CXC Response to June 04 Report 1.Bakeout Status: Paul Plucinsky 2.CIAO upgrade information: Jonathan McDowell 3.DS9 and visualization scripts: Jonathan.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Managing your Loan Star Libraries Grant Part 3 Wendy Clark Jennifer Justus Texas State Library and Archives Commission.

Advertisements

Chandra User’s Committee Meeting (4/15/08) P. Slane (Chandra Mission Planning) Constraint Classifications and the Chandra Long-Term Schedule.

CUC Oct 2013 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 15 Peer Review  June 2013, Hilton Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 15  13 topical panels,

© 2010 MediaMind Technologies Inc. | All rights reserved Shelley Hen| Solution Specialist January Buying Module.

1 HST Cycle 12 TAC Results Bob Williams TIPS – 17 April 2003.

Chandra User’s Committee Meeting (6/27/04) P. Slane (Chandra Mission Planning) Constrained and Coordinated Observations Chandra Mission Planning Response.

19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.

CUC, 12 Jan /18/03Belinda Wilkes, CDO Cycle 5 Chair+Pundit Questionaire  Circulation: 15 people (12 chairs, 3 pundits)  Responses: 8 (7 chairs,

Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 08 – March 09 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 06 April 2008.

Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period April 08 – September 08 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 15 October 2008.

Chandra Users’ Committee, Apr 2007 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed.

Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC Paul Plucinsky CUC September Overall Status of the Instrument 2.Update on Controlling the FP Temperature ACIS Ops.

Cxc CHANDRA X-RAY OBSERVATORY Press Events 39 Press Events 3 Space Science Updates - Perseus Cluster: Chandra "Hears" a Black Hole - RXJ : Star Being.

Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11 Peer Review Proposal Numbers:  668 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.

CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period April 06 – September 06 Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Roger Brissenden 17 October 2006.

Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.

Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2006 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 8  725 submitted proposals  *6.4 oversubscribed.

Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period April 09 – October 09 Edward Mattison CXC Deputy Manager 29 October 2009.

Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period April 07 – September 07 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 19 September 2007.

Users' Committee, 25 Oct 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12 Peer Review  June 2010, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 12 

Chandra Users’ Committee, 9-10 Apr 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.

CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra User Committee Meeting Roger J. Brissenden 25 June 2002.

Director's Office Chandra Users’ Committee, Sept 2007 Chandra Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed (based on time)  48 LP, 10.

Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.

25 June 2002Chandra Users’ Committee, Belinda Wilkes XMM/Chandra Schedules AO date 15 Dec 2002 Deadline 15 March 2003 Peer Review ~15 June 2002 AO date.

Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.

CXC Chandra Users' Committee Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle proposals *6.4 oversubscribed (based on time) GTO for review: due 3 rd April.

Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.

Tracking Chandra Science Productivity Publication Metrics special thanks to Mihoko Yukita (CDO) Sherry Winkelman (Archive Group) Paul J. Green (CDO)

Mopra Time Allocation Mopra publications performance Mopra time allocation statistics Mopra Large Projects Proposal applications for 2012 APRS Jessica.

Tracking Chandra Science Productivity Publication Metrics special thanks to John Bright, Arnold Rots, and Sherry Winkelman (Archive Group) and Mihoko Yukita.

CXC Manager’s Status Report Chandra Users’ Committee Meeting Edward M. Mattison 29 June 2004.

Chandra X-Ray Observatory CXC ACIS Ops team October 17, ACIS Changes Starting in Cycle 8 1) Selection of Optional CCDs 2) Revised Energy-to-PH conversion.

Financials 9.1 Upgrade Progress Update Financial Unit Liaison Meeting May 18, 2011.

Science Operations Status Maria Santos-Lleo EPIC cal & ops meeting, Madrid March, 2010.

CUC, 29 June 2004Belinda Wilkes, Assistant Director CXC Response to Jan 2004 CUC Report 1,2: relate to peer review (Belinda) 3: high-risk science category:

CXC Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center Recommended Best Practices Roger Brissenden and Belinda Wilkes 25 April 2012.

LWA1 User Programs Report Y. Pihlström (UNM). Outline User Programs purpose and functions o Usefull webpages o Plans for a data base CFP1 report CFP2.

Give Your Online Teaching a JOLT Michelle Pilati, PhD Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry, PhD Professor of Mechanical Engineering.

Cycle19 Statistics Brett Blacker Science Policies Group Science Mission Office March 15, 2011.

Cycle 1 Planning Process B-G Andersson (SOFIA Science Operations Manager) & Ravi Sankrit (User Support Scientist) SSSC, May 11, 2011 Mountain View.

1 IAR Prototype Demonstration June 21, 2002 Screens and System Navigation.

April , 2006 HEASARC Users Group Steve Drake RXTE Archive at HEASARC Status and Plans Steve Drake.

Bureau of Local Government Division of Accounting and Auditing Chief: Burton S. Marshall, CPA ( ) Supervisor : Justin.

Chandra Users’ Committee CXC Manager’s Status Report For the period October 2009 – April 2010 Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 27 April 2009.

