1 Gianni Fiorentini Solar Neutrinos The previous millenium: e disappearance An appearance experiment SNO: An appearance experiment Solar neutrinos undergo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard Solar Model Calculation of Neutrino Fluxes Aldo Serenelli Institute for Advanced Study NOW 2006 Conca Specchiulla 11-Sept-2006.
Advertisements

Neutrinos Louvain, February 2005 Alan Martin Arguably the most fascinating of the elementary particles. Certainly they take us beyond the Standard Model.
Neutrino oscillations/mixing
Recent Discoveries in Neutrino Physics: Understanding Neutrino Oscillations 2-3 neutrino detectors with variable baseline 1500 ft nuclear reactor Determining.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
G. Sullivan - Princeton - Mar 2002 What Have We Learned from Super-K? –Before Super-K –SK-I ( ) Atmospheric Solar –SNO & SK-I Active solar –SK.
1 The pp-chain and the CNO-cycle after KamLAND Solar neutrinos after SNO and KamLAND The Boron flux The Beryllium flux Nuclear physics of the pp-chain.
1 Neutrino: a spy of the innermost solar interior Nuclear reactions in the Sun and solar neutrinos.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 5 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
From Nuclei to Neutrinos The Naming of the Denys Wilkinson Building 21 June 2002 Nick Jelley.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
CP-phase dependence of neutrino oscillation probability in matter 梅 (ume) 田 (da) 義 (yoshi) 章 (aki) with Lin Guey-Lin ( 林 貴林 ) National Chiao-Tung University.
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 2 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 6 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
Nuclear reactions and solar neutrinos
1 Nuclear fusion in the Sun The spies of solar interior: –neutrinos –helioseismology What can be learnt about the Sun? What can be learnt about nuclear.
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
1 B.Ricci* What have we learnt about the Sun from the measurement of 8B neutrino flux? Experimental results SSM predictions SSM uncertainties on  (8B)
Solar & Atmospheric. June 2005Steve Elliott, NPSS Outline Neutrinos from the Sun The neutrinos Past experiments What we know and what we want to.
October 3, 2003IFIC, UVEG-CSIC A road map to solar fluxes, osc. param., and test for new physics Carlos Pena Garay IAS ~
8/5/2002Ulrich Heintz - Quarknet neutrino puzzles Ulrich Heintz Boston University
Peggy Norris, Black Hills State Univ/Sanford Underground Laboratory at Homestake.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
Chapter three Sun’s model Major contributions in building the Sun’s model have been made by Eddington (1930’s), Hoyle (1950’s),Bahcall, Clayton (1980’s)
Neutrino Physics - Lecture 4 Steve Elliott LANL Staff Member UNM Adjunct Professor ,
The Importance of Low-Energy Solar Neutrino Experiments Thomas Bowles Los Alamos National Laboratory Markov Symposium Institute for Nuclear Research 5/13/05.
LENA Low Energy Neutrino Astrophysics L. Oberauer, Technische Universität München LENA Delta EL SUD Meeting.
Solar Neutrinos Dr Robert Smith Astronomy Centre University of Sussex.
Solar Neutrinos Perspectives and Objectives Mark Chen Queen’s University and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
The Elementary Particles. e−e− e−e− γγ u u γ d d The Basic Interactions of Particles g u, d W+W+ u d Z0Z0 ν ν Z0Z0 e−e− e−e− Z0Z0 e−e− νeνe W+W+ Electromagnetic.
Solar neutrino measurement at Super Kamiokande ICHEP'04 ICRR K.Ishihara for SK collaboration Super Kamiokande detector Result from SK-I Status of SK-II.
Lecture 13. Review: Static Stellar structure equations Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state: Energy generation: Radiation Convection.
O n t h e T r a c k o f M o d e r n P h y s i c s Wolfgang Pauli was a scientist with "NO" in his mind. Pauli's exclusion principle, that two electrons.
Methods and problems in low energy neutrino experiments (solar, reactors, geo-) I G. Ranucci ISAPP 2011 International School on Astroparticle physics THE.
The Standard Solar Model and Experiments Predictions versus experiments Uncertainties in predictions Challenges and open questions BP00: astro-ph/
Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #6 Wednesday, Feb. 14, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Formalism 2.Neutrino.
Monday, Feb. 19, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #7 Monday, Feb. 19, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Experiments 2.Long.
SNO and the new SNOLAB SNO: Heavy Water Phase Complete Status of SNOLAB Future experiments at SNOLAB: (Dark Matter, Double beta, Solar, geo-, supernova.
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
Kamiokande = Kamioka Nucleon Decay Experiment
Application of neutrino spectrometry
Tests of non-standard neutrino interactions (NSI) Cecilia Lunardini Institute for Nuclear Theory University of Washington, Seattle.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
J. Goodman – January 03 The Solution to the Solar Problem Jordan A. Goodman University of Maryland January 2003 Solar Neutrinos MSW Oscillations Super-K.
Neutrinos: What we’ve learned and what we still want to find out Jessica Clayton Astronomy Club November 10, 2008.
The Troublesome Kid An introductory course on neutrino physics (III) J.J. Gómez-Cadenas IFIC-Valencia Summer Student School CERN, July,2006.
Neutrinos from the sun, earth and SN’s: a brief excursion Aldo IFAE 2006 Pavia April 19 th.
Masatoshi Koshiba Raymond Davis Jr. The Nobel Prize in Physics 2002 "for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, in particular for the detection of cosmic.
SAGE: status and future SAGE: V.N. Gavrin Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
Super-Kamiokande and Neutrino Oscillation
Birth of Neutrino Astrophysics
P Spring 2002 L18Richard Kass The Solar Neutrino Problem M&S Since 1968 R.Davis and collaborators have been measuring the cross section of:
Solar Neutrinos By Wendi Wampler. What are Neutrinos? Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles Neutrinos are chargeless, nearly massless particles.
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
Solar Neutrinos Learning about the core of the Sun Guest lecture: Dr. Jeffrey Morgenthaler Jan 26, 2006.
News from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory Simon JM Peeters July 2007 o SNO overview o Results phases I & II o hep neutrinos and DSNB o Update on the III.
Solar Neutrinos & Homestake or Something new under the Sun Kevin T. Lesko Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA.
Neutrino Physics II Hitoshi Murayama University of Pisa February 25, 2003.
Solar neutrino physics The core of the Sun reaches temperatures of  15.5 million K. At these temperatures, nuclear fusion can occur which transforms 4.
Solar Neutrinos on the beginning of 2017
Neutrino astronomy Measuring the Sun’s Core
Solar Neutrino Problem
“Solar” Neutrino Oscillations (Dm2, q12)
Pauli´s new particle * nt nm ne e m t Beta-Decay Pa 234 b (electron)
Solar neutrinos: form their production to their detection
Neutrino astrophysics
Sudbury Neutrino Observatory
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Some Nuclear Physics with Solar Neutrinos
Presentation transcript:

