EDiscovery and Records Management. Records Management- Historical Perspective- Paper Historically- Paper was the “Corporate Memory” – a physical entity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Impact of Auditing on Records Management Risk and Compliance Susan B. Whitmire, CRM, FAI Manager, Enterprise Records and Information Management BlueCross.
Advertisements

Saving Your Documents Can Save You Anne D. Harman, Esq. Bethany B. Swaton, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 2100 Market Street, Wheeling (304)
2009 Data Protection Seminar
and Electronic Records Retention: IT Requirements Paul Dworak Office of Compliance
Considerations for Records and Information Management Programs in Light of the Pension Committee and Rimkus Consulting 2010 Decisions.
Records Management for UW-Madison Employees – An Introduction UW-Madison Records Management UW-Archives & Records Management 2012 Photo courtesy of University.
HIPAA What’s New? What Is HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
E-Discovery New Rules of Civil Procedure Presented by Lucy Isaki January 23, 2007.
INFORMATION WITHOUT BORDERS CONFERENCE February 7, 2013 e-DISCOVERY AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.
A PROACTIVE APPROACH TO E-DISCOVERY March 4, 2009 Presented to the Corporate Counsel Section of the Tarrant County Bar Association Carl C. Butzer Jackson.
John L. Baines OIT Security and Compliance Retention: Preserving Public Records.
E-Discovery LIMITS ON E-DISCOVERY. No New Preservation Rule When does duty to preserve attach? Reasonably anticipated litigation. Audio sanctions.
Records Management What to Keep and What to Toss.
Litigation Hold Overview Tom O’Connor Gulf Coast Legal Technology Center
Allvision Computing By Legal For Legal 2007 Litigation Readiness Andrew Haslam.
Developing a Records & Information Retention & Disposition Program:
1 © Copyright 2008 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. Litigation Response Planning: eDiscovery Best Practices Stephen O’Leary Sr. eDiscovery and Compliance.
1 E-Discovery Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Concerning Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (ESI) Effective Date: 12/01/2006 October,
EDiscovery and Records Management. Corporate Records Management Historically- Paper was the “Corporate memory”- a visible, physical entity. Original.
ISO 17799: Standard for Security Ellie Myler & George Broadbent, The Information Management Journal, Nov/Dec ‘06 Presented by Bhavana Reshaboina.
RECORDS MANAGEMENT City of Oregon City “ That was then… this is now!”
Electronic Discovery (eDiscovery) Chad Meyer & John Vyhlidal ConAgra Foods.
Caroline J. Walters, MA, MLS University Records Officer.
AIIM Presentation Selecting and Implementing A Records Management System June 5, 2008.
What Will My Records Retention Schedule Look Like ?
Records Management Overview. Why? It’s the Law It’s the Law It’s University Policy It’s University Policy Fiscal and Legal Compliance Fiscal and Legal.
Electronic Communications State Owned System Mandates Presented by: Eileen Goldgeier.
Do you Know Where your Data is? Gregory P. Silberman, CISSP Technology Intellectual Property & Outsourcing Group Kaye Scholer LLP May 10, 2005.
Electronic Records Management: What Management Needs to Know May 2009.
THE CLOUD Risks and Benefits from the Business, Legal and Technology Perspective September 11, 2013 KEVIN M. LEVY, ESQ. GUNSTER YOAKLEY.
Copyright© 2010 WeComply, Inc. All rights reserved. 9/19/2015 Record Management.
Managing the Retention of Electronic Records Ann Marie Przybyla Electronic Records Symposium Region 9, November 2007.
EDiscovery, Records Management and Records Retention.
Rewriting the Law in the Digital Age
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
Records Management Is Not an Option Anymore
M a k i n g w o r k e r s ’ c o m p w o r k ® Content Management & Records Retention “A RIM Perspective” Nancy M. Maglothin, Records and Information Manager.
Against: The Liberal Definition and use of Litigation Holds Team 9.
P RINCIPLES 1-7 FOR E LECTRONIC D OCUMENT P RODUCTION Maryanne Post.
Records Management 101 The Basics Archival and Records Management Services Division.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
EDiscovery Preservation, Spoliation, Litigation Holds, Adverse Inferences. September 15, 2008.
Electronic Records Management: A New Understanding of Policy, Compliance, and Discovery Robert J. Sobie, Ph.D. Director Information Systems Department.
CORPORATE RECORDS RETENTION POLICY TRAINING By: Diana C. Toman, Corporate Counsel & Assistant Secretary.
ILTA – Insight 2007 E-Disclosure --Preparing for Compliance-- Moderator: Sally Gonzalez, Director, Navigant Consulting, Inc. Panelists: Oz Benamram, Director.
Information and Records Management INFM 718X/LBSC 708X Seminar on E-Discovery.
Digital Government Summit
E-Discovery – Practical Experience from an Agency Perspective Robert Wright Former Chief, Plans and Program Management Unit FBI.
Records Management and E- Discovery Nebraska Secretary of State – Records Management Division – November 8, 2007.
Legal Holds Department of State Division of Records Management Kevin Callaghan, Director.
E-Discovery And why it matters to a SSA. What is E-Discovery? E-Discovery is the process during litigation of discovering information relevant to litigation.
HOW TO BE AN EFFECTIVE RECORDS OFFICER Tennessee Secretary of State Records Management Division 1.
EDiscovery Also known as “ESI” Discovery of “Electronically Stored Information” Same discovery, new form of storage.
Surveying and Scheduling Records of OCIO Presented by Jennifer Wright Smithsonian Institution Archives Records Management Team February 16, 2005.
Chapter 3: Business Continuity Planning. Planning for Business Continuity Assess risks to business processes Minimize impact from disruptions Maintain.
WESTERN PA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOCIATION – NOVEMBER 4, 2015 Risk Management for Payroll.
School of Health Sciences Unit 3 Legal Aspects of Health Information and Health Care Statistics HI 135 Instructor: Alisa Hayes, MSA, RHIA, CCRC.
CLOUD VIRTUALIZATION MLArchiver for vCloud Air Archiving | eDiscovery | Records Management | Analytics Stephen Catanzano August.
RECORDS MANAGEMENT TRAINING City of Oregon City. INTRODUCTION TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT
#16PACE Preparing For The Inevitable... How To Be Ready When The Lawsuit Comes And Steps To Proactively Limit Corporate Inconvenience And Liability Mitchell.
CLOUD VIRTUALIZATION MLArchiver for vCloud Air Archiving | eDiscovery | Records Management | Analytics Stephen Catanzano August.
RECORDS MANAGEMENT TRAINING City of Oregon City. INTRODUCTION TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT.
Chapter 6 Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
UW-Madison Guidelines for Managing the Records of Departing Employees*
Leveraging the Data Map – A Case Study November 15, 2016
Data Minimization Framework
Records Management Compliance Training
Records Management Level One.
Information Governance Part 2
IUC Records Retention Tool: Zasio’s Versatile Retention
Presentation transcript:

eDiscovery and Records Management

Records Management- Historical Perspective- Paper Historically- Paper was the “Corporate Memory” – a physical entity driven by the need to retain items coupled with the availability of space to store them Insured authenticity (originals) and access.

Records Management- Digital Perspective Records management is no longer visible. Digital information accounts for greater than 80% of all records. The logical location of these stored electronic records is controlled by computers. And, although, it may appear to be less costly to store digital information, it is important to develop meaningful retention policies.

Consider... A 2006 Survey (ARMA AIMM) of 17,000 Businesses, Government agencies, & non-profits and associations presented the following results: While 87% of organizations had formal record management programs, over 32% of them were rated as ineffective. (2005 Survey = 85% and 41%) Over 43% of the record management programs did not address electronic records. (2005 Survey= 47%) 43% (vs 46% in 2005) did not have a formal plan for discovery requests for records including litigation hold orders and 53% (vs 65% in 2005) of them that did have litigation hold procedures did not include electronic records. 49%(vs 60%) did not have a formal retention policy. Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act on record management program has increased 56% since 2003.

Goals of a Sound Records Management Program Preservation Compliance with Regulations & Statutes. Mitigate Legal Risk. Reduce Litigation and Discovery Costs. Enhance Knowledge Management and Increase Productivity.

Preservation Anticipation of a Claim is all that’s required to trigger the duty to preserve potentially relevant evidence. Effective preservation (or destruction) is difficult. Other issues that must be addressed: –Hardware/software changes. –Employee turnover. –Reminders to organization. –Suspension of defragmentation, alteration, wiping etc. –Responsive vs. Reactive preservation.

Compliance and Risk Mitigation Sarbanes-Oxley. HIPAA. Gramm-Leach-Bliley The potential implications of Zubulake

Compliance with organizational policies, industry standards, local, & National Government laws and regulations dictate evolving retention periods for all types of Data including s.  Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)  HIPAA  SEC 17 CFR Part 210  Florida Sunshine Law  NASD 2860/3010/3110  FDA  Electronic Communications and Transactions Act  National Labor Relations Act  Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974  Americans with Disabilities Act  OSHA  Medicare Conditions of Participation  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Over 6,000 State & Federal Compliancy Laws & Regulations!

Costs Understand the cost of preservation vs automatic destruction policies. Make sure that you establish methods to reinforce your policies and test their effectiveness. Anticipate litigation.

Knowledge Management From a legal perspective maintain your records so they can be updated and be useful for future needs or litigation.

Some of the questions you must answer for your client or company Has relevant data been properly preserved? What is the time, difficulty, costs to recover and retrieve relevant data? What business disruption will occur? How can relevant data be identified and irrelevant or privileged data be sorted out? How can this data be preserved to be used for potential future requests or other matters?

Changing Perspectives on Record Management Ignorance no longer a valid defense. retention policies are difficult or impossible to put in place. Sarbanes-Oxley requires compliance, yet is vague in many areas. Cost shifting strategies and burdensome arguments have a very low success rate.

Best Practices Proactively prepare for future litigation. Map critical electronic data, systems and backup media. Align Legal, IT and the Business. Disaster recovery strategies must no longer be the only purpose of record retention. Create evidence management/ preservation programs and publish, publish, publish

Example Create the Retention schedule/ guidelines and publish to a employee handbook Create a list of every department and division within the corporation and then within that department each major category of documents Create a complete numbering system; i.e LEG ; representing the Legal Department, the Litigation division, and expense records For LEG define the details for that record type electronic and paper life…i.e; online for 3 years, after that destroy, any events that could have an impact, etc. Create a records retention manager and hotline for monitoring and answering immediate questions.