Dr. Geoffrey P Malafsky President, TECHi2 Ms. Elizabeth Sedlacek

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reference Architecture for IT Optimization
Advertisements

DoDAF V2.0 Community Update Overview
DoD Information Enterprise Architecture v2.0
C2 Integration Division Marine Corps Combat Development Command
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
Applying the SOA RA Utah Public Safety ESB Project Utah Department of Technology Services April 10, 2008 Prepared by Robert Woolley.
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) Version 7.
DoD Architecture Framework Overview
Systems Engineering in a System of Systems Context
Connecting People With Information DoD Net-Centric Services Strategy Frank Petroski October 31, 2006.
NDIA / USMC War Game 2007 Command & Control Integration Cell 3 Out Brief.
Security Extensions to the DOD Architecture Framework Kevin Richardson Information Assurance Lab Auburn University Computer Science and Software Engineering.
Database Administration
Creating Architectural Descriptions. Outline Standardizing architectural descriptions: The IEEE has published, “Recommended Practice for Architectural.
Aust. AM Collaborative Group (AAMCOG) An introduction to ISO “What to do” guide 20th October 2014.
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
The Software Product Life Cycle. Views of the Software Product Life Cycle  Management  Software engineering  Engineering design  Architectural design.
Architectural Design Establishing the overall structure of a software system Objectives To introduce architectural design and to discuss its importance.
KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports lessons learned,
Enterprise Architecture
Technical Integrity Assurance For Product Development W. Henson Graves Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Russ Campbell.
Dr. Howard Eisner Professor Emeritus, GWU SEDC CONFERENCE, April 2014 SYSTEM ARCHITECTING – VIEWS vs. FUNCTIONS vs. ALTERNATIVES.
Developing Enterprise Architecture
Chapter 6 System Engineering - Computer-based system - System engineering process - “Business process” engineering - Product engineering (Source: Pressman,
DBS201: DBA/DBMS Lecture 13.
TDT4252/DT8802 Exam 2013 Guidelines to answers
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
What is Enterprise Architecture?
AL-MAAREFA COLLEGE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INFO 232: DATABASE SYSTEMS CHAPTER 1 DATABASE SYSTEMS (Cont’d) Instructor Ms. Arwa Binsaleh.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Army Net-Centric Data Strategy Center Of Excellence (ANCDS) Army Data Harmonization and Integration Working Group (ADHIWG) Sever Ciorlian ANCDS Team Lead.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
11 Aeronautical Information Exchange Model (AIXM) / Weather Information Exchange Model (WXXM) Conference Addressing the NextGen Challenge Charles A. Leader.
ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.
OOI CI LCA REVIEW August 2010 Ocean Observatories Initiative OOI Cyberinfrastructure Architecture Overview Michael Meisinger Life Cycle Architecture Review.
Enterprise Architecture [Product Name] [Enterprise Architect] [Discipline and Names] To-Be Powerpoint Presentation v
Lecture 7: Requirements Engineering
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
9 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fourth Edition.
United States Department of Justice Achieving Information Interoperability and Business Agility The Justice Reference Architecture:
Enterprise Architecture HOW COMPANIES ARE EXPLOITING INFORMATION TO THROUGH IT.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Connecting People With Information Transforming the Way the DoD Manages Data M. David Allen OASD(NII)/DoD CIO May 23, 2006 “The.
JNTC Joint Management Office
The Enterprise Architecture Rush Natty Gur The EA group IASA director of technology.
Week 7 Lecture Part 2 Introduction to Database Administration Samuel S. ConnSamuel S. Conn, Asst Professor.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e As of: 3/1/2016 Air Force Weather Agency CEISC Committee Focus Shift - Proposed Modification to.
1 Industry Advisory Council’s Enterprise Architecture Shared Interest Group (IAC EA SIG) Collaborative Approach to Addressing Common Government- Industry.
IPDA Architecture Project International Planetary Data Alliance IPDA Architecture Project Report.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
Managing Enterprise Architecture
1 The XMSF Profile Overlay to the FEDEP Dr. Katherine L. Morse, SAIC Mr. Robert Lutz, JHU APL
Mgt Project Portfolio Management and the PMO Module 8 - Fundamentals of the Program Management Office Dr. Alan C. Maltz Howe School of Technology.
Discussion Topics for Exploring OMG UPDM Way-ahead
Why KM is Important KM enhances mission command, facilitates the exchange of knowledge, supports doctrine development, fosters leaders’ development, supports.
EI Architecture Overview/Current Assessment/Technical Architecture
Unified Architecture Framework NATO Architecture CaT Introduction
NDIA Architecture Analysis for System-of-System (SoS) Interoperability Assessment Karen L. Lauro, Ph.D Oct 21, 2003.
Air Force Airborne SIGINT Architecture & Analysis
Advance Software Engineering
CV-1: Vision The overall vision for transformational endeavors, which provides a strategic context for the capabilities described and a high-level scope.
Version 3 April 21, 2006 Takahiro Yamada (JAXA/ISAS)
The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
CIMI Enterprise Architecture Proposal
2018 Real Cisco Dumps IT-Dumps
DoD Architecture Framework Overview
, editor October 8, 2011 DRAFT-D
Enterprise Architecture at Penn State
Systems Architecture & Design Lecture 3 Architecture Frameworks
IEEE Architecture Council Overview
Presentation transcript:

Using Enterprise Architecture to Avoid Errors and Ensure Success: A Marine Corps Case Study Dr. Geoffrey P Malafsky President, TECHi2 Ms. Elizabeth Sedlacek Director Information Systems & Infrastructure Marine Corps Systems Command

Architecture The art & science of designing and erecting buildings. A style and method of design and construction Orderly arrangement of parts; structure: the architecture of the federal bureaucracy; the architecture of a novel. Computer Science: The overall design or structure of a computer system, including the hardware and the software required to run it, especially the internal structure of the microprocessor. 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

When We Think of Architecture.. 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Architecture Includes … Form Materials Structure Aesthetics Use patterns Maintenance Construction Safety An architecture is “the structure of components, their relationships, and the principles and guidelines governing their design and evolution over time.” (IEEE Std 610.12) 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Architecture for IT Network diagrams Software models Communication protocols Hardware connections 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Yes, But Also… How, who, when, why, where, what of design, funding, decision-making, development, operation and maintenance Why all of these “soft” issues Lessons Learned from many years of large scale IT programs Organizational issues can dominate systems engineering Real success depends on single system blending people, process, technology 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Architecture Frameworks Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF) Zachman framework The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) Object Management Group (OMG) Model Driven Architecture (MDA) Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DODAF) 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Zachman Framework 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

DODAF Defines 3 primary views There is no single view of an architecture (business process, network, hardware, data management, etc.) that describes all critical components, data, and users Use standardized products, terms, and definitions Operational View: tasks and activities of concern and the information exchanges required Technical View: profile of a minimal set of time-phased standards and rules governing the implementation, arrangement, interaction, and interdependence of system elements. System View: systems of concern and the connections among those systems in context with the operational architecture view. 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

DODAF: Example Key Products ALL Views AV-1: Overview and Summary Information AV-2: Integrated Dictionary Operation Views OV-1: High-level Operational Concept Graphic OV-2: Operational Node Connectivity Description OV-3: Operational Information Exchange Matrix System View SV-1: System Interface Description Technical View TV-1: Technical Architecture Profile 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

System Design & Development: Known Hurdles Acquisition is structured to purchase tools based on lists of functions Users need support of business processes No single organizational group makes all necessary decisions and controls all types of funds Success or failure of the system and program hinges on the intangibles of usefulness, usability, relevance 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Errors to Avoid “Wrong” group doing: Requirements Technical specifications Program management Systems engineering Debating the above issues across organizational roles and responsibilities Relying on vendor or analyst literature for technical design Focusing most effort on networks, hardware, software instead of business process, operational capabilities 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Success Factors to Promote Clear roles and responsibilities Maximize use of industry and government standards Business focused Measures of Effectiveness Constantly restate role of technology as supporting not driving design of capabilities 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

How does EA Help? Keeps people aware of need for synergy among people-process-technology Highlights operational capabilities as source of design and development not by-products Forces explicit definition of information needs, by whom, when, …. Requires explicit statement of organizational roles and responsibilities 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Example: Who Defines Requirements Operational Views show the goals and major information requirements System Views show the layout and connections of network, hardware, software Which view states requirements? Who defines the requirements? Answer: Different roles for different requirements 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

DODAF Views Requirements group, e.g. CIO Systems engineering group: e.g. MCSC Standards group, e.g. Acquisition, policy, industry 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

From Software Productivity Consortium DODAF OVs From Software Productivity Consortium 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

From Software Productivity Consortium DODAF SVs From Software Productivity Consortium 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

As an example, a portal was designed for the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC). As this OV-1 shows, the intent of the portal is not to deploy just a portal but to provide the Marine Corps senior leadership with one secure tool bringing together applications, databases, and metadata to provide key information and data. 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

The OV-2 for the Commandant’s portal shows the major stakeholders and how they are connected in terms of information needs. A separate product (i.e. SV) will show how the system components are connected for each stakeholder. 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

