Paul Below, CCRA Clinical Research Consultant and GCP Trainer

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
UTHSC IRB Donna Hollaway, RN, CCRC 11/30/2011 Authority to Audit 45 CFR (e) An IRB shall conduct continuing review of research covered by this.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
Introduction to GCP and 21CFR312. Dear Clinical Investigator…
Good Clinical Practice in Research
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Pharmacists Responsibilities in Clinical Studies Mike R Sather, PhD Crystal L Harris, PharmD February 26, 2004.
Paul Below, CCRA GCP Trainer Medical Research Management, Inc.
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
Special Topics in IND Regulation
Clinical Pharmacy’s Role in Research Trials Sheree Miller Pharm.D. Investigational Drug Service University of Washington Medical Center.
Tool Summary Sheet Note: This hidden slide will not show in a slide presentation. Remove before providing slide deck to sites. Tool: Sponsor Responsibilities.
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Jennifer McCormick MA, CRC Karla Lichter RN CCRC.
Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs)
Accredited Member of the Association of Clinical Research Professionals, USA Tips on clinical trials Maha Al-Farhan B.Sc, M.Phil., M.B.A., D.I.C.
Monitoring and Special Considerations for Multi-Center Trials
Recapture of Day 1 Suchart Chongprasert, Ph.D. Food and Drug Administration “Practical Aspects in Performing Clinical and Bioanalytical Parts in BA/BE.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP)- An introduction Dr Noor Ibrahim Mohamed Sakian.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
“So You Think You Know GCP …” Session S794 Jill Matzat, RN, BSN, CCRA, CCRT President, Medical Research Management & CRA Solutions, Inc. Paul Below, CCRA,
Good Clinical Practice GCP overview
International Human Subject Research Legal and Ethical Considerations for Investigators Theresa J. Colecchia, Esq. Associate General Counsel May 8, 2006.
Regulatory Authority Governing Clinical Trials Anthony J. Minisi, MD Director, Cardiology Fellowship Program.
Janet Ellen Holwell, CCRC, CCRA President, NY Metropolitan Chapter of ACRP.
A S Nanivadekar Introduction to GCP. A S Nanivadekar Outline Definition and scope Definition and scope Purpose of clinical research Purpose of clinical.
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Establishment and functioning of a REC Retha Britz.
Elements of Clinical Trial Quality Assurance Regulatory Coordinator –SCTR SUCCESS Center QA Monitor – NIDA Clinical Trials Network Stephanie Gentilin,
RESPONSIBILITIES OF INVESTIGATOR
ORO Reviews: Frequent Findings Related to IRBs Bob Brooks Associate Director Research Compliance Education and Policy VHA Office of Research Oversight.
MODULE I Close-Out Visit/Monitoring Reports Jane Fendl April 24, Versions: Final 24-Apr-2010.
Investigational New Drug Application (IND)
Joint Research & Enterprise Office Training The team, the procedures, the monitor and the Sponsor Lucy H H Parker Clinical Research Governance Manager.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Good Clinical Practice A Review for OCRA US RAC Study Group September 2005 Ginger Clasby, MS Promedica International
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
CLINICAL TRIALS – PHASE III. What are phase III trials  Confirmatory phase (Therapeutic confirmatory trial)  Trials are done to obtain sufficient evidence.
GCP & ETHICS COMMITTEES Ravi Rengachari Vector Control Research Centre PONDICHERRY.
UC DAVIS OFFICE OF RESEARCH Overview of Good Clinical Practices (GCP) Investigator and Study Team Responsibilities Miles McFann IRB Administration Training.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Jacquelyn L. Goldberg, J.D. VA IRB Chair Training April 8, 2004.
CONDUCTING COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENTS Allen Ditch Director Corporate Quality Bristol Myers Squibb Medical Research Summit March 6, 2003.
Overcoming challenges in pediatric oncology product development: Regulatory oversight of multi-national clinical studies Ursula Kern, Advisory Committees.
Lifespan GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE Record Management GCP May 2005.
ICH guidelines……….. INVESTIGATOR INVESTIGATOR Investigator's Qualifications and agreements The investigator(s) should be qualified by education, training,
Korea Food & Drug Administration Deputy director Kwang-Soo Joo Korea FDA Sep. 29, 2000 : Korean Good Clinical Practice & Relative Guidelines How to Manage.
Session 2 IRB Training  What is the Principal Investigator’s role in Human Subject Research?  What is the role of the Investigator’s staff in Human Subject.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Cancer Clinical Trials Office Clinical Trials & Research Training Oct2014.
Supervisory Responsibilities of Clinical Investigators
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and Monitoring Practices
Recent Evolution of New Drug Review and Approval System in Korea
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S SITE FILE
The HIPAA Privacy Rule: Implications for Medical Research
ICH-GCP Avinash Kondawar M. Pharm Lead CRA
Beverley Alberola, CIP Associate Director, Research Protections
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Enrolling in Clinical Trials
Administering Informed Consent Issues for Discussion
Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP November 13, 2013
Regulatory Binder: Maintaining Essential Study Documentation
Elements of an Organized Regulatory Binder
Good Clinical Practice in Research
Understanding the Process of Documenting Informed Consent
Good clinical practice
Presentation transcript:

Where the FDA Regulations End and ICH GCP Begins The Differences & Similarities Between the Two Paul Below, CCRA Clinical Research Consultant and GCP Trainer P. Below Consulting, Inc. ACRP of Southern Wisconsin Fall Symposium Milwaukee, WI November 12, 2008

All slides in this presentation have been copyrighted and can not be used without the presenter’s permission.

