A new parameterization of biogenic SOA formation based on smog chamber data: 3D testing in CMAQ Manuel Santiago 1, Ariel F. Stein 2, Marta G. Vivanco 1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intercomparison of secondary organic aerosol models based on SOA/O x ratio Yu Morino, Kiyoshi Tanabe, Kei Sato, and Toshimasa Ohara National Institute.
Advertisements

Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Development of a Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Mechanism: Comparison with Smog Chamber Experiments and Atmospheric Measurements Luis Olcese, Joyce.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development October 30, 2013 Prakash V. Bhave, Mary K. McCabe, Valerie C. Garcia Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Sensitivity to changes in HONO emissions from mobile sources simulated for Houston area Beata Czader, Yunsoo Choi, Lijun Diao University of Houston Department.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 2008 CAMx Modeling Model Performance Evaluation Summary University of North Carolina.
Havala O. T. Pye 1, Rob Pinder 1, Ying Xie 1, Deborah Luecken 1, Bill Hutzell 1, Golam Sarwar 1, Jason Surratt 2 1 US Environmental Protection Agency 2.
CMAQ and REMSAD- Model Performance and Ongoing Improvements Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS December 3, 2002.
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
Secondary Organic Aerosols: What we know and current CAM treatment Chemistry-Climate Working Group Meeting, CCSM March 22, 2006 Colette L. Heald
J.-F. Müller, K. Ceulemans, S. Compernolle
K. Ceulemans, J.-F. Müller, S. Compernolle
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Update on: 1. Secondary Organic Aerosol 2. Biogenic VOC emissions Colette L. Heald Chemistry Climate Working Group Meeting February.
The Framework of Modeling SOA Formation from Toluene Oxidation Di Hu and Richard Kamens Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University.
A model study of laboratory photooxidation experiments of mono- and sesquiterpenes M. Capouet and J.-F. Müller Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy L.
1 Modelling Activities at LAC (PSI) in Switzerland Ş. Andreani-Aksoyo ğ lu, J. Keller, I. Barmpadimos, D. Oderbolz, A.S.H. Prévôt Laboratory of Atmospheric.
4-km AIRPACT vs 12-km AIRPACT Both with dynamic boundary conditions from MOZART-4 Figures created on 5/29/2011 (corrected corrupted JPROC input file)
Developing Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Code for the MCM David Johnson (Mike Jenkin and Steve Utembe) Department of Environmental Science and Technology,
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
The robustness of the source receptor relationships used in GAINS Hilde Fagerli, EMEP/MSC-W EMEP/MSC-W.
Havala Olson Taylor Pye April 11, 2007 Seinfeld Group Department of Chemical Engineering California Institute of Technology The Effect of Climate Change.
Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex 2010 using the CMAQ-VBS Matthew Woody 1, Kirk Baker 1, Patrick Hayes 2, Jose Jimenez 3, and Havala.
Mercury Source Attribution at Global, Regional and Local Scales Christian Seigneur, Krish Vijayaraghavan, Kristen Lohman, and Prakash Karamchandani AER.
Southeast Nexus (SENEX) Studying the Interactions Between Natural and Anthropogenic Emissions at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change A NOAA Field.
Atmospheric chemistry Day 4 Air pollution Regional ozone formation.
Air Resources Laboratory Yunsoo Choi 12, Daewon Byun 1, Pius Lee 1, Rick Saylor 1, Ariel Stein 12, Daniel Tong 12, Hyun-Cheol Kim 12, Fantine Ngan 13,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development, Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Prakash Bhave, Ann Marie Carlton, Sergey Napelenok,
Modeling Studies of Air Quality in the Four Corners Region National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Cooperative Institute for Research in.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
J.-F. Müller and T. Stavrakou IASB-BIRA Avenue Circulaire 3, 1180 Brussels AGU Fall meeting, Dec Multi-year emission inversion for.
Modeling volcanic and marine emissions for Hawaii Air Quality Forecast 10/24/2015Air Resources Laboratory1 Daniel Tong*, Pius Lee, Rick Saylor, Mo Dan,
X. Zhang, J. Liu, E. T. Parker and R. J. Weber
Review of Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds and Their Products Brian Lamb (1), Daniel Grosjean (2), Betty K. Pun (3), and Christian Seigneur (3) Biogenic.
Air Resources Laboratory CMAS meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina Yunsoo Choi 1,2, Hyuncheol Kim 1,2, Daniel Tong 1,2, Pius Lee 1, Rick Saylor 3, Ariel.
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
Parameterization of Global Monoterpene SOA formation and Water Uptake, Based on a Near-explicit Mechanism Karl Ceulemans – Jean-François Müller – Steven.
Karl Ceulemans– Steven Compernolle – Jean-François Müller
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development, Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division Columbus Day 2010 Prakash Bhave U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Operational Evaluation and Comparison of CMAQ and REMSAD- An Annual Simulation Brian Timin, Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Tom Braverman USEPA/OAQPS.
2012 CMAS meeting Yunsoo Choi, Assistant Professor Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston NOAA Air quality forecasting and.
Model & Chemistry Intercomparison CMAQ with CB4, CB4-2002, SAPRC99 Ralph Morris, Steven Lau, Bongyoung Koo ENVIRON International Corporation Gail Tonnesen,
Southeast US air chemistry: directions for future SEAC 4 RS analyses Tropospheric Chemistry Breakout Group DRIVING QUESTION: How do biogenic and anthropogenic.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Model Performance Evaluation with the.
And funding from NASA ACMAP OMI HCHO columns Jan 2006Jul 2006 Using OMI formaldehyde (HCHO) observations to estimate isoprene emissions over Africa Eloïse.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Partnership for AiR Transportation Noise and Emission Reduction An FAA/NASA/TC-sponsored Center of Excellence Matthew Woody and Saravanan Arunachalam Institute.
Yunseok Im and Myoseon Jang
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
MAPPING ISOPRENE EMISSIONS FROM SPACE USING OMI FORMALDEHYDE MEASUREMENTS Dylan B. Millet, Daniel J. Jacob, K. Folkert Boersma, Justin P. Parrella Atmospheric.
Organic aerosol composition and aging in the atmosphere: How to fit laboratory experiments, field data, and modeling together American Chemical Society.
Top Down Emission Analyses Theme 17 th GEIA Conference Nov. 19, 2015 Alex Guenther Department of Earth System Science University of California, Irvine.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 26 October 2011 Diagnostic Evaluation.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
Response of fine particles to the reduction of precursor emissions in Yangtze River Delta (YRD), China Juan Li 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yang Gao 1, Yun-Fat Lam.
Global Simulation of Secondary Organic Carbon Aerosols Hong Liao California Institute of Technology GEOS-CHEM meeting, April 2005.
Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.
Meteorological drivers of surface ozone biases in the Southeast US
SAPRC07T Implementation within the CMAQ model.
Organic Aerosol is Ubiquitous in the Atmosphere
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Potential Anthropogenic Controls on Biogenic Organic Aerosol
Presentation transcript:

A new parameterization of biogenic SOA formation based on smog chamber data: 3D testing in CMAQ Manuel Santiago 1, Ariel F. Stein 2, Marta G. Vivanco 1, Yunsoo Choi 3 and Rick Saylor 4 1 CIEMAT (Research Center for Energy, Environment and Technology). Madrid. SPAIN 2 ERT on assignment of NOAA/ARL, Silver Spring MD 3 NOAA/ARL, Silver Spring, MD 4 NOAA/ARL, Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Division, Oak Ridge, TN 2011 CMAS Conference

Motivation  Biogenic SOA, accounts for the largest fraction of the global atmospheric aerosol  EUPHORE smog chamber experiments: CMAQ paramaters that govern SOA originated by terpenes clearly overestimate our experimental data.  Here, a semi-empirical parameterization based on product distribution given by BVOCs oxidation pathways is presented for  -pinene + limonene SOA

Terpene SOA in CMAQ v4.7  Based on the partition parameters obtained by Griffin et al Two Product Model for different BVOCs Griffin et al., 1999

Terpene SOA in CMAQ v4.7 Compound wght alpha1 Kom1 alpha2 Kom a-pinene b-pinene d3-carene sabinene limonene alpha1 cstar1 alpha2 cstar CMAQ TERPENE Straighforward implementation Lack of known of the product distributions for all the identified SOA precursor pathways Why two-product model?

