Supercell storms Storm splitting, environmental conditions, propagation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tornadogenesis within a Simulated Supercell Storm Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of Oklahoma.
Advertisements

Chapter 2: basic equations and tools 2.5 – pressure perturbations 2.6 – thermodynamic diagrams hodographs All sections are considered core material,
Squall Lines Loosely defined: A line of either ordinary cells or supercells of finite length (10- hundreds of km) that may contain a stratiform rain region.
Lemon and Doswell (1979) Lemon, L. R., and C. A. Doswell III, 1979: Severe thunderstorm evolution and mesoscyclone structure as related to tornadogenesis.
mesovortex apex of bow echo Bow Echo: radar-observed features mid-level overhang weak echo notch bookend vortex.
The Temporal Behavior of Numerically Simulated Multicell- Type Storms. Part II: The Convective Life Cycle and Cell Regeneration RobertG. Fovell and Pei-Hua.
Convective Dynamics Squall Lines Adapted from material from the COMET Program.
MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Deep Convection: Forecast Parameters.
Horizontal Convective Rolls Asai papers & Simulations w/ ARPS.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
Weismann (1992) Weisman, M. L., 1992: The role of convectively generated rear- inflow jets in the evolution of long-lived mesoconvective systems. J. Atmos.
MesoscaleM. D. Eastin Deep Convection: Classification.
Chapter 4. Convective Dynamics 4.6 Supercell Storms
Severe Convection and Mesoscale Convective Systems R. A. Houze Lecture, Summer School on Severe and Convective Weather, Nanjing, 11 July 2011.
More Thunderstorms. Today Homework in Wind shear More multicellular storms.
1 FORMATION DES PREVISIONNISTES CONVECTION WEATHER FORECASTING IN MID-LATITUDE REGIONS IN MID-LATITUDE REGIONS Prepared in close collaboration with the.
Supercells Base lecture and Graphics created by The COMET Program
Lifting by cold pools (RKW theory) A&OS C115/C228.
The supercell storm Anthony R. Lupo Atms 4310 / 7310 Lab 12.
Deep Convection A review of processes “Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not truth” Marcus Aurelius: AD
Convective initiation ahead of squall lines Robert Fovell UCLA Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences (Fovell, Mullendore and Kim 2006, MWR)
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
1 Supercell Thunderstorms Adapted from Materials by Dr. Frank Gallagher III and Dr. Kelvin Droegemeier School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma Part.
Thermal and shear instabilities: Introduction Kelvin-Helmholtz (K-H) waves & horizontal convective rolls (HCRs)
Convective Storm types James LaDue FMI Severe Storms Workshop June 2005 James LaDue FMI Severe Storms Workshop June 2005.
Cumulus Clouds. What goes on inside a cumulus cloud?
Solid body rotation (XY):
Supercell Rotating thunderstorm with updrafts and downdrafts structured so it can maintain itself for several hours What makes a supercell different from.
1 Supercell Thunderstorms Adapted from Materials by Dr. Frank Gallagher III and Dr. Kelvin Droegemeier School of Meteorology University of Oklahoma Part.
Severe Convection and Mesoscale Convective Systems R. A. Houze Lecture, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, 5 August 2010.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
General Theme: ….Consider the evolution of convection in the absence of significant larger-scale forcing influences…or even boundary layer features….
The structure and evolution of vortex lines in supercell thunderstorms
Forecast Parameters. CAPE Convective Available Potential Energy – obviously, positive buoyancy is helpful for producing convection –100 mb mixed layer.
Deep Moist Convection (DMC) Part 2 – Modes of Isolated Organization AOS 453 – Spring /3/2014.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis.
Deep Convection Ordinary Cells Multicell storms Supercells.
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
Chapter 4. Convective Dynamics 4.6 Supercell Storms
The Garden City, Kansas, storm during VORTEX 95. Part I: Overview of the Storm’s life cycle and mesocyclogenesis Roger M. Wakimoto, Chinghwang Liu, Huaquing.
Chapter 11: severe weather!! (a)thunderstorms (classification) (b)tornadoes (c)lightning, and (d)hail.
Convective: Part 2 Weather Systems – Fall 2015 Outline: a. dynamics of rotating thunderstorms (supercells) b. storm splitting – right vs. left movers.
Supercell Thunderstorms
Deep Convection: Physical Processes
Principles of Convection. BACKGROUND When vertical shear is weak, the main influence on convective updrafts & downdrafts is bouyancy. As the vertical.
Numerical Simulation and Prediction of Supercell Tornadoes Ming Xue School of Meteorology and Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms University of.
Test of Supercell Propagation Theory Using Data from VORTEX 95 Huaqing Cai NCAR/ASP/ATD.
Frontogenesis Frontogenesis: The generation of intensity of a front Warm air merged onto colder air Temperature gradient amplified at least one order of.
Ordinary Cells Multicell storms Supercells
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
ARPS( Advanced Regional Prediction System ) Version Center for Analysis and Prediction of Storms (CAPS), Oklahoma University tridimensional compressible.
1 Dynamics of Rotation, Propagation, and Splitting METR 4433: Mesoscale Meteorology Spring 2013 Semester Adapted from Materials by Drs. Kelvin Droegemeier,
Cumulus Clouds. Instabilities Resulting in Vertical Overturning 1.Thermal Instability (Assuming uniform vertical pressure gradient) a) Static (Parcel.
Supercells Eric A. Pani The University of Louisiana at Monroe.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Morris L. Weisman Joseph B. Klemp Presented to you by: Elizabeth Polito.
ATMS 316- Mesoscale Meteorology Packet#11 Interesting things happen at the boundaries, or.
Mesoscale Convective Systems. Definition Mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) refer to all organized convective systems larger than supercells Some classic.
Supercell storms: In-class demo and Experiment 3
Supercells: Theory Richard Rotunno
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms
Wallace A. Hogsett and Stacy R. Stewart
Convective: Part 2 Weather Systems – Fall 2017
Thermodynamic Diagrams and Severe Weather
Shawnee/ Moore, Oklahoma May 20, 2013.
The Wind Hodograph METR 4433: Mesoscale Meteorology Spring 2006 Semester Adapted from Materials by Drs. Kelvin Droegemeier, Frank Gallagher III and Ming.
The Wind Hodograph METR 4433: Mesoscale Meteorology Spring 2013 Semester Adapted from Materials by Drs. Kelvin Droegemeier, Frank Gallagher III and Ming.
Dynamics of Rotation, Propagation, and Splitting
Supercells and Tornadoes.
Presentation transcript:

