CFD Modeling and Simulation for the Waller Creek Tunnel/8 th St. Lateral Junction Alden Research Laboratory Inc. 30 Shrewsbury St., Holden, MA Preliminary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practical Course SC & V More on Boundaries Dr. Miriam Mehl Institut für Informatik Schwerpunkt Wissenschaftliches Rechnen.
Advertisements

Fluid Mechanics Research Group Two phase modelling for industrial applications Prof A.E.Holdø & R.K.Calay.
Phoenics User Conference on CFD May 2004 Vipac Engineers & Scientists Ltd COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS Simulation of Turbulent Flows and Pollutant Dispersion.
Waller Creek Intake CFD Modeling and Simulation ALDEN Research Laboratory Inc. 30 Shrewsbury St., Holden, MA Preliminary Results September 18, 2009.
Waller Creek Intake CFD Modeling and Simulation
Waller Creek Intake CFD Modeling and Simulation ALDEN Research Laboratory Inc. 30 Shrewsbury St., Holden, MA Preliminary Results October 5, 2009.
Outline Overview of Pipe Flow CFD Process ANSYS Workbench
Return on Investment – Payback Method By R. S. Miolla.
University of Western Ontario
Welcome !  Introductions: Steering Committee Members  Please MUTE your phone if possible to minimize background noise.  Please ASK QUESTIONS and for.
High Performance Computing in the SCRamjet Design Project HPC User Forum Meeting Roanoke, April /21/091 Chris Larson, Axel Dietrich.
Waller Creek 8 th Street Side Weir CFD Modeling and Simulation ALDEN Research Laboratory Inc. 30 Shrewsbury St., Holden, MA Preliminary Results September.
1 SEE MSc. Thesis CFD simulation of flow field in a hydraulic turbine Meeting KTH SWECO TURAB.
Youngwook Kang, Cornell University Andrei Simion, The Cooper Union
Waller Creek Outlet CFD Modeling Results Connection #2 with 3’ High Spillway Flip Bucket 2-Year Flood (2320 cfs) Lady Bird Lake Inflow (1.25 ft/s) 9/9/20081ALDEN.
Mike Fitton Engineering Analysis Group Design and Computational Fluid Dynamic analysis of the T2K Target Neutrino Beams and Instrumentation 6th September.
ICHS 2007, San Sebastian, Spain 1 SAFETY OF LABORATORIES FOR NEW HYDROGEN TECHNIQUES Heitsch, M., Baraldi, D., Moretto, P., Wilkening, H. Institute for.
Hydrology and Hydraulics. Reservoir Configuration.
(e.g., the Toth Problem) z x z x h = c x + z o Profile Models.
Gambit Overview Ahmadi/Nazridoust ME 437/537/637.
Computational flow modeling of the equine upper airway
Lecture Objectives: Review discretization methods for advection diffusion equation Accuracy Numerical Stability Unsteady-state CFD Explicit vs. Implicit.
Gully performance – connecting above and below ground system EPSRC Grant: EP/FP202511/1 Ida Sabtu Gavin Sailor John Blanksby Adrian Saul Istvan Galambos.
Aerodynamics of Turbine Blade Cooling Air Feed Rig System: Iris Researcher: Nicholas Wright Mentor: Dr. Shigeo Hayashibara ERAU/NASA Space Grant Honeywell.
Define the borders of the study area Summation of data (Hydraulic data, Hydrology data, Geology data…..etc.) Make planning and suitable methodology.
A High Elevation Aerosol Inlet Modeling Study and Inter-comparison A. Gannet Hallar 1, Ian McCubbin 1, Igor Novosselov 2, Riley Gorder 2, John Ogren 3.
Middle Fork Project Flow and Temperature Modeling (Status Report) November 4, 2008.
© 2011 Autodesk Freely licensed for use by educational institutions. Reuse and changes require a note indicating that content has been modified from the.
ME 566 Computer Lab ANSYS–CFX Tutorial Oct. 5, :30 – 4:30 pm
CFD Pre-Lab 2 Simulation of Turbulent Flow around an Airfoil Seong Mo Yeon, and Timur Dogan 11/12/2013.
Manufactured Treatment Devices Pilot Update 2014.
Review of Urban Modeling Program at LLNL CRTI RD Project Review Meeting Canadian Meteorological Centre August 22-23, 2006.
Flow interaction between two Cars in windtunnel and in Environment By: Ahmad Gohari Farhad Jebelisinaki 1.
Channel Flow Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.4, , 9.7.
6-1 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary © 2009 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. April 28, 2009 Inventory # Chapter 6 Day 1 Review and Tips Introduction to CFX.
Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme. Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme unconditionally stable for  >=0.5 second-order accurate if 
Computational Fluid Dynamics in OpenFOAM Henrik Kaald Melbø Supervisor: Heinz Preisig Department of Chemical Engineering.
2 DGS-SEE SEMINAR ON FIRE PROTECTION FOR PHYSICS RESEARCH FACILITIES OCTOBER 2015 CERN FIRE SIMULATIONS IN THE PS ACCELERATOR TUNNEL TO DEFINE A.
Presentation to Traffic Working Group February 6, 2014.
STUDY OF THE AIR TEMPERATURE AND VELOCITY AROUND THE ATLAS MUON CHAMBERS Emma Vigo Castellvi ST/CV Design.
KIT TOWN OFFICE OSTENDORFHAUS Karlsruhe, 21 st November 2012 CIRTEN Consorzio universitario per la ricerca tecnologica nucleare Antonio Cammi, Stefano.
CFD Lab 1 Simulation of Turbulent Pipe Flow Seong Mo Yeon, Timur Dogan, and Michael Conger 10/07/2015.
उद्यमेन हि सिद्ध्यन्ति
Waller Creek Outlet CFD Modeling Results Connection #2 with 3’ High Spillway Flip Bucket 500-Year Flood (11,270 cfs) Lady Bird Lake Inflow (3.5 ft/s) at.
Lecture Objectives Meshing Unsteady State CFD.
1 CASE 2: Modeling of a synthetic jet in a cross flow Williamsburg, Virginia, USA March 29 th -31 th 2004 C. Marongiu 1, G. Iaccarino 2 1 CIRA Italian.
한국수자원공사 연구소 배관내부 전산해석 : CFX-5.7 김 범 석 한국해양대학교 유동정보연구실.
Lecture Objectives -Analyze some examples related to natural ventilation.
Flood propagation Simulation of the IMPACT case study on the Tous dam-break flow Université catholique de Louvain Sandra Soares Frazão and Yves Zech.
Tony Arts Carlo Benocci Patrick Rambaud
Demonstration of Elmer Ashvinkumar Chaudhari LUT School of Engineering Science BM20A5100 Scientific Computing and Numerics for PDEs.
E. Da Riva, S. E. Wojnarska PS Ventilation - Smoke extraction -
Investigation of supersonic and hypersonic laminar shock/boundary-layer interactions R.O. Bura, Y.F.Yao, G.T. Roberts and N.D. Sandham School of Engineering.
Version 1.0 3/23/2007 © 2007 ANSYS, Inc. All rights reserved. Inventory # BladeModeler 11.0 ANSYS, Inc. Proprietary BladeModeler 1.0 Introduction.
Date of download: 7/9/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Obtaining Time-Varying Pulsatile Gas Flow Rates With the Help of Dynamic Pressure.
Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Hydraulic Loss of Finite Length Dividing Junctions
Design of a Variable Pressure Gradient Wind Tunnel
2D Jet Simulation Testing
Date of download: 10/30/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Shock Wave/ Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions on a Cylinder
Waller Creek 8th Street Side Weir CFD Modeling and Simulation
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Lecture Objectives Learn about Implementation of Boundary Conditions
Physics-based simulation for visual computing applications
SIEVE RIVER: SIMULATION OF THE 19/11/1999 FLOW EVENT
Problem Set #3 – Part 3 - Remediation
Velocity vector images in a characteristic section depicting the main vortex in 4 aneurysms and the inflow jet in 3 of the aneurysms. Velocity vector images.
Investigation of Flow Turning in a Natural Blockage
Practice Geometry Practice
Presentation transcript:

CFD Modeling and Simulation for the Waller Creek Tunnel/8 th St. Lateral Junction Alden Research Laboratory Inc. 30 Shrewsbury St., Holden, MA Preliminary Results By:

CFD Model Geometry

103.41’ 100’ Transition 50’ = 16’ 57.75’ = 16’ Plan View Profile View A A B B Section A-ASection B-B 10 ‘ ’ ’ R = 10.21’ R = ’ Θ = 45 o

Boundary and Flow Conditions Tunnel Inflow Outflow Junction Inflow

Computational Mesh: ~ 310,000 cells

Waller Creek (WC) Tunnel Flow Scenarios Return Period1 yr2 yr5 yr10 yr100 yr500 yr Proposed - Lag Tunnel / Peak Intervening Flow ( 8th Street Lateral Junction) Tunnel Flow (12th St. Inlet) th St. Connector Tunnel Flow % Flow of 8th St. Connector Tunnel41.1%34.2%27.7%25.5%26.8%27.4% Proposed - Lag Tunnel / Peak Intervening Flow ( 4th Street Lateral Junction) Tunnel Flow (12th St. Inlet + 8th St. Inlet) th St. Connector Tunnel Flow % Flow of 4th St. Connector Tunnel21.7%18.2%14.3%13.0%12.8% Flow Scenarios:

Lag Tunnel / Peak Intervening Flow ( 8 th Street Lateral Junction) 100 Year Return Period (Uniform Inflow at Lateral Junction Inlet)

Lag Tunnel / Peak Intervening Flow ( 8 th Street Lateral Junction) 1 Year Return Period (Non-uniform Inflow at Lateral Junction Inlet)

Lag Tunnel / Peak Intervening Flow ( 8 th Street Lateral Junction) 1 Year Return Period (Uniform Inflow at Lateral Junction Inlet)