Office of Research and Development 6 October 2008 Updates to the Treatment of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7 Sergey L. Napelenok, Annmarie G. Carlton,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intercomparison of secondary organic aerosol models based on SOA/O x ratio Yu Morino, Kiyoshi Tanabe, Kei Sato, and Toshimasa Ohara National Institute.
Advertisements

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Lab, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 28 October 2013 H. O. T. Pye, R. Pinder,
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
1 Biogenic Hydrocarbons Lecture AOSC 637 Atmospheric Chemistry Russell R. Dickerson Finlayson-Pitts Chapt. 6 & 9 Seinfeld Chapt. 6 OUTLINE History Nomenclature.
Application of the PTM-MCM to the TORCH-1 campaign Steve Utembe, Mike Jenkin and David Johnson EPSR Group Department of Environmental Science and Technology.
Template Development and Testing of PinG and VBS modules in CMAQ 5.01 Prakash Karamchandani, Bonyoung Koo, Greg Yarwood and Jeremiah Johnson ENVIRON International.
Development of a Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation Mechanism: Comparison with Smog Chamber Experiments and Atmospheric Measurements Luis Olcese, Joyce.
FINE AEROSOL COMPOSITION IN NORTH AMERICA Annual mean PM 2.5 concentrations (NARSTO, 2004) Current air quality standard is 15  g m -3.
ATMO 469b/569b, CHEE 469b/569b Air Pollution II: Aerosols Chemical Composition: New Frontiers Jan. 24, 2007 Dr. Song GAO
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division Photo image area measures 2”
Havala O. T. Pye 1, Rob Pinder 1, Ying Xie 1, Deborah Luecken 1, Bill Hutzell 1, Golam Sarwar 1, Jason Surratt 2 1 US Environmental Protection Agency 2.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosols in Atlanta
Secondary Organic Aerosols: What we know and current CAM treatment Chemistry-Climate Working Group Meeting, CCSM March 22, 2006 Colette L. Heald
Identification of Secondary Organic Aerosol Compounds in Ambient PM 2.5 Samples Edward O. Edney and Tadeusz E. Kleindienst National Exposure Research Laboratory.
J.-F. Müller, K. Ceulemans, S. Compernolle
Chemistry of NO x and SOA: VOC Oxidation by Nitrate Radicals Andrew Rollins Cohen research group, department of chemistry University of California, Berkeley,
Update on: 1. Secondary Organic Aerosol 2. Biogenic VOC emissions Colette L. Heald Chemistry Climate Working Group Meeting February.
The Framework of Modeling SOA Formation from Toluene Oxidation Di Hu and Richard Kamens Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University.
1 Modelling Activities at LAC (PSI) in Switzerland Ş. Andreani-Aksoyo ğ lu, J. Keller, I. Barmpadimos, D. Oderbolz, A.S.H. Prévôt Laboratory of Atmospheric.
Organic Carbon Aerosol: An Overview (and Insight from Recent Field Campaigns) Colette L. Heald NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral Fellow
4-km AIRPACT vs 12-km AIRPACT Both with dynamic boundary conditions from MOZART-4 Figures created on 5/29/2011 (corrected corrupted JPROC input file)
Developing Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Code for the MCM David Johnson (Mike Jenkin and Steve Utembe) Department of Environmental Science and Technology,
Understanding sources of organic aerosol during CalNex 2010 using the CMAQ-VBS Matthew Woody 1, Kirk Baker 1, Patrick Hayes 2, Jose Jimenez 3, and Havala.
Operational Air Quality and Source Contribution Forecasting in Georgia Georgia Institute of Technology Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat Odman 1, Michael E. Chang.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Modeling Division, Research Triangle Park, NC September 17, 2015 Annmarie.
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development, Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Prakash Bhave, Ann Marie Carlton, Sergey Napelenok,
Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.
Glyoxal and Methylglyoxal; Chemistry and Their Effects on Secondary Organic Aerosol Dasa Gu Sungyeon Choi.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory | Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division| A Tale of Two Models: A Comparison.
Modeling Dynamic Partitioning of Semi-volatile Organic Gases to Size-Distributed Aerosols Rahul A. Zaveri Richard C. Easter Pacific Northwest National.
Parameterization of Global Monoterpene SOA formation and Water Uptake, Based on a Near-explicit Mechanism Karl Ceulemans – Jean-François Müller – Steven.
Karl Ceulemans– Steven Compernolle – Jean-François Müller
U.S. EPA Office of Research & Development, Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division Columbus Day 2010 Prakash Bhave U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Model Evaluation Comparing Model Output to Ambient Data Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, California.
Classificatory performance evaluation of air quality forecasting in Georgia Yongtao Hu 1, M. Talat Odman 1, Michael E. Chang 2 and Armistead G. Russell.
Model & Chemistry Intercomparison CMAQ with CB4, CB4-2002, SAPRC99 Ralph Morris, Steven Lau, Bongyoung Koo ENVIRON International Corporation Gail Tonnesen,
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Model Performance Evaluation with the.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling Division Photo image area measures 2” H x 6.93” W and can.
Simulating the Oxygen Content of Organic Aerosol in a Global Model
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 16 October 2012 Integrating source.
New Features of the 2003 Release of the CMAQ Model Jonathan Pleim 1, Gerald Gipson 2, Shawn Roselle 1, and Jeffrey Young 1 1 ASMD, ARL, NOAA, RTP, NC 2.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Yunseok Im and Myoseon Jang
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
BAYESIAN AND ADJOINT INVERSE MODEL ANALYSES OF PM SOURCES IN THE UNITED STATES USING OBSERVATIONS FROM SURFACE, AIRCRAFT, AND SATELLITE PLATFORMS Daniel.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Impact of dimethylsulfide chemistry on sulfate Golam Sarwar, Kathleen Fahey, Kristen Foley, Brett Gantt, Deborah Luecken, Rohit Mathur October 7, 2015.
Evaluation of CMAQ Driven by Downscaled Historical Meteorological Fields Karl Seltzer 1, Chris Nolte 2, Tanya Spero 2, Wyat Appel 2, Jia Xing 2 14th Annual.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Office of Research and Development | National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling and Analysis Division |Research Triangle Park,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division 26 October 2011 Diagnostic Evaluation.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
Understanding the impact of isoprene nitrates and OH reformation on regional air quality using recent advances in isoprene photooxidation chemistry Ying.
Updates to Secondary Organic Aerosol (SOA) Module
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
Havala O. T. Pye1 With contributions from:
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
Organic Aerosol is Ubiquitous in the Atmosphere
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, M. Talat Odman and Armistead G. Russell
Secondary Organic Aerosol Contributions during CalNex – Bakersfield
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Robert Griffin Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space
Potential Anthropogenic Controls on Biogenic Organic Aerosol
Presentation transcript:

