Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping1 Assessment of Policy Options to reduce Air Pollution.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

European Cruise Council 2010 Conference

Advertisements

European Commission - DG Environment Clean Air for Europe Jacques Delsalle European Commission European Commission DG Environment, Unit C1 Update on TREMOVE.

European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport n° 1 Air Quality & CAFE AREHNA WORKSHOP Kos, 3-5 May 2003 Mrs Michèle LEPELLETIER.

The impact of international shipping on European air quality and climate forcing John van Aardenne (EEA), Augustin Colette, Bart Degraeuwe, Pieter Hammingh,

Framework Analysis International European Spain – Barcelona Italy – Genoa, Venice France – Marseille Greece - Thessaloniki 2.

Freight by Water Conference Teesside 7 September 2012 Sulphur Directive Impacts.

Environmental Bunker legislation and the Potential Impact on the Vancouver Market May 2014 May

1 Non-linear effects in modelling PM 10 and PM 2,5 contributions from anthropogenic sources Clemens Mensink, Felix Deutsch, Jean Vankerkom and Liliane.

RAINS review 2004 The RAINS model: The approach. Cost-effectiveness needs integration Economic/energy development (projections) State of emission controls,

The use of the BelEUROS model for policy support at LNE TEMIS-workshop 8/9 October 2007 on behalf of: Mirka Van der Elst Flemish Ministry of the Environment,

LINKING EUROPEAN, NATIONAL & CITY SCALES UK National Focal Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling Helen ApSimon and Tim Oxley, Imperial College in.

| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.

NAMEPA 2014 Annual Conference New York City Canada and North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #

NAMEPA 2014 World Maritime Day Observance Cozumel, Mexico Canada's Experience with the North American Emission Control Area RDIMS #

LINKAGES AND SYNERGIES OF REGIONAL AND GLOBAL EMISSION CONTROL Workshop of the UN/ECE Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling January 27-29, 2003.

European Commission: DG Environment Overview of projections data use in the European policy-making process TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections, 30 October.

European Commission - DG Environment Clean Air for Europe Jacques Delsalle European Commission European Commission DG Environment, Unit C1 Further Development.

European Scenarios of Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gases Mitigation: Focus on Poland J. Cofala, M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, L.

Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol All calculations refer to Parties in the EMEP modelling domain Markus Amann Centre.

Particularly Sea-Sensitive Areas and Marine Protection Zones. A Controversial Issue that needs Interpretation Dr. Aristotelis B. Alexopoulos BCA College.

STREAMLINING CLIMATE CHANGE AND AIR POLLUTION REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Report to TFEIP May 2008.

Marine Services Sustainable Shipping Conference Sustainable Energy in Marine Transportation Zabi Bazari and Gill Reynolds Lloyd ’ s Register EMEA IMarEST.

“Safety in the North”, Alta August 2010 Svalbard’s Maritime Zones The (lack of) jurisdiction of Norway over foreign maritime activities in the waters.

Ship Emission Inventories Chris Whall & Andriana Stavrakaki.

EU Legislation in the field of environment – key developments in 2007 and rd ECENA Plenary Meeting 18 September 2008.

Coordination Centre for Effects Jean-Paul Hettelingh, EC4MACS kick off meeting, IIASA, 6-7 March 2007 EC4MACS Task 3: Ecosystem Impact Assessment by the.

Clean Air for Europe TFIAM Conference Small scale combustion installation AMIENS May 2004 André Zuber & Michel Sponar European Commission TFIAM Conference.

Compilation of emission inventories The situation in the Netherlands Special Session of the UNCEEA on Climate Change (New York, 25 June afternoon)

IIASA M. Amann, J. Cofala, Z. Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Progress in developing the baseline scenario for CAFE.

Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modelling Review of the Gothenburg Protocol UNITED NATIONS ECONOMIC.

CNSS General Assembly, Newcastle, 9 June 2011 Emissions and Modeling Volker Matthias and WP5 members.

Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution CAFE team, DG Environment and streamlined air quality legislation.

RAINS Review Review of the RAINS Integrated Assessment Model Contract with CAFE Dec Sept 2004 Presentation 27 Sep 2004.

RAINS Review Review of the RAINS Integrated Assessment Model Contract with CAFE Dec Sept 2004.

Baseline emission projections for the revision of the Gothenburg protocol Markus Amann Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling (CIAM) International.

1 Review of the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC) and National Emission Ceilings (NEC) Directives Marianne Wenning DG ENV, Head of Unit,

TFEIP-Meeting May 2010 Jochen Theloke 1/ 5 E-PRTR – spatial mapping of diffuse emission sources project Jochen Theloke, Thomas Gauger, Balendra Thiruchittampalam,

Attaining urban air quality objectives- links to transboundary air pollution Helen ApSimon, Tim Oxley and Marios Valiantis UK Centre for Integrated Assessment.

TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.