This presentation was originally given at the 2007 SoCRA Annual Meeting in Denver, CO (September 27, 2007). It was inspired by Norman Goldfarb, Managing Director of First Clinical Research. At the 2006 SoCRA Annual Meeting, he asked the question during a session on monitoring, “How many in the audience know at least three differences between the FDA regulations and the ICH GCP Guidelines?”

Learning Objectives Define what ICH is and what role the ICH guidelines play in clinical research Review the ICH Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and how they differ from the FDA regulations Discuss the impact of ICH GCPs on Investigator sites

What is ICH? International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use Working group of pharmaceutical industry experts and regulatory authorities from the European Union, Japan, and the United States

ICH Purpose Aim to produce a single set of technical requirements for the registration of new drug drug products to streamline development Reduce or obviate duplicate testing More economical use of human, animal and material resources Eliminate unnecessary delays in the availability of new medicines

Importance of ICH to Industry Reduced development time and cost Easier simultaneous new drug submission in many countries Facilitates intra-company globalization

ICH History European Union began to successfully harmonize member country regulatory requirements in the 1980's WHO Conference of Drug Regulatory Authorities (Paris, 1989) was start of the harmonization process between Europe, U.S. and Japan First meeting held in 1990 (Brussels) with biennial meetings held since 37 guidelines produced to date

ICH Categories Quality (24 guidelines) - related to chemical and pharmaceutical quality assurance Safety (15 guidelines) - related to pre-clinical studies Efficacy (18 guidelines) - related to clinical research in human subjects Multidisciplinary (5 guidelines) – i.e., Medical Terminology (MedDRA)

Efficacy Guidelines E2 - Clinical Safety Data Management E3 - Structure and Content of Clinical Study Reports E6 - Good Clinical Practice E7 - Studies in Support of Special Populations/Geriatrics E8 - General Consideration of Clinical Trials E9 - Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials E11 - Clinical Investigation in the Pediatric Population E12 - Clinical Evaluation of New Antihypertensive Drugs

ICH Guideline for GCP (E6) International ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, conducting, recording, and reporting trials that involve participation of human subjects Compliance assures rights, safety and well- being of trial subjects are protected (consistent with Declaration of Helsinki)

ICH GCP Objective Facilitate the mutual acceptance of clinical data by the regulatory authorities of the EU, Japan, and the U.S. Prior to ICH, criteria for acceptance by FDA of foreign clinical studies outlined in 21 CFR 312.120 (required to conduct trials in accordance with Declaration of Helsinki)

ICH GCP Implementation in US Published as “guidance document” in the Federal Register, Vol. 62, May 9, 1997

FDA Guidance Documents Represents FDA's “current thinking” on ways to comply with regulations Not legally binding Non-compliance should not be cited in a FDA Form 483

ICH as FDA Regulation E2A Guideline - Requirements and procedures for expedited pre- and post- marketing safety reporting. “Expedited Safety Reporting Requirements for Human Drug and Biological Products” published Federal Register, October 7, 1997. Incorporated into CFR 21 part 312.32 on April 6, 1998.

Specific Differences Between ICH GCP and the FDA Regulations

ICH GCP Sections Chapter 1 - Glossary Chapter 2 - Principles of ICH GCP Chapter 3 - Institutional Review Board Chapter 4 - Investigator Chapter 5 - Sponsor Chapter 6 - Protocol and Amendments Chapter 7 - Investigator’s Brochure Chapter 8 - Essential Documents

IRB Responsibilities (ICH 3.1) FDA and ICH both require the IRB to review informed consent, protocol, advertisements, and the Investigator's Brochure. ICH also requires IRB submission of: Subject recruitment procedures Written information provided to subjects Information about subject compensation Investigator's current CV and/or other documents evidencing qualifications

IRB Composition (ICH 3.2) Both FDA and ICH require IRBs to be composed of the following members: At least five members One non-scientific member One member not affiliated with the institution Members involved in the protocol not have a voting role

IRB Composition cont. FDA also requires the following (56.107a-f): One scientific member Diversity in race, gender, cultural backgrounds Varying backgrounds - not composed of only one profession Members qualified to assess the acceptability of the protocol with institutional SOPs & professional practice standards Members with a conflicting interest cannot vote for protocol approval

Investigator Agreements (ICH 4.1) ICH requires Investigators to maintain a list of appropriately qualified persons to whom significant trial-related duties have been delegated.