Office of Research and Development 6 October 2008 Updates to the Treatment of Secondary Organic Aerosol in CMAQv4.7 Sergey L. Napelenok, Annmarie G. Carlton, Prakash V. Bhave, Golam Sarwar, George Pouliot, Robert W. Pinder, Edward O. Edney, Marc Houyoux, Kristen M. Foley U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 7 th Annual CMAS Conference Chapel Hill, NC

Office of Research and Development 1 Covered Topics Previous SOA module (CMAQv4.6) Updated SOA module (CMAQv4.7) Additions/Enhancements –New precursors –SOA from aromatics under low-NO x conditions –Acid catalyzed SOA –Oligomerization of semi-volatile material –SOA from in-cloud oxidation –Parameterization changes Preliminary Results

Office of Research and Development 2 Previous Modeled Reactive Organic Gases and SOA (CMAQv4.6) Sources Anthropogenic: Alkanes Xylene Cresol Toluene Biogenic: Monoterpenes 5 Precursors Products Aitken Mode ASOA (AORGAI) Accumulation Mode ASOA (AORGAJ) Aitken Mode BSOA (AORGBI) Accumulation Mode BSOA (AORGBJ) 4 SOA Species

Office of Research and Development 3 Current Reactive Organic Gases and SOA (CMAQv4.7) Sources Anthropogenic: Alkanes Xylene Toluene Benzene Biogenic: Monoterpenes Isoprene Sesquiterpenes Cloud: Glyoxal/Methylglyoxal 8 Precursors Products (Accumulation Mode Only) AALKJ AXYL1J, AXYL2J, AXYL3J ATOL1J, ATOL2J, ATOL3J ABNZ1J, ABNZ2J, ABNZ3J AOLGAJ ATRP1J, ATRP2J AISO1J, AISO2J, AISO3J ASQTJ AOLGBJ AORGCJ 19 SOA Species low-NO x high-NO x acid catalyzed 2-product model “aged” SOA cloud produced unchanged MEGAN emission factors in BEIS 3.14 density update

Office of Research and Development 4 NO x Dependence Under low-NOx conditions, aromatic peroxy radicals preferentially react with HO 2 (and not NO) The resulting SOA formed from these reactions is considered non-volatile For example, benzene: The pathway determines the type of SOA formed –ΔBENZENE NO partitions according to the 2-product Odum model –ΔBENZENE HO2 becomes non-volatile SOA Parameterization was adapted from Ng et al. (2007) Implemented for SAPRC99 and CB05 Changes to emissions processing are required to produce “delumped” benzene emissions

