1 Game theoretic approach to unlicensed spectrum radio resource mgmt. Olav Queseth

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mixed Strategies.
Advertisements

Fostering Wireless Spectrum Sharing via Subsidization Allerton 2013 Murat Yuksel Computer Science and Engineering Department, University of Nevada, Reno.
Game Theory John R. Swinton, Ph.D. Center for Economic Education
Infinitely Repeated Games
Game Theory Assignment For all of these games, P1 chooses between the columns, and P2 chooses between the rows.
T h e G a s L a w s. T H E G A S L A W S z B o y l e ‘ s L a w z D a l t o n ‘ s L a w z C h a r l e s ‘ L a w z T h e C o m b i n e d G a s L a w z B.
Mobile Computing Group An Introduction to Game Theory part I Vangelis Angelakis 14 / 10 / 2004.
Two-Player Zero-Sum Games
Chapter 10 Game Theory and Strategic Behavior
Calibrated Learning and Correlated Equilibrium By: Dean Foster and Rakesh Vohra Presented by: Jason Sorensen.
An Introduction to... Evolutionary Game Theory
Game Theory 1. Game Theory and Mechanism Design Game theory to analyze strategic behavior: Given a strategic environment (a “game”), and an assumption.
© 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. Chapter 15 Game Theory.
Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Zero-Sum Games (follow-up)
Part 3: The Minimax Theorem
A Introduction to Game Theory Xiuting Tao. Outline  1 st a brief introduction of Game theory  2 nd Strategic games  3 rd Extensive games.
Wyatt Earp and the Gun Slinger
Rational Choice Sociology Lecture 5 Game theory I: the concept and classification of games.
1 CRP 834: Decision Analysis Week Five Notes. 2 Review Game Theory –Game w/ Mixed Strategies Graphic Method Linear Programming –Games In an Extensive.
A camper awakens to the growl of a hungry bear and sees his friend putting on a pair of running shoes, “You can’t outrun a bear,” scoffs the camper. His.
Algoritmi per Sistemi Distribuiti Strategici
Bertrand Model Game Theory Prisoner’s Dilemma Dominant Strategies Repeated Games Oligopoly and Game Theory.
PHY layer access misbehavior in WLAN networks Master thesis presentation Radio Communication Systems, KTH Probir Khaskel Advisor: Olav Queseth & Examiner:
Game Problems. Which number is closest to the circumference of the earth? A) 15,000 miles B) 25,000 miles C) 35,000 miles D) 45,000 miles E) 55,000 miles.
Yale lectures 3 and 4 review Iterative deletion of dominated strategies. Ex: two players choose positions on political spectrum. Endpoints become repeatedly.
Review: Game theory Dominant strategy Nash equilibrium
Game Theory and Applications following H. Varian Chapters 28 & 29.
Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W. Upton Game Theory.
Joint Multi-Access and Routing as a Stochastic Game for Relay Channel Yalin Evren Sagduyu, Anthony Ephremides Objective and Motivation * Objective: Analyze.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Review Midterm3/19 3/12.
Autonomous Target Assignment: A Game Theoretical Formulation Gurdal Arslan & Jeff Shamma Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering UCLA AFOSR / MURI.
Advanced Microeconomics Instructors: Wojtek Dorabialski & Olga Kiuila Lectures: Mon. & Wed. 9:45 – 11:20 room 201 Office hours: Mon. & Wed. 9:15 – 9:45.
Outline  In-Class Experiment on a Coordination Game  Test of Equilibrium Selection I :Van Huyck, Battalio, and Beil (1990)  Test of Equilibrium Selection.
XYZ 6/18/2015 MIT Brain and Cognitive Sciences Convergence Analysis of Reinforcement Learning Agents Srinivas Turaga th March, 2004.
6.1 Consider a simultaneous game in which player A chooses one of two actions (Up or Down), and B chooses one of two actions (Left or Right). The game.
Outline MDP (brief) –Background –Learning MDP Q learning Game theory (brief) –Background Markov games (2-player) –Background –Learning Markov games Littman’s.
An Introduction to Game Theory Part III: Strictly Competitive Games Bernhard Nebel.
Nash Q-Learning for General-Sum Stochastic Games Hu & Wellman March 6 th, 2006 CS286r Presented by Ilan Lobel.
Lectures in Microeconomics-Charles W. Upton Minimax Strategies.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
Coye Cheshire & Andrew Fiore June 28, 2015 // Computer-Mediated Communication Game Theory, Games, and CMC.
Introduction to Game Theory Yale Braunstein Spring 2007.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Review Midterm3/23 3/9.
UNIT II: The Basic Theory Zero-sum Games Nonzero-sum Games Nash Equilibrium: Properties and Problems Bargaining Games Bargaining and Negotiation Review.
Minimax Strategies. Everyone who has studied a game like poker knows the importance of mixing strategies. –With a bad hand, you often fold –But you must.
Mechanisms for Making Crowds Truthful Andrew Mao, Sergiy Nesterko.
Game Playing.
Mohammadreza Ataei Instructor : Prof. J.Omidi. 2.
Game Theory Robin Burke GAM 224 Spring Outline Admin Game Theory Utility theory Zero-sum and non-zero sum games Decision Trees Degenerate strategies.
Strategic Decisions in Noncooperative Games Introduction to Game Theory.
Chapter 14 Game Theory to accompany Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms 4th edition by Wayne L. Winston Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a.
1 CRP 834: Decision Analysis Week Four Notes. 2 Review Game Theory –Classification and Description –Two Person Zero-Sum Game Game w/ Dominating Strategy.
Game theory & Linear Programming Steve Gu Mar 28, 2008.
\ B A \ Draw a graph to show the expected pay-off for A. What is the value of the game. How often should A choose strategy 1? If A adopts a mixed.
Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Game Theory: introduction and applications to computer networks Lecture 2: two-person non.
Kin selection and Evolution of Sympathy Ted Bergstrom.
Modeling Reasoning in Strategic Situations Avi Pfeffer MURI Review Monday, December 17 th, 2007.
Information Theory for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (ITMANET): The FLoWS Project Competitive Scheduling in Wireless Networks with Correlated Channel State Ozan.
Non-Cooperative Behavior in Wireless Networks Márk Félegyházi (EPFL) PhD. public defense July 9, 2007.
Replicator Dynamics. Nash makes sense (arguably) if… -Uber-rational -Calculating.
By: Donté Howell Game Theory in Sports. What is Game Theory? It is a tool used to analyze strategic behavior and trying to maximize his/her payoff of.
Day 9 GAME THEORY. 3 Solution Methods for Non-Zero Sum Games Dominant Strategy Iterated Dominant Strategy Nash Equilibrium NON- ZERO SUM GAMES HOW TO.
1 Fahiem Bacchus, University of Toronto CSC384: Intro to Artificial Intelligence Game Tree Search I ● Readings ■ Chapter 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.6 ● Announcements:
1 A Proportional Fair Spectrum Allocation for Wireless Heterogeneous Networks Sangwook Han, Irfanud Din, Woon Bong Young and Hoon Kim ISCE 2014.
BEC 30325: MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS
Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications Lecture 2 Bayesian Games Zhu Han, Dusit Niyato, Walid Saad, Tamer.
Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications Lecture 10 Stochastic Game Zhu Han, Dusit Niyato, Walid Saad, and.
Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms
Presentation transcript:

1 Game theoretic approach to unlicensed spectrum radio resource mgmt. Olav Queseth

2 10 minute game theory intro Zero-sum 2 player games Players Strategy Payoff Police You Road Forrest RoadForrest Escape probability

3 Game theory in radio Player – Someone who plays the game n users or n operators Strategy – A set of possible actions a player can make User: Select waveform, transmission power, timing etc. Operator: Select which users to assign what to Payoff – The reward from the game User: Datarate, power consumption, error probability Operator: Revenues, user satisfaction etc...

4 Complications Utility Is not always easy to assess the perceived value of a payoff More than two players You don’t even have the power of making life misserable for your opponent... Non-zero sum Partially the same objective as your oponent

5 Power game example – players and utility G 11 G 21 G 22 G 12

6 Strategy and payoff 2 BS, user in the middle, 20 dB at other BS Rate proportional to C/I P 1 [dBm] P 2 [dBm] R 1 [dB]

7 Nash equilibrium Reaction function

8 Nash equilibrium P2P2 P1P1 Player 2’s reaction function Player 1’s reaction function Nash equilibrium P max

9 Timeslot game Additional rules: Two timeslots Energy constraint 1 2 P1P1 P2P2 TT

10 Payoff Users use all available power:

11 Nash Equilibrium

12 Nash Equilibrium P 21 P 11 High throughput Low throughput

13 Extensions in the works Rate as a log function More than two (users, timeslots) More complicated games Repeated games – can encourage cooperation Cooperation, contracts and coalitions

14 Final remarks Game theory is a powerful tool for analysis Utility is a tricky assumption It makes sense to use all power in one slot (if there is an energy constraint) These simple games (that can be analysed) may be too simple