Type III Interconnection: Key to Sustainable Local Network Competition Xu Yan, HKUST Business School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Equitable Access to ICT The EAC Experience East African Community.
Advertisements

1 Price squeeze tests in electronic communications: ARCEPs experience Competition Law and Electronic Communications Brussels, June 19, 2008.
Yan Pu1 Theory of Price Regulation Agenda 1 Introduction –1.1 Objective of regulation –1.2 Rate balancing 2 Different approaches of pricing regulation.
Competition in the International Connectivity Muhammad Aslam Hayat Director PIRRC 26 Nov 2012 PacINET, USP, Suva, Fiji.
Regulatory Requirements for Broadband Lebanese Broadband Stakeholders’ Group Workshop TELECOMMUNICATIONS REGULATORY AUTHORIT Y (TRA), LEBANON January 2010.
OSIPTEL - FCC SEMINAR Fernando Hernandez General Manager OSIPTEL Lima, March 14, 2000.
AIG New Europe Fund 1 Bundling the Local Loop Financing Doina Popescu AIG New Europe Fund June, 2004.
Wireless Broadband Services and Policy Concerns in Hong Kong Xu Yan HKUST Business School
Competition in Brazilian telecom market: an emerging market experience Paulo Roberto Gião University of Brasilia & José Rogerio Vargens Filho (presenter)
Telecoms Regulation in the New Millennium David Edmonds Director General OFTEL.
Thank you.
U.S. Wireless Broadband: LMDS, MMDS and Unlicensed Spectrum February 17, 2000 Presented By: Peter Jarich & James Mendelson.
Importance and development of broadband access in Lithuania Paulius Vaina Communications Regulatory Authority of the Republic of Lithuania ITU Regional.
ITS Introducing Competition and its Welfare Implications in Korean Mobile Telecommunications Services Duk Hee Lee & Dong Hee Lee School of IT Business,
1 Access regulation and incentives for investment in alternative broadband infrastructure* Harald Gruber Presentation for REGULATION AND COMPETITION SEMINAR.
Disclaimer: The information contained in this document is intended only for use during the presentation and should not be disseminated or distributed to.
PACIFIC CENTURY Presented by Group 1B. PACIFIC CENTURY Agenda 1)Background of PCCW 2)Industry Life Cycle 3)Key Strategies -Where to compete -How to compete.
-1- Entrance of Cable TV Service Provider into Broadband Internet Service Market : Service Bundling and Role of Access Charge By Jae-Hyeon Ahn, Jungsuk.
A framework for analyzing strategies of Internet Service Providers Authors: Erik Wiersta, Gabriele Kulenkampff and Hans Schaffers Article #: 15 Presented.
A Framework for Analyzing Strategies of Internet Service Providers (ISP) By: Erik Wierstra, Gabriele Kulenkampff, Hans Schaffers Presented by: Ron Johnson.
Telecom Market Liberalization
Cost sharing models of NGN rollout in rural or remote areas BEREC-EaPeReg-REGULATEL-EMERG Summit Barcelona, 2-3 July 2015.
Vivien Foster & Cecilia Briceño-Garmendia, World Bank.
What now for the telecom industry
Ing. Vilém Veselý Czech Telecommunications Office Local Loop Conference Bucharest 5 th July 2005 Situation in Czech Republic.
Accessing Fixed Networks and Facilities to Speed Up Broadband Rollout Presented by Andrew Gorton CANTO 29th Annual Conference & Trade Exhibition 14 th.
The ICT Sector in Zambia Presented by: Ministry of Communications and Transport Overview & Investment Perspective.
1 CANTO 21 st Annual Conference Session 1 Regulatory and Policy OECD EXPERIENCES WITH TELECOMMUNICATION LIBERALISATION Dimitri Ypsilanti OECD
指導教授 : 黃光渠 教授 組員 : 鄭旻昕 、 鍾承耘 、 王泓皓. Outline  Last Mile Introductions  Industry Characteristics  Bottleneck Introductions  Background  Fixed–line.
Property of TERA Consultants CONSULTANTS T E R A IDATE– Workshop Lessons from Tunis (22 November 2005) TERA Consultants 32 rue des Jeûneurs PARIS.
Telecoms Services Sector in the Caribbean Derek Browne Information Technology Specialist CIF November 5, 2007.
0 NGN and core-IP networks regulation (sorry if most has already been said) ITU Geneva M. François Varloot.
DG Information Society 1 Liberalisation and regulation in Electronic Communications in the EU 2nd ICT Summit Istanbul, 3-6 September 2002 Hans-Peter Gebhardt.
Hong Kong: Changes and Challenges The 8th Asian Telecommunications Industry Exchange (ATIE) Forum John Ure Associate Professor and Director of the Telecommunications.
