May 17, 2006 1 Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
Advertisements

1 Software & Grid Middleware for Tier 2 Centers Rob Gardner Indiana University DOE/NSF Review of U.S. ATLAS and CMS Computing Projects Brookhaven National.
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.3 Verification and Validation 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
© , Michael Aivazis DANSE Software Issues Michael Aivazis California Institute of Technology DANSE Software Workshop September 3-8, 2003.
17 May 2006 Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences Preliminary Design Robert J. Moorhead Mississippi State University.
Cyberinfrastructure for Rapid Prototyping Capability Tomasz Haupt, Anand Kalyanasundaram, Igor Zhuk, Vamsi Goli Mississippi State University GeoResouces.
SpaceGRID and EGSO Satu Keski-Jaskari Maria Vappula Parallal Computing – Seminar
Secure System Administration & Certification DITSCAP Manual (Chapter 6) Phase 4 Post Accreditation Stephen I. Khan Ted Chapman University of Tulsa Department.
02/07/2001 EOSDIS Core System (ECS) COTS Lessons Learned Steve Fox
CLIMATE SCIENTISTS’ BIG CHALLENGE: REPRODUCIBILITY USING BIG DATA Kyo Lee, Chris Mattmann, and RCMES team Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Caltech.
8 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
System Engineering Instructor: Dr. Jerry Gao. System Engineering Jerry Gao, Ph.D. Jan System Engineering Hierarchy - System Modeling - Information.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
Annual SERC Research Review - Student Presentation, October 5-6, Extending Model Based System Engineering to Utilize 3D Virtual Environments Peter.
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY Continuity of Operations Planning (COOP)
JWST Integrated Modeling Environment James Webb Space Telescope.
Web Development Process Description
1 Beyond California Water Plan Update 2005 California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual Meeting, March 3 rd, 2005.
05 December, 2002HDF & HDF-EOS Workshop VI1 SEEDS Standards Process Richard Ullman SEEDS Standards Formulation Team Lead
Server Virtualization: Navy Network Operations Centers
Current Job Components Information Technology Department Network Systems Administration Telecommunications Database Design and Administration.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Sept. 5, 2012 Kevin T. Gallagher and Linda C. Gundersen September 5, 2012 CDI Science.
Markus Dolensky, ESO Technical Lead The AVO Project Overview & Context ASTRO-WISE ((G)A)VO Meeting, Groningen, 06-May-2004 A number of slides are based.
Slide 1V&V 10/2002 Software Quality Assurance Dr. Linda H. Rosenberg Assistant Director For Information Sciences Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA
1 NUOPC National Unified Operational Prediction Capability 1 Review Committee for Operational Processing Centers National Unified Operational Prediction.
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
The Saguaro Digital Library for Natural Asset Management Dr. Sudha RamSudha Ram Advanced Database Research Group Dept. of MIS The University of Arizona.
Lecture 7: Requirements Engineering
Government Procurement Simulation (GPSim) Overview.
Keith O. Hodgson SSRL Director Brief Update on the Linac Coherent Light Source - LCLS February 26, 2002 Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Undulator.
Reclamation Climate Variabilaity Activities March 28, 2014 Tucson, AZ.
EVA Workshop, 26 March 2003, Florence, Italy1 COINE Cultural Objects In Networked Environments Anthi Baliou University of Macedonia,Library Thessaloniki,
Search Engine Optimization © HiTech Institute. All rights reserved. Slide 1 What is Solution Assessment & Validation?
