CALICE Thermal Simulations Steve Snow 6/3/06 Aim to predict the temperature values and gradients within the CALICE structure. Use spreadsheet estimates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heat Loss Calculator for a Stainless Steel Complex Pipe System By: Thomas Morris & Jacob Hannon.
Advertisements

Quiz – An organic liquid enters a in. ID horizontal steel tube, 3.5 ft long, at a rate of 5000 lb/hr. You are given that the specific.
Application of Steady-State Heat Transfer
CALICE Dave Bailey. Aims and Objectives Develop the technology to build a high- resolution tracking calorimeter for ILC experiments Main thrusts: –Testbeam.
CompTest 2003, January 2003, Châlons-en-Champagne © CRC for Advanced Composite Structures Ltd Measurement of Thermal Conductivity for Fibre Reinforced.
UNIT 13 : HEAT 13.1 Thermal Conductivity 13.2 Thermal Expansion.
2003 International Congress of Refrigeration, Washington, D.C., August 17-22, 2003 CFD Modeling of Heat and Moisture Transfer on a 2-D Model of a Beef.
W.O. Miller i T i VG 1 Bridge Analysis Objective Objective –Develop model suited to examining effect of low velocity air flow through the isolating air.
UNIT III Lecture 61 Fiber optics Basic principles Physical structure of optical fibre Propagation characteristics of optical fibre PH 0101 UNIT-3 LECT.
Chapter 3 Steady-State Conduction Multiple Dimensions
Mechanical Status of ECAL Marc Anduze – 30/10/06.
An Introduction to Heat Flow
M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski and M. D. Hageman Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Extrapolating Experimental Results for Model Divertor.
Momentum Heat Mass Transfer
2S Module Workshop, 30 Jan 2012 Module positioning and cooling contacts 2S Module Workshop, 30 Jan 2012 Antti Onnela, CERN  The objectives  Module positioning.
Mickael Frotin– 15/01/2010 ECAL MACHANICAL R&D ECAL meeting - PARIS 1.
ROSIER Ph End cap – TPC - LC DRAFT Definition of the front-end electronics and its cooling in the Alice TPC experiment Page 1A The Alice TPC.
Calorimeter Analysis Tasks, July 2014 Revision B January 22, 2015.
1 VI Single-wall Beam Pipe tests M.OlceseJ.Thadome (with the help of beam pipe group and Michel Bosteels’ cooling group) TMB July 18th 2002.
Apex Target Marco Oriunno, April 23, Design and fabrication by: Marco Oriunno, Dieter Walz, Jim McDonald, Clive Field, Douglas Higginbotham, and.
Two Dimensional Steady State Heat Conduction
What are common results of heat transfer? Case #1, no phase transition or work done. How much does the temperature vary? Heat is energy in transit! Positive,
ATLAS Calorimeter Argon Gap Convection Test Bed Brian Cuerden 24 Apr
Tungsten Calorimeter Model Calculations and Radiation Issues Pavel Degtiarenko Radiation Control Group, Jefferson Lab.
Mechanical Status of EUDET Module Marc Anduze – 05/04/07.
Montpellier, November 12, 2003Vaclav Vrba, Institute of Physics, AS CR 1 Vaclav Vrba Institute of Physics, AS CR, Prague CALICE ECal Status Report.
Regression Lines. Today’s Aim: To learn the method for calculating the most accurate Line of Best Fit for a set of data.
FVTX substrate FEA1 FVTX Substrate FEA C. M. Lei March 02, 2006.
ATLAS Calorimeter Argon Gap Convection Test Bed April 25,
Heat Transfer from Extended Surfaces Heat Transfer Enhancement by Fins
An example of vertical profiles of temperature, salinity and density.
EUDET JRA3 ECAL in 2007 : towards “The EUDET module” C. de La Taille IN2P3/LAL Orsay.
50 Years of Dilution Refrigeration
Modelling the damage to carbon fibre composites due to a lightning strike Please use the dd month yyyy format for the date for example 11 January 2008.
1 VI Single-wall Beam Pipe Option: status and plans M.Olcese TMB June 6th 2002.
