April 2012 Iceland: Accession negotiations with the European Union The.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – Regional Policy Why change? Cohesion Policy has been changing already for a long time! ✦ EU has been changing:
The European Union and Accountability Robert Evans Tuesday 22 October 2013.
Macro Economic Framework for Economic Growth Renzo Daviddi European Commission Liaison Office to Kosovo 8 June 2010.
STATUS OF NEGOTIATIONS OF THE EAST AFRICAN MONITORY UNION (EAMU PROTOCOL)
MANIFESTO FOR RESPONSIBLE EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT EUROCADRES’ Conference Nov 2003 Dirk Ameel.
BULGARIAN ECONOMY ON THE ROAD TO EUROPEAN UNION AND ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION IVAN ISKROV GOVERNOR BULGARIAN NATIONAL BANK 14 July 2006 Athens.
Studies of Impact Assessment in Turkey-EU Accession Negotiations Process.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
Annual Growth Survey What is the AGS? A communication, which sets out the economic and social priorities for the EU in 2013 Launches the next European.
Media Projects Marija Gaćeša and Violeta Ćorić Belgrade, 1 st October Ministry of Finance.
Europe’s mission in the 21st century is to: provide peace, prosperity and stability for its peoples; overcome the divisions on the continent; ensure.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA INSTITUTE OF MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT July 2007 Where is Lisbon? (and how far is it from Ljubljana)
STRUCTURAL FUNDS MANAGEMENT IN GREECE: The experience of the Management Organisation Unit of the CSF Presented by: Dex. Agourides Director General M.O.U.
EU perspective on occupational health and safety - role and place of unions Károly György Kiev, December December Károly György, MSZOSZ.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.

Towards a Single Economy and a Single Development Vision Norman Girvan UWI.
Deepening Integration in SADC - Macroeconomic Policies and Their Impact South African Country Study 3rd – 6th April 2006 Zambezi Sun Hotel, Livingstone,
TOWARDS BETTER REGULATION: THE ROLE OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT COLIN KIRKPATRICK IMPACT ASSESSMENT RESEARCH CENTRE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER, UK UNECE Symposium.
Close to Nature Forestry and Forest Policy Challenges in Europe Ilpo Tikkanen, European Forest Institute Zvolen, Slovakia October, 2003 Together.
EU financing to Bulgarian economy Spyros Argyropoulos Latest Development in Bulgarian Economy & Prospectiveness for Cooperation Thessaloniki, 9 th November.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
DG Enlargement – Effective Support for Enlargement Conference, Brussels 19 October 2009 Concluding Remarks of the Co-chairs.
EU FUNDING INSTRUMENTS – GENERAL REVIEW. EU's funding structure and the associated instruments and programmes  Pre-Accession Assistance:
Belgian Presidency of the Council of the European Union General presentation July 05, 2010.
The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche (wiiw) Introduction.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL PLAN ( ) Date : 8/10/2010 Decision No : 2010/28.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE ENSURING STABILITY AND GROWTH PLAMEN ORESHARSKI MINISTER OF FINANCE 12 December 2007 Sofia.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Delegation of the European Commission to Turkey Delegation of the European Commission to Turkey Brussels, 4 May 2009 EU Action for Human Rights in a Candidate.
EU Commission's (draft) Country Strategy Paper for Turkey Local Consultation 18 December 2013 Wolfgang Schlaeger Head of Operations EU Delegation Ankara.
Regional Policy Future of Cohesion Policy and Investments in Health Christopher Todd, Head of Unit, Slovakia European Commission, Directorate General for.
History of the European Union (EU) 1948 – Organization for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC) founded to administer U.S. Marshall Plan 1957 – Treaty.
European Union support to the Ukraine Bratislava, 3 June 2016 Livia Vasakova, EC Representation in Slovakia.
European Union Delegation to Iceland
Iceland – EU Accession Talks State of Play
Day 1 Training in Project Cycle Management, Procurement and Contracting of Pre-Accession Projects and Management of EU Structural Instruments.
Ministry of Finance Contribution of the Operational Programmes to the implementation of the NSRF objectives Boriana Pencheva Director Management.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January – 30.
Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan
INTEGRATION PROCESS TO EU – EXPERIENCES OF MONTENEGRO
The experiences of Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia with the screening for Chapter 18 - Statistics PGSC, Kruševo October 2018.
Representation of the European Commission in Romania
Presentation transcript:

TURKEY IN THE ACCESSION NEGOTIATIONS Nilgün ARISAN ERALP Secretariat General for the EU Affairs 28 April 2006 TURKEY IN THE ACCESSION NEGOTIATIONS Nilgün ARISAN ERALP Secretariat General for the EU Affairs 28 April 2006

Negotiations Against all odds, accession negotiatons between EU and Turkey were initiated on 3rd of October, around hrs GMT. Key Questions? How long they are going to last ? What will be the final outcome ?

