Junction Modelling in a Strategic Transport Model Wee Liang Lim Henry Le Land Transport Authority, Singapore.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Advertisements

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR THE OLYMPIC GAMES ATHENS 2004 ATTIKO METRO S.A. Anna Anastasaki.
Jeannie Wu, Planner Sep  Background  Model Review  Model Function  Model Structure  Transportation System  Model Interface  Model Output.
Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.
Transportation Engineering
INTRODUCTION TO TRANSPORT Lecture 3 Introduction to Transport Lecture 4: Traffic Signal.
Presented by: Pascal Volet, ing. October 11,2007 Application of Dynameq in Montréal: bridging the gap between regional models and microsimulation Application.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
SATURN and DIADEM Practical Experience Toni Dichev 31 st Oct 2008.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
SCAG Region Heavy Duty Truck Model Southern California Region Heavy Duty Truck Model.
2012 Citilabs Asia User Conference
GEOG 111 & 211A Transportation Planning Traffic Assignment.
Enhanced analytical decision support tools The Scheme level Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January.
REVISION. Sample Question The sample questions for this year. Describe briefly the classic transport model, explaining the four stages of the model. [10]
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
About this presentation Target audience: Prepared for Dr. Mitsuru Saito’s BYU graduate level class. Feb Please contact Mike Brown at
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
THE PLANET99 MODEL DEMAND AND REVENUE FORECASTING TOOL FOR RAIL OPERATORS 8th EUROPEAN EMME/2 USERS CONFERENCE Jeremy Douch GIBB Transport Planning May.
Modelling of Toll Roads KUALA LUMPUR region Malaysia Presentation to Emme/2 users Group Brisbane April 2004.
An Experimental Procedure for Mid Block-Based Traffic Assignment on Sub-area with Detailed Road Network Tao Ye M.A.Sc Candidate University of Toronto MCRI.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Travel Demand Modeling At NCTCOG Presentation For IOWA TMIP Peer Review March 30 – April 1, 2004.
Seoul Development Institute Building a TDM Impact Analysis System for the Introduction of a Short-Term Congestion Management Program in Seoul Jin-Ki Eom,
Traffic Assignment Convergence and its Effects on Selecting Network Improvements By Chris Blaschuk, City of Calgary and JD Hunt, University of Calgary.
Considerations when applying Paramics to Strategic Traffic Models Paramics User Group Meeting October 9 th, 2009 Presented Matthew.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
The Use of EMME/2 by Transek – an Overview “Fantasy and imagination is the limit” by Göran Tegnér Transek Consultants, Solna, Sweden Presentation for the.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
Technical Session 4 – Model Development & Calibration 4.1 Calibration of the TRANS Model for the National Capital Region (Ottawa-Hull) Don Stephens P.
Tshwane Line 1 Traffic Simulation Results October 2012.
Detailed Intersection Modelling Based on Analysis of the Interaction of Conflicting Traffic Movements Edwin Hull, Billy Kwok September 2011.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
Transportation Planning, Transportation Demand Analysis Land Use-Transportation Interaction Transportation Planning Framework Transportation Demand Analysis.
GABITES PORTER Waikato Regional Transportation Model Grant Smith & Julie Ballantyne.
Cal y Mayor y Asociados, S.C. Atizapan – El Rosario Light Rail Transit Demand Study October th International EMME/2 UGM.
Major Transportation Corridor Studies Using an EMME/2 Travel Demand Forecasting Model: The Trans-Lake Washington Study Carlos Espindola, Youssef Dehghani.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Challenges in Using Paramics in a Secondary Plan Study – Case Study of Downsview, Toronto Paramics Users Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
The implementation and effects of recent updates to the crowding assignment macro within the Docklands Public Transport Model (DPTM) Michael Swiderski.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
Intersection Delay Modeller - EMME Modeller
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
CE 341 Transportation Planning
Turn Penalties Based on Junction Delays Imported from SATURN Need for Strategic & Detailed Model Need for Strategic & Detailed Model Traditional Methodology.
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
Comparative Analysis of Traffic and Revenue Risks Associated with Priced Facilities 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
Transport Model for Scotland SHS-based inputs and forecast trends SHS User Day David Connolly and Lucy Barker| November 2007.
Incorporating Time of Day Modeling into FSUTMS – Phase II Time of Day (Peak Spreading) Model Presentation to FDOT SPO 23 March 2011 Heinrich McBean.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
CEE 320 Fall 2008 Route Choice CEE 320 Steve Muench.
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Traffic Management in Singapore
Travel Demand Forecasting: Mode Choice
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Ohio Traffic Forecasting Manual
Transportation Engineering Calculating Signal Delay February 23, 2011
Presentation transcript:

Junction Modelling in a Strategic Transport Model Wee Liang Lim Henry Le Land Transport Authority, Singapore

Outline Background Objective Overview of the LTA Strategic Transport Model Review of iterative junction modelling Revised junction modelling Comparison of performance results Conclusions

Background Singapore A city state 648 km 2 area ; 4.1 mil population. 109 km rail lines (MRT/LRT), 150 km expressways 575 km major arterial roads, 1500 signalised junctions EMME/2 Strategic Transport Model Used widely to forecast travel demand for planning & design of transport proposals, also calculate user benefits Enhanced over the years Incorporated “iterative” junction modelling in 2000 Recently revised junction modelling