CUC Oct 2012 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 14 Peer Review   June 2012, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 14  13 topical.

GLAST Science Support CenterAugust 9, 2004 Users’ Committee Meeting GSSC USER SUPPORT David Band – GSSC.

GLAST Science Support CenterNovember, 2005 GSSC User Committee Meeting Tools for Mission and Observation Planning Robin Corbet, GSSC

NCLB Monitoring September 19, 2012 Webinar.

XMM 1Norbert Schartel Report From The Project Scientist Presentation for the XMM-Newton Users Group Meeting VI 19 th / 20 th May 2005 Norbert Schartel.

S. Ritz 1 GLAST Science Policy Document Outline Action Item GUC Meeting June 2005 R. Brissenden S. Ritz Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

GO Program: Cycle 1 process, results, and Cycle 2 schedule Koji Mukai Astro-E2 Guest Observer Facility.

1 Proposal and Observation Handling Ravi Sankrit (User Support Scientist) SSSC May 11, 2011.

GLAST Science Support Center June 21, 2007 Getting Involved with GLAST GLAST Guest Investigator Program David Band, GSSC CRESST/GSFC/UMBC.

2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January

GLAST Science Support Center May 8, 2006 GUC Meeting Status of GLAST User Support David Band (GSSC/JCA-UMBC)

GLAST Science Support Center November 17, 2006 GUC Face-to-Face Meeting GLAST GI Program (with revised schedule) David Band, GSSC.

Fermi Science Support Center September 26, 2008 FUG Face-to-Face Meeting Fermi GI Program Update David Band, FSSC CRESST/GSFC/UMBC.

NASA Herschel Science Center - page 1 PACS NHSC Cycle 1 Open Time Proposal Planning Workshop 3-4 June 2010 ESA AO and NASA Funding Call Phil Appleton and.

GO Program: Past, Present & Future Koji Mukai Suzaku Guest Observer Facility.

Agriculture, Human and Natural Resources Information Technology, Virginia Tech United States Department of Agriculture Peer Panel Meeting July 8-9, 2004.

July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday

A Year in the Life Of a State Data Coordinator December, 2013.

Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org GKIDS Mid-Administration Workshop Georgia Kindergarten Inventory.

Roger Brissenden CXC Manager 22 October 2013

Proposal Cycle: Updates and Plans

OPTN/UNOS Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee

Legislative Appropriations Request 2018 and 2019

2015 January February March April May June July August September

Presentation transcript:

CXC Response to June 04 Report 1.Bakeout Status: Paul Plucinsky 2.CIAO upgrade information: Jonathan McDowell 3.DS9 and visualization scripts: Jonathan McDowell 4.Calibration: 1.Status and requirements: Larry David 2.Iridium Edge: Herman Marshall 5.Pileup: Jonathan McDowell 6.Joint Proposals: we feel the process is working, we will continue to instruct panels to critique all time requests carefully 7.Cross-Calibration:

Observation Cycle 6 Status  Cycle 6 Proposal Statistics –Received 789 proposals, accepted 191 TypeNo. ProposalsNo. TargetsAllocated Time (ks) (or $: AR,Th) ARCHIVE180$1,105,693 GO GTO (competed)3484 LP THEORY70$488,224 TOO TOO/LP12340 VLP

Cycle 6 Peer Review Report (cont)

Cycle 6 Peer Review Report

Cycle 6 Peer Review Report (cont)

Cycle 7 Status Schedule and Deadlines for the CfP Cycle EventDate CfP Release15 December 2004 Science Proposal Deadline (Stage 1)6 p.m. EST, 15 March 2005 Peer Review21-23 June 2005 Selected Proposals AnnouncedEarly July 2005 Budget Deadline (Stage 2)6 p.m. EDT, 18 August 2005 Cost ReviewSeptember 2005 Stage 2 Final SelectionOctober 2005 EPO Electronic Deadline5 p.m. EDT, 21 October 2005 EPO Hardcopy Deadline4 p.m. EDT, 25 October 2005 EPO ReviewDecember 2005 Cycle 7 StartsAbout December 2005

What’s New in Cycle 7 Summary (Section 1.5 of CfP) Spitzer Joint Time: 110 hours Spitzer time allocated by Chandra review (400 ksec Chandra time to Spitzer review) Pitch Angle Restrictions: Restriction due to EPHIN → ° New restriction, pitch angle > 168° to avoid frozen fuel lines (already being put in place for Cycle 6) Proposals: PDF files only Electronic distribution to reviewers (on CDRom), hardcopies on request only Target Specifications: emphasizing that all specifications should be explicitly entered on RPS form TOO Specification: expanded to allow follow-ups to explicitly include a different instrument (previously link had to be made manually by the CXC) Time-constrained fraction: has been reduced to 15% of targets

User Interface Changes  Contact Scientists: have been removed as an option  User Interface (USINT): self-serve users now include: –experienced PIs with unconstrained observations –CXC and GTO PIs –Help/USINT assignment is available on request.