Negotiations Negotiations Negotiations constitute a new reality : “ there are still years of negotiations and plenty of pitfalls ahead, but if Turkey ever joins the European Union, people will look back on this summit as a decisive moment ” Chris Morris, BBC Europe correspondent. “now EU has become a stakeholder in the continuation of the political, economic and social transformation of the country ” Olli REHN, Enlargement Commisioner

Negotiation Framework - -definitely a vigorous and strict one ; - -signals a tough time ahead: challenges and difficulties; - - contains grey areas.

Negotiation Framework outcome of the following factors: - -Turkey’s differences (size, population, geographical location etc.) - -Negative experiences of the 5th enlargement ; - -Enlargement fatigue/ “temporary indigestion” caused by the 5th enlargement/enlargement fear; - -Certain level of mistrust towards Turkey.

Negotiation Framework Our attention should focus on : “the shared objective of the negotiations is accession” For the moment we should try to omit the fact that: “politics not technicalities will finally decide Turkey’s fate” We have to concentrate on another fact : “the pace of the negotiatons is closely related to Turkey’s performance in fulfilling the membership criteria”

Negotiations What we expect : ‘a strict (negotiation framework) but fair approach ’ on the basis of merit

Membership Criteria  Political Criteria  Economic Criteria  “Acquis Criteria” : adopting and efficiently implementing the body of EU legislation

Political Criteria Key importance in the negotiation process:   Closely monitored by the European Commission;   Failure in this area might result in the suspension of the talks.

Political Criteria European Commission : “Turkey has sufficiently fulfilled the political criteria”. Ambitious transformation especially since summer 2002:   abolishing the death penalty;   Kurdish language learning;   broadcasting in Kurdish language;   scrapping state security courts;   revising the penal code;   tightening the civil control over the army.

Political Criteria Still much to do to establish the EU norms in the country keywords :   implementation;   monitoring (reform monitoring group);   minimising road accidents;   putting the emphasis on training (law enforcement bodies and judiciary).

Economic Criteria Not the subject of negotiations per se. The process of fulfilling the economic criteria will be closely monitored and the failure of doing so might be a benchmark for opening aup negotiations in some chapters related with the economy :   Free movement of Capital;   Competititon;   Economic and Monetary Policy;   Enterprise and Industrial Policy.

Economic Criteria EU demands: “ disinflation and fiscal sustainability” and necessary reforms necessary to attain these Turkey’s main priority : To ensure a sustainable growth environment reducing inflationary pressures and bringing public sector deficit and debt ratios to EU averages.

Economic Criteria: Key Instruments Particular emphasis : privatisation and structural reforms and lowering regional differences

Economic Criteria: Key Instruments Main Structural Reforms : - -completing the reform of the financial sector and modernising public finances; - -modernising public administration; - -reforming agricultural sector.

Economic Criteria: Accomplishments   institutional and legal infrastructure of a free market economy has almost been completed;   significant improvement in key macroeconomic indicators like growth (2004 : 9.9, 2005: 5.3 %), inflation rate (2004 : 9.3, 2005: 7.6 %), ratio of budget deficit to national income (2004 : -7.1%, 2005: %), ratio of public debt to national income (2001 : 90.5 %, 2005: 70 % ), etc. ;   economic stability and predictability has significantly improved;   there is broad consensus on essentials of economic policy ;   privatisation process has accelerated;

Economic Criteria: Accomplishments   structural reforms seem to be in the right track in general;   major shift in development policy : National Development Plan;   a new policy : Rural Development

Economic Criteria Main Challenges :   Unemployment (10 %) ;   Agricultural employment (35.2 % of workforce in agriculture);   Regional disparities;   Existence of informal sector;   Lack of a coherent education policy geared towards the needs of the labour market.

Economic Criteria: What Remains to be Done Economic Criteria: What Remains to be Done Major concerns of the EU :   sustainability of macroeconomic stability and fiscal discipline (are they still fragile?) and predictability ;   state intervention in the economy : three state banks still control % of the banking sector;   unfavorable investment climate.

