Building a Business Innovation Accelerator to Meet Rhode Island’s Needs: Lessons from other States Richard A. Bendis President and CEO Innovation America.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The project is funded by the European Union Institutional capacity development of the three innovation centres and research sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Advertisements

Founded in 1998 Private not-for profit Oklahoma Corp. Offices in Oklahoma City and Tulsa Staff of 12.
4-H Administrative Update 2006 Youth Development Institutes March 2006.
Connecting the Technopark to the Incubator Association of University Research Parks, 2012 © Harold Strong, AURP Immediate Past President Director of Discovery.
©2006 Ann Arbor SPARK 2010 Successes 2011 Opportunities Washtenaw Workforce Investment Board July 8, 2011.
` OEDIT Presentations December 8, Collaborative innovation is key for job creation and economic growth “Given the complexity of the problems and.
Erin Sparks CSG-West Annual Meeting July 31, 2013 Redesigning State Economic Development Agencies.
High Impact Implementation for an Innovation-Driven Economy The Texas Industry Cluster Initiative.
Program on Globalization and Regional Innovation Systems Community Participation and Emerging Forms of Governance in Economic Development Strategy David.
Who We Are What We Do What We Do - By The Numbers Key State Programs Used for Projects & Operations Unified Voice in Economic Development Professional.
KICKSTART SEED FUND: IGNITING INNOVATION KICKSTART SEED FUND OVERVIEW GAVIN CHRISTENSEN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, KICKSTART SEED FUND Aug, 2009.
SMEs Division National IP Action Plan for Entrepreneurs and SMEs March 2008 Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
Regional Innovation Strategies José Luís Simões 2001/03/30 Reflections on US economic development policies: Meeting the ‘new economy’ challenge by Mikel.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Sustainable Smart Cities Symposium April 3, 2013 Richard B. Marchase Vice President for Research and Economic Development.
One Community One Goal The purpose of One Community One Goal (OCOG) is to provide Miami-Dade County with a roadmap for its future economic development.
John McDougall, President 10 th Annual Re$earch Money Conference, 11 May 2011.
STAR Park – STAR One Science, Technology and Advanced Research A member of The Texas State University System.
George McAllister ext The SBTDC is a business advisory service of The University of North Carolina System operated.
Impact Investing in Israel G8 Taskforce Plenary July 9 th, 2015 Yaron Neudorfer CEO, Social Finance Israel July 2015.
September 5, 2013 Growing Missouri’s Economy Through Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
Stanford Technology Ventures Program Slide 1 State Policy Academy on Entrepreneurship New Orleans, July 16, 2001 “Human Capital.
Innovation Systems Research Network MCRI Theme III: Social Inclusion and Civic Engagement David A. Wolfe, Ph.D. Program on Globalization and Regional Innovation.
Entrepreneurship in Missouri  Business Recruitment  Business Expansion  Entrepreneurism/New Business Formation Strategies for Economic Development.
Advisory Board and Commission Retreat September 11-12, 2013.
E2 Tech Forum November 15, 2011 Andrew Wilson, Executive Director.
Pennsylvania’s 21 st Century Workforce Initiatives.
©2006 Ann Arbor SPARK 2010 Successes 2011 Opportunities Presentation to Livingston County Economic Development Council.
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
Changing the Business Model -- Adding Value Constantine Katsigiannis President HELLENIC-CANADIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Constantine Katsigiannis President.