Office of Research and Development 5 Acid Catalyzed Reactions Under acidic conditions, SOA production from isoprene is enhanced CMAQ parameterization is based on a series of chamber experiments where the acidity of the seed aerosol was controlled (Surratt et al., 2007) Acidity enhancement is approximated by normalizing the empirical relationship: The hydrogen ion concentration is computed from a charge balance and limited by the range of the experimental conditions [ 0.0, ] nmol/m 3

Office of Research and Development 6 Condensed-Phase Reactions Semi-volatile SOA is converted to low-volatility products through polymerization processes Kalberer et al. (2004) estimated that after 20 hours of aging, 50% of organic particle mass consists of polymers CMAQ semi-volatile species are “aged” by transferring the mass into two separate non-volatile species: –Anthropogenic Oligomers from alkanes, xylene, toluene, and benzene –Biogenic Oligomers from monoterpenes, isoprene, sesquiterpenes The SOA/SOC ratio for these products was set at 2.1 according to Turpin & Lim (2001) for non-urban areas

Office of Research and Development 7 Cloud-Produced SOA Most air quality models predict lower OC concentrations aloft than are suggested by measurements Models also predict less spatial and temporal variability CMAQ implementation: –Glyoxal and Methylglyoxal as precursors, based on Carlton et al. (2007) and Altieri et al. (2008) Yield is estimated to be 4% based on laboratory data OM/OC = 2.0 Cloud-produced SOA is considered non-volatile

Office of Research and Development 8 Parameterization Changes - ΔH vap Enthalpy of vaporization has a role in the dependence of the partitioning coefficient, K om, on temperature: Previously, 156kJ/mol was used for all SOA species in CMAQ Values that appear in literature and are used in other models range from kJ/mol, depending on the compound. The old CMAQ value was too large and was partly to blame for exaggerated night-time and wintertime SOA peaks

Office of Research and Development 9 Impact of New ΔH vap Values Compound Ethalpy of vaporization (kJ/mol)* SV ALK40 SV XYL32 SV TOL18 SV BNZ18 SV TRP40 SV ISO40 SV SQT40 *based on lab measurements (Offenberg et al., 2006)

Office of Research and Development 10 Interpreting SOA Results – OM/OC ratios Model calculates total organic mass OM/OC ratios are necessary for comparisons with measurements CMAQv4.7OM/OC AALK1.56 AXYL, ATOL, ABNZ2.0 AISO1 & AISO21.6 AISO32.7 ATRP1.4 ASQT2.1 AORGC2.0 AOLGA2.1 AOLGB2.1 AORGPA1.0 CMAQv4.6OM/OC AORGA1.67 AORGB1.47 AORGPA1.2

Office of Research and Development 11 Preliminary Module Evaluation Seasonal comparisons over eastern United States –January and August 2006 –More reasonably predicted higher concentrations in the summer (previously winter was higher) Model configuration: –12km resolution –CMAQv4.6 “increment” with previous and new SOA treatment –CB05 chemistry (EBI solver) –“yamo” advection –“acm2” diffusion –“acm” clouds

Office of Research and Development 12 Anthropogenic SOA (monthly average, μg/m 3 ) Change to enthalpy of vaporization SOA model updates August 2006 January 2006

Office of Research and Development 13 Biogenic SOA (monthly average, μg/m 3 ) Change to enthalpy of vaporization SOA model updates August 2006 January 2006

Office of Research and Development 14 Preliminary Module Evaluation (Part 2) Carbon Tracer comparison at a site in RTP, NC –Four 48 hour measurements during August/September 2003 –Speciated biogenic SOA (isoprene, monoterpene, sesquiterpene) and aromatics –Improvement over the old model is evident, but concentrations are still much lower than indicated by tracer measurements –Uncertainty in the tracer measurements: can laboratory measured tracer/SOC ratios be applied to atmospheric conditions?

Office of Research and Development 15 Comparison to Carbon Tracer Measurements – RTP 2003

Office of Research and Development 16 Summary Major changes to CMAQ SOA module –New precursors –New processes –Updated parameters –Only moderate CPU time requirement increase – 17% Preliminary evaluation suggests several improvements –Better seasonal trends –Better diurnal trends –Better science! Total OC mass did not increase much –TRP SOA is lower due to lower ΔH vap offsetting gains from new precursors –Intercontinental transport (boundary conditions) of longer-lived species? –Role of intermediate VOCs?