Investigator Resources (ICH 4.2) ICH requires Investigators to demonstrate potential for recruiting the required number of patients within the agreed recruitment period. Retrospective data Patient database analysis

Subject Medical Care (ICH 4.3) ICH requires Investigators to inform subjects when medical care is needed for an intercurrent illness. ICH recommends that Investigators inform the subject’s primary physician of trial participation (with the subject’s permission). ICH requires Investigators to make every reasonable effort to ascertain the reason(s) for subject early withdrawal (although the subject is not obliged to give a reason).

Protocol Compliance (ICH 4.5) ICH requires Investigators (or their designees) to document and explain any deviation from the approved protocol.

Investigational Product (ICH 4.6) ICH allows the delegation of study drug dispensing, patient counselling, and drug accountability to a designee. FDA has no regulations concerning delegation of these duties but recently published a draft guidance (May 2007) on the supervisory responsibilities of investigators.

Informed Consent (ICH 4.8) ICH allows the delegation of the informed consent process to a designee. FDA has no regulations concerning delegation of this duty although it is discussed in the FDA Information Sheets. UPDATE: Also discussed in detail in the May 2007 FDA draft guidance on the supervisory responsibilities of investigators

Informed Consent cont. ICH requires the person conducting the informed consent process to sign and date the consent form. ICH requires that the subject receive a signed and dated copy of the consent form. FDA only requires that a copy be provided.

Informed Consent cont. ICH requires the following informed consent elements not required by the FDA: Discussion of trial treatments and probability of random assignment Subject responsibilities Anticipated payment, if any, to the subject Important potential risks and benefits of alternative treatment Authorization to access medical records by regulatory authorities (FDA and foreign)

Records and Reports (ICH 4.9) ICH requires Investigators (or designees) to: Document explanations for discrepancies between data in the CRFs and the source documents. Initial, date and explain (if necessary) all CRF changes/corrections. CRF designees must be documented. Endorse & retain records of all CRF changes made by the Sponsor.

Records and Reports (ICH 4.9) ICH requires the retention of “essential documents” for at least two years after the approval of a marketing application in an ICH region or until there is no pending or contemplated applications in an ICH region or development is formally discontinued. ICH compliance generally requires a longer retention time than FDA regulations.

Sponsor QA/QC (ICH 5.1) ICH requires Sponsors to secure agreement from all involved parties to ensure direct access of study records to foreign regulatory authorities.

Record Keeping (ICH 5.5) ICH requires Sponsors to inform Investigators in writing of: Study record retention requirements Notification of when records are no longer needed

Compensation (ICH 5.8) ICH requires Sponsors to provide insurance or indemnify the investigator against claims arising from the trial.

Financing (ICH 5.9) FDA requires extensive disclosure of the Investigator’s financial relationship with the Sponsor (21 CFR 54). ICH has no comparable guideline and only requires that financial aspects of the trial be documented in an agreement between the Sponsor and Investigator.

IRB Review (ICH 5.11) ICH requires Sponsors to obtain a statement from Investigators that their local IRB is organized and operates according to GCP and applicable laws and regulations.

Supplying IP (ICH 5.14) ICH requires Sponsors to obtain documentation of IRB approval prior to shipping investigational product to an Investigator.

Monitoring (ICH 5.18) FDA specifies that Sponsors shall monitor the progress of all clinical investigations (21 CFR 312.56) and that monitors be qualified by training and experience (21 CFR 312.53). FDA has a guidance document on the topic, “Guideline for the Monitoring Clinical Investigations” (January 1988).

Monitoring cont. ICH includes the following items not addressed in the FDA guidance: Monitor qualifications must be documented Monitors must verify that trial functions have not been delegated to unauthorized individuals Sponsors must document review and follow-up of the monitoring report

Protocol and IB (ICH 6 & 7) ICH has more detailed outline of contents of the protocol and Investigator Brochure than the FDA regulations [21 CFR 312.23(a)(5-6)] ICH requires that the protocol identify any data to be recorded directly on the CRFs and to be considered source data (ICH 6.4.9)

Essential Documents (ICH 8) ICH requires the following documents not specified by the FDA: Subject Screening Log (to document subjects who enter trial screening) Subject Identification Code List (confidential list of subject names in case identity must be revealed for follow-up) Signature Sheet (to document signatures/initials of persons authorized to make CRF entries and corrections)

Essential Documents cont. ICH requires the following documents be filed at the site: Trial Initiation Monitoring Report (to document that trial procedures were reviewed with the Investigator and staff) Relevant Communications (letters, meeting notes, notes of telephone calls)

A manuscript of this presentation was published in the SoCRA Source in August 2008

Contact Information Office: (952) 882-4083 E-mail: paul@pbelow-consulting.com