Partnerships and collaboration Working together: good for business, good for research I work for business.gov.au but also thought it would be a good opportunity.
Technology Based Economic Development in West Virginia Gaps, Strengths and Recommendations 2008 Create WV Conference.
The Chesapeake Crescent A Collaborative Initiative to Drive Regional Prosperity and Global Competitiveness Maryland, Virginia, the District of Columbia.
United States High Growth Industry Initiatives Gregg Weltz Director of Youth Services U.S. Department of Labor XIV Inter-American Conference of Ministers.
Building A Skilled Workforce. Pennsylvania’s Workforce Development System 22 Workforce Investment Boards 22 Workforce Investment Boards 69 Pennsylvania.
1 The Innovation Performance Review of Kazakhstan: Main Conclusions and Recommendations.
1. 2 Our Goal The goal of the Technology Investment Office is to ensure that the variety of TBED organizations and initiatives located throughout the.
Providing capital, knowledge & networks since Federal Laboratory Consortium Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting Ben Franklin Technology Partners of Southeastern.
SMEs in Canada Facts Federal Role. 1 Outline Overview of SMEs in Canada Roles of Government.
Entrepreneurship As a Community Development Strategy John Gruidl and Deborah M. Markley.
Creating a Knowledge Worker Economy March 22, 2006 Gerald Ephault, Regional Manager Pocono Northeast.
Dr. Pradeep Haldar Professor and Head, NanoEngineering Constellation Director, Energy & Environmental Technology Applications Center (E2TAC) Executive.
A new start for the Lisbon Strategy Knowledge and innovation for growth.
The Bulgarian ICT Cluster The European Day Of The Entrepreneur – Sofia, 2005.
Entrepreneurship: a competitive edge for economic development Presenter H. Randall Goldsmith, PhD.
Navigating the Changes in Economic Development – Sighting for the Collaborative Lighthouse Federal Laboratory Consortium Mid-Atlantic Regional Meeting.
Strategies for ICT-enabled Competitiveness and Job Creation Jim Jaffe President and CEO National Association of Seed and Venture Funds March 30, 2011 World.
Strategic Entrepreneurship
Access to Capital/Resources for Entrepreneurs Lynne Shea, CEcD Business Development Manager.
Transforming the Tech Valley Workforce Region A Blueprint From Traditional Manufacturing to Globally Competitive Advanced Manufacturing and Technology.
Statewide Strength, Regional Focus, Global Impact Gerald A. Ephault Regional Manager
Accelerating Adoption of Sector Strategies A State Policy Development Assistance Project Funded by The Ford and C. S. Mott Foundations February 24, 2006.
Australian Injury & Disability Insurance Network AIIN Health Special Interest Group & ICT Geelong November
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
FutureWorks An Economic Development Strategy and Action Plan for Northwest Pennsylvania.
Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR) Presented by Sharina Broughton.
Presented By: Business Data Processing Wilkes-Barre Area Vocational-Technical School.
Interaction Private Sector Working Group Discussion with USAID Global Partnerships January 30, 2014.
ANN ARBOR REGION SUCCESS STRATEGY Board of County Commissioners Working Session Nov 6, 2008  Present vision and strategy  Discuss BOC’s continued leadership.
ACCELERATING THE GROWTH ENTREPRENEURIAL INNOVATION
Penn State Economic Development Course
…. the Angel Perspective
Penn State Economic Development Course
CHAPTER 13 Strategic Entrepreneurship
Marcia Mellitz President Center for Emerging Technologies
COMMERCILIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLANGES
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
MSU’s place for connecting to the private sector
MISSION: To accelerate the growth of the entrepreneurial
Presentation transcript:

Building a Business Innovation Accelerator to Meet Rhode Island’s Needs: Lessons from other States Richard A. Bendis President and CEO Innovation America May 19, 2009

Innovative Small Business Facts Innovative small business have generated 60 to 80 percent of net new jobs annually over the last decade Employ 30 percent of high-tech workers, such as scientists, engineers, and computer workers SMEs produce 13 times more patents per employee than large patenting firms Small Companies are a key source of innovation by themselves and for Large Companies Source: Small Business Administration

2001 RECESSION: Small Business Drives Job Creation In the three years after the 2001 recession, Companies of less than 20 employees created 107% of net new jobs while companies over 500 employees eliminated a net of -24% Source: Small Business Administration

Knowledge Economy: Definitions & Terminology Knowledge is the confident understanding of a subject, potentially with the ability to use it for a specific purpose Knowledge economy is based on creating, evaluating, and trading knowledge Innovation is the creation and transformation of knowledge into new products, processes, and services that meet market need

Goals of Innovation-Based Economic Development Intervene at the margins of private sector investment flows of capital (financial and intellectual) to: Address economic transition Capture the benefit of investments in research and development, higher education Build entrepreneurial cultures Help existing industries modernize Diversify economy WHAT IS INVOLVED IN TECH-BASED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT? Like all economic development, we are not creating economic activity or jobs, but seeking to influence private investment flows, to channel thestream to achieve public policy goals that are parochial -- to capture benefits for OUR PLACES. #2 bullet, for example. Education, R&D investment “public goods”. Govt invests because private sector left to own devices would not do so sufficiently because it cannot capture all the benefits. Our strategies aim to capture benefits of particularly federal investments in R&D (labs, universities) for OUR PLACES.

The Role of Industry: Wealth Creation Capitalism is a Process of Creative Transformation “The interaction of technological innovation with the competitive marketplace is the fundamental driving force in capitalist industrial progress.” Joseph A. Schumpeter, 1942

The Role of the Public Sector A healthy, educated public Job creation, economic health, and KNOWLEDGE WORKER development World leadership in science, engineering, mathematics, and technology Improved environment quality and sustainable development Harnessed information technology Enhanced national security

The Role of Academia Knowledge Integration Resource Investment Continuous Learning and Innovation Education Research Knowledge Creation Knowledge Transfer

Traditional ED vs. Innovation-based ED Natural resources Highways / Rail Proximity Costs i.e. PHYSICAL Specialized talent Networks, information University research / professors Market understanding i.e. KNOWLEDGE Competitive Basis Business parks Incentives Access to research Workforce competencies Lifestyle Key values / offerings Lead Organization Chambers / EDCs Innovation intermediaries, Economic developers 9

Commercialization Model

Innovation Paradigm Shift PROOF OF CONCEPT PROOF OF RELEVANCE

Greater Providence Knowledge Economy Initiative

Greater Providence Knowledge Economy Targets of Opportunity Target Sectors Environmental and Alternative Energy Preventative Medicine and Behavioral Sciences Medical Devices and Rehabilitative Services Facility and Spatial Design (including Logistics) Product Safety and Design Cross-Cutting Efforts Workforce Continuum for 21st Century Skills Strengthening the Academic & Research Alliance Entrepreneurs, Innovators, Disruptors: Unique Economic Leadership

Providence Knowledge Economy Strategic Objectives Fostering collaboration among academic, medical, industrial and civic assets Boosting the commercialization of research conducted in the region Increasing jobs and tax base for Providence Increasing competitiveness for knowledge-based industries in attracting and retaining skilled workers to meet the demands of the Knowledge Economy Delivering a sustainable governance structure for the Providence Knowledge Economy

Accelerating Entrepreneurial and Growth Companies Greater Providence Recommendations include: Increased coordination of entrepreneurial sector Engage a wide spectrum of companies, ideas, and technologies Reward existing growth companies Reward collaborations among distinct sectors

Creation of a Knowledge & Business Accelerator Greater Providence Knowledge Economy Principles include: Physical and Virtual Programming Create incentives for academic institution collaboration private/entrepreneurial sector partnerships Leverage RIEDC work and other ways of conducting innovation assessments in both existing and emerging entities Amplify the critical collaboration with the RISD Center including a and the Business Innovation Factory program Create formal network for high-tech businesses to access management talent, markets, and capital by using existing capital programs and resources Leverage with federal and broader-geographic reach (New England, Mid-Atlantic) as well as alumni networks, new philanthropy, and corporate procurement

Rhode Island Center for Innovation & Entrepreneurship Business Innovation Accelerator Collaborative statewide venture to help RI-based entrepreneurs, researchers, and existing companies advance commercialization of ideas Supporting institutions include colleges, universities, city and state government, and private sector

Implementing a New Innovation Intermediary Willingness to deviate from traditional and parochial perspectives Encourage public investment and risk taking Developing trust through collaboration Ensuring the paradigm is responsive to partners’ missions Building consensus of all constituents through education, participation, and positive outcomes Move from technology-based economic development to Innovation-Based Economic Development

Human Connectivity Communications networks have the ability to transform economic, political, and social relationships on a global scale. In the past, organizations strategized to gain COMPETITIVE advantage. The emphasis in the future will be to gain COOPERATIVE advantage. A core competency needed in individuals, organizations, and regions alike is CONNECTIVITY.

