FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 1 Validation of confirmatory methods for MRPL and MRL substances in matrices of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A ERROR : FALSE POSITIVE ß ERROR : FALSE NEGATIVE ANALYTICAL LIMITS consumer risk producer risk non-compliant compliant Ref: H. De Brabander.
Advertisements

Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Validation of screening methods (2002/657/EC)
Analytical Method Development and Validation
Instrumental Analysis
1 Method Selection and Development l Initial Considerations n What does the method need to do? 3 What analyte/s need to be assayed? 3 What range or concentration.
CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY Fall
Chapter 1 Introduction Analytical Chemistry deals with methods for determining the chemical composition of samples. Qualitative Analysis (identification)
World Health Organization
Results of a European proficiency test for the detection of streptomycin/dihydrostreptomycin, gentamicin and neomycin in milk by ELISA and Biacore methods.
Accreditation & Validation
Surveillance of chloramphenicol residues in milk, eggs and chicken meat by LCMSMS.
Quality Assurance Chapter 29. Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Daniel C. Harris, 6 th Edition, New to this edition and a very important topic in industry.
Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice
Validation of analytical methods
ASEAN GUIDELINES FOR VALIDATION OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES
QUALITY CONTROL OF PHYSICO-Chemical METHODS Introduction :Validation توثيق المصدوقية.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Validation of Analytical Methods Used For Bioequivalence.
Chemometrics Method comparison
Instrumental Analysis
Validation of Analytical Method
Laboratory Validation of Analytical Methods
WELCOME. UV Spectrophotometric Method Development And Estimation of Bicalutamide in Pharmaceutical Dosage Form.
The following minimum specified ranges should be considered: Drug substance or a finished (drug) product 80 to 120 % of the test concentration Content.
Analytical considerations
Laboratory Technical Issues Presentation to: KWWOA April 9, 2014 Department for Environmental Protection Environmental & Public Protection Cabinet To Protect.
Introduction to Analytical Chemistry Dr M. Abd-Elhakeem Faculty of Biotechnology General Chemistry Lecture 7.
Quality WHAT IS QUALITY
DEVELOPMENT OF A RP-HPLC METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF METFORMIN IN HUMAN PLASMA.
Koch, M.: Control Charts© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 In: Wenclawiak, Koch, Hadjicostas (eds.) Quality Assurance in Analytical Chemistry – Training.
Development and validation of Biacore methods for the detection of streptomycin/dihydrostreptomycin, gentamicin and neomycin in milk VIIth International.
Quality Assurance How do you know your results are correct? How confident are you?
5. Quality Assurance and Calibration Quality assurance is We do to get the right answer for our purpose. Have Sufficient accuracy and precision to support.
1 International Federation for Consulting GmbH IFC Validation on the basis of Commission Decision 2002/657/EC by Dr. Michael Scheutwinkel.
1 International Federation for Consulting GmbH IFC Method Validation and QC for Pesticide Residue Analysis SANCO/2007/3131 by Dr. Michael Scheutwinkel.
Introduction The importance of method validation
Validation Defination Establishing documentary evidence which provides a high degree of assurance that specification process will consistently produce.
B. Neidhart, W. Wegscheider (Eds.): Quality in Chemical Measurements © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000 W. WegscheiderValidation: an Example 1 Learning.
Wenclawiak, B.: Fit for Purpose – A Customers View© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 In: Wenclawiak, Koch, Hadjicostas (eds.) Quality Assurance in.
Industrial Technology Institute Test Method Validation & Verification H.P.P.S.Somasiri Principal Research Scientist / SDD-QAD /QM Industrial Technology.
LECTURE 13 QUALITY ASSURANCE METHOD VALIDATION
Workshop Method Validation in Analytical Sciences Current practices and future challenges Gent, 9-10 May 2016 Report from WG 4.
Validation of the AOAC method for pesticides residues analysis in oranges and mandarins in LATU Marina Torres (1) 1, Lucía Alcarraz 1 (2) 1 Laboratorio.
European legislation on methods for antibiotics detection in milk (Council Regulation 2377/90/EC, Council Directive 96/23/EC and Commission Decision 2002/657/EC)
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and
EQUIPMENT and METHOD VALIDATION
L’innovazione Scientifica per la Nutrizione La statale per EXPO, Lodi 16 Ottobre 2015
means to “TO CHECK OR PROVE THE VALIDITY OF” According to FDA – “ The goal of validation is to establish a documented evidence which provides a high degree.
Challenges in Method Validation – A Regulatory Laboratory Perspective
Multi-Analyte LC-MS/MS Methods – Best Practice.
Seán Earley B.Sc., Ph.D. Veterinary Public Health Regulatory
James Byrd, Marta Kozak 28 Apr 2011
Serpil KILIÇ, Murat KILIÇ
Is My Method Fit For Purpose ?
World Health Organization
A sensitive and repeatable method for characterization of sulfonamides and trimethoprim in honey using QuEChERS extracts with Liquid-Chromatography-Tandem.
Troubleshooting Method Development – a case study. Diclofenac in milk.
Dr. Birgit Schmauser, BfArM, Bonn
Validation of Screening Methods
Introduction 3. Instrumentation 2. Objectives 4. Results
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
به نام خدا تضمين کيفيت در آزمايشگاه
Analytical Method Validation
Chapter 5 Quality Assurance and Calibration Methods
ANALYTICAL METHOD VALIDATION
World Health Organization
Simultaneous determination of creatinine, iohexol and p-aminohippuric acid in animal plasma by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass.
Introduction to Analytical Chemistry
Multi-laboratory Method Validation
Levofloxacin structural formula
Presentation transcript:

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 1 Validation of confirmatory methods for MRPL and MRL substances in matrices of veterinary origin according to 2002/657/EC: Case Study VALIDATION OF METHODS Dr. Apr. S. Impens and Ir. S. Carbonnelle Department of Pharmaco-Bromatology Drugs and Hormones

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 2 Allowed substances: maximum residue limits (MRL) Forbidden components: Minimum Required Performance Levels (MRPL) Dxm (EMEA)MRL b,p,e 2 µg/kg Btm (EMEA)MRL b,p 2 µg/kg Prolon (EMEA)MRL b 10 µg/kg Mprolon (EMEA)MRL b 10 µg/kg Flm (B)MRPL2 µg/kg TrmAt (B)MRPL2 µg/kg Example: corticosteroids in liver b = bovine p = porcine e = equidae

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 3 Analysis portion: 20  5 g Hydrolysis: H. Pomatia extract (2 h – 60  5 °C) L/L-extraction: methanol – diethylether Purification: Solid Phase Extraction (C18-column) Separation – Detection: LC-MSn (ThermoFisher Deca XP ion trap) Corticosteroids in liver

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT /657/EC: Performance Characteristics Allowed substances: maximum residue limits (MRL)  QUANTITATIVE PARAMETERS Forbidden components: Minimum Required Performance Levels (MRPL)  QUALITATIVE PARAMETERS

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 5 Criteria for specificity 2002/657/EC: - Chemically related components (metabolites, isomers,…) - Representative number of blank samples Practical work: - 20 blank samples - 20 blank samples fortified with possibly interfering compounds

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 6 Criteria for trueness 2002/657/EC: - 6 replicates of Certified Reference Materials (CRM) if available - Calculation of mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation - Trueness (%)= mean recovery-corrected concentration detected x 100 certified value - Remark: CRM not available  recovery Practical work: -6 identical blank samples fortified at MRL/MRPL

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 7 Criteria for recovery, repeatability and reproducibility 2002/657/EC: - Recovery: 18 samples fortified at : - 6 x 0.5 MRL or 1 MRPL - 6 x 1 MRL or 1.5 MRPL -6 x 1.5 MRL or 2 MRPL - Repeatability: 3 series of recovery analyses -Within-laboratory reproducibility: 3 series of recovery analyses (different operators, different environmental conditions, …) -For between-laboratory reproducibility: Proficiency tests

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 8 Criteria for applicability and ruggedness 2002/657/EC: -Determination of factors influencing measurements results (Method of Youden) Practical work: -Development of the method: minimalisation of the factors influencing the results