Objective To present a review of the iterative approach in junction modelling and its limitations. To present a revised & simpler approach in junction modelling and its improvements in model convergence

Trip Generation Trip Distribution Mode Split Peak Hour Factors Trip Assignment Model Inputs Model Outputs Model Step iteration HBW (car, m/c, taxi, LRT, MRT, bus, c/o bus) HBS (car, LRT, MRT, bus, school bus) HBB, HBL, NHB Daily OD matrices by mode and trip purpose - travel times - highway volumes - transit volumes - other performance measures for downstream analysis (e.g. financial, economic analysis) Model outputs - car, m/c, taxi - LRT/MRT - c/o bus, school bus - bus Peak hour matrices, AM, PM & OP by mode HBW (highway, transit) HBS, HBB, HBL, NHB Trip distribution matrices by trip purpose and main mode HBW, HBS, HBB HBL, NHB Daily trip ends by purpose OVERVIEW OF LTA STRATEGIC TRANSPORT MODEL - Planning Data: population, employment, school enrolment. - Car ownership, - Dwelling types & others Land use data Trip rate data From assignments - Car, m/c, Taxi - LRT/MRT/Bus Skims of time and cost From HIS and traffic count data Peak hour factors by trip purpose, mode and area - tourist trips, airport trips - goods vehicle trips Special trip matrices - links, junctions - travel time, delay functions - transit services Network From HIS and SP survey Mode split parameters Trip distribution functions HIS data

Junction Modelling - Iterative Approach Review Standard Calculate link delay Assign Traffic Start Check Convergence No END Yes Calculate link delay Calculate Junction delay Calculate movement capacity & effective green time Iterative Approach Run assignment for N iterations Start Check Convergence No END Yes Assignment Procedure

Iterative Approach Review Turn penalty (delay) function (tpf): User defined turn data –UP1: 6 digits to store 1:No. of lanes 2: No. of short lanes 3:Shared lane description 4: Signal control or not 5:Opposed information6: unused –UP2: unopposed green time & opposed green time –UP3: cycle time Extra user turn data: effective green time & capacity Junction Coding

Iterative Approach Review Delay function was based on SIDRA Formulae Delay = uniform delay + Overflow delay Function of cycle time, green split, arrival flow and movement capacity Delay Function for Signalised Movement D(delay) = c/2*(1-u) 2 /(1-u*x) + 900*(x-1 + Sqr((x-1) 2 + 4x/C))

Iterative Approach Review Unopposed Movement –Capacity = Saturation flow*green time/cycle time Opposed Movement: –Opposing movement & flow –Effective saturation flow –Effective capacity for opposed movement Movement in a shared lane: –Capacity is proportioned to the ratio of its flow over total lane flow. Movement Capacity

Assignment & convergence instability. Factors identified: (i) Steep junction delay curve (ii) Iterative calculation of movement capacity Iterative Approach Review Limitation s 1st Iteration 3rd Iteration 2nd Iteration 4th Iteration

REVISED JUNCTION MODELLING

Revised Approach To represent realistically the junction delay in a strategic network To improve model convergence and therefore assignment stability and accuracy Objectives

Junction Modelling - Revised Approach Assignment Procedure Calculate link delay Calculate Junction delay Calculate movement capacity & effective green time Iterative Approach Assign Traffic Start Check Convergence No END Yes Calculate link delay Calculate Junction delay Calculate movement capacity & effective green time Revised Approach Assign Traffic Start Check Convergence No END Yes

Revised Approach To reduce the steep gradient of the iterative delay curve Revised Delay Function Delay = { (V/C)}*{c-g} for V/C <1 { (V/C-1)}*{c-g} 1 < V/C < 2 {2 + 2 (V/C - 2)}* {c-g}2 < V/C Source: V/C < 1: uniform delay V/C > 1: calibration of the base model

Revised Approach Different base saturation flow (veh/hour) Left ThroughRight Simplified calculation for shared lane movements Saturation flow = base saturation flow/no. movements Added calculation for short Lane Saturation flow = storage length/(vehicle space* mov. green time) (Capacity  400 veh/hr) Simplified calculation for opposed movement Saturation flow = base saturation flow/3 (Capacity  200 veh/hr) Revised & Improved Calculation of Movement Capacity

COMPARISON OF PERFORMANCE RESULTS

Comparison of movement delays Left Movement Iterative: Ave 16.8 sec Revised: Ave 22.2 sec 32% increase

Iterative: Ave 30.0 sec Revised: Ave 27.0 sec 10% reduction Through Movement Comparison of movement delays

Iterative: Ave 38.4 sec Revised: Ave 43.2 sec 12.5 % Increase Right Movement Comparison of movement delays

Comparison of network travel time 1999 Network - AM peak Observations: Junction delay increased despite delay curve smoothened Link travel time reduction => more efficient route choice, more converged assignment

Comparison between modelled and observed traffic volumes

Comparison between modelled and observed travel time

Improvement in model convergence Comparison of model running time on the 2015 network The revised approach has improved model convergence through reducing number of iterations & running time. Note: (38) number of iterations per highway assignment

Conclusion Junction delay is a major contributor to a journey time in an urban network. Full incorporation of SIDRA to a strategic transport model may not suitable. Revised and simpler approach to calculation of junction delay was presented The revised model represents realistic movement delays, travel times and traffic demand in a network. Model converges faster and predicts stable travel time & saving for transport schemes.