NIAM/APRIL/UCL meeting, 8-9 January 2009 ‘Reducing the environmental impacts of transport with behavioural change’ Type of measure Example Instruments.

Preparations for the review of the Gothenburg Protocol Report to the WGSR September 2006 Markus Amann et al., EMEP Centre for Integrated Assessment Modelling.

1 Monitoring and assessment in Europe Joining forces between EMEP and EEA Roel van Aalst 30 May 2001.

1 Environmental aspects of green shipping Jacqueline McGlade Executive Director European Environment Agency 15 June 2010.

Leading the way; making a difference NOx Tier III requirements 1. 1.The NOx Tier III enforcement date of 1 January 2016 is kept for already designated.

Fine particles: the views of the WG on Strategies and Review Richard Ballaman Chairman of WGSR Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape.

Control by existing protocols and current work under the Convention Richard Ballaman Chairman of WGSR Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape.

Overview: Benefit Analysis in CAFE Paul Watkiss AEA Technology Environment.

The GAINS optimization approach – Basic background information Fabian Wagner International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) IIASA workshop.

1 Marco Polo Accompanying Measure, Lot 4 Provision of Support Services in the Field of IWT Technical Assistance Emission Reduction of the Inland Waterway.

The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.

EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.

CLEANING UP THE SHIPPING SECTOR

CEF Action n° 2016-EU-SA-0009 "CYnergy"

Baltic Sea cooperation for reducing ship and port emissions through knowledge- & innovation-based competitiveness BSR InnoShip Baltic Sea cooperation for.

Clean Air for Europe and Research Needs

Benefit & Cost Analyses in Support of an ECA Application for Mexico

An approach that could lead to an amendment of the Directive 97/68/EC on emissions of NRMM Bruno Van Zeebroeck (Transport & Mobility), Arnoud Lust, Stijn.

Stakeholder meeting Friday 3rd April 2009

Time table for revision of the NECD

M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,

Stakeholder Expert Group on the Review of EU Air Policy 6-7 June 2011

Jacques Delsalle Clean Air and Transport Unit DG ENV

Integrated measures to reduce Ammonia emissions

M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,

IPPC Review Stakeholder Hearing

J. Cofala, M. Amann, C. Heyes, Z. Klimont, M. Posch, W. Schöpp

Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012

The Thematic strategy and the possible measures of action

Steve Griffiths, Rob Lennard and Paul Sutton* (*RWE npower)

Second Stakeholder Expert Group meeting 19-20/01/2012

Presentation transcript:

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping1 Assessment of Policy Options to reduce Air Pollution from Shipping using Market Based Instruments P. Campling, S. Janssen, P. Lodewijks, Koen Van Den Bossche (IEEP), Kris Vanherle (TML)

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping2 Overview »Background, objectives and consortium »Importance of maritime emissions »Policy developments to reduce maritime emissions »Legal and technical issues »Approach to quantifying benefits of including maritime into a land based ETS »Summary

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping3 Background, objectives and consortium »Background – DG ENV service contract Dec ’08 to Dec ’09 – use of market based instruments to reduce air pollution »Lot 1 – land based sources (IPPC installations) – ENTEC consortium »Lot 2 – maritime sources – VITO consortium »Objective and tasks »Expand land based EU ETS to include maritime sector »Special attention to legal and technical aspects (Task 1) »Possible solutions to obstacles (Task 2) »Assessment of benefits (Task 3) »Consortium »VITO – project coordination, air dispersion modelling, ETS (MBI) tool, impact assessments »IEEP – environmental policy experts at EU level, maritime law »TML – TREMOVE model, maritime emissions, abatement curves »ARCADIS – maritime emissions and abatement curves

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping4 Importance of maritime emissions »90% of EU’s external trade transported by water »3.5 billion tonnes freight loaded and unloaded per year »Sea freight grew 34% 1995 to 2005 »Most major ports continue to grow »Rotterdam 1990 to % »Antwerp 1990 to % »Hamburg 1990 to %

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping5 Importance of maritime emissions (SO2 and NOx)

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping6 Policy developments to reduce shipping emissions (Sulphur) (2000 to 2006) Time- line Regulat- ion Refer- ence Enforce- ment Area Impacted Operator Detail of Restriction 07/ /32/ECEU PortsAll VesselsMax 0.2% m/m sulphur content of Marine Gas Oil 08/ /33ECEU PortsScheduled Passenger Vessels (>12 passengers) Max 1.5% m/m sulphur content of bunker fuel 08/ /33ECBaltic Sea (SECA) All VesselsMax 1.5% m/m sulphur content of bunker fuel 08/ /32/EC 2005/33EC EU PortsSuppliersNo sale of > 1.5% sulphur content of Marine Diesel Oil