1 Monophase Measurements on Prototype Pixel Structures D. Bintinger, M. Gilchriese, J. Taylor and J. Wirth and contributions from D. Cragg, E. Perrin and.
CALICE collaboration CALICE collaboration J-C BRIENT LCWS02 – Jeju Island The CALICE –ECAL Silicon - V. Vrba Very FE - S. Manen Readout/DAQ - P. Dauncey.
M. Sannino for S. Cuneo - I.N.F.N. Genova1 Rich2 MAPMT Housing & Cooling Outdated designs and what is needed to get a final executive design Imperial College.
– EUDET module – Report from Mechanics Brainstorming Marc Anduze – 30/06/2009 Laboratoire Leprince Ringuet Ecole polytechnique - Palaiseau.
Marc Anduze – CALICE Meeting – KOBE 10/05/07 Mechanical R&D for Technological EUDET ECAL Prototype.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation CRaTER Thermal Analysis Huade Tan 6/27/05.
Pixel upgrade test structure: CO 2 cooling test results and simulations Nick Lumb IPN-Lyon MEC Meeting, 10/02/2010.
Cooling of GEM detector CFD _GEM 2012/03/06 E. Da RivaCFD _GEM1.
ERMSAR 2012, Cologne March 21 – 23, 2012 Post-test calculations of CERES experiments using ASTEC code Lajos Tarczal 1, Gabor Lajtha 2 1 Paks Nuclear Power.
5 May 2006Paul Dauncey1 The ILC, CALICE and the ECAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
19 Jan Ron Settles MPI-Munich LCTPC advanced-endcap for the ILD- LOI1 ILD Logo goes here Iteration on LCTPC “advanced-endcap” for the ILD LOI…
ERT 216 HEAT & MASS TRANSFER Sem 2/ Dr Akmal Hadi Ma’ Radzi School of Bioprocess Engineering University Malaysia Perlis.
H.J.Simonis, IEKP Uni-Karlsruhe, SuperKEKB meeting, KEK 18.mar 2009 Thermal studies for the DEPFET Pixel Detector IFIC – University of Valencia (Spain)
FVTX substrate FEA1 FVTX Substrate FEA C. M. Lei March 02, 2006.
Date of download: 6/28/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: From the Casimir Limit to Phononic Crystals: 20 Years of Phonon Transport Studies.
CHAPTER 6 Introduction to convection
Marc Anduze first drawings of Ecal eudet module COPIED FROM : Marc Anduze PICTURES FROM : CALICE/EUDET electronic meeting – CERN – 12 July 07.
Marc Anduze – EUDET Meeting – PARIS 08/10/07 Mechanical R&D for EUDET module.
1 Calorimeter 4-May-2009 Added Slides Data from MAS GCALOR with phojet min-bias events in ATLAS detector.
Date of download: 9/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
T-simulation OUTLINE Inputs to the T-simulation: chips, boards, crate mechanics and fan T-simulation performed into two steps: On large scale: simple AM.
University Physics: Waves and Electricity
CALICE: Thermal, Mechanical and Assembly issues
FP420 Detector Cooling Thermal Considerations
Hybrid Mechanical/Thermal Design ideas
Practical Metalworking
Atlas Calorimeter with LN2 Cooling Loops, Revision B
Lesson 12 CONDUCTION HEAT TRANSFER
What is Fin? Fin is an extended surface, added onto a surface of a structure to enhance the rate of heat transfer from the structure. Example: The fins.
Thermal behavior of the LHCb PS VFE Board
Multiplying Binomials
WP4 Dave Bailey 5th May 2006.
PANDA Collaboration Meeting
Presentation transcript:

CALICE Thermal Simulations Steve Snow 6/3/06 Aim to predict the temperature values and gradients within the CALICE structure. Use spreadsheet estimates and fast simulations that can easily be modified. At this stage in design, trying many variants is more important than high accuracy. The problem: Complex cell structure, cell details may influence thermal properties. Main temperature gradients are over long distances → many cells → many nodes → slow. Solution: Use detailed models to calculate an average bulk conductivity of the structure in the three principle directions; X (across slab), Y (along slab), Z (perpendicular to slab). Use these values, together with chips/m 3 and chip power as inputs to model of whole module.

