Oklahoma Cow-Calf Management Practices: Breeding Program Results from the assessment distributed with Oklahoma Beef Cattle Manuals.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Standard Grade Biology
Advertisements

Beef Cattle. Angus Brahman Charolais Hereford.
Caution!!! Unless n is extremely large, the large sample procedure performs poorly when p is near 0 or near 1. For instance ; p= and n=100 so that.
Unit 14 Assessment Objective Three. Unit 14 Assessment Objective Three.
Reaching New Audiences with Oklahoma’s Master Cattleman Program Damona Doye, Agricultural Economics David Lalman, Animal Science Oklahoma State University.
Number of students in a class of 30 who: Sometimes, most of the time, or always wore a seatbelt.
Percentage of students who: Never or rarely wore a seat belt when riding in a car Ever rode with a driver.
And standard deviation
Practice Using the Z-Table
ADVERB NOTES Grade 7. A word that modifies (adds information to) a verb, adjective, or other adverb. ADVERB DEFINITION.
Beef Cattle. Black Angus Pictures from Native to Angus (near Scotland) Most popular beef breed in the US Always.
Cow/Calf Cost of Production Goals Oklahoma State University.
What is the OSU Master Cattleman program?
An introduction to evolution
BEEHIVE MASTER BEEF MANAGER PROGRAM – MEETING THE EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN RISK MANAGEMENT OF UTAH BEEF PRODUCERS C. Kim Chapman Extension Animal Scientist.
Standard Scores & Correlation. Review A frequency curve either normal or otherwise is simply a line graph of all frequency of scores earned in a data.
North Carolina Grass-fed Beef Demand Assessment. Husted, R. (2005) National Cattlemen’s Beef Association.
Genetics of the Black Polled Hereford By: Cassady Wilson.
Percent Problems Solving Simple Percent Problems.
Cow-Calf Operations Its all about BEEF!. Advantages Forage is cheaper than feed. Less labor requirements. Low death loss. Adapt well. Good demand for.
Breeds of Beef Cattle and Dairy Cattle Country of Origin Special thanks to Oklahoma State University Animal Science Dept. For more information visit:
Improvement in the Cattle Industry Stephanie Stimpson.
1.3(M2) Warm Up (8 + 4i) – (9 – 2i) (-2 – i) + (-6 – 3i)
To be certified as a Master Cattleman, producers must complete a minimum of 28 hours of instruction from the Master Cattleman curriculum. The core curriculum.
Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Putting Statistics to Work.
Improving Beef Cattle Reproductive Rates Through Management Part 1 Dr. Tom R. Troxel Professor and Associate Department Head – Animal Science.
People with Dogs By Raffaella I. Kishner. People with dogs always treat their dogs with love and care.
Enhancing Quality Of Dystocia Data By Integration Into A National Dairy Cattle Production Database C. P. Van Tassell 1,2 and G. R. Wiggans 1 Animal Improvement.
Factors Affecting Cow-Calf Costs, Production, and Profits Clement E. Ward, Professor Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University.
Beef Lifecycle. Step 1 On cow-calf farms and ranches, cows are bred and give birth to a calf each year.
 decimals/cc-7th-fracs-to-decimals/v/converting-fractions-to-decimals-example.
IE(DS)1 May of the measures that are of interest in psychology are distributed in the following manner: 1) the majority of scores are near the mean 2)
Choose a category. You will be given the answer. You must give the correct question. Click to begin.
Denise Schwab ISU Extension Beef Program Specialist 2013 Beef Production SPA Lab 2013 Beef Production SPA Lab
Please turn off cell phones, pagers, etc. The lecture will begin shortly.
IE(DS)1 Many of the measures that are of interest in psychology are distributed in the following manner: 1) the majority of scores are near the mean 2)
Exploring the Beef Industry SECHS Mr. Pullom Fall 2011.
The Beef Industry. Beef Products What products can you think of? What products can you think of?
Eric A. DeVuyst Department of Ag. Economics Oklahoma Stage University.
An Introduction to. The OSU Master Cattleman program is… A comprehensive educational curriculum for beef cattle producers with opportunities for continuing.
Oklahoma Stocker Management Practices Results from the assessment distributed with Oklahoma Beef Cattle Manuals.
Unit #2 – Confidence Intervals (An Overview) ©2005 Dr. B. C. Paul.
3 STUDENT ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT
Cow-Calf Enterprise Standardized Performance Analysis.
Mr. Chudej.  Originated in Scotland  Black in Color  Naturally polled  #1 Beef Breed.
General Ag Ky. Ag. 1 Ky.
Telescoping Series & P-Series Objectives: Be able to describe the convergence or divergence of p-series and telescoping series. TS: Explicitly assess information.
Angus Red Angus Aknole Watusi Charolais Chianina Gelbvieh Hereford Longhorn Polled Herford Limousin Maine-Anjou Salers Shorthorn Simmental South Devon.
To find near doubles.
Hypothesis Testing with z Tests
Added Value of Preconditioning
Molecular genetic in Animal Production
Oklahoma Cow-Calf Management Practices: Calf Management
The Beef Industry.
Breeds of Beef Cattle and Dairy Cattle Country of Origin Special thanks to Oklahoma State University Animal Science Dept. For more information visit:
Feeder Cattle Price Differences
Many of the measures that are of interest
Oklahoma Cow-Calf Management Practices: Herd Health
Oklahoma Beef Quality Assurance
Evaluation and Assessment of the Individual: Week 2 Discussion
Energy Cost Management: Crops: Animal Products: It is more efficient to feed on crops than on animal products because.
Oklahoma Cow-Calf Management Practices: Hay & Forage
H0: m = m0 Ha: m > m0 Ha: m < m0 Ha: m  m0 “EXTREME”
Distribution of responses from 112 dairy and 90 beef farmers when asked ‘Where do you find information with regards to vaccinating your cattle?’. *DairyCo.
Oklahoma Cow-Calf Management Practices: Nutrition
Oklahoma Cow-Calf Management Practices
Oklahoma Stocker Management Practices: Herd Health
What does it mean when we talk about a breed of cattle?
Oklahoma Cow-Calf Management Practices: Preconditioning
Prepared by: Elisha Bashford
Presentation transcript:

Oklahoma Cow-Calf Management Practices: Breeding Program Results from the assessment distributed with Oklahoma Beef Cattle Manuals

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Nearly always, 7 = Rarely if ever Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses

1 = Extremely Important, 7 = Extremely Unimportant Percentage of Responses