WINS NG 2.0 Current Status and Network Assembly Sensoria Corporation Internetworking the Physical World Santa Fe, NM January 16, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mobile Date: A Dating Application For Mobile Phones Mark Mucha and Juan Carcheri EEL-6788 Advanced Topics in Wireless Networks Spring 2010.
Advertisements

Automatic Configuration of DICOM Network Applications Experience with Frozen Draft of Supplement 67 DICOM Anniversary Conference & Workshop Baltimore,
* Distributed Algorithms in Multi-channel Wireless Ad Hoc Networks under the SINR Model Dongxiao Yu Department of Computer Science The University of Hong.
A new Network Concept for transporting and storing digital video…………
SELF-ORGANIZING MEDIA ACCESS MECHANISM OF A WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK AHM QUAMRUZZAMAN.
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
TDMA based MAC protocol to assist in Wide area Sensor Network Deployment Nuwan Gajaweera.
IPP & AFA vs. Axiovision Strong points of Cell Observer system: Zeiss name, Zeiss’s success in high-end application, especially in LSM, gives them very.
Impala: A Middleware System for Managing Autonomic, Parallel Sensor Systems Ting Liu and Margaret Martonosi Princeton University.
1 An Approach to Real-Time Support in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Mark Gleeson Distributed Systems Group Dept.
Madhavi W. SubbaraoWCTG - NIST Dynamic Power-Conscious Routing for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Madhavi W. Subbarao Wireless Communications Technology Group.
Dynamic Sensor Networks DARPA SensIT PI Meeting January, 2002 Santa Fe, NM Brian Schott USC Information Sciences Institute You Are Here.
Channel Access Methods When several devices are connected to a single channel, there must be some rules to govern these devices as they access, transmit,
Web Server Hardware and Software
1 ITC242 – Introduction to Data Communications Week 12 Topic 18 Chapter 19 Network Management.
Effective Agent Participation in Rescue Operations Brent Dutson CS7100 Fall 2009.
2008/7/3 NanoMon: An Adaptable Sensor Network Monitoring Software Misun Yu, Haeyong Kim, and Pyeongsoo Mah Embedded S/W Research Division Electronics and.
SensIT PI Meeting, April 17-20, Distributed Services for Self-Organizing Sensor Networks Alvin S. Lim Computer Science and Software Engineering.
Wireless Sensor Networks for Habitat Monitoring Jennifer Yick Network Seminar October 10, 2003.
Empirical Analysis of Transmission Power Control Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks CENTS Retreat – May 26, 2005 Jaein Jeong (1), David Culler (1),
Basic Concepts of Computer Networks
NAME: NASIRAHMADPROGRAM: B.S TELECOMSEMESTER: 7THREG#: SU/ PRESENTED TO: ENGR. GUL ZAMEEN KHANDATE: UNIVERSITY: SARHAD UNIVERSITY.
Protocols for Video Conferencing and Surveillance You Are Here Brian Schott Ladan Gharai Colin Perkins Carl Worth NETEX Industry Day September, 2001.
Barracuda Load Balancer Server Availability and Scalability.
Server Load Balancing. Introduction Why is load balancing of servers needed? If there is only one web server responding to all the incoming HTTP requests.
Mobile Distributed 3D Sensing Sandia National Laboratories Intelligent Sensors and Robotics POC: Chris Lewis
SensIT PI Meeting, January 15-17, Self-Organizing Sensor Networks: Efficient Distributed Mechanisms Alvin S. Lim Computer Science and Software Engineering.
1 Sequential Acoustic Energy Based Source Localization Using Particle Filter in a Distributed Sensor Network Xiaohong Sheng, Yu-Hen Hu University of Wisconsin.
Advisor: Quincy Wu Speaker: Kuan-Ta Lu Date: Aug. 19, 2010
Cullen College of Engineering RFID-Based Solutions for Piping Technology Piping Tech & UH July, 2007.
Module 13: Maintaining Software by Using Windows Server Update Services.
1 CS 501 Spring 2003 CS 501: Software Engineering Lecture 16 System Architecture and Design II.
Usability Issues Documentation J. Apostolakis for Geant4 16 January 2009.
