NSF Workshop on Fundamental Research in Networking: Future Directions and Visions for Networking Research Ness B. Shroff School of Electrical and Computer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brief-out: Isolation Working Group Topic discussion leader: Ken Birman.
Advertisements

INDIANAUNIVERSITYINDIANAUNIVERSITY GENI Global Environment for Network Innovation James Williams Director – International Networking Director – Operational.
All rights reserved © 2006, Alcatel Grid Standardization & ETSI (May 2006) B. Berde, Alcatel R & I.
The Role of Environmental Monitoring in the Green Economy Strategy K Nathan Hill March 2010.
Software Engineering Course Instructor: Aisha Azeem.
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
DriveSense’14 NSF Workshop on Large-Scale Traffic and Driving Activity Data DriveSense’14, Oct 30-31, Norfolk, VA.
Collaboration Proposal Proposed Interaction between CSDL and AAI With Narration by Nicholas J. Parks.
GENI: Global Environment for Networking Innovations Larry Landweber Senior Advisor NSF:CISE Joint Techs Madison, WI July 17, 2006.
4.1.5 System Management Background What is in System Management Resource control and scheduling Booting, reconfiguration, defining limits for resource.
Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense © 2005 by Carnegie Mellon University 1 Pittsburgh, PA Dennis Smith, David Carney and Ed Morris DEAS.
Rugged Communications Connected for Good. Philosophy Rugged Communications aims to extend the frontier of connectivity by designing and deploying autonomously.
1 Sensor Networks and Networked Societies of Artifacts Jose Rolim University of Geneva.
Introduction and Overview “the grid” – a proposed distributed computing infrastructure for advanced science and engineering. Purpose: grid concept is motivated.
Is 'Designing' Cyberinfrastructure - or, Even, Defining It - Possible? Peter A. Freeman National Science Foundation January 29, 2007 The views expressed.
Internet Research Needs a Critical Perspective Towards Models –Sally Floyd –IMA Workshop, January 2004.
1 GENI: Global Environment for Network Innovations Jennifer Rexford On behalf of Allison Mankin (NSF)
1 Cross-Layer Design for Wireless Communication Networks Ness B. Shroff Center for Wireless Systems and Applications (CWSA) School of Electrical and Computer.
Innovation and IS Kieran Mathieson. What is Innovation?  Long definition Successful innovation is the creation and implementation of new processes, products,
Grand Challenges in Wireless Ness B. Shroff Center for Wireless Systems and Applications (CWSA) School of ECE, Purdue University
The Future of Internet Research Scott Shenker (on behalf of many networking collaborators)
1 Algorithmic Foundations of the Internet Alejandro Lopez-Ortiz (Waterloo) Jennifer Rexford (Princeton) Rebecca Wright (Stevens)
Building a Strong Foundation for a Future Internet Jennifer Rexford ’91 Computer Science Department (and Electrical Engineering and the Center for IT Policy)
Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council.
Whitacre College of Engineering Panel Interdisciplinary Cybersecurity Education Texas Tech University NSF-SFS Workshop on Educational Initiatives in Cybersecurity.
A Research Agenda for Accelerating Adoption of Emerging Technologies in Complex Edge-to-Enterprise Systems Jay Ramanathan Rajiv Ramnath Co-Directors,
Achieving Better Reliability With Software Reliability Engineering Russel D’Souza Russel D’Souza.
Strengthening the quality of research for policy engagement in the African context – achievements and aspirations Tebogo B. Seleka Botswana Institute for.
Data Infrastructures Opportunities for the European Scientific Information Space Carlos Morais Pires European Commission Paris, 5 March 2012 "The views.
Sept 29-30, 2005 Cambridge, MA 1 Grand Challenges Workshop for Computer Systems Software Brett D. Fleisch Program Director National Science Foundation.
NSF Critical Infrastructures Workshop Nov , 2006 Kannan Ramchandran University of California at Berkeley Current research interests related to workshop.