1 Gianni Fiorentini Solar Neutrinos The previous millenium: e disappearance An appearance experiment SNO: An appearance experiment Solar neutrinos undergo flavor conversion e -> (  or   Non e are the main component of the flux at E >5 MeV Main issue: mechanism of conversion? What have we learnt on the Sun ? What can we learn from neutrinos ?

2 The 2002 Nobel prize: new ways of looking at the sky Riccardo Giacconi “ for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, which have led to the discovery of cosmic X-ray sources" Ray Davis and Masatoshi Koshiba “ for pioneering contributions to astrophysics, in particular for the detection of cosmic neutrinos”

3 Davis: a formidable radiochemical experiment e Since 1970 Davis has been looking for solar e by means of the Pontecorvo reaction: e + 37 Cl -> 37 Ar + e e + 37 Cl -> 37 Ar + e 37 Ar + e -> e + 37 Cl Collect for one month Ar atoms, extract them and look for their decay: 37 Ar + e -> e + 37 Cl Expt. sensitive only to e, mainly from B, and to a smaller extent from Be. The signal of neutrinos was observed, however: Cl(exp)= 1/3 Cl (SSM) - Cl(exp)= 1/3 Cl (SSM) - No directionality - No real time - (Signal possibly correlated with “11 years” solar cycle) Be

4 Neutrino telescopes: Kamiokande and Superkamiokande directionalreal time Koshiba and his school have developed directional and real time -detectors: Study of elastic collisions of with electrons in a huge water tank + e(at rest) -> + e( moving) Electron direction is strongly correlated ( -telescope). with that of neutrinos ( -telescope). Electrons are detected by means of the emitted Cerenkov light in water. The energy spectrum of electrons can be measured. Sensitive to e with E>6MeV (B only)  also detected (   =   = 1/6  e ) but cannot be distinguished from e