CMC Portal OV-3: Information Exchange Requirement Need Line ID Info Exch ID Content Scope Media Type Acc Producer Cons Security Class Time Crit Freq IA A (ACMC-CMC) A-1 CMC Issues Maintains Organizational awareness at same level as CMC in role as Assistant Data, Text, Graphics, Audio, Video High ACMC CMC U, SBU minutes-weeks Event Driven A-2 Congressional Issues Keeps CMC informed of Congressional activities that affect USMC hours-days A-3 OSD Issues Keeps CMC informed of OSD issues that affect USMC 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

The SV-1 for the Commandant’s portal shows the major system components and how they are connected in terms of hardware needs. 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

United States Marine Corps Enterprise Architecture Ms. Elizabeth Sedlacek Director Information Systems and Infrastructure Marine Corps Systems Command

What is an Enterprise Architecture? 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

What is an Enterprise Architecture? Takes the…Baseline Architecture Enterprise Architecture – Is a discipline for assessing and recommending candidate Information Technology solutions in an integrated context with business and mission operations Translates to – Significant increase in the Warfighting Capability Utilizes… an Integration Plan To develop…a Target Architecture 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

How do we use the Enterprise Architecture? - Operational Requirements Provides the basis from which we define operational capabilities Describes the linkages among systems, which turn separate systems into Warfighting Capabilities. EA is the disciplined approach to achieve a Network Centric Warfare Capability 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

How do we use the Enterprise Architecture? – Systems Engineering It provides a tool for systems engineers to communicate so that the separate system designs become integrated to produce required Operational Capabilities. 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

How do we use the Enterprise Architecture? – Modeling and Testing It provides a tool for test engineers to develop scripts which are operationally relevant and doctrinally sound that goes beyond architecture modeling. Agency-Level View (OV-2) Architecture Cube It is important to note that we use architectures to develop our test scripts at MCTSSA. The Arch cube is basically the MSTAR and C2OA repositories (soon to be called MCASE). From that we extract an Organizational/Agency level view and examine activities in that agency. Shown next is a Fire Support example with a description of individual roles and chores. - Next Slide - Roles & Chores (Composite View) 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

How do we use the Enterprise Architecture? – Analyses It provides a common framework to evaluate, analyze and report linkages and sensitivities among the DOTMLPF factors. Map Roles & Chores to Systems Map Chores to System-Operator Steps Next they map these roles and chores to systems, then operator steps in a sequence of events/operator steps…this creates the test script. The final step in this test is relating back to the Expeditionary Force Development process and DOTMLPF to assess consistency. - Next Slide - Assess Consistency of Doctrine, Organization, Training, and Materiel 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Roles and Responsibilities MOA HQMC, C4 CIO - Define and issue IT standards and policies - Participate in the collaborative environment - Develop the Roadmap for enhancing the EITA - Address architectures in AIS/IT requirements MCCDC - Develop and maintain the operational architectures and concepts - Participate in the collaborative environment - Address architectures in AIS/IT requirements MCSC - Develop and maintain systems and technical architectures - Create a collaborative environment to develop and maintain the EITA - Ensure all IT programs are compliant with the EITA - Lead the resolution of conflicts between operational, systems, and technical views 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Marine Corps Enterprise IT Services (MCEITS) A look at the Marine Corps EA in action…….. 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

What is MCEITS MCEITS is envisioned to become the Marine Corps solution for: Infrastructure (brick and mortar) IT Centers – Physical location of hardware, software and computer applications Services Data Management – Access to data needed to make decisions Application Management – 24/7 availability of computer applications Governance Policy and Engineering Management – Standards and Systems Engineering Acquisition Support Governance Services Infrastructure 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

MCEITS and NCES Infrastructure Services Governance The IT Centers will comprise a disciplined and standardized hardware, software, and firmware baseline which will furnish the MC with proven, reliable, resilient, and survivable production, testing, and development environments. Services This baseline will host multiple database systems and application in an N-tier architecture and will also provide the requisite administrative and management Services to fully support the hosted systems. Governance The capabilities of the IT Centers and Services will be harnessed and augmented by a consistent and disciplined Governance process. Beginning of Marine Corps Net-Centric Enterprise Services Implementation 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Overall Benefits Harmonizes ITS/NSS Assets - Cost, readiness, interoperability Enables Marine Corps to respond to DoD IT business process improvement and transformation initiatives Facilitates Marine Corps participation in DoD Net-Centric programs Creates conditions for enterprise IT demands (scalability) Augments current initiatives (NMCI, COOP, PORs) Provides common user / application services Forcing function for creating system interoperability, integration and training 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

So what about the Enterprise Architecture? Forcing function for creating system interoperability, integration and training System identification and interfaces NCES/NII/OSD requirements Organizational processes Program alignment and interoperability 20Sep2004 TECHi2, MCSC

Summary & Questions Brief is available at: www.techi2.com www.e-gov.com/events/2004/ea2/downloads/