SenseIT: Networking 1 Sensor.com WINS NG Networks Networking Research Review SenseIT PI Meeting October 7-8, 1999 Marina Del Rey Presented to Dr. Sri Kumar.
Improving Capacity and Flexibility of Wireless Mesh Networks by Interface Switching Yunxia Feng, Minglu Li and Min-You Wu Presented by: Yunxia Feng Dept.
Location Centric Distributed Computation and Signal Processing Parmesh Ramanathan University of Wisconsin, Madison Co-Investigators:A. Sayeed, K. K. Saluja,
Guide to Linux Installation and Administration, 2e1 Chapter 2 Planning Your System.
한국기술교육대학교 컴퓨터 공학 김홍연 Habitat Monitoring with Sensor Networks DKE.
Advanced Computer Networks Topic 2: Characterization of Distributed Systems.
1350 TAC Training © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco Aironet 350 Series Product and Software Update WNBU Technical Marketing.
What is a Sensor Web ? Abhinav Roongta Wireless Information Networking Group University of Florida March 3, 2004.
Architectural Approaches (Part 1) Power Aware Distributed Systems Kickoff August 23, 2000.
TANGO TANGO ALTERNATE NETWORK GRAPH ORGANIZER Olof Hellqvist Zak Blacher.
Milestones, Feedback, Action Items Power Aware Distributed Systems Kickoff August 23, 2000.
11 CLUSTERING AND AVAILABILITY Chapter 11. Chapter 11: CLUSTERING AND AVAILABILITY2 OVERVIEW  Describe the clustering capabilities of Microsoft Windows.
End-to-End Efficiency (E 3 ) Integrating Project of the EC 7 th Framework Programme General View of the E3 Prototyping Environment for Cognitive and Self-x.
Mark E. Fuller Senior Principal Instructor Oracle University Oracle Corporation.
Wiimote/Kinect Lab Midterm Update Senior Design December 2011, Group 16 Adviser: Dr. Tom Daniels Brenton Hankins Rick Hanton Harsh Goel Jeff Kramer.
NETWORKING FUNDAMENTALS. Network+ Guide to Networks, 4e2.
1 Trustworthy Operation within Infrastructure-less Networked Embedded Systems William M. Merrill Sensoria Corporation Control-Theoretic Approaches for.
Adaptive Sleep Scheduling for Energy-efficient Movement-predicted Wireless Communication David K. Y. Yau Purdue University Department of Computer Science.
System/SDWG Update Management Council Face-to-Face Flagstaff, AZ August 22-23, 2011 Sean Hardman.
SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION Chapter 2 The OSI Model. The OSI Model was designed by the International Standards Organization (ISO) as a structural framework.
Link Layer Support for Unified Radio Power Management in Wireless Sensor Networks IPSN 2007 Kevin Klues, Guoliang Xing and Chenyang Lu Database Lab.
WIRELESS INTEGRATED NETWORK SENSORS
SensorWare: Distributed Services for Sensor Networks Rockwell Science Center and UCLA.
EmStar: A Software Environment for Developing and Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks CENS Research Review October 28, 2005 UCLA CENS EmStar Team.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Dynamic Declarative Networking Exploiting Declarative Knowledge To Enable Energy Efficient Collaborative Sensing Daniel J. Van Hook.
BORDER SECURITY USING WIRELESS INTEGRATED NETWORK SENSORS (WINS) By B.S.Indrani (07841A0406) Aurora’s Technological and Research Institute.
Border Security Using Wireless Integrated Network Sensors
CRESST ONR/NETC Meetings, July July, 2003 ONR Advanced Distributed Learning Bill Kaiser UCLA/SEAS Wireless Networked Sensors for Assessment.
How to minimize energy consumption of Sensors in WSN Dileep Kumar HMCL 30 th Jan, 2015.
Created by :- prashant more prashant more. INTRODUCTION Bluetooth is wireless high speed data transfer technology over a short range ( meters).
What is BizTalk ?
Border security using Wireless Integrated Network Sensors(WINS)
J. Michael, M. Shing M. Miklaski, J. Babbitt Naval Postgraduate School
Introduction to Wireless Sensor Networks
Bluetooth Based Smart Sensor Network
Sensor Networks – Motes, Smart Spaces, and Beyond
Overview: Chapter 4 Infrastructure Establishment
Presentation transcript:

WINS NG 2.0 Current Status and Network Assembly Sensoria Corporation Internetworking the Physical World Santa Fe, NM January 16, 2002

2 Sensoria Corporation Introduction Sensoria Corporation is an innovator of networking embedded computing systems Products for: Defense Automotive Industrial Health Care Logistics Integrated Edge-to-Enterprise Platforms SensIT Development SHM Platform PicoWINS Tags Automotive Telematics Gateway

3 WINS Node Status Ninety WINS NG 2.0 development nodes have been delivered to the SensIT community prior to SITEX02. –Development platform including, high speed sampling, RF support, GPS, Linux 2.4 Kernel, … –Embedded sensing node with expanded capability to support development Additionally Two WINS Imager v.2 have been provided. –Authorized in October, delivered later that month –Provide WINS NG 2.0 development environment integrated with an imaging module, currently visible CCD In process of evaluating use of uncooled thermal IR subsystems Latest v1.3 WINS NG 2.0 and Imager software updates provided December –Updates Linux Kernel to –Updates development tools, to track latest open source updates Including compiler –Refines RF and sensing APIs Updates RF robustness Updates capability of GPS synchronization with sampling

4 WINS NG 2.0 at SITEX02 Seventy-five node WINS NG 2.0 nodes and two Imagers were deployed for SITEX02 –Heavy utilization over 3 weeks provided user feedback on: With complete software distributions were loaded at SITEX02, kernel panics were observed in the kernel distributed with the first WINS NG 2.0 build –This was resolved with the open source community updates to the Linux kernel operating on the SH4 –Tested with a random input test (the crashme utility), operated on the nodes for extended periods without failures on the new Kernel provided at SITEX02 GPS module failures –~10 nodes returned due to GPS module hardware failure –Currently testing operation and correcting available nodes Requested updates to node synchronization –Coordinated with Pete Boettcher to allow PPS access on the SH4 to support NTP Request for an http server to transfer images from the imager –Porting apache web server is in process Feedback is appreciated, in order to duplicate and identify observed issues

5 Steel Knight Imager Deployment To provide a SensIT demo at Steel Knight, Sensoria and BBN installed –2 Imagers –a long range b link –a database server –a web based GUI WINS Imager v 2.0 operated continuously over a week –Linux kernel, with sampling API running continuously –Each Imager equipped with 2 PIR, seismic and acoustic –Imager’s triggered locally with the PIR sensors –Only problem over two weeks when database server was shut down accidentally (by W.J.K.) Provided imaging within seconds of vehicle passage –Sequences of pictures provided to capture, large or multiple targets

6 Steel Knight Sample Images

7 WINS NG 2.0 Network Assembly To support multi-cluster passing of data wirelessly over the network the network must be assembled WINS NG 2.0 radios utilize a TDMA base-remote cluster structure –Base or remote status and channel number (hopping scheme) must be assigned to support the desired architecture. –For example to set the architecture shown: Radios a, c, g, and e are on network 1, radios d,f,h, and j are on network 2, and radios I and l are on network 3 Radios c, f, and l are bases and the rest remotes a b c d e f h g j m l i

8 Radio Configuration Function calls to configure each radio are available in the rfmodemd driver. –Ioctl() calls to configure the network, base/remote status, and Tx power Scripts can run on each node at start up to build there own deterministic networks. Defined network for comparison with self assembled. Reconfigurable for testing multiple scenarios. Suitable to a demo or experiment with a fixed node layout. –Autonomous network assembly a development option for each of the PIs, with Sensoria developing supporting technology to be delivered in the third year of the program –Additional need for self-assembled networks to place and forget

9 Autonomous Self-Assembly Considerations Each base supports up to 16 remotes, however 7 or less remotes per base are recommended. –RF channel TDMA sliced between base and remotes, limiting packet sizes as more remotes are added RF communication is environmentally dependent –Expected ground-to-ground distance is >30m at the MCAGCC desert environment. Base to remote distance, per leg of the star or cluster. –Increases to >70m for nodes at a height of 1.5m. Base operation requires more power than remotes –To maintain synchronization without transmitting data bases use ~420mW, compared to ~90mW for remotes (at 100mW transmit power). –Additional cost to send data is ~20mJ/kbit at the base and ~50mJ/kbit at the remote.

10 Autonomous Self-Assembly Considerations Nodes decide base/remote and network state with local information –WINS NG 2.0 baseline is to use two default networks (known hopping patterns) –Each radio listens as a remote on one network Becomes a base if does not hear another base after random interval –Updates to network structure (base and network assignment) based on: Node locations within a cluster Number of remotes per base Remaining power Link QoS, or signal strength Operation limited by robustness and adaptability –Respond to node destruction/ power failure –Incorporate new nodes with a minimum of communication Focus on a distributed decision, on each node to support multi- cluster multi-hop architecture

11 Conclusions 90 WINS NG 2.0 nodes supplied to SensIT –Operation demonstrated by multiple organizations both at SITEX02 and for this meeting –Continued upgrades and support of RF API, Sampling API, GPS, and Development Environment 2 Imagers v 2.0 supplied to SensIT –Demonstrated operation at the end of SITEX02, and at Steel Knight, also present here Next steps include: –Self assembly of the WINS NG 2.0 RF network –WINS NG 2.0 and Imager refinements