Electrochemical Performance and Microbial Characterization from a Thermophilic Microbial Fuel Cell K.C. Wrighton 1, P. Agbo 1, F. Warnecke 3, E.L. Brodie.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fuel Cells and a Nanoscale Approach to Materials Design Chris Lucas Department of Physics Outline PEM fuel cells (issues) A nanoscale approach to materials.
Advertisements

Microbial Fuel Cells And You!. What are MFCs? o MFCs are bioelectrical devices that harness the natural metabolisms of microbes to produce electrical.
Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad Microbial Fuel Cell By- Aditya Aagare Devanshi Gupta.
FUEL CELL.
Physical and Microbiological Analyses of a Shallow Wastewater Treatment Outfall Effluent Plume in a Lagrangian Frame P. Holden 1, C. Ohlmann 1, L. Washburn.
Chapter 26: Bacteria and Archaea: the Prokaryotic Domains CHAPTER 26 Bacteria and Archaea: The Prokaryotic Domains.
1 Prokaryotic Microbial Diversity Early attempts at taxonomy: all plants and animals Whitaker scheme (late 20th century): Five kingdoms –Animalia, Plantae,
Metagenomic investigation of the intestinal microbiome in healthy and diarrheic horses M. COSTA 1, A. STURGEON 1, L. G. ARROYO 2, H. R. STAEMPFLI 2, J.
Nitrogen transformations include denitrification to N 2 O or N 2, oxidation of ammonium to nitrate, (nitrification) and anaerobic ammonia oxidation (anammox).
Project Updates: Small-scale Solar-Biopower Generation For Rural Central America 1 WHA Costa Rica Project Team November, 2012 Biosystems & Agricultural.
FACE Soil Metagenome Comparisons in IMG Melissa Dsouza, Peter Hallin, Craig Herbold, Rima Upchurch, & Paul Wilkinson.
Characterization of microbial communities in a fluidized-pellet-bed bioreactor by DGGE analysis As an extension of the fluidized pellet bed operation used.
Bryan A. Reed Rising Senior : Manchester-Essex Regional High School NEB Summer Internship: Weigele Lab June 23-Aug 15, 2008 Testing Microbial Fuel Cell.
Structural Analysis of Load Distribution within Single Cell Fuel Cell Eric O’Brien.
1 Fuel Cells ME 252 Thermal-Fluid Systems G. Kallio.
Microbial Diversity.
Prokaryotic Microbial Diversity
Microbial Fuel Cells For Bioenergy Generation Meng Hu 1, Aijiao Zhou 2, Tian C. Zhang 1, and Haiyang Huang 1 1 Department of Civil Engineering, University.
Molecular Microbial Ecology Lecture 1 Professor Ralph Kirby Faculty of Life Sciences Extension 5511 Room B322.
By: Adam B and Marshall L.  What are the different types of fuel cells? Compare, Contrast and describe at least three.
Laboratory of Microbial Ecology How microbes and hosts interact ?
R. Shanthini 26 Feb 2010 Source: Microbial Fuel Cells.
Microbial taxonomy and phylogeny
Chapter 26. An electrochemical cell A device that converts chemical energy into electrical energy. A Daniell cell is a device that could supply a useful.
2 1 Divices Solut on I nnovation and Abilities eng. Elitsa Petkucheva (Student) UCTM University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy Center for Hydrogen.
DNA AND PLFA ANALYSES FOR REMEDIATION OPTIMIZATION Len Sinfield, R.G. – U.S. Navy Public Works Center-San Diego, NAVFAC Tim Latas, R.G. – Anteon Corporation.
Introduction Nitrogen is one of the most essential nutrients for plant growth and development. However, plants are unable to use nitrogen in its natural.
GEOBACTER METALLIREDUCENS MUTANTS FOR CHROMIUM BIOREMEDIATION Ilaria J. Chicca, Gabriele Pastorella and Enrico Marsili School of Biotechnology, DCU GEOBACTER.
Biological and Chemical Conversion Technologies
Probes can be designed in an evolutionary hierarchy.
Measuring the T m of DNA GC pairs connected by 3 H bonds AT pairs connected by 2 H bonds * Higher GC content  higher T m Absorbance of 260 nM light (UV)
Montecito Sanitary District Ocean Outfall Study Carter Ohlmann 1, Trish Holden 1, Libe Washburn 1, Laurie Van De Werfhorst 1, Bram Sercu 1, Cindy Wu 2,
Identify gene markers for different taxonomic groups in Archaea and Bacteria Genomes Dongying Wu 1,2, Jonathan A. Eisen 1,2 1. DOE Joint Genome Institute,
Barak Vasker ID Marine Biotechnology Keuter et al
The Possibilities of Biological Fuel Cells. Microbial Electricity Generation Microbial fuel cells are based on the recently identified ability of microorganisms.