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping7 Policy developments to reduce shipping emissions (Sulphur) (2007 to 2010) TimelineRegulation Reference Enforce ment Area Impacted Operator Detail of Restriction 11 August /33ECNorth Sea (SECA) All VesselsMax 1.5% m/m sulphur content of bunker fuel 1 January /32/EC 2005/33EC EU PortsAll VesselsMax 0.1% m/m sulphur content Marine Gas Oil 1 Jan /33ECEU PortsAll Vessels at berth and inland waterways Max 0.1% m/m sulphur content of fuel. Exemptions for: Short-stay vessels Using shore-side electricity 1 Jan /32/EC 2005/33EC EU PortsSuppliersNo sale of >0.1% sulphur content of Marine Gas Oil

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping8 NEC Report Version 6 (IIASA) – emissions (kT) BAU 2020 SO2 BAU 2020 NOx BAU 2020 PM2.5 IMO 2020 SO2 IMO 2020 NOx IMO 2020 PM2.5 Baltic Sea Med Sea

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping9 Legal and technical issues and constraints International legal framework (enforcement / practicalities) »Main problem transboundary issue (+different jurisdictional zones) »Law of the Sea convention (maritime zones affecting enforcement) »Marine pollution (in principle dealt with through IMO - politically/or legally regarded as sole institution) »Internal waters (port state jurisdiction) »Territorial seas (innocent passage) (<12nm) »Contiguous zone (only enforcement of functional rights in respect of territory) (12 – 24 nm) »Exclusive Economic Zone (only functional sovereign rights) (<200nm) »High seas (flag state jurisdiction) »Flag of convenience within and outside Community waters

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping10 Preliminary results of legal / technical analysis »Inland waters (including ports) »Emission trading possible »Differentiated dues/charges possible »Taxation possible »Imposing fuel and technology standards possible »Territorial seas (less 12 nautical miles) – MBI and regulation tools are only possible in “context of services rendered” »Emission trading NOT possible »Differentiated dues/charges possible »Taxation possible »Imposing fuel and technology standards NOT possible

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping11 Shipping emissions inventory »Determine an EU maritime emission baseline, taking into account: » Geographic distribution » Port / at sea (cfr. different health impact, ETS schemes) » Source type (i.e. technology relating to abatement options) » (Vessel type) » (Size) »Data sets – EXTREMIS database (inventory developed for JRC), IIASA data (based partially on ENTEC grid), TREMOVE and EMMOSS (detailed ship emissions from Belgian ports)

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping12 Shipping emissions – ports vv seas, EU vessels vv non- EU vessels (NOX)

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping13 Shipping emissions – ports vv seas, EU vessels vv non- EU vessels (SO2)

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping14 Modelling impact of ETS (MBI) options »Specific Objectives »Modelling the environmental impacts of an NOx and SO2 ETS (other MBI options) extended for ship emissions »EU wide assessment (60km resolution) »Zoom on restricted trading zones or hotspots e.g. the Channel, Baltic Sea (7.5 km resolution)

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping15 Modelling scheme for impact of ETS (MBI) options Emission inventory maritime sector Emission Trading System (MBI options) EU emission inventory (IIASA, EMEP) E-MAP (emission mapping tool) belEUROS (dispersion model) – EU and hotspots Impact assessment Population density Critical loads ExternE factors ECMWF meteorology

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping16 Modelling impact of ETS (MBI options) simulations »Transformation of ETS output to gridded emissions: E-MAP tool »Tool developed at VITO »Spatial distribution of emissions making use of proxy data (e.g. shipping routes, EPRTR stack data, poplation density…) »Output emissions compatible with dispersion model

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping17 Dispersion modelling tool »Dispersion model: BelEUROS »EUROS developed by RIVM (Netherlands) for modelling of ozone »BelEUROS extended by Vito in 2004/2005 to model dispersion of primary and secondary particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5) »Meteo: ECMWF (T, rH, wv+wd, CC, PR, mixing layer height) »Emissions: EMEP/CORINAIR + local emission inventories »Emission scenarios: GAINS Europe »Resolution: horizontal: 60 kmor 7.5 km

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping18 Impact assessment »Gridded emissions (E-MAP) »Air quality maps for the EU domain and the Channel zoom (belEUROS) »Impact assessment on human health (population exposure) and sensitive ecosystems (exceedance of critical loads)

Confidential – © 2009, VITO NV – All rights reserved 01/06/2015Reducing air pollution from shipping19 Summary »Shipping is an important source of NOx and SO2 emissions »Legal and technical constraints on using MBI to reduce NOx and SO2 pollution from ships (legal jurisdiction, legal enforcement, EU vv non-EU vessels, 16 vessel type categories »Inland waters (including ports) – ETS, differentiated dues/charges, taxation, fuel and technology standards »Territorial seas (less 12 nautical miles) – only differentiated dues/charges and taxation in context of services rendered »Ports only account for <10% NOx and S02 emissions »Generic tool at EU level – ETS (ports) + differentiated dues/charges (territorial seas + resticted seas e.g. Baltic, Adriatic)???? »Confined ETS scheme – Port Zone (ships trading with local IPPC installations)????