Happy Network Administrators  Happy Packets  Happy Users WIRED Position Statement Aman Shaikh AT&T Labs – Research October 16,
Wednesday Working Group Topics 1.Collaboratory Development: –Community issues, workshops, cross-disciplinary communications, development of cross-program.
A New Collaborative to Improve Broader Impacts Kevin Niemi, U. Wisconsin-Madison Kemi Jona, Northwestern U. Jane Horwitz, U. Penn
Man-Sze Li IC Focus Enterprise Interoperability Research Roadmap SME aspects.
Wireless Networks Breakout Session Summary September 21, 2012.
National Science Foundation 1 Evaluating the EHR Portfolio Judith A. Ramaley Assistant Director Education and Human Resources.
Research Recommendations for the Broadband Taskforce Agenda November 23, 2009.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
The roots of innovation Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) The roots of innovation Proactive initiative on:
Virtual Data Grid Architecture Ewa Deelman, Ian Foster, Carl Kesselman, Miron Livny.
ASCAC-BERAC Joint Panel on Accelerating Progress Toward GTL Goals Some concerns that were expressed by ASCAC members.
New World, New World Bank Group Presentation to Fiduciary Forum On Post Crisis Direction and Reforms March 01, 2010.
1 BRUSSELS - 14 July 2003 Full Security Support in a heterogeneous mobile GRID testbed for wireless extensions to the.
Jean Walrand – NSF – April 24-25, 20031/5 Economic Mechanisms Grand Challenge: Design economic mechanisms that provide incentives for increasing the utility.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
Community Resilience To Climate Change in Hawai`i 2009 Hawai`i Conservation Conference Hawai`i in a Changing Climate: Ecological, Economic, and Policy.
DriveSense’14 NSF Workshop on Large-Scale Traffic and Driving Activity Data DriveSense’14, Oct 30-31, Norfolk, VA.
Committee Meeting, June 9, 2008 Strategic Institutional Research Plan.
Breakout # 1 – Data Collecting and Making It Available Data definition “ Any information that [environmental] researchers need to accomplish their tasks”
Networking Grand Challenges NSF Future Directions Workshop April 2003.
Developing the theoretical and conceptual framework From R.E.Khan ( J199 lecture)
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Marv Adams Chief Information Officer November 29, 2001.
Outline The key findings What the SGA Summit did Smart City Amsterdam Some more detail on the disrupters – Ecosystem of the Grid – Distributed Generation.
Current state of affairs No framework for theoretical analysis of (some) protocols –chaos small changes make a lot of difference difficult to tune - or.
Tufts Wireless Laboratory School Of Engineering Tufts University Paper Review “An Energy Efficient Multipath Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks”,
Concerns with Network Research Funding S.Floyd & R. Atkinson, Editors Internet Architecture Board draft-iab-research-funding-02.txt.
Network Reliability and Interoperability Council VII NRIC Council Meeting Focus Group 1B Network Architectures for Emergency Communications in 2010 September.
NCP Info DAY, Brussels, 23 June 2010 NCP Information Day: ICT WP Call 7 - Objective 1.3 Internet-connected Objects Alain Jaume, Deputy Head of Unit.
30 November 2001 Advisory Panel on Cyber Infrastructure National Science Foundation Douglas Van Houweling November 30, 2001 National Science Foundation.
1 Architecture and Behavioral Model for Future Cognitive Heterogeneous Networks Advisor: Wei-Yeh Chen Student: Long-Chong Hung G. Chen, Y. Zhang, M. Song,
Breakout Group 1 Summary NSF workshop on Bridging the Gap between Wireless Networking Technologies at the Physical Layer Aug
Towards ‘Ubiquitous’ Ubiquitous Computing: an alliance with ‘the Grid’ Oliver Storz, Adrian Friday, and Nigel Davies Computing Department, Lancaster University,
Session 1: Technology Development August 15 NSF Workshop.
NSF: The Workshop on Fundamental Research in Networking April 24-25, 2003 Airlie House Jorg Liebeherr Ness Shroff .
V. Arun College of Information and Computer Sciences
Emerging Information Technologies I
Research in Networking (NSF Workshop Report)
Presentation transcript:

NSF Workshop on Fundamental Research in Networking: Future Directions and Visions for Networking Research Ness B. Shroff School of Electrical and Computer Engineering Network Engineering and Wireless Systems (NEWS) Group Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

NSF Workshop The NSF Workshop on Fundamental Research in Networking was held in Arlie House, Virginia, April In attendance: 27 Experts spanning a broad spectrum of networking areas and disciplines. Mission: Prepare a report on the current state of networking and to articulate a vision for the future of fundamental research in networking

NSF Workshop: Logistics and Ground Rules Two day workshop that was mission focused  Only 2 panel sessions  A lot of time in breakout groups  Writing began during the workshop Not to simply have an intellectual discussion Not to write a report consisting of a laundry list of people's favorite topics Represent the community at large, Hope that report will stimulate far-reaching future research initiatives and collaborations.

Fundamental Research  Spans the entire spectrum of networking research, from theory to systems-oriented research Fundamental Research was defined as having one or more characteristics of being far-reaching, solid, long-term, paradigm-changing, risk-taking, disruptive, high-impact research that could be funded by a program such as the Network Research program at NSF.

Quick Look at Workshop Report Executive Summary: Findings and Recommendations Models of Success Case studies of networking research successes Network Innovator’s dilemma Need for reproducibility and benchmarking Importance and Impact of Basic Research in Networking New Applications and Paradigms Grand Challenges in Networking Focus on selected items from report here … Full report is available at this conference and also on

Network Innovator’s Dilemma Looking to models of success for future research, we must avoid the temptation of falling into the trap of Innovator’s Dilemma (Clayton Christenson) For example: Success of the Internet carries the risk of complacency about the need for out-of-the-box thinking. Fail to observe disruptive technologies that take radical new shape Past: Needed new community to think radically (e.g., bell-heads were left behind in the Internet boom) Future: Do it ourselves!

Importance of Basic Research Basic Research in Networking addresses more foundational and theoretical aspects of networking. Brings together methodologies from a variety of different fields to address specific issues of relevance to networking. Aims: develop insights and principles understand performance limitations suggest “good” solutions and policies guide the development of protocols and control mechanisms

Importance of Basic Research Basic research: key role in the understanding and development of Internet and wireless networks Distributed routing protocols (Bellman-Ford and Dijkstra). Multiaccess mechanisms from ALOHA to CSMA/CD TCP and more general AIMD congestion control 3G scheduling mechanisms in wireless systems Queueing and Large Deviations lead to understanding of network congestion and resource allocation LRD properties in network traffic… Also provided the impetus for advancements in associated fields. Needed now more than ever to design and control networks on an even grander scale than before! Greater impact if basic research is pursued in conjunction with focus areas and real problems.

New Applications and Paradigms Applications are and will continue to be the raison d’etre of networks! 3 illustrative applications were chosen as likely to play an important role driving future networking. Ubiquitous Tele-presence (ability to interact with others and environment without shackles of space) Universal Sensing (large-scale sensor networks integrated into all aspects of life). Emergency Response and Disaster Recovery Networks Applications will induce user focused as well as network centric challenges Question: Are there a set of grand challenges for networking?

Grand Challenges Classical definition "Grand Challenges are fundamental problems in science and engineering with potentially broad social, political, economic, and scientific impact that can be advanced by applying high performance computing resources.“ Definition used in Workshop " As a fundamental problem with broad economic and scientific impact that is currently considered intractable, and whose solution can be advanced by fundamental research."

Grand Challenges Meta Grand Challenge To develop new network theories, architectures, and methodologies that will facilitate the development of the next generation of services and applications Indvidual Grand Challenges Network Information Theory for Wireless Networks Providing Market Incentives (The Economics of Networking) Development of resilient Networks Sensorized Universe Design of Overlay Networks Virtual Networks Discuss only first three bullets

Network Information Theory for Wireless Networks Classical Information theory: basis for major developments in communications, error control, and signal processing over the last 50 years. Main limitation: characterization of delay is absent from traditional information theory. Many important theoretical developments (scheduling, queueing, control, routing), there is no such unified information theory for networks.

Network Information Theory Challenges: Characterize the fundamental limits performance limites of mobile and static wireless networks Capacity Delay Power Connectivity and Coverage Can we develop distributed algorithms to achieve these limits? Network Coding? Can we achieve orders of magnitude increases in network peformance by exploiting underlying technologies (physical layer, VLSI design, etc.)?

The Economics of Networking Lack of Marketing Incentives are one of the main impediments to the deployment of new services on the Internet. Recent history has demonstrated that the bottleneck to improving the global network may be economics and not technology. There has been enormous interest in pricing to manage networks. However, most works do not consider a competitive market environment. But the Internet is not a single service provider!

The Economics of Networking Major Challenge: In developing economic mechanisms for the creation of efficient markets: Allow everyone to be a player (not simply social maximization) Designed for multi-provider and multi-business environment (heterogeneous) Incentive-compatible (Don’t assume altruism) Scalable (12,000+ AS!) Flexible: Support different service types (e.g., Dependable service, variable price; Dependable price, variable service) Revenu e Quality Increases Improves

Resilient Networking As the Internet grows in scale it faces an increasingly adverse environment Due to the sheer scale, faults become quite commonplace, rather than the exceptions Component failure Human operational errors Spread of software viruses Malicious attacks.

Resilient Networking Challenge: To provide the Internet with a resilient infrastructure. Need to develop a basic understanding of the rules and principles in network protocol design that facilitate the realization of resiliency in large-scale networks. Can we develop specific enhancements that can readily be applied to the current Internet to effectively strengthen its defense ability? Can we really prepare against the unexpected?

Conclusion Networking has seen unprecedented success and growth Future is bright and holds even greater and grander challenges Our mission: Innovate, conduct high-quality research, and educate industry and government agencies of the enormous continued importance of the field.