Microbial Fuel Cells for Renewable Energy - Characterization Study
Metagenome Analysis: a case study Analysis of a thermophilic terephthalate-degrading syntrophic community Thanos Lykidis.
Prokaryotes Lack nucleus No organelles Possess DNA, RNA, and all other machinery Possess ATP synthesis Two Domains –Bacteria –Archaea.
Oxidation-Reduction Processes in Ground-Water Systems Chapelle Groundwater Microbiology and Geochemistry Chapter.
1 CE 548 II Fundamentals of Biological Treatment.
Figure S1 The North Sea beach of the Dutch barrier island of Schiermonnikoog (N53°30’ E6°10’). The transect indicates the chronosequence along the developing.
Abstract Our current understanding of the taxonomic and phylogenetic diversity of cellular organisms, especially the bacteria and archaea, is mostly based.
Microbial biomass and community composition of a tallgrass prairie soil subjected to simulated global warming and clipping A. Belay-Tedla, M. Elshahed,
Introduction / Background Wastewater Treatment is an energy intensive process Increased population and energy demands leads to increased energy costs Bioelectrochemical.
Pp 69 – 73 & Define cell respiration Cell respiration is the controlled release of energy from organic compounds in cells to form ATP Glucose.
Archaea DLO-like N-fixers Metal-reducers Methanotroph NH 3 + oxidizer Acetogens S-oxidizer High Density Microarray analysis of prokaryotes in planktonic.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Dr. Kagan ERYURUK.
Department of Microbiology, University of Oklahoma
Major characteristics used in taxonomy
By: Adam B and Marshall L.  What are the different types of fuel cells? Compare, Contrast and describe at least three.
Introducing DOTUR, a Computer Program for Defining Operational Taxonomic Units and Estimating Species Richness Patric D. Schloss and Jo Handelsman Department.
Metagenomic survey of a biological tannery wastewater treatment plant in Modjo, Ethiopia Adey Feleke Desta*, Seyoum Leta***, Francesca Stomeo**, Joyce.
Presented by Samuel Chapman. Pyrosequencing-Intro The core idea behind pyrosequencing is that it utilizes the process of complementary DNA extension on.
Fig.4 Impedance of MFC with CFBC, PtCPC and PCPC electrodes in algae aeration Conclusion MFC performance in photoautotrophic algae (Scenedesmus. obliquus)
Biodegradation of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products by Bacteria from Freshwater Biofilms Samantha Retzloff, McNair Scholar, Dr. Kevin Crawford*,
Soil Microbiome of Native and Invasive Marsh Grasses in Blackbird Creek, Delaware Lathadevi K.Chintapenta 1#, Gulnihal Ozbay 1#, Venu Kalavacharla 1* Figure.
Jeon Yong Won Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology Konkuk University Green Energy & Biosensors Laboratory.
Quantitative Phylogenetic Assessment of Microbial Communities in Diverse Environments Xinjun Zhang.
Environmental Biochemistry University of Oldenburg Fremantle, 2013
Some Basic Concepts Related to Fuel Cells with a Focus on Microbial and Enzymatic Fuel Cells Nevin Longenecker John Adams High School.
Small-scale Solar-Biopower Generation For Rural Central America
Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora
Objectives Understand how a fuel cell makes electricity
Microbial Fuel Cell (MFC)
Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Microbial flora of giant pandas.
Volume 141, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Phylogenetic tree of genome-sequenced bacterial strains from the Populus microbiome. Phylogenetic tree of genome-sequenced bacterial strains from the Populus.
