20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November 2006 1 SMOS Project Status 1.Payload 2.Platform 3.Satellite 4.Launcher 5.Flight Operations Ground Segment 6.Data Processing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leicester SRC, 3-5 Dec 2007 Systems engineering at detector level Tim Stevenson.
Advertisements

June 26, 2002; Page: 1 ESOC (TOS-OGR) European Space Operations Centre Manfred Warhaut Ground Segment Manager TOS-OGR ROSETTA Ground Segment.
1 SMOS IOCP Key-Point 0 09 Dec ESAC SMOS Commissioning activities In Orbit Commissioning Activities : System Reviews F.Bermudo / CNES.
Commissioning KP 0ESAC December Michele Zundo ESA/ESTEC EOP-PEP SMOS KP 0 09-Dec-2008 SMOS SODAP Status.
DAVOS, November 2010 group GETCU (JP Marcovici) PICARD : Consortium meeting 1 PMOD/WRC Davos november 2010 Présenté par : JP. Marcovici Sigle.
PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.
SMOS SAG, November 2-3, 2006 SMOS Data Processing Ground Segment (DPGS)
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Spacecraft Structure Development - Vibration Test - (60 minutes)
SMOS SAG 20 VILLESPA. Agenda 1. Welcome and Introduction 2. Reporting on on-going activities: 3.Airborne demonstrators - first results/limitation/discussion.
Iterative development and The Unified process
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
1 Engineering the James Webb Space Telescope Paul Geithner JWST Deputy Project Manager - Technical March 26, 2011.
A Finmeccanica Company 04/2000/1 EUSO Development Philosophy EUSO General Meeting Max Planck Institute for Physics Munich, November the 20th 2003.
System Implementation. System Implementation and Seven major activities Coding Testing Installation Documentation Training Support Purpose To convert.
IMPRS June Space Research, in praxis, illustrated by a ground-based example The „Ozonometer“ as a student project.
4.2 Develop Project Management Plan
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
BSBPMG502A Manage Project Scope Manage Project Scope Project Scope Processes Part 1 Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit.
THEMIS-SCM THM – SCM – CDR – 08-April-2004 in Velizy
Presentation EddiCam consortium, FF, Madrid 13/06/2002 Eddington programmatic status Fully approved by SPC as part of ESA’s science program as project.
MERMAG-M/MGF MGF-OS MGF-IS MAST-MGF MAST-SC PWI-SC Credit : RISH, Kyoto Univ.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
COROTWEEK n°8 Toulouse May the 24th, 2005 Program Status (Th. Lam-Trong) 1 COROT.
Corotweek n°9 - ESTEC December 6th, 2005 COROT PROJECT STATUS 1 COROT PROJECT STATUS Thien LAM TRONG.
PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 IIDR Close-out1 Close-out of IIDR Recommendations A. Poglitsch.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
1 WP4 – System Testbed Trial 2 preparation Barcelona 3/03/05 Marco Bobbio Pallavicini - Carlo Gavazzi Space SpA.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
1 Galileo Research and Development Activities GALILEO GALILEO 6 th Framework Programme Aeronautics & Space November 2003.
Herschel/Planck January 13, 2005PACS IQR - SCI-PT/ ggonzale: Herschel PACS Instrument Qualification Review Review Objectives and Organisation G.Crone/G.Pilbratt.
WGISS /09/2015 DATA PRESERVATION – CNES APPROACH B. Chausserie-Laprée.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity 1 SMOS IOCP Key-Point 0 09/12/ Operations Report of LEOP S. Burgaud / CNES.
Software Configuration Management (SCM). Product Developer Disciplines One view of the world is that there are three types of activities are required.
GLAST LAT ProjectSeptember 15, 2006: Pre-Shipment Review 1 Integration and Test Presentation 11 of 12 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT Pre-Shipment Review.
Toulouse, September 2003 Page 1 JOURNEE ALTARICA Airbus ESACS  ISAAC.
International Atomic Energy Agency 1 Grid, Industrial involvement and procurement Akira OMOTO DIR, NENP.
GIST-24 Meeting December MSG PROGRAMME STATUS Presentation to the GIST-24 meeting.
S.MonteilCOMMISSIONING1 PS/SPD ELECTRONICS OUTLINE 1)STATUS OF PS/SPD FE BOARDS PRODUCTION 2)PHASES OF PS/SPD COMMISSIONING 1)LEDs AND DETECTORS 2)TUBES.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Goddard Space Flight Center Cryogenics and Fluids Branch Status of the AMS-02 Cryocooler January 2007 TIM.
SPP FIELDS DFB Quarterly June 16, 2015 Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Instrument Quarterly Q Digital Fields Board (DFB) 1.
Contract Year 1 Review IMT Tilt Thompkins MOS - NCSA 15 May 2002.
LISA News from ESA O. Jennrich LISA Project Scientist.
The Copernicus Sentinel-3 Mission: Update on status Susanne Mecklenburg – ESA Sentinel-3 Mission Manager Sentinel-3 ESA development & operations teams.
GLAST LAT Project LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT System Engineering Pat Hascall SLAC System Engineering Manager
PACS IBDR MPE 27/28 Feb 2002 System Engineering 1 PACS IBDR Model Philosophy / Development Plan Reinhard Katterloher.
FM1 Instrument Suite Pre-Ship Review (PSR)INT- 1 UCB September 21, 2005 THEMIS FM1 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) INTEGRATION AND TEST PLANS Jeremy.
ESA Harwell Robotics & Autonomy Facility Study Workshop Autonomous Software Verification Presented By: Rick Blake.
Tecnologica Componentes Electrónicos, S.A. Workshop - Laser diodes in Space Slide No: 1 Date: May 11 – 12, 2006 Componentes Electrónicos, S.A. Juan Barbero.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
T EST T OOLS U NIT VI This unit contains the overview of the test tools. Also prerequisites for applying these tools, tools selection and implementation.
SMOS Commissioning KP-0, ESAC, 9 December /17 Payload Functionality during SODAP: preliminary review SMOS Project Team, ESTEC/ESAC/ESRIN EADS-CASA.
THEMIS MRRSystems - 1 GSFC, Jan 5, 2007 Systems Engineering.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
FM4/FM5 IPSRSYS - 1 UCB, May 5, 2006 THEMIS INSTRUMENT SUITE FM4/FM5 PRE-SHIP REVIEW SYSTEM OVERVIEW Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
POIWG#38 ARTE - Thermal Exchange Presenter: Valerio Di Tana (Argotec)
Rationale for Selected MIL-STD-1540E Thermal Test Requirement
SMOS IOCP KP0, 9 December SMOS DPGS at KP0 1.Production 2.Product Quality 3.Problems Identified 4.Positives.
 Overview of Project management. ◦ Management. ◦ Project Management. ◦ Software Project Management. ◦ Project(Dimensions, Characteristics, Complexity,
Double Star: Experiment Activities
SPF MAG Quarterly Report – Feb 2015
Double Star Progress Meeting #3 Beijing 2 July, 2002.
EM pre-integration review
PHI Status Report SO Cleanliness Working Group #24
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Integration and Test Organization Chart
Presentation transcript:

