Part Average Analysis PAA Rev. 2.0 / 2005 2. Mathematics part B Calculation rules for fault risk assessment and cpk-monitoring P.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantitative Capability Assessment
Advertisements

Supplemental Figure 1 A No. at risk T T T
Statistical Process Control Using Control Charts to Monitor “Quality”
Quality Assurance (Quality Control)
1 Manufacturing Process A sequence of activities that is intended to achieve a result (Juran). Quality of Manufacturing Process depends on Entry Criteria.
Quality Management 09. lecture Statistical process control.
Quality Control Pertemuan 12 Mata kuliah: J Manajemen Operasional Tahun: 2010.
Adeyl Khan, Faculty, BBA, NSU Quality Control Adeyl Khan, Faculty, BBA, NSU Phases of Quality Assurance 10-2 Figure 10.1 Acceptance sampling Process.
Where does Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) come from?  Developed by the Aerospace industry in the1960s  Spread to the Automotive industry 
Managing Quality Chapter 5.
© Part Average Analysis PAA Rev. 2.0 / Basic Methodology P AA.
Part Average Analysis PAA Rev. 2.0 / Mathematics part A Calculation rules for anomalies detection P AA.
Chapter 10 Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Department of Construction Engineering & Management CEM 515: Project Quality Management “SIX SIGMA FOR PROJECT.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 10 Quality Control.
10 Quality Control CHAPTER
A Systems Approach to Electronic Assembly Optimization L B Newnes, A R Mileham and A Doniavi Chris Egbert Dec. 8, 2008.
Total Quality Management BUS 3 – 142 Statistics for Variables Week of Mar 14, 2011.
Lecture 2 Data Processing, Errors, Propagation of Uncertainty.
Quality Manual for Interoperability Testing Morten Bruun-Rasmussen Presented by Jos Devlies, Eurorec.
Probability and Statistics in Engineering Philip Bedient, Ph.D.
10-1 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Operations Management, 2 nd Canadian Edition, by Stevenson & Hojati Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
Chapter 10 Quality Control McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Statistical Applications in Quality and Productivity Management Sections 1 – 8. Skip 5.
Process Capability Process capability For Variables
 Review homework Problems: Chapter 5 - 2, 8, 18, 19 and control chart handout  Process capability  Other variable control charts  Week 11 Assignment.
Copyright © 2014, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Chapter 14 Sampling Variation and Quality.
INTRODUCTION TO MEASUREMENT
 Review homework Problems: Chapter 5 - 2, 8, 18, 19 and control chart handout  Process capability  Other variable control charts  Week 11 Assignment.
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan The current qualification and verification.
Chapter 36 Quality Engineering (Part 2) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Summer A, 2012.
Chapter 6. Control Charts for Variables. Subgroup Data with Unknown  and 
A Process Control Screen for Multiple Stream Processes An Operator Friendly Approach Richard E. Clark Process & Product Analysis.
Wong, Gardner, Krieger, Litt (2006) Zack Dvey-Aharon, March 2008.
Statistical Quality Control
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education. Chapter 22 Quality Control.
AP Statistics Chapter 21 Notes
1 SMU EMIS 7364 NTU TO-570-N Control Charts Basic Concepts and Mathematical Basis Updated: 3/2/04 Statistical Quality Control Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener,
Chapter 36 Quality Engineering (Part 1) (Review) EIN 3390 Manufacturing Processes Fall, 2010.
EKT 314/4 WEEK 2 : CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO EI ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION.
Concept Selection and DFMEA Heidi Ploeg Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering and Biomedical Engineering.
TAUCHI PHILOSOPHY SUBMITTED BY: RAKESH KUMAR ME
Product Lifecycle Management
ERROR PROOFING VALIDATION LOG
36.3 Inspection to Control Quality
Guide for the application of CSM design targets (CSM DT)
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
MSA / Gage Capability (GR&R)
Process Capability and Capability Index
1 2 3 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ROORKEE PROJECT REPORT 2016
36.1 Introduction Objective of Quality Engineering:
Sources of Variation and Error in Wafer Fab Processing
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Determine Causes/ mechanisms failure
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel 3rd Edition
Process capability in JMP 12 –A new look
10 Quality Control.
10 Quality Control.
GE 6757 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
The Certified Quality Engineer Handbook Ch
The Certified Quality Engineer Handbook Ch
Higher National Certificate in Engineering
The Certified Quality Process Analyst Handbook: Process Capability Measures Ch. 20 1st edition Ch. 14 2nd edition Presented by Dr. Joan Burtner Certified.
The Certified Quality Process Analyst Handbook: Process Capability Measures Ch. 20 1st edition Ch. 14 2nd edition Presented by Dr. Joan Burtner Certified.
J1879 Robustness Validation Hand Book A Joint SAE, ZVEI, JSAE, AEC Automotive Electronics Robustness Validation Plan Robustness Diagram Trends and Challenges.
Process Capability Process capability For Variables
Process Capability.
Control chart (Ex 3-2) Subgroup No. Measurement Average Range Date
Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
BENEFITS OF AUTOMATED SPC
Statistical Quality Control
Presentation transcript:

Part Average Analysis PAA Rev. 2.0 / Mathematics part B Calculation rules for fault risk assessment and cpk-monitoring P AA

Risk figure R k Calculate the risk figure Rk Significance of anomalies 1 = Relevance of observed parameters (type) (U, I, t,....), depends on the circuit design 9 = Clear indication of technical defect (Leacage current, Voltage Drop) 3 = High probability to indicate technical defect (default value) 2 = Low probability to indicate technical defect 1 = Less relevance The relevance should be selected by the development engineers

Risk figure R k R k calculation, select component if R K  9 Statistical Process Analysis (SPA) cpk – monitoring for systematic failure detection The focus of the PAA is the detection of stochastical failures in standard processes. Systematical failures in manufacturing processes can be observed by a wide range of parameter distribution (  ) or continuous parameter drifts which lead to a reduction of the process ability characteristics cp and cpk. (VDA 4) For instance, ceramic capacitors can break by mistakes in the SMD assembly or in thermal processes with which the signal / noise ratio decreases and thus the distribution of the characteristic voltage values shows burglary cp-and cpk values. In this case the decreased cpk value with <1.67 is an unequivocal indicator for a preinjured product. With local cpk values < 2 and a symmetrical parameter distribution the quality of abnormal parts detection by PAA will be reduced. Notice, it has turned out suitable to calculate the local cpk value in supplement to the PAA, and to submit to a monitoring as in the following is described. The following definitions are based on standard processes with N  400 and M lokal  20 for all measuring parameters

Risk figure R k Calculation of the local gliding cpk value cpk (local) = MIN(cpk, USL (local); cpk, LSL (local)) For cpk (local) < 1.67 index (red): Process ability is insufficient; corrective action items should be defined. The product must be seperated in a stock, and can be requalified as good part by screening methods or by risk evaluation of the quality engineers, when the real cause for the bad cpk value has been found out. For cpk (local)  2.0 index (green): Process ability is sufficient. For 1.67 < cpk (local) < 2 index (yellow): Process ability is poor; corrective action items should be defined. In case, that there is no valid reglementation it is allowed to ship the product to the customer. But it is neccessary to sign up the product for a good tracebility in prevention of possible later reclaims. When the quality is recorded please give a hint, that the PAA observation level was reduced.