Civil/Military Users: Whose Airspace is it Anyway? Kim O’Neil Advanced Aviation Technology Ltd. AAT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATC Simulation as an integral part of ensuring Operational Safety David Webb Air Systems.
Advertisements

Safety and Security in Air Traffic Management Rod Graff Agenda Item 2.
UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
Introduction ATMCP and Performance Dominique Colin de Verdière (CENA) Bernard Miaillier (Eurocontrol) TIM9 - ATMCP-RTSP May 2002.
Service Technique de la Navigation Aérienne NexSAT: Mission Hypothesis 20 may, 2003 STNA/31 ATM issues at horizon 2015 over ECAC Capacity: - VHF spectrum.
17th February 2004: Slide 1 DG Transport and Energy OATA Workshop 17th February 2004 European Commission OATA and the Single European Sky.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.
25 August 2014Page 1 Civil Military Cooperation in Enhancing operations Asia and Pacific Regional Sub-Office 2014 BEIJING, CHINA; 30 JUN-11 JUL 2014.
ATN ‘99, London, 23 September 1999 David Russell ATS Market Manager, SITA AIRCOM SITA AIRCOM Data Link Service.
Traffic Management and FUA integration
F. Schubert / page 1 Functional Airspace Blocks - Can they inspire the ANS World? Air Transport, Air & Space Law and Regulation International.
Data-link: Fact and Fiction Kim O’Neil Advanced Aviation Technology Ltd.
ETSI STF293: Proposed groups of Community Specifications for the EATMN CNS/ATM Steering Group 11/12 October 2005 K.-D. Ehrhardt.
Applications from packages I to III
International Civil Aviation Organization Block Upgrades Next Steps & AN-Conf/12 Alexander Korsakov Air Navigation Commissioner International Civil Aviation.
Mr. Hooper Harris FAA/JAA Annual Meeting Phoenix, AZ June 3 - 7, 2002
‘ Social injustice is killing people on a grand scale ’ ‘ A new approach to development ’ economic growth is without question important, particularly for.
1 Introduction of new electronic systems for aviation Thor Breien, Dr. Ing Park Air Systems AS Presented by Linda Lavik.
CURRENT AIRSPACE MANGEMENT PROCEDURES AND LARA IMPLEMENTATION Traineeship report 15 October 2010.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-25/PIA-2 Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-35/PIA3 Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network-Wide.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Study Continuous Climb Operations
Frank Brenner Director General, EUROCONTROL European ATM Israel Civil Aviation Conference, 18th November 2013.
Regional ATFM in Europe
Page Lufthansa ASAS It's Time for a paradigm change... Workshop May 2003, Rome
Lecture 1 Introduction- Manifestations of Transport and Tourism.
Can our ATM systems cope?
10/31/06 F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Civil Aviation.
ASAS-TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, MalmöSlide 1 Airborne Surveillance Applications included in ‘Package I’ Francis Casaux CARE/ASAS manager.
ASAS FRA OB/T ATM Projects Lufthansa point of view.
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-84 Initial Capability for Ground-based Cooperative Surveillance SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi.
2 nd ASAS-TN2 Workshop - Rome, 4 th April 20061/13 Civil-Military cooperation as a key factor in ASAS implementation Italian Air Force (IAF) Ltc. Maurizio.
Draft High Level Operational Concept V0.4 Mode of Operation for the Single European Sky Deployable from /11/04.
- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.
MFF is a EC co-funded programme Rome, 3-5 Aprili 2006 ASAS-TN2 Rome, 3-5 April 2006 Maurizio Zacchei, ENAV (MFF PM) Mediterranean Free Flight Programme.
EUROCONTROL European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation.
Reducing Emissions through Operational Efficiency Capt. Russell Davie Cathay Pacific Airways.
A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau Agenda Item 1.
Flexible Use of Airspace and Collaborative Decision Making The aim of this presentation is to provide the aviation industry with the understanding of the.
DIRECTION TECHNIQUE CERTIFICATION Paris, April 2008 SL ASAS TN2 Workshop ppt ASAS & Business.
1 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation Jan Van Doorn Director EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre April 2006 ASAS / ADS-B: Implementation.
Benefits of CDM Within AFI Region Presented by: Mikateko Chabani.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
The Global Voice of ATM Building ATM Capacity in the Middle East.
19-21 April 2004ASAS TN – 3 rd workshop AIRLINES/IATA OVERVIEW Needs and Considerations Anthony van der Veldt/IATA Assistant Director Safety Operations.
1 From Planning to Implementation. 2 Aviation Needs ECIP Institutional Arrangements EATM Programmes Implementation & Operations Europe wide Planning LCIPs.
A consolidated starting point from DFS / AENA / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Toulouse, Is ASAS /ADS-B needed for ANSP strategy?
DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT Information Day 6th Framework Programme 1st Call for Proposals, 5 Feb. 2003, Brussels ASAS operational improvements:
1 EUROCONTROL S TRATEGIES FOR The ATM Strategy for the Years As from MATSE/6 decision (Jan. 2000): To cater for forecast increase in demand.
September 2003 ATN Middle East Airlines CNS Developments in the Middle East Captain Ousama Balaa, Head of Technical Department Middle East Airlines.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
AVIATION SYSTEM BLOCK UPGRADES (ASBU)
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Blocks 2 & 3 Overview Samuli Vuokila Air Navigation Commissioner
Agenda Item 1 A Vision Based on Achievable Expectations Jack Howell Director / Air Navigation Bureau.
The Single European Sky Implementation Programme: SESAME
Internet Interconnection
Aviation Innovation for Regional Integration
Civil Military Cooperation in Enhancing operations
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Traffic Management and FUA integration
Performance Framework Concept
USER’S EXPECTATIONS AND CONCERNS Aena’s ADS Programme Manager
Dave Behrens Director, Infrastructure Strategy IATA
Presentation transcript:

Civil/Military Users: Whose Airspace is it Anyway? Kim O’Neil Advanced Aviation Technology Ltd. AAT

Objectives F To Set the Scene F Key Issues to be addressed: –Safety –Military Requirements –Institutional Issues –The future of Air Traffic Management –Civil/Military Operations and Cooperation AAT

Introduction F Conference Addresses Many Issues: –Wide coverage –In Depth –Relevant –Current F Your Active Participation Encouraged AAT

Origins of ATC AAT

Origins of ATC F Origins in WW II –Driven by Defence Need to Control Airspace F Enormous Growth in Civil Aviation –Major Global Business –Need to Manage Safety of Airspace F Decline in Military Budgets –Changing Tactical Requirements AAT

Origins of ATC F Traditional Civil/Military Relationships: –Major Changes, but –Change Lags behind Need –Still too many “Sacred Cows”? F Hot Issues NEED vigorous debate –Longstanding relationships/protocols –Obstruct Constructive Debate AAT

Change F Privatisation/Corporatisation F Civil ATC Losing Governmental ‘Authority’ –Just another commercial service? –New Roles for “Airspace Policy”? F Undreamt Areas: –Global ATC providers? –Not Located in Country where services provided? AAT

Civil/Military Interests F Civil/Military Cooperation Based on: –Airspace Use and Safety –Sharing Resources/Services –Compatibility/Interoperability –Reducing/Sharing Costs F Mutual Interest….? –Or Mutually Self Assured Destruction? AAT

Civil/Military Cooperation F Military Origins of ATC: –Initially funded –Technological development –Military still big investors F Civil Aviation an Ungrateful Child? –Why so little common ground? AAT

Civil/Military Cooperation F Changes in Civil Aviation: –New Technology –New Techniques –New Requirements F Impact on Military Costs –May be No Direct Benefits –Costs may be Very Big AAT

Civil/Military Technology F CNS/ATM: –Datalink (VDL 2/3/4?) –MLS (or GNSS?) –Mode S (or ADS-B?) F Cost/Benefits: –Not Accepted by Civil Airlines –Military Benefits but Few Civil Benefits F Implementation: –Not Enforceable by Civil ATC AAT

Civil/Military Interface F Airspace Users: –Civil Airlines –Military F Civil ATC ‘authorities’: –Arbitrator between Airspace Users? –Or Obstacle? AAT

Civil/Military Interface F Role of Civil ATC ‘Arbritration’: –Gloriously Unsuccessful –Unproductive –Expensive F Time for a New Approach? –Direct Liaison between Airspace Users –Airlines and Military AAT

Civil/Military Interface F Civil/Military ATC Needs can Conflict: –Military require Primary Radar –Secondary only Required for Civil En-route –Result: Reductions in Primary Radars –Also Rejection of Mode S F Tactical Benefits of MLS to Military –Minimal Benefits over ILS for Civil Aviation AAT

Civil Perceptions? AAT

Air Traffic Management F Civil and Military Controllers: –Sit side-by-side in ATC Centres –Facilitate Management of Civil/Military Traffic –Adjacent Airspace and Crossing Traffic F Tactical Need to occupy Civil Airspace: –Political Consent of States Required –Limited Cooperation over National Boundaries –Still a ‘Local’ Arrangement………. AAT

Air Traffic Management F Civil/Military Airspace Sharing: –Restricted by Civil ATM –Civil ATM Procedures too Limited (ASAS?) –ATC not ATM F Crowded Empty Skies??? –Limitations of ATC intervention F Free Flight: –The Ultimate Answer? AAT

Flexible Use of Airspace F Flexible Use of Airspace? “Airspace should no longer be designated as either military or civil, but should be considered as one continuum and used flexibly on a day-to-day basis….. Any necessary airspace segregation should be only of a temporary nature” F Pie in the Sky? AAT

Flexible Use of Airspace F Too Grand an Objective? –Benefits Overstated? –Two-way Process? OR –Civil Monster Consuming Military Airspace? –Or Poor Management of Civil Airspace? F What are the Real Benefits….? –What are the Obstacles? AAT

Flexible Use of Airspace F How “Flexible” is it? F Civil Airspace Released for Military Use? –Not if it disrupts Airline schedules? F Are Civil Users willing to share? –All Airspace Flexible? Two-way? AAT

Airspace F Who is Responsible for: –Airspace Concepts? –Airspace ‘Policy’? –Airspace Design? F If Airspace is just a Resource…… –Issues are more about Commercial Realities –Safety, Capacity, Efficiency, Sharing - of course –Competition for a Scarce Resource…... AAT

Airspace Politics F Whose Airspace is it? –Need Clearer Political Direction –Recognise Commercial Imperitives –Based on Far-reaching Concepts –Free of Petty Considerations –Embracing new Techniques/Technology –Cost/Effective F Complete with Business Case Too AAT

The End! Open Eyes. Open Mind. AAT