Semiempirical Parameterization Theoretical K om,i calculation for individual SOA constituents  -pin + limo yield calculation Two product model fit (Based on theoretical constraints) Comparison with current CMAQ parameters

Smog Chamber Experiments  Outdoor chamber EUPHORE (CEAM, Valencia, Spain)  Approximated volume of 200 m 3  Biogenic VOCs mixture photooxidation experiments: (isoprene +  -pinene + limonene) + HONO

Smog Chamber Experiments ppb CHAMBER : ppb RURAL ATM. = 10 2 – 10 3 Exp.ISOAPINLIMOHONONONO 2 SO 2 ppbC/ppbNOxTRH ppb K%

 -pinene SOA products (Kamens and Jaoui, 2001) p o L,i (Torr) K om,i (m 3.  g -1 ) Limonene SOA products (Jaoui et al., 2006) p o L,i (Torr) K om,i (m 3.  g -1 ) Pinic acid 7.6E Limonic acid 6E Hydroxypinonic acid 7.1E hydroxylimononic acid 5.5E Ketolimonic acid 2.4E Ketonorlimononic acid 6.2E Pinonic acid 1.1E hydroxyketolimononic acid 2.2E Norpinonic acid 2.9E oxopinonic acid 1.3E Limononic acid 8.4E hydroxypinonaldehyde 1.1E Ketolimononic acid 3.3E Organic nitrate 1.2E Organic nitrate 1E m 3 /  g < K om,1 < 0.5 m 3 /  g 0.01 m 3 /  g < K om,2 < m 3 /  g Individual K om,i calculation The contribution method SIMPOL.1 (Pankow and Asher, 2008) was used for the calculation of individual p o L,i and K om,i

Y isoprene = 0.02  -pin + limo Yield Calculation  1 = K om,1 = m 3.  g -1  2 = 0.2 K om,2 = m 3.  g -1

Model Description CMAQ v4.7 simplified version: only gas phase chemistry and aerosol formation  Domain: 4 x 4 cell grid located in Valencia, Spain (LAT: 39, LON: 0)  Meteorology: Hourly T, P and QV values measured in the chamber  CCTM Conditions: Gas/Aerosol mechanism: CB05-AERO5 Solver: SMVGEAR Temporal Resolution: (hhmmss)

11 K om,1,298K (m 3.  g -1 ) cstar (m 3.  g -1 ) 22 K om,2,298K (m 3.  g -1 ) cstar (m 3.  g -1 ) TRP_originalAPIN LIMO TRP TRP_revisedAPIN LIMO TRP TRP_fitTRP Parameterizations to test TRP_original : Current parameters in CMAQ v4.7 (scale up of  i to consider 1.3 g/cc density) TRP_revised: re-derived parameters for 1.3 g/cc density (Carlton et al.2010) TRP_fit: parameters obtained in this work (Santiago et al., 2011, submitted to ES&T)

data alpha / , ! SV_ALK & , , ! SV_XYL1, SV_XYL2 & , , ! SV_TOL1, SV_TOL2 & , 1.162, ! SV_BNZ1, SV_BNZ2 & , , ! SV_TRP1, SV_TRP2 & 0.232, , ! SV_ISO1, SV_ISO2 & 1.3 / ! SV_SQT data cstar / 0.020, ! SV_ALK & 1.314, , ! SV_XYL1, SV_XYL2 & 2.326, , ! SV_TOL1, SV_TOL2 & 0.302, , ! SV_BNZ1, SV_BNZ2 & 7.466, , ! SV_TRP1, SV_TRP2 & , 0.617, ! SV_ISO1, SV_ISO2 & / ! SV_SQT Model Description orgaer5.f

Chamber Experiments Simulations

TRP_originalTRP_revisedTRP_fit Normalized Mean Bias (%)

CMAQ v4.7 3D Settings  Study Period: August 2009  Emissions: based on NEI 2005  Meteorology: NAM  Horizontal/Vertical Resolution: 12 km/22 layers  Boundary Conditions: GEOSCHEM monthly average  Chemical/Aerosol Mechanism: CB05-AE5

TRP_original SOA Monthly Average

Effect of different parameters TRP_original – TRP_revised TRP_original – TRP_fit

 A 2 product parameterization for SOA from  -pinene and limonene has been calculated with a mixed theoretical-experimental approach  Mechanistic considerations considered in TRP_fit represent an improvement of the treatment of SOA from  -pinene and limonene  Parameters re-derived by Carlton et al (TRP_revised) reduce original parameters bias by 50%. Still an overprediction is observed (NOx dependent SOA?) Summary  Differences in the chamber experiment simulations do not drive to substantial changes on the model response on SOA monthly average concentration  TRP_revised and TRP_fit show a similar reduction of the original CMAQ values (TRP_original).  Only  -pinene and limonene parameters have been calculated in this work. The same procedure should be done for the rest of terpenes SMOG CHAMBER EXPERIMENTS 3-D AUGUST 2009 SIMULATION