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
1 NOAA Baseline Observing Systems Architecture “Current State” as of October 25, 2005 NOSC corporate oversight Planned by Goals & Programs; executed by.
March 2004 At A Glance NASA’s GSFC GMSEC architecture provides a scalable, extensible ground and flight system approach for future missions. Benefits Simplifies.
PoDAG XXI: SEEDS SEED: NSIDC Potential Interactions NSIDC DAAC should prepare an evaluation of their desired future roles in "core activities" and in mission.
Darone Jones - Program Lead Aaron Sutula – Technical Lead Iris Application Framework.
Seeking SC Feedback on Draft Technology Strategy and Roadmap for EarthCube Draft of 3 November 2015 The Technology and Architecture Committee (TAC) Chairs:
Evolving a Legacy System Evolution of the Earth Observing Data and Information System M. Esfandiari 1, H. Ramapriyan 1, J. Behnke 1, E. Sofinowski 2 1.
Software Project Management (SEWPZG622) BITS-WIPRO Collaborative Programme: MS in Software Engineering SECOND SEMESTER /1/ "The content of this.
COMPETITIVE AND SUSTAINABLE GROWTH Science, research and development European Commission Søren Bøwadt, M&T,I Workshop on Virtual Institutes 28th of Sept.
Distributed Data Analysis & Dissemination System (D-DADS ) Special Interest Group on Data Integration June 2000.
Breakout Session Assignments and Goals. Summary of Objectives and Charge to Breakout Groups Desired outcome: a comprehensive vision for NACP Data Management.
1 Overview of Maintenance CPRE 416-Software Evolution and Maintenance-Lecture 3.
Arlington, VA March 31, 2004 Presentation for the Advisory Committee for Business & Operations Effective Practices Research Overview For Merit Review This.
Proposed Course: ENG450: Multidisciplinary Design Bob Dennis.
The Earth Information Exchange. Portal Structure Portal Functions/Capabilities Portal Content ESIP Portal and Geospatial One-Stop ESIP Portal and NOAA.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
1 Recommended Next Steps For Improving Quantitative Information California Water Plan Advisory Committee Meeting August 17, 2005.
Page 1 CSISS Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems 09/12/2006 Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems (CSISS) George Mason University.
NASA Earth Exchange (NEX) A collaborative supercomputing environment for global change science Earth Science Division/NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS)
PDS4 Project Report PDS MC F2F University of Maryland Dan Crichton March 27,
ETICS An Environment for Distributed Software Development in Aerospace Applications SpaceTransfer09 Hannover Messe, April 2009.
Advanced User Support in the Swedish National HPC Infrastructure May 13, 2013NeIC Workshop: Center Operations best practices.
Data Infrastructure Building Blocks (DIBBS) NSF Solicitation Webinar -- March 3, 2016 Amy Walton, Program Director Advanced Cyberinfrastructure.
1 The XMSF Profile Overlay to the FEDEP Dr. Katherine L. Morse, SAIC Mr. Robert Lutz, JHU APL
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition
Sample Fit-Gap Kick-off
Chapter 8 Environments, Alternatives, and Decisions.
Delivery of Science Components to NRCS Business Applications
Joseph JaJa, Mike Smorul, and Sangchul Song
ESMF Governance Cecelia DeLuca NOAA CIRES / NESII April 7, 2017
Project Readiness Review P10029 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb
DOD’S PHASED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
Brokering as a Core Element of EarthCube’s Cyberinfrastructure
Brian Killough (NASA, SEO), Mirko Albani (ESA, WGISS Chair)
Maria Teresa Capria December 15, 2009 Paris – VOPlaneto 2009
Process Wind Tunnel for Improving Business Processes
Presentation transcript:

May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University

May 17, Goal Formulate architectures and develop baseline capacities that integrate applied sciences systems tools into configurations to support efficient evaluation of the prospects of integrating research results from NASA’s Earth observation systems (with emphasis on spacecraft instruments on missions recently launched or planned for near-term launch) and associated Earth system models systems engineering tools enterprise architecture tools information visualization and analysis tools uncertainty characterization tools performance assessment tools (“System Engineering Tools: Rapid Prototyping Capability,” presented August 2005 at SSC Workshop)

May 17, Fall 2005 Situation Ad hoc transition from research to operations Wide variety of R2O projects –Varied scope –Various parts of systems engineering process –Customized immediate goals –Time-consuming (not rapid) –No common infrastructure

May 17, Mission Timeline “Extending NASA Earth-Sun System Research Results through a Systems Engineering Capacity”, Working document v. SEC_V_5

May 17, NASA Systems Engineering Process “Extending NASA Earth-Sun System Research Results through a Systems Engineering Capacity”, Working document v. SEC_V_5

May 17, Justification for RPC Demonstrate the utility of innovative solutions prior to budget support for operational use of missions. Significantly accelerate the evaluation of mission science results. Make budget support for a mission possible much earlier than under the current situation.

May 17, Problem Space SNRPCISS S. Marley, “Architectural Framework,” NASA Rapid Prototyping Workshop, Hampton, Virginia, April 2006

May 17, January 2008 RPC Concepts People. Teams to perform due-diligence systems engineering of research-to-operations ideas. Place. Collaboration in-person Infrastructure. Virtual collaboration Tools. Rapid integration of new data sources Manipulation of data sets Integration of simulation models, local and remote Configuring of model runs, local and remote Evaluation of model results Extensible architecture

May 17, January 2008 Operation of RPC 1.Solutions Network proposes RPC experiments. 2.RPC steering committee approves and prioritizes. 3.A multidisciplinary RPC experiment team is formed. 4.Necessary resources scheduled. 5.RPC experiment team conducts the experiment. 6.Results of RPC experiment used when formulating a solicitation for the follow-on Integrated Systems Solutions effort. 7.RPC experiment results published in science literature 8.Results submitted to ESAT

May 17, January 2008 Overview

May 17, RPC Room at NASA/SSC

May 17,

May 17,

May 17,

May 17, Capabilities Science Data Manager Access data from observation sources –Distributed Active Archive Centers (DAAC) –Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSE) –Application Research Toolkit (ART) and similar systems. Maintain metadata in compliance with the NASA Enterprise Architecture (EA) Submit to the Earth Observation section of the Earth-Sun System Architecture Tool (ESAT).

May 17, Capabilities Interoperable Geoprocessing Environment Develop data products that measure geophysical parameter needed for models Extract data from NASA sources specifically needed for the experiment Document and catalog model data requirements in a database Submit to the Data Products section of ESAT.

May 17, Capabilities Model Manager Manage the model runs –Catalog the configuration of the model run and other parameters –Record and catalog the results of the model runs Submit to the Model Outputs section of ESAT

May 17, Capabilities Performance Metrics Workbench Provide tools to determine if there is significant change in model performance. Visualization of model results Statistical analysis tools

May 17, Idealized Scenarios Perform experiment using Multiple data sources and a single model Baseline data sources and multiple models

May 17, Limitations Substantial programming of software is outside the scope of RPC experiments, e.g. major modification of existing models RPC experiments will perform due-diligence systems engineering of limited prototypes. –Not the same as ISS RPC infrastructure (January 2008) will consist of two computational nodes, one at NASA Stennis Space Center and one at Mississippi State University. RPC (January 2008) will have one physical meeting facility at NASA Stennis Space Center.

May 17, Impacts Shift from ad hoc to a systems engineering approach for transitioning research to operations. “Steering committee” — Organizational mechanism for approving and prioritizing RPC experiments. “Experiment team” — Temporary multidisciplinary teams to facilitate and conduct the experiment. “Technical working group” — Multidisciplinary team to oversee the technical evolution of the infrastructure.

May 17, RPC Summary Infrastructure will provide a suite of tools Facility at NASA Stennis Space Center Experiments conducted during development (January 2006–December 2007) will illustrate the long-term potential for rapid effective RPC experiments. Design will allow replication of nodes at other locations.

May 17, Backup

May 17, Research to Operations Societal Benefits Crosscutting Solutions National Applications Applied Sciences Program Evaluation Verification and Validation Benchmarking supply demand Rapid Prototyping Capacity Integrated System Solutions Uncertainty Analysis Scientific Rigor Government Agencies & National Organizations NASA Earth-Sun System Research Solutions Network Research and Analysis Program Operations “Extending NASA Earth-Sun System Research Results through a Systems Engineering Capacity”, Working document v. SEC_V_5

May 17, Context

May 17, Workflow Step 1. Selection of experiment Step 2. Preparation by researchers/modelers Step 3. Evaluation by end users/clients Ongoing: RPC development RPC Hardware/Software Environment