WHY IS THE RHODE RIVER SO MUDDY? BY KWADWO OMARI (INTERN: PHYTOPLANKTON ECOLOGY LAB)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 Communities and Biomes
Advertisements

Experimental Design 9th Grade EIC September 28, 2010.
IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF SUSPENDED SEDIMENT CONCENTRATION AND FLUX IN THE LITTLE BEAR RIVER Brant Whiting, Jeffery S. Horsburgh and Amber S. Jones Utah Water.
Lab: Plankton Sampling and Analysis Ventura Pier, Harbor and Estuary.
Limnology 101 Dan Obrecht MU Limnology
Turbidity or Not Turbidity? That Is The Question!!!!
Mountain Research Station – University of Colorado, Boulder.
Impacts of Hurricanes on Phytoplankton Blooms in the Chincoteague Bay Trudee Jaeger, Department of Biology, York College Introduction Due to the climate.
Long-Term Volunteer Lake Monitoring in the Upper Woonasquatucket Watershed Linda Green URI Watershed Watch ,
Introduction Changes in suspended sediment concentration (SSC) are important for both the physical and ecological environment. Attenuation of light intensity.
Ecology 15 Freshwater, Marine and Wetland Systems Global Climate Change Ralph Kirby.
Nonpoint Source Pollutant Reduction in Tensas River Watershed Using a Vegetated Filter Strip - Retention Pond System Principal Investigator: Beatrix Haggard,
Turbidity & Solids What you see is what you get….
Suspended particle property variation in Gaoping Submarine Canyon Ray T. Hsu and James T. Liu Institute of Marine Geology and Chemistry, National Sun Yat-sen.
Determination of sediment phosphorus concentrations in St. Albans Bay, Lake Champlain: Assessment of internal loading and seasonal variations of phosphorus.
What is an Indicator? Water is seen as “good quality” or “bad quality” based off of several criteria These criteria indicate the health of the water Includes.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering
Water Quality Analysis Methods and Applications. Water Quality Analysis Physical Factors including suspended materials (called suspended solids) and dissolved.
Indicators Water is seen as “good quality” or “bad quality” based off of several criteria These criteria indicate the health of the water Includes turbidity,
General Our project includes the followings: The aim of the project The aim of the project A map of the study area A map of the study area An introduction.
Indicators of Water Quality
Solids Measurement by Gravimetry n Objective n to understand the difference between the various Solids fractions that occur in Water, Effluent and Sludge.
Water Quality Update for Wahwashkesh Lake Water quality update for WWK from the Ministry of the Environment Lake Partner Program that includes phosphorus.
Turbidity and Water. Turbidity is a measure of water clarity, how much the material suspended in water decreases the passage of light through the water.
Methods Pigment analyses by HPLC Identification of pigments by –RT (retention time) –PDA (photodiode array) –LC-MS (mass spec.) Sediment Pigments as Biomarkers.
Continuous monitoring in the benthic boundary layer off the Northwestern Florida shelf. William M. Landing, Stephanie Fahrny, Kevin Speer, Markus Huettel.
EQ: How can we determine the safety and drinkability of our water supplies? LT: I can describe the indicators of water quality. LT: I will identify the.
Water Quality ESI Stream Water Mass after collecting by filtration Evaporate water after filtering, determine mass of residue TDS by conductivity since.
Notes: Indicators of Water Quality There are 6 indicators of water quality that we are going to study: Turbidity pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nitrates/Ammonia.
WQSTM Shallow-Water Simulation We received the shallow-water database from CBP circa autumn These are grab samples and measures collected when continuous.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – February 2004 Part 1 – Water Quality Assessment.
Site Locations Shaded area = Counties that do not drain into the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Basin.
Linda C. Schaffner AIWA Conference November 18, 2010.
Physical Properties Discharge rate, temperature and other physical attributes of the stream.
Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) abundance and diversity in the tidal Potomac River and estuary By Nancy Rybicki, Jurate Landwehr, Edward Schenk, and.
Ghost River & Waiparous Creek in Waiparous Village on June 21, 2007.
Assessing changes in contaminant fluxes following removal of a dam in the Pawtuxet River Results and Discussion Methods and Approach Passive samplers (polyethylene;
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
By Blue Herrings Paul Ayala, Hamid G Makki, Jimmy Tran, Felicia Sainvilus.
Biotic controls on microbial communities in estuarine and riverine habitats Trisha Pascal-Lopez Microbial Ecology Lab, Mentors: Rima Franklin, Ph.D, and.
Sediment Delivery to the Watonwan River
Effects of Nutrient Nonpoint Source Pollution on Seagrasses in Redfish Bay Kelly Darnell GISWR Fall 2009.
The Blue Planet The Blue Planet Indicators of Water Quality.
The Subtidal1 Life on the Continental Shelf. The Subtidal2 The Continental Shelf.
Healthy Rivers Water Chemistry Dissolved Oxygen oxygen gas dissolved in liquid water. Why is Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Important? Why is Dissolved Oxygen.
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Indicators of Water Quality. Turbidity: measure of the degree to which water looses its transparency due to the presence of suspended particulates pH:
Egg production rates of Pseudocalanus mimus and Pseudocalanus newmani in the Gulf of Alaska R.R. Hopcroft, C. Clarke, & A.I. Pinchuk Institute of Marine.
Turbidity Definition: The measure of the degree to which water loses its transparency due to the presence of suspended particulates. Levels: Ideal Level:
Foldable You will create a foldable or brochure You will include information for each You will include a picture of each You will include an example.
Tim Clark King County Department of Natural Resources Water and Land Resources Division Impacts of Saltwater Intrusion into an Urban Freshwater Lake.
Rande Kamolz Tyler Huntley GEOG 4401/5401 Soils Geography Fall 2007 – Univ of Colorado, Boulder.
Dissolved Oxygen Pollution Types.
Warm up: Describe the features of a river basin.
Same dredger, different location: Environmental impacts of dredging
Redahegn Sileshi1, Robert Pitt2 and Shirley Clark3
Stream Ecology.
SPM Suspended Particulate Matter
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Water Quality Monitoring Update – Summary August 15, 2017.
Lake Spokane 2012 Nutrient Monitoring Data
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Bay Grass Abundance 42% Bay Grass Abundance of Goal Achieved
Technical Communication 1
Aquatic Ecology Envirothon
Indicators of Water Quality
Results and discussion
What you see is what you get…
Presentation transcript:

WHY IS THE RHODE RIVER SO MUDDY? BY KWADWO OMARI (INTERN: PHYTOPLANKTON ECOLOGY LAB)

INTRODUCTION Background The Rhode river which was once vegetated experienced less under water grasses in the late 1960’s. Since then there has been a sporadic occurrence of these under water grasses in the Rhode River. Sea grasses are important as food sources, habitats (protection from predators, breeding ground) for some aquatic organisms. Their presence at any point in a water body much depends on the clarity of the water body which also depends on Chlorophyll and suspended particulate matter in the water.

Factors Affecting Sediment Concentration Wind Runoff Inorganic Solids Wind peaks in March Runoff peaks in June-July Sediments peak in August Peak coincides with peak in mobile benthic animals

INTRODUCTION CONT’D. Water clarity in the Rhode River is shown to be the best during winter. In summer when there’s lighter wind activity and no inflows into the river, water clarity is shown to be the worst. These observations make these two questions very important: (i) Why the Rhode river, in the first place, is so muddy? (ii) Why is the water clarity so much worse in summer than winter?

OBJECTIVES To determine the settling rate of sediments in the Rhode River To determine the susceptibility of the Rhode River (muddy up estuary versus sandy down estuary) to resuspension by a standard disturbance in the early and late summer.

Experimental Procedure The whole approach of this experimental set up was to enclose a volume of water that will reduce turbulence. Short cylinder used at Fox Point and long cylinder was used at the Canning House bay. Cylinders placed in water and held firmly in place by the iron rods. YSI probe was programmed to take data (turbidity and chlorophyll readings) every 30 seconds. METHODOLOGY

METHODOLOGY CONT’D Each experiment was in two parts; (i) Before anchor/weight was dropped (ii) After anchor/weight was dropped The ambient turbidity measurement (profile) was taking before the start of the experiment and the turbidity profile of the water trapped in the cylinder was again taken after the experiment.

Canning House Bay Fox Point METHODOLOGY Study Area Fox Point (Muddy bottom) Canning House Bay (Sandy bottom)

METHODOLOGY CONT’D Materials (i) YSI probe (ii) Cylinders (iii) Weight (anchor) Water samples were brought from the site and analyzed for the Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Fixed Suspended Solids (FSS). The water samples were usually taken from the water trapped in the cylinder.

RESULTS TbTb Before disturbance After disturbance

Turbidity Signal is Dominated by Inorganic Suspended Solids After anchor drop, chlorophyll slowly increases while turbidity is decreasing. TSS were 75% inorganic and 25% organic. DateSiteTSS mg/l FSS mg/l % Inorg. 30 Jul Canning House Bay Aug Fox Point Aug Fox Point Aug Fox Point

COMPARISON OF SITES No significant difference between sites for Time Constant or Baseline Turbidity BEFORE DISTURBANCE

COMPARISON OF SITES AFTER DISTURBANCE TIME CONSTANT WAS SIGNIFICANTLY SHORTER AND BASELINE TURBIDITY WAS SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER AT FOX POINT

COMPARISON OF SITES CHANGE IN BASELINE TURBIDITY AFTER DISTURBANCE

CHANGES THROUGH TIME BASELINE TURBIDITY BEFORE DISTURBANCE Decreasing baseline turbidity at Canning House Bay and constant baseline turbidity at Fox Point.

CHANGES THROUGH TIME BASELINE TURBIDITY AFTER DISTURBANCE Decreasing baseline turbidity at Canning House Bay and slightly increasing (ns) baseline turbidity at Fox Point.

SUMMARY TSS were 75% inorganic and 25% organic. Before the disturbance, there was no significant difference between sites for time constant or baseline turbidity. After the disturbance, time constant was significantly shorter and baseline turbidity was also significantly higher at Fox Point.

SUMMARY Before disturbance there was a decreasing baseline turbidity at Canning House Bay and a constant baseline turbidity at Fox Point through time. After disturbance there was a decreasing baseline turbidity at Canning House Bay and an increasing baseline turbidity at Fox Point through time.

CONCLUSIONS The turbidity consists of rapidly and slowly settling components. The water column clearance time for rapidly settling component was about 0.6 hour (3*time constant) The difference between sites was consistent with expectations for the sandy and muddy bottoms. The comparisons between sites indicates that shallow muddy sites may be the source of turbidity for most of the river. Also the susceptibility of the bottom to resuspension seemed to progress through the summer.

FUTURE WORK Work should be repeated in winter.