Implementing Innovation Connectivity Effective Intermediaries strive for the 5C’s of INNOVATION CONNECTIVITY: Cultivation Collaboration Capital Careers Commercialization

Innovation Connectivity

21st Century Innovation Intermediary: Operating Model Connectivity of Key Human & Institutional Players Research & Marketing of the Strengths of the Innovation Economy Leverage & Alignment of Funding & Resources The Innovation Intermediary Programs Commercialization Direct Investment Angel Capital SBIR Programs Technology Mining / Intellectual Property Programs

Innovation Intermediary Commercialization Structure Technical Market Business Investigation Technology Concept Analysis Market Needs Assessment Venture Assessment Development Phase Feasibility Technology Feasibility Market Study Economic Feasibility Planning Engineering Prototype Strategic Marketing Strategic Business Plan Introduction Pre-Production Prototype Market Validation Business Start-Up Commercial Phase Full Scale Production Production Sales and Distribution Business Growth Maturity Production Support Market Diversification Business Maturity

U.S. National Best Practices Ben Franklin Technology Partners (BFTP, 1982) http:///www.benfranklin.org/ Innovation Philadelphia (IP, 2001) http://www.innovationphiladelphia.com/ Kansas Technology Enterprise Corp. (KTEC, 1987) http://www.ktec.com/ Oklahoma Center For The Advancement Of Science And Technology (OCAST, 1987) http://www.ocast.state.ok.us/ UCSD Connect (1985) http://www.connect.org/

National Best Practices, Common Attributes Longevity Bipartisan Support & Champions Independent Organizations Continuous Reinvention Private Sector Involvement Understand Return On Investment Sustainability In Funding Accountable Innovative Effective Leadership

Ben Franklin Technology Partners Established in 1982 to stimulate economic growth through innovation, entrepreneurship, and the development and adoption of new technologies. BFTP operates on a Regional level through four centers strategically located throughout PA , with offices in Pittsburgh, State College, Bethlehem, and Philadelphia. Every dollar invested in BFTP yielded nearly $23 of additional income in the state. BFTP generated 93,105 job-years at a cost to PA of $3,342 per job-year*. The state garnered more than $400 million in additional tax revenue as a direct result of the program, which more than covered the operating costs of the program over the same period. BFTP boosted Pennsylvania’s economy by $8 billion. Web site – www.benfranklin.org

PA Champions From Gov. Thornburgh To Gov. Rendell 26 Years of Success “Making investments that will help grow Pennsylvania’s technology industry will secure our competitive place in the global marketplace while creating new opportunities and supporting the revitalization of our towns and cities.” - Edward G. Rendell, Governor of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Retention - City Commerce PIDC Attraction - PIDC/City Commerce Economic Development Economic Development is like a three-legged stool: Attraction Retention Grow Your Own (Innovation Philadelphia’s focus) IBED requires patience and persistence, continuity and consistency. Working with early-stage companies takes time. Retention - City Commerce PIDC Grow Your Own - IP Attraction - PIDC/City Commerce

A Public/Private Partnership created to: Innovation Philadelphia’s Mission A Public/Private Partnership created to: Grow the Wealth and Workforce of the Greater Philadelphia Global Innovation Economy

How Innovation Philadelphia Started Blank sheet of paper Need for an Innovation Intermediary Gap analysis of all Regional-based economic development and investment programs SWOT analysis of all organizational programs, boards, and funding

