The Next Step Chandra Trikha System Planning Manager SHETL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guidance Note on Joint Programming
Advertisements

UNFCCC secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechanisms Verónica Colerio, Standard Setting Unit Standardized Baselines in the CDM: Decisions and Way Forward.
Regulators’ Code July Regulators’ Code A statutory Code Came into effect in April 2014, replacing the Regulators’ Compliance Code All local authorities.
ICN Merger Working Group Work Product Merger Review Workshop March 10-11, 2009 Taipei.
2015 – a forward glance 17 February South Africa has a sophisticated credit bureau system
Structure of Distribution Charges A User’s perspective David Tolley Innogy & Npower.
Procurement and Tendering Presentation to [NAME OF CLIENT] [YOUR NAME] [DATE]
Comments on the 2011 draft SGEI Package Damien Geradin Covington & Burling, Tilburg University and College of Europe Bruges, 30 September 2011.
The Australian telecommunications access regime Presentation to ACMA International Training program 2006 Michael Eady Communications Group Compliance and.
John Zammit-Haber National Grid
Implementing RIS3: from Strategy to Action Plan Panagiotis Koudoumakis Head of Programming and Evaluation Unit Managing Authority of Eastern Macedonia.
Simple, Effective, Transparent Regulation: Best Practices in OECD countries Cesar Cordova-Novion Deputy Head of Programme Regulatory Reform, OECD.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
The Lean Sourcing Process
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Review of progress and future work SQSS Sub Group 2 August 2006 DTI / OFGEM OFFSHORE TRANSMISSION EXPERTS GROUP.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Staffing and Training.
Entry Capacity Release Methodology Statement Transmission Workstream, 4 th May 2006.
Achieving a sound investment climate – the role of regulators Boaz Moselle Joint-Chair, CEER Gas Working Group Managing Director – Corporate Strategy Ofgem.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
Flanders project application and appraisal How it supports partnership.
7/12/20051 Integrity Transparency Consistency. 7/12/20052 What is The Association? A cross-industry group of organizations with an interest in achieving.
MOD506 – Gas Performance Assurance Framework and Governance Arrangements.
Consult21 Information is subject to change and is for discussion purposes only. Any dates/timings are the current anticipated timescales and may be subject.
GCSE and A level reform Phil Carr and Laura Dougan Reform Managers, Ofqual.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Ofgem’s Gas SCR – Background on the DSR mechanism Stephen Jarvis 02/07/14.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
Medium-term TEC Trading ARODG Seminars Glasgow & London February 2007.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
1 Sustainable Development Assessment: A formalized approach initiated in Tunisia Rafik MISSAOUI (APEX-ALCOR)
Code Governance Seminar 11 February 2008 Philip Davies Director of Regulatory Affairs.
Ms. Tshilidzi Ramuedzisi Chief Director: Energy Planning Integrated Energy Plan: Introduction and Background 1.
Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.
Code Governance Review Major Policy reform Proposals Gas Customer Forum 26 January 2009.
The partnership principle and the European Code of Conduct on Partnership.
Tahir Kapetanovic ENM TF Co-Chair XIX Florence Forum, December 2010 ERGEG Opinion on the ENTSO-E pilot TYNDP.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
1 May 2012CACM Network Code Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management for Electricity Network Code ROME, 15 th May 2012.
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
15 February 2006 TPCR second consultation: gas offtake Offtake Arrangements Workstream 15 February 2006.
CDCM Annual Review Workshop Mo Sukumaran SSEPD (on behalf of DNOs) 17 May May | Energy Networks Association - CMG.
Fundamentals of Governance: Parliament and Government Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
Entry Capacity Substitution Workshop 4 9 th July 2008 Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement: Discussion Paper.
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement - ExCR Transmission Workstream – 5 th March 2009.
Aspect 1 Defining the problem - Problem: The design context will normally offer a variety of potential problems to solve. A focused problem and need is.
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
Work Plan and Key Deliverables 2 November WORK PLAN.
Stages of Research and Development
Technical Business Consultancy Project
Evaluation training NHS NEW Devon CCG Transforming Community Services
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
Presentation on the Application Process
Business environment in the EU Prepared by Dr. Endre Domonkos (PhD)
The Lean Sourcing Process
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
Proposer: Malcolm Montgomery Panel Date: 20/10/16
Background MDD is currently managed within SPAA
Development of Entry Capacity Substitution
Portfolio, Programme and Project
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
Commercial Arrangements For Gas Quality Service – Introduction
Capacity Access Review
HMPPS Innovation Grant Programme (2020 – 2022)
Presentation transcript:

The Next Step Chandra Trikha System Planning Manager SHETL

The Next Step Developments of Scenario. Application of methodologies to the scenario. Evaluation of outputs and methodologies. Proposed SQSS changes Impact Assessment Report to the Review Group Industry consultation Change request submission to the Authority.

Review Group - Principles Licensees can discharge their obligations Develop, maintain and operate an efficient, economical and coordinated transmission system. Ensure that the users of the transmission system have appropriate level of Security and Quality of supply. No discrimination Facilitate effective competition in supply and generation.

Working Group – Evaluation and Assessment The working group will provide the following to the Review Group: Criterion for evaluation of methodology. Provide methodology details to the review group. Provide appropriate and sufficient information to the Review Group to enable –Industry consultation –Parties to carryout assessment.

Stage 1 Evaluation Criterion In evaluating methodologies the WG will use the following evaluation criterion (a)Level of Security and Quality of Supply using each methodology. (b)Consistency in application. (c)Ease of application. (d)Gives “Appropriate” level of transmission. (e)Results in a deterministic standard with guidance on economic assessment. (f)“Fits Well” to the current market arrangements. (g)Transparency in application.

Evaluation Criterion (a)The level of Security and Quality of supply the methodology provides. The WG will be seeking to achieve “NO LESS and NO MORE” Security and Quality of Supply to the users of the transmission system than the current SQSS provides.

Evaluation Criterion (b) The methodology has consistency and repeatability. The aim is to ensure that the application of any new methodology results in consistent and repeatable answers i.e. applying the methodology by separate licensee for similar background conditions results in similar outputs.

Evaluation Criterion (c) Ease of application. The WG will consider the relative simplicity of the methodology to ensure that the it can be easily understood and applied by engineers using generally available analysis tools and does not require complex detailed simulation, investment in bespoke analysis tools etc.

Evaluation Criterion (d) The methodology gives ‘Appropriate’ level of transmission. Evaluation will take in to account that the licensee is required to develop its transmission system in an efficient, economical and coordinated manner. Licensees are seeking to determine the most appropriate level of transmission to achieve an optimum solution.

Evaluation Criterion (e) Investigate how the methodology delivers the deterministic criteria and what guidance is given on the options for economic assessment. It is generally accepted and we believe that a deterministic standard is easy to apply, transparent, defendable and gives clear messages whereas an “economic” assessment based standard brings with it the burden of uncertainty and contention.

Evaluation Criterion (f) The methodology “Fits Well” with the current market. Does the methodology provides accurate and appropriate signals to enable participation in the market in a non discriminatory manner.

Evaluation Criterion (g) The methodology is transparent in application. The degree of transparency could be judged on the basis that the licensee can simply explain the methodology to an Inspector (during planning application process); or to a Regulator for justifying investment and operating costs.

Industry Views on Evaluation Criterion It is vital for the GB SQSS Review Group to engage with the industry and seek their views on the following important factors such as Wind generation and Security of Supply. Access to the system. Consistency of application. This workshop is first of such opportunity.

Stage 2 Assessment of Methodologies The Working Group is developing a scenario for the years 2007/08, 2013/14 and 2020/21. The methodologies will be applied to this scenario. The output at selected boundaries (e.g. SHETL – SPT and others) will be assessed against the review group principles and evaluation criterion. The aim of the working group is to prepare a proposal for the GB SQSS Review group.

Stage 3 Industry Consultation The WG proposal will allow the GB SQSS Review group To conduct an industry consultation. Allow review group parties to assess impact. Submit to the Authority a change request. This will be an other opportunity for the industry to express their views.

Your suggestions Your comments, suggestions, observations, and views will be appreciated by the WG. Please the GB SQSS Review Group secretary at