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 9 Criteria for stability 2002/657/EC: - Analyte in solution at each concentration level Practical work: - Preparation of working solutions - Conditions of conservation: tabel - Analysis at time 0, after 1 week, 2 weeks, … until instability - 20 °C+ 4 °C+ 20 °C Dark10 aliquots Light10 aliquots

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 10 Criteria for stability 2002/657/EC: - Analyte in matrix at detection capability level Practical work: - Analysis of incurred material - preparation of fortified blank samples - Conservation at min. – 20 °C - Analysis at time 0, after 1 week, 2 weeks, … until instability (max. 20 weeks)

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 11 Criteria for calibration curve 2002/657/EC: - At least 5 levels (including 0) - Description of working range - Determination of the mathematical formula, goodness of fit and acceptability ranges Practical work: -5 levels of concentrations: 0 – 0,5 – 1 – 1,5 – 2 MRL/MRPL

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 12 Criteria for Decision Limit (CCα) 2002 /657/EC: - MRL Substances (permitted limit – α = 5%): 1. Calibration curve: analysis of blank samples and blanks fortified around the MRL  CCα = MRL+ 1,64 σ RWOR blank samples fortified at MRL  CC α = MRL+1.64 σ RW

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 13 Criteria for Decision Limit (CCα) 2002/657/EC: - Banned Substances (no permitted limit – α = 1%): 1. Calibration curve: analysis of blank samples and blanks fortified at and above the MRPL  CCα = Y intercept σ RWOR blank samples  CCα = 3 x S/N RT

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 14 Criteria for Detection Capability (CCβ) 2002/657/EC: - MRL Substances (permitted limit): 1. Calibration curve: analysis of blank samples and blanks fortified around the MRL  CCβ = CCα + 1,64 σ RWOR blank samples fortified at CCα  CCβ = CCα +1,64 σ RW

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 15 MRL CC  Signal or Concentration CC   =   MRL  sample Detection Capability Case of permitted limit

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 16 Criteria for Detection Capability (CCβ) 2002/657/EC: - Banned Substances (no permitted limit): 1. Calibration curve: analysis of blank samples fortified below and at the MRPL  CCβ = CC α +1,64 σ RWOR 2. Analysis of 20 blank materials fortified at CCα  CCβ = CC α +1,64 σ RWOR 3. Analysis of 20 blank materials fortified at and above CCα:  Less than 5% of false compliant

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 17 Detection Capability Case of no established permitted limit or banned substance X blank CC  Signal or Concentration CC   ≠   blank  sampl e

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 18 Validation of corticosteroids in liver 0 MRL0,5 MRL1 MRL1.5 MRL2 MRL Day Day Day Day Analysis of mix of liver (pork, beef, horse, sheep) MATRIX EFFECTS: DILUTION EFFECT Alternative validation strategy

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 19 Validation of corticosteroids in liver 0 MRL0,5 MRL1 MRL1.5 MRL2 MRL Day Day Day Day Analysis of bovine liver + calibration curve in matrix (0 - 0,25 - 0, ,5 - 2 MRL/MRPL) + calibration curve in mobile phase (0 - 0,25 - 0, ,5 - 2 MRL/MRPL)

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 20 Flexible scope Criteria that should be fulfilled by ISO accredited laboratories working with the principle of flexible scope for analyses concerning EC Decision 96/23/EC – 2002/657/EC BELAC 2 – 105 rev1-2006

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 21 Flexible scope - Continuous changes of normes  flexibility - Classes of matrices for flexible scope: - eggs and protein-rich tissues (muscle, kidney, liver, thyroid,fish, aquaculture, eggs) - fat - urine, bile water - plasma, blood, milk -Faeces -Feed -Preparations -Hair -Others (retina, honey,...) Secondary validation: - Qual methods:  3 blank samples, 3 fortified samples at or below MRL/MRPL - Quant methods:  3 blank samples, 6 fortified samples at or below MRL/MRPL (CC  – repeatability – trueness - recovery)  completion of validation: routine analyses