Office of Research and Development 17 Current and Future Plans Continue SOA Module Evaluation –RTP tracer data comparison –LADCO data set analysis –Sensitivity Analysis Parameterization Updates –Yields, H vap, non-volatile rates, etc. Rosenbrock solver for aqueous chemistry More sophisticated oligomerization treatment Further investigation in current and possible new precursors

Office of Research and Development 18 Contact: you are here!

Office of Research and Development 19 BONUS SLIDES

Office of Research and Development 20 Model CPU Time is Important! 17% increase

Office of Research and Development 21

Office of Research and Development 22 Results in Context with Other Work – Morris et al., 2006 Identified several missing pathways for SOA formation in AQ models Implemented three of these into CMAQ v4.4: –Polymerization Based on Kalberer et al. (2004) –Production from sesquiterpenes Emissions split from BEIS3 TERP SOA is nonvolatile –Production from isoprene New volatile species

Office of Research and Development 23 Results in Context with Other Work – Henze et al., 2008 Developed a mechanism to model competition between low and high- yield pathways of SOA formation from aromatics –Toluene –Xylene –Benzene (new) CMAQv4.7 aromatic SOA parameters are based on this work Found benzene to be the most important aromatic species for SOA formation CMAQv4.7 ΔH vap values are lower than what was used here (42 kJ/mol)

Office of Research and Development 24 Overview of the Underlying SOA Module Absorptive Partitioning Theory as adapted by Schell et al. (2001) Generally: Some products, C i,j, are condensable and contribute to SOA production: Stoichiometric yield coefficients,, are obtained from smog-chamber studies

Office of Research and Development 25 Overview of the Underlying SOA Module (continued) Partitioning between gas and particle phase is based on saturation concentration, Considering a mixture of condensable compounds (Raoult’s Law), particle phase concentration of each can by calculated by: –Important parameters: Stoichiometric yield coefficients: Saturation concentrations: (also T and ΔH vap ) Molecular weights:

Office of Research and Development 26 Seasonal Pattern Improves (SOA b ) August 2006 January 2006 AERO5AERO4New - Old

Office of Research and Development 27 Evaluation of TC results at Duke Forest (August 2006) Monthly-averaged TC concentrations from SOA Increment are slightly lower than previous simulations. Neither model version captures the peak on 25-Aug. However, the SOA Increment exhibits several improvements relative to previous simulations: lower coefficient of variation lower daily amplitude Observations Previous Incr. SOA updates Obs Previous SOA Incr. update Total Carbon mean stdev CoV Daily amplitude [ug/m3] median min max # paired hours: 246 # days with complete data: 25

Office of Research and Development 28 Altieri, K.E., S.P. Seitzinger, A.G. Carlton, B.J. Turpin, G.C. Klein, A.G. Marshall, Oligomers formed through in-cloud methylglyoxal reactions: Chemical composition, properties, and mechanisms investigated by ultra-high resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry, Atmos. Environ., 42, , 2008 Carlton, A.G., B.J. Turpin, K.E. Altieri, A. Reff, S. Seitzinger, H.J. Lim, and B. Ervens, Atmospheric Oxalic Acid and SOA Production from Glyoxal: Results of Aqueous Photooxidation Experiments, Atmos. Environ., 41, , Henze, D.K., J.H. Seinfeld, N.L. Ng, J.H. Kroll, T.-M. Fu, D.J. Jacob, C.L. Heald, Global modeling of secondary organic aerosol formation from aromatic hydrocarbons: high- vs. low- yield pathways, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, , Kalberer, M., D. Paulsen, M. Sax, M. Steinbacher, J. Dommen, A.S.H. Prevot, R. Fisseha, E. Weingartner, V. Frankevich, R. Zenobi, U. Baltensperger, Identification of polymers as major components of atmospheric organic aerosols, Science, 303, , Morris, R.E., B. Koo, A. Guenther, G. Yarwood, D. McNally, T.W. Tesche, G. Tonnesen, J. Boylan, P. Brewer, Atmos. Environ., 40, , Ng, N. L., J. H. Kroll, A. W. H. Chan, P. S. Chhabra, R. C. Flagan, and J. H. Seinfeld, Secondary organic aerosol formation from m-xylene, toluene, and benzene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, , Schell, B., I. J. Ackermann, H. Hass, F. S. Binkowski, and A. Abel, Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality modeling system, J. Geophys. Res., Vol 106, No D22, , Surratt, J.D., M. Lewandowski, J.H. Offenberg, M. Jaoui, T.E. Kleindienst, E.O. Edney, J.H. Seinfeld, Effect of acidity on secondary organic aerosol formation from isoprene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, , Turpin, B. J. and H.-J. Lim, Species contributions to PM2.5 mass concentrations: revisiting common assumptions for estimating organic mass, Aero. Sci. Technol., Vol 35, , Further Reading Material