Presentation transcript:

Electrochemical Performance and Microbial Characterization from a Thermophilic Microbial Fuel Cell K.C. Wrighton 1, P. Agbo 1, F. Warnecke 3, E.L. Brodie 2, Y.M. Piceno 2, K.A. Weber 1, C. Chow 1, T.Z. DeSantis 2, G.L Andersen 2, and J.D. Coates 1 1 Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 3 Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA Abstract Significant research effort is currently focused on microbial fuel cells (MFC) as a source of renewable energy. To date, most of these efforts have concentrated on MFCs operating at mesophilic temperatures. However, many previous studies have reported on the superiority of thermophilic conditions in anaerobic digestion and demonstrated a net gain in energy yield, in terms of methane, relative to the increased energy requirements of operation. Because of this, our recent studies on MFCs focused on investigating the operation and microbiology associated with thermophilic MFCs operating at 55°C. Over 100-day operation, these MFCs were highly stable and achieved a maximum power density of 24mW/m 2 and a columbic efficiency of 89 percent with acetate as the sole electron donor. In order to characterize the microbial community involved in thermophilic electricity generation, DNA and RNA were isolated from the electrode. PhyloChip and clone library analyses were performed to describe anode bacterial community membership and dynamics. PhyloChip analysis using 16S rDNA and rRNA sequences revealed an increase in relative abundance of populations belonging to the Firmicutes and Chloroflexi by at least one order of magnitude in current producing reactors. Clone library analysis confirmed the dominance of Firmicutes and identified specific genera enriched only in current producing reactors. To better characterize the active microbial populations, we enriched and isolated novel Firmicutes, strain JR and strain S2E, from samples collected from an operating MFC. Based on 16S rRNA gene analysis strain JR was a member of the family Peptococcaceae clustering with Thermincola ferriacetica (>99 percent similarity) while strain S2E was a member of the family Bacillaceae clustering with Geobacillus (>98% similar to Geobacillus pallidus). Phenotypic characterization revealed that both strains were capable of thermophilic dissimilatory reduction of insoluble electron acceptors such as amorphous Fe(III); as well as reduction of the model quinone 2,6-anthraquinone disulfonate (AQDS). Thermincola strain JR was also capable of producing current by coupling acetate oxidation to anodic electron transfer. This represents the first organism isolated from a thermophilic microbial fuel cell and also the first Firmicute representative capable of independent anodic electron transfer. The results of this study indicate the potential advantages for thermophilic MFCs and the novel microbiology associated with their operation. Reactor Design and Model CEM Acetate + 2H 2 0 2CO 2 + 8H+ 8e- 4H 2 O 2O 2 + 8H+ 8e- e- A microbial fuel cell (MFC) is a device that uses bacteria as catalysts to oxidize organic matter to generate current. In this MFC, bacteria in the sludge completely oxidize acetate to carbon dioxide and protons. In metabolizing the acetate, the bacteria subsequently liberate electrons from the acetate onto the graphite anode. Electrons then flow through an external circuit to the cathode where they combine with oxygen and protons that have diffused through the cation exchange membrane (CEM) from the anode. Conclusions   Thermophilic current production is sustainable over a 100 days   PhyloChip analysis using 16S rRNA and rDNA response identified members of the Firmicutes and Chloroflexi that increased by at least one order of magnitude only in electricity producing MFC   Firmicutes sequences dominated (74%) the 16S rDNA clone library   specifically sequences belonging to genera Alicyclobacillus, Bacillus, Geobacillus, and Thermincola were enriched only in current producing reactors   Thermincola strain JR and Geobacillus Strain S2E, members of the Firmicutes, can reduce solid phase iron as well as transfer electrons to the electrode   Thermincola Strain JR produces mA of current independent of an electron shuttle   Geobacillus Strain S2E produces 0.04 mA of current dependent on the addition of an exogenous electron shuttle   Together these results confirm the role of the Firmicutes in MFCs and expand the known role of Firmicutes to include both independent and dependent methods of current generation Clone Library Electrochemical Performance A total of six MFC reactors were constructed to evaluate thermophilic performance and microbiology. Three treatments (acetate amended, no electron donor control, and open circuit control) were applied with duplicate reactors. Shown below is representative current production from acetate and non acetate treatments.   