Innovation Philadelphia’s Structure LLC IP Management Corp. For-profit C-corp Mid Atlantic Commercialization Corporation 501 (c) (3) IP Administrative Services, LLC For-profit LLC Mid-Atlantic Angel Group Fund I, LP Limited Partnership

Innovation Philadelphia’s Strategic Goals Increase the INVESTMENT in knowledge-based companies Increase the KNOWLEDGE Economy workforce Foster and LEVERAGE Regional COOPERATION to Accelerate Technology COMMERCIALIZATION and Wealth Creation BRAND and market the Greater Philadelphia Region Promote SUSTAINABLE economic development Increase the Number of INNOVATION-BASED COMPANIES in the Greater Philadelphia Region

Why was a Road Map needed? Greater Philadelphia was at an economic crossroads – and at risk of losing our status as a top tier city. Many plans had been created. We don’t need another plan, rather an umbrella strategy that acts as a multiplier to leverage disparate and often competing economic activities into a comprehensive Regional effort. To develop a comprehensive understanding of Regional opportunities as well as an understanding of scenarios in which we can realistically leverage critical ‘ingredients’ for the Regional innovation ‘recipe’. To challenge the perception that the Region merely used to be a center of innovation, intellect, commerce, and culture. Now is the time to act. There is a unique convergence of circumstances and timing that is creating a window of economic opportunity for the entire Region over the next 5-10 years. If we don’t act now the window will close – potentially forever. When we act together, we win.

Five Prime Targets of Opportunity The Targets of Opportunity: Churn Indicators Five Prime Targets of Opportunity Transforming Biomedical Research Chemical Industries The Creative Economy Nanotechnology Business Process, Technology and Software

Innovation Philadelphia’s Programmatic Goals Increase the Number of Knowledge-Based Companies in the Greater Philadelphia Region Increase Knowledge Economy Workforce and Stimulate “Brain Gain” Develop and Grow Entrepreneurial Financing & Support Resources Foster and Leverage Regional Cooperation to Accelerate Technology Commercialization and Wealth Creation Provide Value-Added Services Brand the Greater Philadelphia Region

IP Core Products / Services Global & Regional Workforce / Economic Development Branding, Research & Marketing Investment Commercialization World’s Best Technology Network

University Innovation Science Center – Currently home to 25 companies. Have started over 350 companies. Drexel University – Currently home to 10 companies. University of Pennsylvania Center for Technology Transfer. Launched 14 companies in 2004. Set to launch 12 – 16 companies in 2005.

Cumulative Funding Per Deal Total Annual Deal Funding Available World’s Best Technology Network Cumulative Funding Per Deal Total Annual Deal Funding Available Ben Franklin Up to $750K $3M BioAdvance Up to $1M $5M Science Center Up to $500K IP (ESF) Up to $100K $500K-1M MAG Up to $250K IPART & IP SBIR Program Up to $13M Regional Branding & Marketing Common Investment Review Process Shared Due Diligence

What Worked For IP INTEGRATED Science & Technology Collaboration for Philadelphia PRIVATE Sector Leadership Functions as a BUSINESS Successfully manage a technology investment portfolio for ROI Operational FLEXIBILITY ACCOUNTABILITY with measurable outcomes Experienced PROFESSIONAL team Focus on the ENTREPRENEUR’S needs SUSTAINABLE Funding

Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center: Leverage & Alignment Hepatitis B Foundation Pennsylvania Biotechnology Center Government Non-profit COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Industry Academia Programs Launch Innovations PA Immunotope University of Oxford TransComm Fund

ACCELERATING THE GROWTH ENTREPRENEURIAL INNOVATION OF THE ENTREPRENEURIAL INNOVATION ECONOMY IN AMERICA

Hot Off the Presses Creating a National Innovation Framework 4-22-09 Federal Aid Sought for Equity-Backed Companies 4-21-09 More Signs of Capital Starvation 4-27-09 A Federal VC Fund of Funds? 4-13-09 Into the Valley of Death 4-20-09 Recession Knocks VC Funds to 5 ½ Year Low 4-14-09 Health Care Bleeds Small-Biz Finances, 5-12-2009 Buzz Article, 5-13-2009 www.innovationamerica.us