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 22 Validation of corticosteroids in liver 0 MRL/MRPL 0,5 MRL/MRPL 1 MRL/MRPL 1.5 MRL/MRPL 2 MRL/MRPL pork133 horse133 Sheep day Sheep day Mini validation: Analysis of other species (horse, porcine, ovine)  ovine: 2 series of analyses because of additional extraction step (hexane)

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 23 Qualitative validation parameters Relative retention time (RRT) RRT = absolute retention time target absolute retention time internal std  2002/657/EC: RRT (LC-MSn) = ± 2,5 % RRT reference std or control sample Diagnostic ions - identification points (IPs) -Flm,TrmAt (banned)  2002/657/EC: min. 4 IPs -Dxm, Btm, Prolon, Mprolon  2002/657/EC: min. 3 (MRL bovine) or 4 IPs (horse, sheep)

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 24 RRT - IPs Identification Points: - Precursor Ion → 1 IP - Transition Product Ion → 1.5 IP = 4 IPs

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 25 Linearity Mandel’s Fitting Test : linear (y = ax + b) or quadratic (y = ax 2 + bx + c) regression?  Calibration curves linear Dexamethasone 0 – 4 µg/ kg

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 26 Matrix effect Calibration curve’s slope: comparison mobile phase – matrix (T-test)  matrix effect prednisolone flumethasone

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 27 Quantitative validation parameters CCα - CCβ  ISO is used to calculate CCα and CCβ CostNormes (µg/ kg) CC  (µg/ kg)CC  (µg/ kg) Btm Dxm Flm MProlon Prolon TrmAt

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 28 Quantitative validation parameters CCα - CCβ  ISO is used to calculate CCα and CCβ Repeatability  recovery (70-110%) and CVr (max. 2/3 CVrw Horwitz) Cost CVr (%)Recovery (%) Btm Dxm2.696 MProlon Prolon9.5105

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 29 Quantitative validation parameters CCα - CCβ  ISO is used to calculate CCα and CCβ Repeatability  recovery (70-120%) and CVr (max. 2/3 CVrw Horwitz) Reproducibility  CV rw Cost CVrw (%) Btm19 Dxm9 MProlon11.9 Prolon25.2

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 30 Quantitative validation parameters CCα - CCβ  ISO is used to calculate CCα and CCβ Repeatability  recovery (70-120%) and CVr (max. 2/3 CVrw Horwitz) Reproducibility  CV rw Selectivity and specificity  LC-MSn: selective and specific

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 31 LC-MSn: selectivity - specificity

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 32 Quantitative validation parameters CCα - CCβ  ISO is used to calculate CCα and CCβ Repeatability  recovery (70-120%) and CVs (max. 2/3 CV Horwitz) Reproducibility  CV rw Selectivity and specificity  LC-MSn: selective and specific Stability  under current development

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 33 Stability in solution 2002/657/EC: - Analyte in solution at each concentration level Practical work: - Analysis: - Cost in Meoh: 1 mg/ ml, 100 µg/ml, fortification mix - Cost in mobile phase: reference std mix - Analysis at time 0, after 1 week, 2 weeks, … until instability - 20 °C+ 4 °C+ 20 °C Dark10 aliquots Light10 aliquots

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 34 Stability in solution concentrationSolventconservation 1 mg/ mlMeoh12 months (- 20 °C) 100 µg/ mlMeoh12 months (- 20 °C) Fort mixMeoh3 months (8 °C) 100 µg/ mlMobile phase1 week (8 °C) Ref std mixMobile phase1 week(8 °C)  reference std in mobile phase with fortification mix in meoh

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 35 Stability in matrix 2002/657/EC: - Analyte in matrix at detection capability level Practical work: - Preparation of fortified blank samples, conservation at min. – 20 °C - non-compliant samples: conservation for max. 6 months  under development

FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE (FPS) HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT 36 Conclusions All 2002/657/EC validation criteria for the determination of corticosteroids in liver using LC-MSn are fulfilled CONCLUSION The analytical procedure is suitable for identification and quantification of Betamethasone, Dexamethasone, Flumethasone, Methylprednisolone, Triamcinolone-Acetonide in bovine, porcine, horse and ovine liver.