Testing Gravity with Lunar Laser Ranging James Battat August 9, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lunar Laser Ranging - A Science Tool for Geodesy and General Relativity Jürgen Müller Institut für Erdmessung, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany 16th.
Advertisements

By: Rubi Almanza.  Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) started in 1969, when the crew of the Apollo 11 mission placed an initial array consisting of one-hundred.
Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation
1 Motion – Newton’s Laws Gravity – A Closer Look The Universal law of Gravity.
Gravitational physics, planetary science and exploration with laser retroreflectors Manuele Martini Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (LNF) dell’INFN, Frascati.
Outline of the Lectures Lecture 1: The Einstein Equivalence Principle Lecture 2: Post-Newtonian Limit of GR Lecture 3: The Parametrized Post-Newtonian.
APOLLO: One-millimeter LLR
2/12/ Moon Phases and Eclipses 2/12/2015 Application: Ws Connection: The next Solar Eclipse is scheduled to be viewed in the US on May 20,
LLR Analysis – JPL Model and Data Analysis James G. Williams, Dale H. Boggs and Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology.
APOLLO: Next-Generation Lunar Laser Ranging Tom Murphy UCSD Tom Murphy UCSD.
C.D. Hoyle for the Eöt-Wash Group at the University of Washington ? Testing Gravity from the Dark Energy Scale to the Moon and Beyond C.D. Hoyle.
General Relativity I The need for a more general theory of relativity… Einstein’s tower experiment The strong equivalence principle.
Extra Dimensions, Dark Energy and the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law ? Liam J. Furniss, Humboldt State University.
Preliminary Results from an Advanced Mission Concept Study Mars Laser Ranging UCSD: Tom Murphy (PI) JPL: Slava Turyshev (JPL PI) William Farr Bill Folkner.
D epartment of P hysics Brown APJC – August 2008 Recent Precision Tests of General Relativity Thomas P. Kling Brown Astrophysics Journal Club August 2008.
Lunar Laser Ranging (LLR) within LUNAR Tom Murphy 1 Doug Currie 2 Stephen Merkowitz 3 D. Carrier, Jan McGarry 3, K. Nordtvedt, Tom Zagwodski 3 with help.
APOLLOAPOLLO Testing Gravity via Laser Ranging to the Moon Testing Gravity via Laser Ranging to the Moon Tom Murphy (UCSD)
1 Millimeter Laser Ranging to the Moon: a comprehensive theoretical model for advanced data analysis Dr. Sergei Kopeikin Dr. Erricos Pavlis (Univ. of Maryland)
Space-Based Optical Communications with Precision Ranging Capability For Testing Relativity Stephen M. Merkowitz and Jeff Livas NASA/GSFC May 22, 2006.
General Relativity: Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation Presented By Arien Crellin-Quick and Tony Miller SPRING 2009 PHYS43, SRJC.
Gravitomagnetism The Myth and the Legend
Gravitational Waves aka Gravity acting
ESPACE Porto, June 2009 MODELLING OF EARTH’S RADIATION FOR GPS SATELLITE ORBITS Carlos Javier Rodriguez Solano Technische Universität München
WAG 2013, Bern, Nov. 14, 2013 True Tests of the Weak Equivalence Principle for Antiparticles Unnikrishnan. C. S. Gravitation Group & Fundamental Interactions.
8. Gravity 1.Toward a Law of Gravity 2. Universal Gravitation 3. Orbital Motion 4. Gravitational Energy 5. The Gravitational Field.
Next-Generation Lunar Laser Ranging Tom MurphyUCSD.
Recent determination of Gamma with Cassini M.T. Crosta, F. Mignard CNRS-O.C.A. 5th RRFWG, June, Estec.
Free Association well, Cheap Association. 1 Potpourri.
FORCE – A PUSH OR A PULL THAT CAUSES THE CHANGE IN MOTION OF AN OBJECT THERE ARE FOUR FUNDAMENTAL FORCES IN NATURE: 1)GRAVITATIONAL FORCE – IS ALWAYS.
Pioneer Anomaly Test – Jonathan Fitt 1 Design Assessment of Lunar, Planetary and Satellite Ranging Applied to Fundamental Physics Jonathan Fitt Friday,
Testing Gravity with Lunar Laser Ranging DoE Site Visit James Battat August 21, 2006.