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November SMOS Project Status 1.Payload 2.Platform 3.Satellite 4.Launcher 5.Flight Operations Ground Segment 6.Data Processing Ground Segment [N. Wright] 7.Processor developments [S. Delwart] 8.Calibration Expertise Center (CEC) 9.SVRT [S. Delwart] 10.Other Issues

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Payload (1) All MOHA bits & pieces delivered, being successively integrated. CCU provisionally delivered, to proceed with electrical integration (but see below) CMNs: 6 units delivered and integrated (but see below) EMC filters for CMN harness procured / integrated / inspected LICEF units transferred from STM used for antenna pattern measurements at DTU to FM (but see below) X-band chain, Pyrobox, all units of CAS delivered and integrated Most harness and thermal control (thermistors, thermostats, heaters) integrated.

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Payload (2) Problem case 1: CCU Between the ICU part (Astrium) and the MOHA part (Contraves), there is a board which has to make ~ 750 connections! This is done by so-called “interposer” connectors. 1 connection failed during shock test, leading to detailed investigations about board quality, connector qualification history, and mechanical configuration. Present state: New board under procurement, new (mechanically symmetric) connectors under procurement, mechanical design reworked. Once assembled / tested at board level, CCU will be returned to Astrium for replacing the board and completing mechanical test programme (shock & vibration) To be completed before end 2006.

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Payload (3) Problem case 2: CMN Series production of CMNs (total of 13) is running late. All manufacturing / board assembly complete, box level test / acceptance programme running. From the 6 completed CMNs, 2 showed failures: –1 local oscillator board showed anomalous locking behaviour (locking on side-tune when upwards sweeping frequency) –1 local oscillator board did not lock at all. Investigations are ongoing (component failures? Spurious contact to ground? Difference sine wave / square wave? etc.) Completion of CMN deliveries expected by end November 2006.