Supercell storms Storm splitting, environmental conditions, propagation

Ordinary/multicell storm Browning et al. (1976)

Fovell and Tan (1998)

Supercell (rotating) storm Lemon and Doswell (1979) Plan view at surface UD = updraft FFD = forward flank downdraft RFD = rear flank downdraft Gust front Hook echo Dot ~ tornado location

Beneath a rotating supercell Made using ARPS and Vis5D

Animation (delcity_orig_3Dvort.MOV)

Storm splitting Wilhelmson and Klemp (1981)

Storm splitting (delcity_str_Vprt_QR.MOV) Two symmetric storms result from initial impulse Yields right & left movers Note rotation Domain is moving to east; storm motion subtracted Made w/ ARPS and Vis5D

24 April 2007 splitting storm (as seen from Laughlin AFB radar in SW Texas)

Split L mover weaker R mover turns right R mover hook Purple = hail

Tornado report Maverick, TX

Dynamics of storm splitting Klemp (1987); See Houze p

Shear-induced vortex tubes…

…leads to splitting and rotation Lifting of vortex tubes by updrafts create counter-rotating horizontal vortices… vertical vorticity Low pressure in the vortices establish new updrafts on original storm’s flanks The original storm decays… and voila, the storm appears to have split, yielding counter-rotating storms Note now L pressure and updraft are colocated… shear has contributed to storm stabilization

Splitting – step I

Splitting – step 2

Splitting – step 3

Splitting – step 4

Precipitation is NOT involved Simulations without rain still show storm splitting

Close look at two papers Weisman and Klemp (1982) –Environmental conditions favoring ordinary/multicell storms and supercell storms Rotunno and Klemp (1982) –Why right-movers are favored in U.S. –Why right-movers move to right of mean winds

