IMPACTS OF LARGE DISTRIBUTED GENERATORS ON CENTERPOINT ENERGY’S DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1 Presented by Ed Briggs, P.E. Manager of Electric Distribution Planning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Advertisements

Distributed Generation (DG)
New Energy Horizons Opportunities and Challenges Fault Current Contributions from Wind Plants Dean Miller PacifiCorp July 25,
Sistan & Balouchestan Electric Power Distribution Company
© 2006 San Diego Gas & Electric Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. Microgrid – A Smart Grid Alternative Service Delivery Model? Thomas.
DOD Microgrids The Missing Link: Microgrid Applications Michael Dempsey P.E. Burns & McDonnell June 12, 2013 © 2013 Burns & McDonnell. All Rights Reserved.
Electrical Systems.  This section discusses: –How utilities charge for electricity –How to calculate the avoided cost of electricity –How to use utility.
Stray Current Investigations A Method of Troubleshooting Stray Current on Underground Residential Distribution (URD) Loops Stacey Mighty Malcolm Distribution.
1 Pacific Gas & Electric Company MTS: Evolution of the Electric Distribution System Manho Yeung, Senior Director, System Planning and Reliability PG&E.
1 Distributed Generation and Power Quality. 2 Relaying considerations DG infeed may reduce the reach of overcurrent relays –DG feeds fault, so utility.
Lecture 26 Distribution Systems Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Reporting the Economics of Reliable Energy Ralph Fehr, P.E. Engineering Consultant Reliability of the U.S. Power Grid.
Sean A. Kufel, P.E. Power System Engineering, Inc. April 20, 2015 Distributed Generation System Impact Analysis with Computer Modeling Tools IEEE Rural.
RiversidePublicUtilities.com Arts & Innovation RiversidePublicUtilities.com Challenges and Solutions for Large-Scale PV Integration on RPU’s Distribution.
1 Training Session on Energy Equipment Electricity Presentation from the “Energy Efficiency Guide for Industry in Asia” ©
Plant Utility System (TKK-2210)
1 Green River Utah Area Transmission and Distribution System – January 16, 2009.
Interconnect Protection of Dispersed Generators
Farid Katiraei Ph.D. Candidate
AFCI Reaction to Utility Events. CenterPoint Energy 35 KV Distribution Capacitor Bank – Switched through an automated system.
Applying the Distribution System in Grid Restoration/NERC CIP-014 Risk Assessment Srijib Mukherjee, Ph.D., P.E. UC Synergetic.
Summary Overview: MADRI Model Small Generator Interconnection Procedures Prepared by Brad Johnson* June 15, 2006 ACN Energy Ventures
Applied Harmonics Control of Harmonics
Distributed Generation & Distribution Companies Darius Vaiciunas Collingwood.
WESTERN UNDERGROUND COMMITTEE 2015 Spring Conference 65 th ANNIVERSARY 1950‐2015 Welcome Remarks Bill Chiu Director of Engineering – T&D Southern California.
Small Generation Interconnection Standards - IOU Dennis Reed Westar Energy Topeka, KS September 26, 2007.
1 Distributed Generation SWEDE 2006 CenterPoint Energy Walter R. Bartel, P.E. Supervising Engineer Distribution System Reliability.
By J DAVID MANOHAR (08A31A0232). NECESSITY OF SUPERCONDUSTOR  Damage from short circuit is constant threat in power systems  All the power systems components.
Overview What's is micro grid Over view of electric grid
Distribution Planning Use of SMART Distribution Automation Control System (DACS) Presented by: Ed Briggs, P.E. Created by: Ed Briggs & Greg Wickliffe
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY DG CONFERENCE UPDATE ON THE CURRENT STATUS OF DG INTERCONNECTION PROTECTION WHAT IEEE 1547 DOESN’T TELL YOU ABOUT INTERCONNECTION PROTECTION.
Energy Storage Applications at AEP Emeka Okafor American Electric Power Presentation to SouthWest Electric Distribution Exchange May 7, 2009.
December 2008 Sandia Advanced Microgrid R&D Program Advanced Microgrids – Supporting Use of Renewable, Distributed, and Smart Grid Technologies for Assured.
Clemson University Electric Power Research Association CHANDANA BOMMAREDDY CLEMSON UNIVERSITY DG VOLTAGE CONTROL IN AN ISLANDING MODE OF OPERATION.
05/18/001 N.Treadway Distributed Resources and Competitive Energy Markets in Illinois Workshop Session III, “Interconnection Issues” Thursday, May 18,
DG Toronto Hydro’s Perspective Task Force on Distributed Generation Richard Lü VP, Environment, Health & Safety March 5, 2003.
Power Quality Impacts of Distributed Generation Roger C. Dugan Sr. Consultant Electrotek Concepts, Inc. Tennessee Tech. February 9, 2004.
Power Plant Construction and QA/QC Section 4.4 – In-Plant Electrical Distribution Engineering Technology Division.
ANALYSIS OF THE OPERATING CONDITION OF Qalqilia ELECTRICAL NETWORK
1 Distributed Generation and Power Quality-Continued.
Steady State Analysis Of A Microgrid Connected To A Power System
EECE 887 Distribution System Engineering CHAPTER 1 Power Delivery Systems.
Jesus A. Guerra, P.E. Distribution System Reliability CenterPoint Energy SWEDE 2011.
Distributed Generation Registration June 30, 2008.
Distribution Systems-General
Transmission Capital Project Updates. Transmission Expansion Plan Sigurd to Red Butte 345 kV line in-service May, 2015 Permitting activities continue.
132KV GSS PIPAR CITY JODHPUR
2006 Hurricane Preparedness June 5, 2006 Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc R. Ben Brickhouse: Director of Engineering & IT John J. LaSelva: Director of.
1 Grid Impact of PEV Charging Possible Consequences Jan Berman Sr. Director, Policy & Integrated Planning Integrated Demand Side Management Customer Care.
ECE498HZ: Power Distribution System Analysis
A PRESENTATION On 400KV GSS SURPURA JODHPUR
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION ISSUES Technical Issues Non-Technical Issues.
MERC (N ET METERING FOR R OOF - TOP S OLAR P HOTO V OLTAIC S YSTEMS ) R EGULATIONS, 2015 Commercial Section.
Interconnected Generation Preliminary Engineering Work Related to Fees.
Impact of Distributed Generation on Fault Induced Transients: A Case Study Sukumar Brahma Adly Girgis Clemson University Electric Power Research Association.
Summary Overview: Maryland Straw Man Interconnection Rule Prepared by Brad Johnson* January 11, 2007 ACN Energy Ventures *National.
URBAN DESIGN Non-standard (Alternative) and Aesthetic Liafis A Ogboye, P.E.
STUDY OF ELEMENTS OF A 220/132/33KV SUBSTATION
Power Quality at Solar Distributed Generation Facilities
Management Of Tulkarm Electrical Network
Advanced Fuse-Saving Techniques
35kV Assessment SWEDE 2007 May 10, 2007.
Subteam 1a Competitive Solicitations Framework Working Group Meeting
DISTRIBUTED GENERATION (DG) MODELING CRITERIA SWEDE 2016
Distributed Generation (DG) Modeling Criteria
Distributed Energy Resources (DER) Experiences at CenterPoint Energy
Why does power factor matter Make-up of distribution capacitor banks
Sami Repo Tampere University of Technology FINLAND
Electrical Distribution System Basics
Ahmed Kulab Moh. Abed Foaad Al-Habeel
Presentation transcript:

IMPACTS OF LARGE DISTRIBUTED GENERATORS ON CENTERPOINT ENERGY’S DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1 Presented by Ed Briggs, P.E. Manager of Electric Distribution Planning SWEDE Presentation May 9, 2014 CenterPoint Energy Proprietary and Confidential Information

SAFETY MOMENT PUBLIC AND EMPLOYEE SAFETY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT CONSIDERATION OF DG DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITY INTERCONNECTION ! 2

WHAT IS DISTRIBUTED GENERATION (DG) ? 3 Texas PUC Substantive Rule An electric generating facility located at a customer’s point of delivery (point of common couple) of ten megawatts (MW) or less and connected at a voltage less than 60 kilovolts (kV) which may be connected in parallel operation to the utility system.

4 DISTRIBUTED GENERATION BY FUEL TYPE

5 Total Pending and Connected DGs Through 4/16/14

Large DG (7500+ KW) Statistics 6

WHATS DRIVING THE LARGE DISTRIBUTED GENERATION INTERCONNECTIONS? Emergency Response Service (ERS) or Demand Response Close transition-parallel with the utility grid for less than 1 second (closed transition switching) Parallel operation with power export option Parallel operation with no power export 7

LOAD VOLTAGE POWER FACTOR FAULT CURRENT CIRCUIT PROTECTION LATERAL FUSE COORDINATION EFFECTIVE GROUNDING RELIABILITY SAFETY 8 IMPACTS OF LARGE DISTRIBUTED GENERATION

DG SIZE RATING A GENERATOR NAME PLATE RATING SHOWS % POWER FACTOR WHAT IS THE DG kW CAPACITY ?  2000 kW or 2500 kW ? SAME QUESTION AS ABOVE EXCEPT THE PRIME MOVER OF THE GENERATOR IS A DIESEL ENGINE RATED AT 1800kW WHAT IS THE DG kW CAPACITY ?  1800 kW or 2000 kW or 2500 kW ? 9

