THE LAW MAKING PROCESS OF AN ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING REGIME IN KENYA Presented By: Anne N. Angwenyi National Environment Management Authority (Kenya)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seite 1 Regional Cooperation on ABS in the Andean Community and the ASEAN Dr. Andreas Drews Session Practical Approaches for Regional Cooperation.
Advertisements

ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND BENEFIT-SHARING UNDER THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND BENEFIT-SHARING.
REGIONAL ABS CAPACITY BUILDING WORKSHOP FOR EASTERN AND SOUTHERN AFRICA Working Group Issues and Recommendations Report.
BIO-PROSPECTING PRUNUS AFRICANA IN UGANDA By David L.N. Hafashimana (Ph.D) National Forestry Resources Research Institute (NaFORRI), UGANDA.
Regional ABS Capacity- Building Workshop for Eastern and Southern Africa, Addis Ababa October 2 nd -6 th, 2005 Bioprospecting for enzymes in protected.
The Dutch-German ABS Capacity-Building Initiative for Africa Initial Workshop At the Kirstenbosh National Botanical Garden Cape Town, South Africa November.
Agreement on Access to, and Benefit-sharing from, Teff genetic resources Institute of Biodiversity Conservation.
LEGAL AND REGULATORY REGIME FOR ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING IN KENYA Presented By: Anne N. Angwenyi National Environment Management Authority (Kenya)
National Herbarium & Botanic Gardens of Malawi
Agreement on Access to, and Sharing Benefit from, Vernonia galamensis L. Institute of Biodiversity Conservation June 2007.
Commercial Research, Biodiversity and Benefit Sharing: Exploring Best Practices for Biotrade and ABS – Windhoek, Namibia, 18 th to 20 th June 2007 The.
A vision is…. NOT a dream NOT a forecast NOT an objective.
ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES AND BENEFIT-SHARING UNDER THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY by Valérie Normand Secretariat of the Convention on Biological.
Access to and Use of Traditional Knowledge A view from industry Bo Hammer Jensen.
Agrobiodiversity and Intellectual Property Rights: Selected Issues under the FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture.
GENETIC RESOURCES vs. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES DEFINITIONS, UTILIZATION AND BENEFIT SHARING.
BASIC RESEARCH VS COMMERCIAL RESEARCH Dr Jean-Dominique WAHICHE Museum national d’histoire naturelle, Paris – France.
1 A&BS in Relation to Marine Genetic Resources Prof. Dr. Alexander Proelß hydrothermal systems.
The Convention on Biological Diversity, access to genetic resources and IPR Yovana Reyes Tagle University of Helsinki.
Emerging Challenge? Accessing Genetic Resources : the building blocks of new technologies Access and Benefits Sharing, an emerging issue transitioning.
“Undoing the Knot in A&BS Transactions: In Search of Amicable Solutions” Introduction Gerd Winter.
The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Kent Nnadozie
Information Exchange in Botanical Garden Networks Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.
Experiences with implementation of Brazilian A & BS Regime and Suggestions for Reform Juliana Santilli.
Access and Benefit Sharing and the Nagoya Protocol Nashina Shariff Manager Environmental Stewardship Branch November 2014.
Facilitating South-South Cooperation Using Intellectual Property to Protect Traditional Knowledge, Cultural Expressions and Genetic Resources Manuel Ruiz.
1 Roles of UNEP, GEF & CBD in the Environment 2 nd Training Workshop for BCH Regional Advisors May 2006 Bangkok, Thailand.
THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN PROTECTING TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE The Philippine Experience Presented by: Marga C. Domingo-Morales Senior Policy.
Cartagena protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the International debates (COP- MOP) Stakeholders’ workshop on the Biosafety.
ABS Management Tool International Stakeholder Workshop 27 and 28 November 2006, Heredia Costa Rica Sponsored by SECO and UNU/IAS Organized by IISD, Stratos.
Negotiations for an International Regime for Access and Benefit Sharing and the Microbial Research Commons Stefan Jungcurt International Institute for.
What makes Clinical Research Ethical? Dr Enoka Corea Co-secretary, ERC Faculty of Medicine, Colombo.
Options for governing the microbial commons informed by the need to bridge the 1993 CBD divide Microbial Commons National Academy of Science October 8-9,
The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture The Multilateral System of Access and Benefit-sharing.