Sub-Millimeter Tests of the Gravitational Inverse-Square Law C.D. Hoyle University of Washington In collaboration with: E.G. Adelberger J.H. Gundlach B.R.
Fundamental Principles of General Relativity  general principle: laws of physics must be the same for all observers (accelerated or not)  general covariance:
19 Years Timing of J Weiwei Zhu NANOGrav Timing Group
Motion and Forces (p ). Motion describes how objects travel in space and time The main variables in the description of motion are: –Speed (velocity)
8. Gravity 1.Toward a Law of Gravity 2. Universal Gravitation 3. Orbital Motion 4. Gravitational Energy 5. The Gravitational Field.
Outline of the Lectures Lecture 1: The Einstein Equivalence Principle Lecture 2: Post-Newtonian Limit of GR Lecture 3: The Parametrized Post-Newtonian.
The Matter Force The Matter Force By By Ray Fleming Ray Fleming.
Franz Hofmann, Jürgen Müller, Institut für Erdmessung, Leibniz Universität Hannover Institut für Erdmessung Hannover LLR analysis software „LUNAR“
Solar and Lunar Eclipses Eclipses. Solar Eclipse During a solar eclipse, the moon blocks our view of the Sun. It only happens during a new moon. The shadow.
My Chapter 26 Lecture.
Space-Time coordinates are not fundamental,
Motions of Self-Gravitating bodies to the Second Post- Newtonian Order of General Relativity.
LLR Analysis – Relativistic Model and Tests of Gravitational Physics James G. Williams Dale H. Boggs Slava G. Turyshev Jet Propulsion Laboratory California.
GRAVITATION NEWTON’S LAW OF GRAVITATION There is an attractive force between any two bodies which is directly proportional to the product of their masses.
C H A P T E R 4 Forces and Newton's Laws of Motion
What is the centripetal force acting on a 2000 kilogram airplane if it turns with a radius of 1000 meters while moving at 300 meters per second? a c =
2_5 Falling Objects Force = mass x ___________ Speed = _______ time Velocity is _______ in a given _________ Acceleration = ________________ time 13 March.
Universal Law of Gravitation. Newton and Gravity Newton and the apple “If gravity attracts an apple toward the Earth, perhaps it also attracts the Moon,
The Solar System The Moon The Earth The Sun How do they move? Why doesn’t the Earth fly away? Photos by NASA.
2/18/ /18/2016 Practice: Notes Application: Ws Connection: The next Solar Eclipse is scheduled to be viewed in the US on May 09, If we.
Atom-interferometry constraints on dark energy Philipp Haslinger Müller group University of California Berkeley.
XXXVI th Recontres de Moriond Very High Energy Phenomena in the Universe 22 January 2001 Ephraim Fischbach Department of Physics Purdue University, West.
Dark Energy: Hopes and Expectations Mario Livio Space Telescope Science Institute Mario Livio Space Telescope Science Institute.
Lunar University Network for Astrophysics Research Jack Burns, Director A LUNAR LASER RANGING RETRO-REFLECTOR ARRAY for the 21 st CENTURY Professor Douglas.
BY: SAMANTHA 9B Space and Gravity. Definitions Gravity- the force that attracts a body towards the centre of the earth, or towards any other physical.
Testing general relativity experimentally: Equivalence Principle Tests
“Universal Gravitation”
Visit for more Learning Resources
8th January 2008 Taitung workshop Sachie Shiomi
10th Inkaba yeAfrica/!Khure Africa (AEON) Conference/Workshop
Gravity and Motion Ms. Mudd 6th Astronomy.
The Moon and Earth.
Harvard graduate student Arti Garg hunting dark matter (microlensing candidates) with the Magellan telescope (Above) The PanSTARRS telescope atop the volcano.
Forces.
3.4 Motion and Forces (p.79-92) Write this title 
Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation
Solar and Lunar Eclipses.
NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Moblas 4 Monument Peak, CA LRO and HPWREN Scott Wetzel NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Program Near Earth Networks Programs.
The Moon and Earth.
Presentation transcript:

Testing Gravity with Lunar Laser Ranging James Battat August 9, 2005

Point Strong Laser at Moon Apache Point Observatory 3.5 meter dish 20 Hz pulses ~ 2.5 second round trip travel time. ~ 50 pulses in air simultaneously

Aim for Retroreflectors 3.5 meter dish Thank you Buzz Aldrin… 36 years and counting.

Motivation for LLR Test fundamental physical phenomena. –Push GR tests by 10x –Possibility that GR cannot explain data. –Unification of gravity with other forces –New clues to explain existing paradigm.

LLR is the best test of Strong equivalence principle Gravitomagnetism dG/dt Geodetic precession (de Sitter) Long range forces

10x Better Range Accuracy

APOLLO’s Capabilities Weak Equivalence Principle to  a/a ≈ Strong Equivalence Principle to  ≈ 3×10 -5 Gravitomagnetism (frame dragging) to dG/dt to G per year Geodetic precession to ≈ 3×10 -4 Long range forces to × the strength of gravity Timescales to achieve stated 1-σ results vary according to the nature of the signal.

Equivalence Principles Weak Equivalence Principle –Objects follow the same trajectory in a gravitational field irrespective of their internal structure and composition. –Testable in the lab Strong Equivalence Principle –WEP is valid for self-gravitating bodies –Gravitational self-energy has mass –Does this mass accelerate the same as other mass? –M g /M i = ?

Damour, Class. Quantum Grav., 13, A33, 1996 Push the Equivalence Principle Test Thibault Damour

Gravitational Self-Energy Objectm SE /m 1 kg sphere, 6” diam5 x Moon2 x Earth5 x

Nordtvedt Effect Visualized Nordtvedt, Phys Rev, 169, 1014, 1968 Nordtvedt, Phys Rev, 169, 1017, 1968 Nordtvedt, Phys Rev, 170, 1186, 1968

APOLLO is at APO In New Mexico Elevation: 2,788 m 32° 46’ 49” N 105° 49’ 13” W 3.5 m diameter dish Median Seeing: <1” Sloan 3.5 m Solar

The APO 3.5 meter

The Action is at the Back Telescope boresite

The Action is at the Back Timing Electronics Laser APD Detectors Control Computer Thermal Control Telescope boresite

The Laser Firing

APD Detectors MIT Lincoln Labs Single  detectors 50% efficiency 50 ps timing jitter (7 mm one-way)

Some Challenges Lunar crustal tides (~4 m) Earth crustal tides (~20 cm) Solar radiation pressure (~4 mm)

Some Solutions Geophysical metrology –High precision GPS –Gravimetry Detailed ephemeris modeling –Harvard, JPL –Included manifold geophysical effects Signal at known frequency

F I R S T L I G H T

APOLLO Summary LLR is an incisive probe of gravity. Any known GR alternative violates SEP. 1mm ranging improves constraints by 10x. Geo-metrology and models account for contaminating effects. APOLLO data is imminent.

APOLLO Collaboration Harvard: Christopher Stubbs James Battat UCSD: Tom Murphy Eric Michelsen Adam Orin U. Washington: Eric Adelberger Erik Swanson C. D. Hoyle JPL: Jim Williams Jean Dickey Slava Turyshev Lincoln Labs: Brian Aull Bernie Kosicki Bob Reich Northwest Analysis: Ken Nordtvedt