TRANSTEL Implications of the Big Bang on telecommunications and the SNO Dr Angus Hay Chief Technology Officer, Transtel.
1 Investment incentives in an environment of dwindling voice revenues* Harald Gruber Presentation for Conference “The Future of Voice” Geneva January.
Regulatory Issues Europe and Austria VON 2003 Boston Fall 2003 Telecom Policy Summit 22. September 2003 Richard STASTNY ÖFEG/TELEKOM AUSTRIA, Postbox 147,
Liberalization of Telecommunications in Europe Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006 Verona.
Proposed Tactical Framework Telecomm Regulation Onno W. Purbo
VoIP: New regulatory paradigm or more plain old telephony? Will VoIP change the regulatory landscape?
LLU Update Elizabeth Wilks-Wood Compliance Directorate.
Local Loop Unbundling PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 6 th JUNE 2007.
Telecommunication Regulatory Authority Investing In Infrastructure Telecom & ICT Opportunity 13 April 2008 ألاقتصاد والأعمال Al-Iktissad Wal-Aamal Conference.
Telecommunications competition - a new entrant’s perspective on the UK experience Rickard Granberg 2 December 2008.
FCC EN BANC PRESENTATION January 29, 1998 Heather Burnett Gold President, ALTS.
Conditions for the entry to electronic communications market in Montenegro Pavle Mijušković,B.Sc.E.E. manager for Internet and IP based services SEE Business.
How can Liberalization maximize the Benefits from the Telecommunications Sector to the Caribbean Lisa Agard VP Legal Regulatory and Carrier Services TSTT.
This project is funded by the European Union EU regulatory framework for electronic communications - Access Directive Richard Harris Independent EU telecommunications.
Critical Factors in Telecom Reform Xu Yan
The Regulation of Network Industries Simon Wilkie. Caltech Lecture for May 7, 2004.
Building Broadband for Development January 21, 2010.
Views expressed are those of the author and may not reflect opinion of ITU, its members or the government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
David Flacher¹ & Hugues Jennequin¹, ² ¹ : Paris XIII University CEPN – CNRS UMR 7115 ² : Rouen University, CARE Liberalization of the telecommunications.
1 OVERVIEW OF TISP WORK: Analysis of Policies and Regulations Carrier Selection and Pre-selection Indicators of the Assessment of Telecommunications.
Amman October 1-2, 2003 Presentation Evolution of Saudi Telecom During Sector Reform 3 rd Annual Private Sector Cooperation Meeting in the Arab Region.
Interconnection and Access Presentation by Dale N. Hatfield Chief, Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission June 6, 2000.
Economics of Telecom TC 310 May 15, Discussion Point Which serves telecom customers better?  Free Market?  Regulated Market? Does this apply to.
Info-comm Infrastructure Development in Taiwan Directorate General of Telecommunications Ministry of Transportation and Communications July 2000.
11 th Report on European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2005 Viviane Reding – Commissioner DG Information Society and Media 20 February.
Mec1224 EETT: From Telecommunications to Electronic Communications Athens, 28 March 2005 “Investment and competition in electronic communications services.
Local loop Unbundling Dr. ZOUAKIA Rochdi ANRT. Presentation outline Definition of Unbundling local loop (LLU) Importance of LLU Types of LLU : Description.
Broadband Workshop Facilitating Broadband Investment French regulatory framework Bertrand Vandeputte ARCEP European Commission – DG INFSO March 23rd, 2011.
Competition Policy for the new U.S. Telecoms Market: Background and Outline Howard A. Shelanski, U.C. Berkeley Nanterre, Paris X November 9, 2006.
Workshop for West-African Telecommunication Regulators Abuja (Nigeria), September 21-22, 2000.
SIMMONS & SIMMONS An international law firm London Paris Brussels Lisbon Milan Rome Abu Dhabi Hong Kong Shanghai New York Workshop on a new Telecom Policy.
Asia ISOM 591 April 10,
©Alliance Law Group LLC
Mr. Cleveland Thomas Vice Chairman Working Party 2/3 Study Group 3 ITU-T.
Practical considerations of USO cost modelling
FOV Round Table Agenda for Action
Presentation transcript:

Type III Interconnection: Key to Sustainable Local Network Competition Xu Yan, HKUST Business School

Hong Kong’s Local Fixed Networks Monopoly Operation by former Hong Kong Telecom until 1995 under exclusive franchise In 1995, in addition to Hong Kong Telecom, three new licenses were issued to Hutchison, New T&T and New World In 1999, Hong Kong Telecom surrendered its exclusive IDD franchise

Hong Kong’s Local Fixed Networks In 1999, Hutchison, New T&T and New World get a moratorium with investment commitment In 1999, five wireless local fixed network licenses were issued. Hong Kong Cable also obtained license for telecom service Since 1 January 2003, local fixed network market has been fully liberalized

Market Structure of the Local Fixed Network in HK, the UK and the US (By Dec. 2003) Source: FCC ( OFTA ( Oftel ( Type of Access Hong Kong (Since 1995) United Kingdom (Since 1984) United States (Since 1996) Direct Access60.7%89.7%23% Resale0%10.3%16% Unbundled local Loops (Type II Interconnection) 39.3%0%61% Total Market Share by New Entrants 27.5%17%16.3%

Regulator’s Efforts in Facilitating Competition Operator Number Portability statutory right of access into buildings sharing of facilities (cable ducts, etc) Type I Interconnection Type II Interconnection

Type I Interconnection - Interconnection between Network Gateways Network 1Network 2 POI Gateway

Type II Interconnection - the Local Loop Unbundling Local Exchange of Network 1 MDF Distribution Point Street Building Network 1 Network 2 Block-wiring TBE Room A B C

Equipment Collocation in TBE Room

Deployment of Type II Interconnection: The Cut-over of Jumper Line 2N Collocation Room Main Distribution Frame (MDF) Incumbent’s Switching Equipment Equipment Side Line Side LAL Tie Circuits Incumbent’s Exchange MDF To 2N’s Host Exchange (Backhaul process) Customer Building Blockwiring in TBE Room Incumbent’s External Cable Cable Lead-in (4) (3) (5) 2N’s Fiber Cable

Universal Service Contribution: Subsidies from IDD HKTC HKTI International Destination New FTNS Mobile Service

Price Squeezing Retail Price Intercon nection Payment

Price Rebalancing Starting from 1/8/19961/8/19971/9/199922/1/20011/1/2002 Business$104.6$108.8 $128 No price control Residential$67$68.9$90$110 No price control

More Exchange Opened for Type II Interconnection 50% residents have choice among operators, new entrants are committed for more investment for moratorium Source:

Accelerated Market Share of New Entrants

The Case of Wharf T&T By the end of 2002: Profit: HK53 million, 5.5 times comparing to 2001 Revenue from fixed network: HK$833 million Total lines: 340,000 Market share: 9% (business 15%)

Backbone Network of Hutchison Global Communication in Hong Kong

Benefits of Competition is no Longer Just Limited to Corporate Users

Type III Interconnection? Local Exchange of Network 1 MDF Distribution Point Street Building Network 1 Network 2 Block-wiring TBE Room A B C

Reasons for Change Regulation at different points are different A: collocation, cut-over B: Rights of way C: building access Different points represent different development strategies A: Indirect access C: Direct access Bottleneck at point C may no longer be controlled by the incumbent Property developers holding class license New entrants affiliated with the property developers Experience of success: the case of Korea

Advantages of Change Explicitly structured regulatory framework Type I: any-to-any communication; Type II: deployment of cut-over; Type III: subscribers access in buildings. Flexibility in regulation: Direct access vs. Indirect access Respond to market change From overall asymmetric regulation to site-specific asymmetric regulation

Conclusions Type II interconnection (local loops unbundling) is efficient in facilitating local fixed network competition as long as there is no market distortion; It is necessary to review type II interconnection timely in order to respond to the market change; Type III interconnection is essential in guaranteeing universal choice so as to guarantee sustainable universal service

Q &. A

Thank You and welcome to Hong Kong Mobility Roundtable 2005! (