The Funding Gap Deepens REDUCED ANGEL ACTIVITY Angel Investors reduced their investments by over 26% in 2008 Availability of investment capital among angels decreased dramatically by 40% in 2008 VENTURE FUNDING MOVING DOWNSTREAM The average investment by venture firms last year was $8.3 million per investment and only about 4% of the capital went to early-stage companies. First Quarter of 2009 was the worst quarter in 12 ½ in terms of total capital invested by venture firms STATE TECH-BASED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Budgets decreasing

Financing for Innovation in Crisis Venture Funding 90% of the already-funded companies can’t obtain follow-on funding to get to the next level. Without this follow-on funding, they will die and a generation of great ideas will die along with them. 75 % of the money received by seed- and early-stage venture funds comes from private investors 70% of the money needed to fill this early stage investment gap is less than a million dollars per company 60% of early-stage funds aren’t making any new investments Entrepreneurial Companies 75% of the companies investors are putting money into can’t leverage that money into bank financing 42% of the companies investors are putting money into have been stripped of their lines of credit Seed- and early-stage investors and entrepreneurs are struggling more than usual according to a recent survey by the National Association of Seed and Venture Funds

Angel Groups, TBED, SBIR, Seed Funds Innovation Capital Valley of Death “VALLEY OF DEATH” POC / Pre-Seed Stage Seed/Start-Up Early Later Founders FFF Angel Groups, TBED, SBIR, Seed Funds Source Venture Funds $25K $100K $500K $2, 000K $5, 000K Demand “VALLEY OF DEATH” Supply Secondary Funding Gap Funding Gap

National Innovation Framework Angel Capital Association (ACA)* Community Development Venture Capital Alliance (CDVCA)* National Association of Seed & Venture Funds (NASVF)* American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)* State Science & Technology Institute (SSTI)* National Business Incubation Association (NBIA)* Association of University Research Parks (AURP)* Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM)* *Potential partnering innovation associations and networks Federal Innovation Partnership Federal Agency (TBD) NPPPI 501©3 Not For Profit National Innovation Seed Fund $2 billion fund National Innovation Advisor Innovation Federal Capital Programs –CRA, CDFI, NMTC, NISF National Seed Fund of Funds 50 Seed Funds $1.8 billion Innovation Capital Technical Assistance Grant Fund $200 million Federal Technology Innovation Programs – SBIR, STTR, TIP, MEP, WIRED, FLC, EPSCoT, EPSCoR, NSF-PFI, NSF-IUCRC, NSF-Eng’g Resource Center, DOE-Ind’l Tech. Program Technology, Economic & Workforce Development Networking, Strategic Planning, Marketing & Branding Technical Assistance, Education, & Mentoring Investment Commercialization

Recommendations Create a $2 billion dollar National Innovation Seed Fund (NISF) that consists of a Fund of Funds and a Technical Assistance Grant Fund. The Technical Assistance Grant Fund provides entrepreneurial support resources and services to portfolio companies and Fund Managers. Encourage the leveraging and coordination of Federal Technology Innovation Programs through a Federal Innovation Partnership with a new administration high-level National Innovation Advisor that has access to the President. Create a new Public-Private Innovation Intermediary with a mission to accelerate the growth of the entrepreneurial innovation economy in America and oversee the National Innovation Seed Fund. This intermediary would be a program partially supported by a U.S. federal agency like the Department of Commerce or the Small Business Administration. www.innovationamerica.us

Partners in National Innovation Development Community Development Venture Capital Alliance

Richard A. Bendis President and CEO Innovation America 2600 Centre Square West 1500 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 (215) 496-8102 rbendis@bendisig.com www.innovationamerica.us