Adopting the Acquis 1-Free Movement of Goods 2-Free Movement of Workers 3-Right of Establishment and Freedom to Provide Services 4-Free Movement of Capital 5- Public Procurement 6-Company Law 7- Intellectual Property Law 8-Competition Policy (State Aids) 9- Financial Services 10- Information Society and Media

Adopting the Acquis 11-Agriculture and Rural Development 12- Food Safety, Veterinary and Phytosanitary Policy 13 -Fisheries 14-Transport Policy 15-Energy 16-Taxation 17- Economic and Monetary Policy 18- Statistics 19- Social Policy and Employment

Adopting the Acquis Adopting the Acquis 20- Enterprise and Industrial Policy 21- Trans-European Networks 22-Regional Policy and Coordination of Structural Instruments 23- Judiciary and Fundamental Rights 24- Justice, Freedom and Security 25- Science and Research 26- Education and Culture 27- Environment

Adopting the Acquis Adopting the Acquis 28- Consumer Protection 29- Customs Union 30- External Relations 31-Common Foreign and Security Policy 32- Financial Control 33- Financial and Budgetary Affairs

Values and Principles of the EU Acquis: Governability The governability principles are embedded in the EU acquis (body of EU legislation) : - -transparency; - -accountability; - - participation with a special emphasis on “social dialogue”; - -change in the role of state : producer state regulatory state/ monitoring state/coordinator state Olli REHN : “Good governance is the key to make full use of Turkey’s potential ”

TURKEY’S ACCESSION PROCESS Acquis : the principles and values Transparency and accountability the Law on the right to have access to information ; Public Financial Management Law; new simplified budgetary system; strengthening of the Public Procurement Authority. Participation change in the working procedure of the Economic and Social Council; strengthening of social dialogue especially in the labour market ; preparing the National Development Plan with a participatory method;

TURKEY’S ACCESSION PROCESS Acquis : the principles and values Public sector reform programme aims to enhance the participation principle in the state-citizen relations by increasing the number of consultation mechanisms in the policy-making. introduces “regulatory impact analysis” method to the drafting stage of the legislative process in Turkey Change in the role of state Network industries and natural monopolies have been introduced to market competition. State: regulator in these sectors.

THE UNDERLYING PRINCIPLE OF TURKEY’S CURRENT NEGOTIATION PROCESS “ at the core of integration of any form, lies the need to establish credible commitments ” (Phedon Nicolaides) Turkey currently concentrates all its efforts to make its commitments credible. New Negotiation Structure Ministries : main actors Coordination : Prime Ministry, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Secretariat General for the EU Affairs, State Planning Organisation, Turkey’s Permanent Representation in the EU.

THE SCREENING PROCESS OF TURKEY CHAPTER EXPLANATORY EXPLANATORYSCREENING BILATERAL BILATERALSCREENING 1.SCIENCE AND RESEARCH 20 OCTOBER NOVEMBER EDUCATION AND CULTURE 26 OCTOBER NOVEMBER PUBLIC PROCUREMENT 7 NOVEMBER NOVEMBER COMPETITON POLICY 8-9 NOVEMBER DECEMBER RIGHT OF SETTLEMENT AND FREE MOVEMENT OF SERVICES NOVEMBER DECEMBER FREE MOVEMENT OF CAPITAL 25 NOVEMBER DECEMBER AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEV. 5-8 DECEMBER JANUARY JUSTICE, FREEDOM AND SECURITY JANUARY FEBRUARY FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS JANUARY FEBRUARY CUSTOMS UNION 31 JANUARY-1 FEBRUARY MARCH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW 6-7 FEBRUARY MARCH SOCIAL POLICY AND EMPLOYMENT 8-10 FEBRUARY MARCH ECONOMIC AND MONETARY POLCIY 17 FEBRUARY MARCH FISHERIES 24 FEBRUARY MARCH FOOD SAFETY, VETERINARY AND PHYTOSANITARY POLICY 9-15 MARCH APRIL-3 MAY 2006

THE SCREENING PROCESS OF TURKEY CHAPTER EXPLANATORY EXPLANATORYSCREENINGBILATERALSCREENING 16. ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRIAL POLICY MARCH 4-5 MAY FINANCIAL SERVICES MARCH 2-3 MAY ENVIRONMENT 3-11 APRIL 29 MAY -2 JUNE 2006

CONCLUSION  A significant synergy has already been created in various important fields;  A real sense of direction has been built and a significant momentum has been attained.  This momentum will be strengthened with the negotiation process.

CONCLUSION However : Vision and political courage is required on both sides for the period ahead of us to be succesful and these should be translated into policies as : “vision without implemantation is hallucination” (Bertrand Russel)