5 Superkamiokande (20,000m 3 water detector with 10,000 phototubes)

6 The heart of Kam. and SuperKam. It is in the  =50 cm phototubes especially developed by Hamamatsu. MITI financed a joint R&D project between Hamamatsu and the Metropolitan Tokyo University. As a return, Japan has a got a Nobel prize and the world leader for phototube production. 50 cm

7 The results of Kamiokande and SuperKamiokande Sun -> do come Neutrinos do come from the Sun Neutrino disappearance is confirmed: SK(exp)= 0.45 SK(SSM) SK(exp)= 0.45 SK(SSM) The B-neutrino spectrum looks undistorted Seasonal variations consistent with geometry No day-night variation observed, at the % level No apparent correlation with the solar cycle Why is the SK signal higher than Davis? The two expts become consistent with each other and with SSM if some 2/3 of Boron  e ->   or   ) (Villante Lisi GF 98 ). An experiment is needed which can distinguish (  or   ) from e.

8 The Gallium experiments powered by nuclear reactions Gallex (now GNO) at LNGS and SAGE in Russia have shown that the Sun is powered by nuclear reactions, measuring (mainly) the pp and Be neutrinos by means of:  e + 71 Ga-> e + 71 Ge A radiochemical method is used. Again a deficit with respect to SSM: Ga(exp) =( )Ga(SSM) Important deficit since predictions on pp and Be are much more robust. Cannot separate the amount of (pp) and (Be).

9 Disappearance vs. Appearance ?

10 SNO: the appearance experiment heavy A 1000 tons heavy water detector sensitive to B-neutrinos by means of: CC: e +d -> p + p + e CC: e +d -> p + p + e sensitive to e only, provides a good measurement of e spectrum, weak directionality NC: x +d -> p + n + x NC: x +d -> p + n + x all Equal cross section for all flavours. Measures total 8 B flux from Sun. ES: x +e -> e + x ES: x +e -> e + x Mainly sensitive to e, strong directionality The important point is that SNO can determine both: and  ( e ) and  ( e +  +  )

11 SNO results Total measured B-flux is in excellent agreement with SSM 2/3 of produced B-neutrinos transform into  or .

12 Implications for neutrinos Neutrino Energy (MeV) From exp.tal rates one can deduce the energy dependence of the survival probability P ee : P ee (E>5MeV)  1/ 3 SNO&SK give Boron: P ee (E>5MeV)  1/ 3 Cl- SNO&SK -> Be+CNO: P ee (0.8<E<5MeV)  Ga-Cl- SNO&SK -> pp: P ee (0.2<E<0.4MeV)  3/4 Energy dependence is found. Be is worst determined (wait for Borexino) Complete analysis include all other observables (spectra, day/night, seasonal variations…), see e.g Smirnov, Bahcall...

13 Neutrino oscillations Neutrino oscillations The total 81 data are well fitted within the simplest scheme of oscillations between two active neutrinos The best fit is provided by the LMA solution, with:  m 2 = eV 2 tan 2 = 0.4 f B =1.06 The energy dependence (and large suppression) is related to matter effect in the Sun. Other oscillation solutions (SMA, Just-So,LOW, sterile…) are presently disfavoured by data. differences scale Warning: oscillations are sensitive to mass differences, not to the absolute mass scale.

14 Crucial predictions of the LMA solution Crucial predictions of the LMA solution Earth matter effect. So far 1  effect in SK and 2  in SNO. It needs time….. NC/CC Day/night asymmetry % SNO will get significant improvement on NC in near future, by adding salts with large n- absorption x-section.

15 Kamland: a crucial test of the LMA solution Kamland: a crucial test of the LMA solution If LMA is the solution, the oscillation length of MeV (anti) neutrinos is L  100 Km. Kamland, an 800 ton scintillator detector, is measuring events from a dozen reactors, through: anti- + p ->e+ +n n+p->d+  In the absence of oscillation, some 400ev/yr are expected (above geo- )

16 Oscillations or what else? Oscillations or what else? Kamland is a crucial test for the LMA solution, which predicts a large reduction of reactor events. Remind that other solutions are possible for the solar neutrinos, e.g: Spin-flavour transitions, induced by the solar magnetic field (Okun, Akhmedov...) Hypothetical flavour changing interactions, inside the sun (Wolfenstein) Both these explanations predict a null effect for Kamland SFT FCI

17 Neutrons and neutrinos neutron well log In 1940 Pontecorvo applied the recent slow neutron studies of the Rome group to invent the neutron well log, an instrument still used for oil (and water) prospection. Now that we have learnt enough on neutrinos, we have to learn from neutrinos The Oil And Gas Journal, 1940, p.32