The Relationship between TRIPS and the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) - State of play in the TRIPS Council - WTO Symposium on Trade and Sustainable.
Potential trade implications of CBD and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety MEA – UNEP meeting on Enhancing MEA and WTO Information Exchange 11 November,
A new international regime: how does it affect botanic gardens? Kate Davis CBD Unit, Conventions and Policy Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Eurogard.
1 February 2005 Briefing Sessions Draft Regulations Using Water for Recreational Purposes.
The Negotiations on the International Regime on Access and Benefit-Sharing within the framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Session 4: The Convention on Biological Diversity Making Access Decisions.
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 1992 (entered into force in December 1993) website: Dr Mahfuzul Haque.
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT LAWS FIRST AMENDMENT BILL [B 13B─2012] Briefing to the Select Committee on Land and Environmental Affairs, 26 February.
The EU Commission's legislative proposal on implementing the Nagoya Protocol in the Union I.Background II.Preparatory work done in support of the proposal.
1 Proposal To Extend the Application of the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Biosafety Protocol to the Hong Kong SAR.
The CBD for Botanists An introduction to the Convention on Biological Diversity for people working with botanical collections.
P. Pushpangadan & K. Narayanan Nair National Botanical Research Institute (Council of Scientific & Industrial Research) Lucknow – , India ACCESS.
“PERUVIAN EXPERIENCE IN THE PROTECTION OF TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE” Presentation by Minister Counsellor Betty Berendson, Deputy Permanent Representative of.
Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme Ninth Global Forum on Bioethics in Research Auckland, New Zealand 3-5 December, 2008 Access &
National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Bill 2003 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS AND TOURISM.
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Session 7: IPRs II: How Intellectual Property Rights Can Affect the Daily.
Session 9: Cross-Cutting Issues. Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources  To describe the key cross-cutting.
Law and Policy of Relevance to the Management of Plant Genetic Resources Objectives of Day Four 1.To discuss and understand how intellectual property.
ABS ASPECTS OF THE MOOREA BIOCODE PROJECT CASE STUDY - FRENCH POLYNESIA Sabine Brels Legal analyst, R.B Gump research station (UCB)
The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture and The Convention on Biological Diversity Training Workshop The International.
PRESENTATION TO THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON LAND AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS TOWARDS THE RATIFICATION OF THE NAGOYA PROTOCOL ON ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING 13.
1 DEAT PERSPECTIVE ON GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS 31 JULY 2007.
Implementing the Global Plan of Action for Animal Genetic Resources Opportunities for collaboration Beate Scherf Animal Genetic Resources Group Animal.
Deriving benefits from genetic resources by Naana E. K Halm WIPO Consultant 1.
Paradoxes of ratification: The impact of the Nagoya Protocol on Brazilian biodiversity policies Flavia Donadelli Thomas R. Eimer Doctoral Researcher Assistant.
African Training Workshop on Community Protocols, Indicators on Traditional Knowledge and Customary Sustainable Use under the Convention on Biological.
Objectives of the Biodiversity Bill
The FAO Global System for the Conservation and Sustainable Utilization of Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Training Workshop The International.
Pre-assigned groups Chair & Rapporteurs Workshop goals
Objectives, Scope and Structure of Country Reports
1999 MOSAICC 2001 CBD BONN GUIDELINES
Objectives of Day Three
Nagoya Protocol on Access & Benefit Sharing Arising from the Utilization of Biological Resources GEF/UNEP-SPREP Regional Project on the Ratification of.
Module 2: The Development of an International Regime on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing Science Places Plants People.
Module 3: Key Articles of the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing Science Places Plants People.
To change the images at the bottom of the slide:
Presentation transcript:

THE LAW MAKING PROCESS OF AN ACCESS AND BENEFIT SHARING REGIME IN KENYA Presented By: Anne N. Angwenyi National Environment Management Authority (Kenya)

RELEVANT PRIMARY LAWS The Constitution of Kenya provides that all natural resources and the benefits derived thereof belong to the Government and people of Kenya. All laws on the issue of access to and protection of resources (intellectual property laws) are subject to the provisions of the Constitution. The Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act (No. 8 of 1999) provides for the regulation of biological resources and genetic resources for ensuring sustainable management and protection of such resources.

No specific policy in Kenya on GR No specific policy in Kenya on GR Section 53 – NEMA required to issue guidelines and prescribe measures for the sustainable management and utilization of genetic resources in Kenya … Section 53 – NEMA required to issue guidelines and prescribe measures for the sustainable management and utilization of genetic resources in Kenya … … appropriate arrangements for access to GR of Kenya including issue of licence and fees for such access … appropriate arrangements for access to GR of Kenya including issue of licence and fees for such access … the sharing of benefits derived from access to GR in Kenya … the sharing of benefits derived from access to GR in Kenya The Environmental Management and Co ordination (Conservation of Biological Diversity and Resources, Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing) Regulations The Environmental Management and Co ordination (Conservation of Biological Diversity and Resources, Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing) Regulations POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE MEASURES ON ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES IN KENYA

The Regulations do not apply to: (a)the exchange of genetic resources, their derivative products, or the intangible components associated with them, which are carried out by a local community of Kenya among themselves and for their own consumption; (b)access to genetic resources derived from plant breeders as defined under the relevant laws relating to plant breeding and plant varieties; (c)human genetic resources; and (d)approved research activities intended for educational purposes within recognized Kenyan academic and research institutions which are governed by relevant intellectual property laws.

Access’ means obtaining, possessing and using genetic resources, their derived products, and where applicable, intangible components for purposes of research, bio-prospecting, conservation, industrial application or commercial use. No access without a PIC and MTA SCOPE

Commercial use’ means any collection and use of genetic material for profit making; Genetic material’ means any genetic material of plant, animal, microbial or other origin containing functional units of heredity; ‘Germplasm’ means genetic material capable of propagation;‘ Genetic resources’ means genetic material of actual or potential value; ‘Holotype’ means the single specimen chosen for designation of a new species; ‘Intangible components’ means any information held by persons that is associated with or regarding genetic resources within the jurisdiction of Kenya; RELEVANT DEFINITIONS

BENEFIT SHARING Monetary benefits may include but are not limited to: (i)Access fees/fee per sample collected or otherwise acquired; (ii)Up-front payments; (iii)Milestone payments; (iv)Payments of royalties; (v)License fees in case of commercialisation; (vi)Special fees to be paid to trust funds supporting conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity; (vii)Salaries and preferential terms where mutually agreed; (viii)Research funding; (ix)Joint ventures; and (x)Joint ownership of relevant intellectual property rights.

Non-Monetary benefits may include, but are not limited to: (i)Sharing of research and development results; (ii)Collaboration, cooperation and contribution in scientific research and development programmes, particularly biotechnological research activities where possible in Kenya; (iii)Participation in product development; (iv)Admittance to ex situ facilities of genetic resources and to databases by participating institutions;

(v)Transfer to Kenya of genetic resources of knowledge and technology under fair and most favourable terms, including concessional and preferential terms where agreed, in particular, knowledge and technology that make use of genetic resources, including biotechnology, or that are relevant to the conservation and sustainable utilization of biological diversity; (vi)Strengthening capacities for technology transfer to Kenya; (vii)Institutional capacity building; (viii)Human and material resources to strengthen the capacities for the administration and enforcement of access regulations; (ix)Training related to genetic resources with the full participation of Kenya and where possible in Kenya;

(x)Access to scientific information relevant to conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, including biological inventories and taxanomic studies; (xi)Institutional and professional relationships that can arise from access and benefit sharing agreements and subsequent collaborative activities; and (xii)Joint ownership of relevant intellectual property rights.

GAPS No clear provision of how benefits are to be distributed to local community (what is fair and equitable?) Who is the local community and TK associated to them? Do the regulations cover biological resources as well? No standard form/provisions of the contents of PIC and MTA – this may cause confusion to providers/owners and users as this is a new issue for the country No distinct lines when research ends and commercialization starts – the dilemma of enforcement.

STRENGTHS Participatory and consultative process that was used to develop regulations Comprehensive framework to regulate genetic resources and benefit sharing Harmonized both regional and international (Bonn Guidelines) laws on ABS. Clear provision for mandatory PIC and MTA to ensure that the providers/owners receive benefits.

OVERALL CHALLENGES Different sectors use GR and BR in different ways, adopt a diversity of approaches and tools for ABS associated with resources. Different sectors use GR and BR in different ways, adopt a diversity of approaches and tools for ABS associated with resources. Capacity building in provider countries – negotiating skills to reduce inequities between contracting parties. Capacity building in provider countries – negotiating skills to reduce inequities between contracting parties. Potential frustration in seeking PIC, negotiating terms and sharing of benefits associated with use of TK is unclear (which local community) Potential frustration in seeking PIC, negotiating terms and sharing of benefits associated with use of TK is unclear (which local community) Need for legal certainty and clarity of rights to material Need for legal certainty and clarity of rights to material Problems of genetic identification, capacity constraints and complexity of designing monitoring and tracking system. Problems of genetic identification, capacity constraints and complexity of designing monitoring and tracking system. Continued and effective participation of Kenya in development of an internationally legally binding regime on ABS. Continued and effective participation of Kenya in development of an internationally legally binding regime on ABS.