12.47 kV DISTRIBUTION FEEDER DG STUDY 7 GENERATORS RATED AT 2500 kW EACH (7 X 2500 = 17,500 kW) PRIME MOVER DIESEL ENGINE RATED AT 1800kW ACTIVE GENERATION = 7 X 1800 = 12,600 kW kV FEEDER RATED AT 12,960 kW DG VOLTAGE 100%PF 10

kV FEEDER PEAK LOAD 10,260 kW 540 kVAR 99.9 PF DG SUB

DISTRIBUTIVE GENERATION SETUP (PCC IS POINT OF COMMON COUPLING) 12 Utility sourceUtility Source PCC kVA TRANSFORMER PCC kV BUS TO SUBSTATION 2500 kW GENERATOR 480Y277V

DG TRIPS IF: VOLTAGE = 126V FOR 30 SECONDS VOLTAGE = 132V FOR 10 CYCLES CUSTOMER WANTS TO OPERATE DG AT 100% PF 13 DG VOLTAGE TRIP SETTING

CNP SUBSTATION VOLTAGE REGULATION IS SET AT 122V TO 125V FOUR CIRCUIT MODELING SENARIOS ARE:  SUMMER PEAK LOADING SUB AT 125V SUB AT 122V  OFF-PEAK LOADING SUB AT 125V SUB AT 122V 14 DG ANALYSIS

LOCATION AT PCC WITH SUB AT 125 V WITH SUMMER PEAK LOAD 15

16 LOCATION AT PCC WITH SUB AT 122 V WITH SUMMER PEAK LOAD

17 LOCATION AT PCC WITH SUB AT 125 V WITH OFF-PEAK LOAD

18 LOCATION AT PCC WITH SUB AT 122 V WITH OFF-PEAK LOAD

19 LOCATION AT PCC WITH SUB AT 125 V WITH SUMMER PEAK LOAD & EFFECTS OF CAPACITOR BANKS

20 DG CAN REDUCE THE VOLTAGE AT PCC BUT RESULTS IN INCREASED kVAR WHICH RESULTS IN A 394 kVA DEMAND THUS A $$$$$ MONTHLY BILL

DURING OFF PEAK SEASON 4 DGs BACKFEEDS SUBSTATION TRANSFORMER WITH 2279 kW 21 Substation Transformer Circuits #1 #2 # kW

kV FEEDER PEAK LOAD 10,260 kW 540 kVAR 99.9 PF DG SUB DG

At PCC with Sub at 125 V with Summer peak load & DG located near Sub 23

At PCC with Sub at 125 V with Summer peak load & DG located at end of circuit 24

25 DG INCREASES CIRCUIT FAULT CURRENT AND CAUSES 100T FUSE NOT TO COORDINATE WITH 65T, MUST CHANGE LATERAL TO A FEEDER AT CUSTOMER EXPENSE Without DGs, I LG max = 2578 A With 7 DGs, I LG max = 3976 A 100 T fuse 65T fuse

DG ELEVATES FAULT CURRENT ON SUBSTATION BUS AND ADJACENT CIRCUITS 26  A FAULT ON ADJACENT CIRCUIT WILL BE FED BY DG CIRCUIT AND MAY RESULT IN TWO CIRCUITS OPERATING THUS IMPACTING RELIABILITY  LATERAL FUSE COORDINATION WILL NEED TO BE ASSESSED ON ADJACENT CIRCUITS DUE TO HIGHER FAULT CURRENT

Line to Ground Fault Currents 27

EFFECTIVELY GROUNDED SYSTEM PER IEEE STANDARD

EFFECTIVELY GROUNDED SYSTEM CHECK ? CUSTOMER’S HIGHSIDE RESISTIVE GROUNDING 24 OHM ON 12.47kV SIDE OF THE TRANSFORMER 29

CNP REQUIRES TRANSFER TRIP FOR DGs OVER 2000 kW. HOWEVER CIRCUIT SWITCHING CAN SCUTTLE THIS 30 Sub 1Sub 2 DG N.C.N.O. (TIE) N.C. Utility crew opens the N.C. switch Utility crew closes the tie switch DG will be transferred from a feeder from sub 1 to another feeder from sub 2 Lateral

SWEDE 2015 NEXT YEAR’S PRESENTATION DG ACTUAL DATA VERSUS MODELED THANK YOU ! 31

NEXT YEAR DG ACTUAL VERSUS MODELED THANK YOU ! 32 Any Questions ?