18 Implications for the Sun Boron neutrinos are a probe of the deep solar core, their production being peaked at.05R o. Their flux depends on nuclear physics inputs (branches of ppI, ppII and ppIII) and on astrophysical inputs (Z/X, opacity, diffusion, luminosity). central temperature These latter control the central temperature T : 20  (B) =  (B) SSM (T/T SSM ) 20 (S/S SSM ) Due to high power dependence,  (B) is a good thermometer for the solar interior, if nuclear physics S 17 (S=S 33 s S 17 S e7 -1 ) is well determined. From present data: T=15.7(1+-1%)10 6 K Comparable errors arise from  (B) and S 17 (after LUNA measurements at LNGS) Observational accuracy comparable to that of SSM. Information complementary to helioseismology, which determines u =T/ .

19 Bruno Pontecorvo Three great ideas: i)The Sun as a neutrino source ii) The Cl-Ar method iii)Neutrino oscillations

20 The success of SSM and helioseismology 33 11 BP2000  U/U (Model- Sun)/Model Model=BP2000 Sun=from inversion of helioseismic data Error estimate: from Dziembowki et al. Astrop. Phys. 7 (1997) 77 Agreement to the level of few in Systematic errors from the inversion procedure dominate accuracy (starting solar models, interpolation…)

21 LUNA at LNGS Laboratory for Underground Nuclear Astrophysics at Gran Sasso. LUNA-I has measured the 3 He+ 3 He-> 4 He +2p at the solar Gamow peak, by using a 50 KV underground accelerator at LNGD LUNA-II is measuring the p+ 14 N-> 15 O +  reaction, with a new200 KV accelerator A new measurement of p- 7 Be is planned.

22 (Anti)- neutrinos from Earth What is the content of radioactive material (U, Th and K) inside Earth? What is the radiogenic contribution to heat flow? neutrinos produced in the Earth interior Detection of (anti) neutrinos produced in the Earth interior is the way for measuring Earth radioactivity, once we know the fate of neutrinos. This is becoming possible now...

23 Expectations for Kamland and Borexino Signal energy [MeV] (anti)- +p-> n+e + e + releases energy and annihilates: S.E.=E(e+) + 2m e Delayed coincidence with 2MeV  from p+n->d+ . Separation from reactor events.  -osc. give  1/2 reduction

24 Detectors built for studying neutrinos from reactors and Sun, will also have the first signal of anti neutrinos from Earth.. From Sun to Earth: Kamland (Jap) and Borexino (LNGS)

25 A few references…*) Recent Data: SNO: Ahmad et al nucl- ex/ SK: Fukuda et al hep-ex/ Recent analysis : Fogli et al, hep-ph/ Barger et al hep-ph/ Bahcall et al hep=ph/ Berezinsky and Lisi De Holanda and Smirnov hep-ph/ See also transparencies of Neutrino 2002, Munich at *)and a lot of apologies for missing references

26 Appendix

27 pp-chain

28 Appendix Neutrino Energy (MeV) Neutrino flux

29 Uncertainties on B and Be production Source 8 B 7 Be ___________________________ p-p He+ 3 He He+ 4 He p+ 7 Be Comp Opacity Diffusion Luminosity

30 Energy dependence of different oscillations

31 Summary of ocillation solutions Solution  m 2 (eV) 2 tan2 Solution  m 2 (eV) 2 tan2 2 /d.o.f. LMA5.5E /79 LOW7.3E /79 QVO6.5E /79 SMA5.2E-61.1E-383.1/79 Fogli et al hep-ph LMA gives a good fit, LOW and VO survive at 3 , SMA is excluded at 5 

32 Pull off diagrams P de Hollanda and Smirnov LMA gives a good fit, LOW and VO survive at 3 , SMA is excluded at 5 

33 Spin flavor precession* Transitions e -> anti- m could be driven by solar magnetic field if neutrino has a transition magnetic moment . Transitions e -> anti- m could be driven by solar magnetic field if neutrino has a transition magnetic moment . Can reconcile strong suppression at intermediate energy (Be) with no distortion at high energy ( B) Can reconcile strong suppression at intermediate energy (Be) with no distortion at high energy ( B) Consistent with data provided: Consistent with data provided: -  = (0.3-1)  B -B max = 10 5 G -Suitable B(r) profile *) Lim, Marciano, Akhmedov, Valle, Miranda.. RSF