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Payload (4) Problem case 3: LICEF / NIR Antennas During the antenna pattern measurement campaign, one LICEF antenna showed abnormal behaviour in X pol. Replacing with the spare, the spare showed similar behaviour. Cause seems to be a poor board quality (insufficient copper thickness in the through- holes) combined with poor workmanship of connection soldering (insufficient solder fillet) leading to cracks in the connection under mechanical stress. Initiated course of actions: –re-procurement of patch boards –re-manufacturing of first antenna batch of 18 –inspection of all other antennas

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Payload (5) Low level / application software acceptance tested on EM Electrical test procedures are being coded for automatic execution on the EGSE EGSE not completely stable (mainly for data storage / analysis issues) MGSE for TV and IVT being produced, test procedures generated Problem:availability of Large Space Simulator for TV test (blocked by ATV and Herschel projects, accumulating delays) Conclusion:P/L level test programme not expected to start before early 2007.

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Platform Proteus platform for SMOS Mission completed and formally delivered. “BV 2”test for tailored software to commence in November, but depends on: –Corot launch –PL - EM availability SMOS Platform

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Satellite Satellite CDR successfully completed 3 issues: –Clearance between arm deployment & solar Array –Battery management –Failure detection & isolation optimisation AIT planning (incl. need P/L support) completed. Total duration (incl. realistic allocations for holiday periods etc.) 9 month incl. margin. Start date depends on completion of P/L delivery. No major interference from other PROTEUS – based projects expected (Corot, Jason 2)

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Launcher Injection scenario modified such that PROBA 2 is injected below SMOS Final Mission Analysis meeting under preparation (thermal analysis, ICD updates, …) Launch site survey delayed until March 2007 Joint Operations Plan: baseline is separate transport / preparation of PROBA 2 Launcher adaptor manufacturing completed, waiting for arrangements with Krunichev for fit-check GOCE FMAM December 2006 with SMOS participation (mainly to verify Cryosat lessons-learnt implementation)

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Flight Operations Ground Segment CNES SOGS adaptation proceeding nominally: –TM/TC data base, PRESTO simulator –G2 (flight dynamics) –LEOP scenario definition Payload operations facility PLPC: first version delivered and installed (at ESTEC and at ESAC), evaluation / familiarisation ongoing Payload simulator “MIRASIM” delivered and used First version of mission planning facility (SPGF) delivered and under evaluation. Flight operations procedures (payload on / off, calibration timelines) are being developed and verified.

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Data Processing Ground Segment see dedicated presentation by N. Wright

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Processor Development see dedicated presentation by S. Delwart

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Calibration Expertise Center (1) A collection of tools and knowledge-full people to look at the quality of the mission output. Developments: SMOS Product Quality Facility (SPQF): automatic monitoring of functional product parameters (processing quality, aux data availability, limit checks, …) Monitoring facility (MF): automatic generation of parameter plots, statistics, etc. which enable skilled people to assess quality and stability of products and parameter fields Data viewer “Interactive analysis tools” (IAT): collection of specialised tools to assess specific aspects of the mission.

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Calibration Expertise Center (2) Mission Manager Operations SPGF PLPC MIRASIM PXMF SOGS I/F SOGS PDPC Ops. XBAS PLPC core ops→ MUIS I/F Level 0 Proc Level 1 Proc Level 2 Proc SPQF LTA I/F LTA Repr. Fac. CEC MF IAT Ref. Proc L. 1 Ref. Proc L. 2 Data Viewer I/F with SVRT SVRT PLSO OBSM Instr. Expert GS Organigramme

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Calibration Expertise Center (3) Status: SPQF: part of DPGS development. Functions to be defined by industry MF:based upon tool by Deimos (Sp) developped for Cryosat. Generic functions by industry, specific functions ESTEC in-house. First set of required functions defined for level 1, level 2 to follow (~ 4 months from now) DV:development under way IAT:generic ideas expected from science community / Cal/Val AO participants. After demonstration of the principle and tuning of algo / parameters, handover to CEC expected. Examples: RFI monitoring, Ruf method, Dome C comp., …

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November SVRT see dedicated presentation by S. Delwart

20 th SMOS SAG, ESAC, 2 & 3 November Other Issues SEPS: “SEPS GS” for generation of representative X-band data NRT Service: DOSTAG / PB-EO are discussing since more than one year the possibility of a NRT upgrade for SMOS Mission / System Key Point (~Feb 07): review of preparation status for system integration and validation Commissioning phase definition: not much progress Preparation for phase E are starting slowly: –Nomination of a Mission Manager –Level of staffing at ESAC / functions –Phase E management plan and available budgets.