Cell layout Layout is based on presentation of Marc Anduze of 9/6/2005 plus some guesses. X-Z section Y-Z section Guesses for: carbon fibre thickness 0.3 mm and 1.0 mm glue1 thickness 0.1 mm air gaps (clearance) 0.5 mm in X, 0.2 mm in Z. Unit cell contains half of each tungsten layer.

Layout continued X-Y section Unit cell shown by red box.

Thermal conductivities Based on standard tables plus some guesses. Section from FlexPDE code: C_W = { conductivity of tungsten W/(mm*K)} C_Si = { silicon } C_Al = { aluminium } C_N = { nitrogen or air } { below here are guesses } C_g_SiH = { glue Si to H } C_g_AlH = { glue Al foil to H } C_g_SiPCB = { glue Si to PCB } C_CF_in = 0.05 { carbon fibre in-plane } C_CF_out = { carbon fibre out-of-plane } C_PCB_in = 0.01 { PCB in-plane } C_PCB_out = { PCB out-of-plane }

FlexPDE model for Cx Cooling in the x direction seems unlikely, but I calculated Cx anyway. Layer 5 is the alveolus structure. It carries 93% of the heat at the slab boundaries but only 54% at the slab mid point.

FlexPDE model for Cy Conductivity in this direction is fairly trivial. Nearly all the heat flows in the two tungsten layers. Layer 1 is the tungsten/CF in the slab. It carries about 40% of the heat. About 38% is in the alveolus tungsten/CF and the remainder mainly in the silicon.

FlexPDE model for Cz Conductivity in the z direction is mainly (80%) in the vertical wall of the alveolus. Conduction through the slab would become significant if the air gaps were a factor 2 or 3 smaller.

Results This table shows conductivity values (K/W) for the unit cell in three directions. The first two rows give very simple spreadsheet estimates for the alveolus and slab seperately. The third row is their sum and the fourth is the result of the detailed simulation. In Y and Z the FlexPDE simulation was not necessary; spreadsheet was good enough. In Z the detailed simulation gives a value between 'alveolus' and 'sum', as expected. Assuming that the chip power is 0.1 mW/channel and that the pad size is 5x5 mm 2, then the power per unit cell is P=0.015 W. We take number of cells in the calorimeter module to be N x =17, N x =28 and N z =40. Now making the assumption that the module is a rectangular block cooled in the x direction on just one face we can estimate the temperature difference from  T x = P N x 2 / (2 C x ). The result is  T x = 10.3,  T y = 15.6,  T z = 17.5

Results 2 In fact the module is not rectangular and it could be cooled on more than one face, so we use FlexPDE again to solve this problem and find: Cooling in the Y direction only. Hottest point is 13.5 degrees Cooling in the Z direction only. Hottest face is 19.0 degrees Cooling in the Y and Z directions. Hottest point is 10.0 degrees

Conclusions The C y value has little uncertainty because it depends mainly on the dimensions and conductivity of the tungsten, which are both well known. Given the present assumptions about chip power and pad size, it would be possible to cool in the Y direction (along the slabs) with temperature difference of 14 degrees - large but not impossible ? The C z value has huge uncertainty, hardly better than a guess. But if correct it would be not much worse to cool in the Z direction. The X direction is presumably unattractive because it would cause a crack in the calorimeter acceptance. Combining Y and Z cooling could reduce the temperature difference to 10 degrees.