Current was produced continually for 100 days in MFC amended with acetate, where MFCs lacking exogenous electron donor failed to produce current after 4 days   Duplicate reactors were functionally reproducible Current Production for 100 Days   471 ohms internal resistance (Ri= -m; y=mx+b)   24.2 mW/m 2 power density   89% of the electrons available in acetate were recovered as current Electrochemical Characterization A polarization is calculated by measuring potential and current changes across various external loads. It is used to calculate the internal resistance as well to describe the power as a function of current.. Firmicute Isolates Capable of Electricity Generation Geobacillus Strain S2E Characterization   Geobacillus strain S2E was isolated from a thermophilic MFC on solid phase iron and acetate   Gram positive, spore forming, obligately thermophilic rod belonging to class Bacillus, family Bacillaceae   Facultative anaerobe capable of fermentation as well as the reduction of solid phase iron and AQDS but cannot reduce soluble forms of iron (III), sulfate, chlorate, and perchlorate Thermincola Strain JR Current Production Thermincola Strain JR Characterization   Thermincola strain JR was isolated from a thermophilic MFC on AQDS and acetate   Gram positive and obligately thermophilic rod belonging to class Clostridia, family Peptococcaceae   Obligate anaerobe capable of reduction of solid phase iron and AQDS but cannot reduce soluble forms of iron (III), sulfate, chlorate, perchlorate, and nitrate Geobacillus Strain S2E Current Production   Strain JR generated a maximum of mA (mean mA, n=3 ±0.025) without the presence of a mediator   Geobacter sulfurreducens mA (n=3, ±0.04)   Shewanella putrefaceins IR mA (n=3, ± not reported)   Strain S2E generated a small amount of current (0.04 mA) when provided with an electron shuttle PhyloChip Current Producing Community Structure   The high similarity between 16S rRNA and rDNA response from electricity producing anodes (distance between red and black labels in dark blue circle) signifies that the active community (rRNA) is similar to the persistent community (rDNA) Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) distances are based on relative similarity; samples that are most similar will appear closer on the MDS map. A stress value = 0.01 indicates the MDS accurately reflects the Bray-Curtis similarity matrix. Bacterial Dynamics   Members of the Firmicutes, Chloroflexi, and alpha Proteobacteria increased by at least one order of magnitude in relative abundance in rDNA response only in current producing reactors   Based on the enrichment of Firmicutes in rRNA and rDNA response, and the lack of enrichment of these OTUs in control reactor communities, strongly suggests Firmicutes play an active role in the current generating community A 1000 unit change in hybridization intensity represents a one log change in relative abundance between the initial starting inoculum and the electrode community after 100 days of current production. Change in intensity with time Cyanobacteria Verrucomicrobia Chloroflexi Chlorobia Bacteroidetes Actinobacteria Proteobacteria Firmicutes Alpha Beta Delta Epsilon Gamma Bacillus Clostridia Other Cyanobacteria Verrucomicrobia Chloroflexi Chlorobia Bacteroidetes Actinobacteria Cyanobacteria Verrucomicrobia Chloroflexi Chlorobia Bacteroidetes Actinobacteria Proteobacteria Firmicutes Alpha Beta Delta Epsilon Gamma Bacillus Clostridia Other Proteobacteria Firmicutes Alpha Beta Delta Epsilon Gamma Bacillus Clostridia Other Alpha Beta Delta Epsilon Gamma Bacillus Clostridia Other Change in intensity with time Cyanobacteria Verrucomicrobia Chloroflexi Chlorobia Bacteroidetes Actinobacteria Proteobacteria Firmicutes Alpha Beta Delta Epsilon Gamma Bacillus Clostridia Other Cyanobacteria Verrucomicrobia Chloroflexi Chlorobia Bacteroidetes Actinobacteria Cyanobacteria Verrucomicrobia Chloroflexi Chlorobia Bacteroidetes Actinobacteria Proteobacteria Firmicutes Alpha Beta Delta Epsilon Gamma Bacillus Clostridia Other Proteobacteria Firmicutes Alpha Beta Delta Epsilon Gamma Bacillus Clostridia Other Alpha Beta Delta Epsilon Gamma Bacillus Clostridia Other   Bacteria electrode communities cluster by electricity production and not temporally   Unique bacterial community associated with current production Hierarchical clustering to compare differences in overall community structure of anode communities and initial inoculum. Initial Inoculum Current Producing No Current Controls Linking Bacterial Dynamics with Activity Phylogenetic distribution of 42 OTUs identified by PhyloChip 16S rDNA analysis that increase by one log in relative abundance. Firmicutes (16) Proteobacteria (8) Chloroflexi (5) Cyanobacteria (3) Planctomycetes (2) AD3 (1) Chlorobi (1) Lentisphaearae (1) OP10 (1) OP9/JSI (1) Spirochaetes (1) Termite Group 1 (1) Chloroflexi Unclassified Thermomicrobia Chlroflexi-4 Chloroflexi-3 Proteobacteria Gamma Delta Alpha Firmicutes Symbiobacteria Desulfotomaculum Unclassified Bacilli Clostridia Firmicutes (7) Chloroflexi (3) Proteobacteria (1) Planctomycetes (1) Chlorobi (1) Termite Group 1 (1) Firmicutes Desulfotomaculum Clostridia Bacilli Chloroflexi Unclassified Thermomicrobia Anaerolineae Proteobacteria Delta Phylogenetic distribution of 14 OTUs identified by PhyloChip 16S rRNA analysis that increase by one log in relative abundance. Current Production Initial Inoculum No Current Controls Clusters are >87% similar (Bray-Curtis Similarity) Acetate No Acetate Acetate Open Acetate No Acetate Acetate Inoc. DNA RNA Inoc. Identification of Dominant Bacteria A maximum likelihood tree showing phylogenetic position of 16S rDNA clones generated from current producing electrodes. A total of 302 clones were sequenced representing 25 OTUs which are indicated in bold. Values in parentheses indicate number of clones from each OTU. Sequences from electrode biofilm isolates are also included on the tree and are denoted in red. The scale bar represents 0.1 inferred nucleotide changes per 100 substitutions.   Firmicutes sequences are enriched (77% of clones) only in clone libraries constructed from current generating reactors   Dominant Firmicute genera   Bacillus sp. (81 OTUs, 27%)   Alicyclobacillus sp. (73 OTUs, 24%)   Thermincola sp. (65 OTUs, 22%)   In contrast to the Firmicutes, Coprothermobacter sequences represent (16%) of the clone library sequences in current generating and (14%) of the initial inoculum   PhyloChip described 35 times more diversity than detected by clone library analysis B11C-0620