Weisman and Klemp (1982; “WK”) “Dependence of Numerically Simulated Convective Storms on Vertical Wind Shear and Buoyancy” 3D simulations, started with thermal Varied CAPE by manipulating boundary layer moisture Considered speed shear only see Houze, p

CAPE Convective Available Potential Energy –“positive area” of a sounding –Integrated from LFC to EQL –WK and Houze (eq. 8.1, p. 283) expressions involve potential temperature Should involve virtual potential temperature

WK’s sounding CAPE varied by setting PBL moisture Standard case has 14 g/kg

WK wind profiles Note: no directional shear Us = wind speed change over 10 km

WK Wmax vs. time q = 14 g/kg simulations No shear case: intensifies fastest dies first Larger shear - slower development By this metric, moderate shear storm is strongest

WK simulations have symmetry axis No initial flow in N-S direction; Initial bubble is radially symmetric. Therefore, storms have N-S symmetry

WK results multicellular supercellular

Us = 30 m/s, q = 14 g/kg Surface rainwater (g/kg) and surface positive vorticity (1/s, dashed) Low-level radar reflectivity field BWER = Bounded weak echo region

WK response to initial bubble CAPE

“Secondary storms” are Subsequent ordinary cell developments (i.e., multicells) “Split storms” are supercells, resulting from splitting of initial cell

WK analysis “Bulk Richardson number” ∆u = avg. wind of lowest 6 km minus avg. wind of lowest 500 m “Storm strength” Wmax = largest updraft Denominator = theoretical updraft max ~ ignores pressure perturbation!

WK analysis R = BRi Larger BRi = initial storm stronger more CAPE, or less shear Largest is ~ 60% of theoretical max Multicells favored for BRi > 30 or so… Supercells smaller BRi relatively larger S

BRi as predictor of storm mode

Concerns w/ BRi CAPE –As formulated in WK (and Houze’s eq. 8.1), moisture in environment neglected (apart from parcel definition) –Water loading, entrainment neglected –Convective inhibition (CIN) completely ignored Shear –Relevant depth 6 km? Always? –Directional shear completely ignored Uniqueness of BRi –Same value for low CAPE/low shear as high CAPE/high shear. Reasonable to expect same convective mode and/or intensity? This has been a very valuable result

Rotunno and Klemp (1982; “RK”) Most tornadoes associated with supercells –tornadoes have same sense of rotation as parent storm Further, vast majority of tornadoes are CCW rotating –after splitting, CW left movers tend to die (and/or be non-tornadic) So why are left movers disfavored? –it’s directional vertical shear

RK hodograph

Straight vs. curved hodograph Note mirror-image storms; both have hook-like echoes Note only right-mover has hook shape; left-mover weaker

Straight vs. curved hodograph With directional shear, right mover soon favored Without directional shear, symmetric pulse always remains symmetric W at 1.5 km

Pressure decomposition Recall nondimensional pressure perturbation π’ subdivided into dynamic and buoyancy pressures Dynamic pressure can be further partitioned into linear (L) and nonlinear (NL) pressures using perturbation analysis NOTE the overbars… the base state winds

π’ caused by vertical shear π’ - heavy contours  - thin contours Vertical shear vector shown X-direction:

Propagation to left & right Net result… L pressure on flanks + L pressure ahead lead to propagation to left and right of mean winds L L On flanks, both CW & CCW cause L pressure where vort is max, min

Unidirectional shear case Shear vector shown Vertical accel largest on E (forward) side… storm moves E Nonlinear p’ encourages ascent on flanks -- storm splitting Result symmetric (neither split storm member is favored)

Directional shear case RK’s analysis shows that  NL and buoy favor the left mover. But  L favors the right mover and dominates

Hodograph with directional shear. Thin shear vector used for lower-level shear. Circle indicates updraft. Linear term encourages low pressure downshear; high pressure upshear For lower-level shear, lowered pressure to NE

Upper level shear produces pressure perturbations in different places On south side of updraft there is lowered pressure aloft overlying raised pressure below. This flank is favored for ascent.