Correlation Between Lightning and the Joplin Missouri Tornado Ariel Powers 1, Brian West 1, Humberto Barbosa 2, Ivon Wilson 2 1 1Department of Earth Sciences, SUNY Oswego, NY 13126, USA and 2Department of Metereology, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Maceio, Alagoas, Brazil ConclusionReferencesAcknowledgements Introduction Methods Objectives Results Lightning and tornados are two important phenomena. To the general public they may commonly be associated with one another. This research focuses on determining whether there is a connection between these two weather occurrences. Joplin, MO Tornado Touched down: May 22, 2011 at 2234 UTC and ended at 2312 UTC Path length: 22.1 miles (35.6 km) Path width: ¾-1 mile ( km) Winds: >200 mph (>321.9 kph) Peaked at EF5 for 6 miles (9.7 km) 24 minute warning for Joplin Lightning Requires deep convection (as do tornados), separation of charges in a cloud, and ice collisions within the cloud Lightning data is conveyed through very low frequency (VLF) waves ( kHz) detected through the World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) antennas. WWLLN 68 stations world wide Every station has an antenna that detects the lightning close to it’s peak power (peak power arrival) also known as Time of Group Arrival (TOGA). Data, time, and location were chosen based upon radar and satellite images from May 22. Latitude: (decimal) Longitude: (decimal) Time: UTC Data retrieved from WWLLN was stored in plain text data. This file was opened and the user input the selected time, latitude and longitude through programming. MATLAB software was used to put the points into Google Earth using KML language. PHP script was used to read the output files from MATLAB. Four 20 minute frames were created and used for an animation on Google Earth using KML language. The tornado’s path was displayed on Google Earth using a KML file from a NOAA link. This process made it easier to compare the density of lightning with the tornado. Motivation Tornadoes are a common occurrence that lead to many fatalities in the United States. Joplin, MO was chosen because it was a recent event and the most severe tornado we have seen in Hypothesis The goal is to see where the majority of the lightning occurs whether it is before, during or after the tornado. We hypothesized that the majority of the lightning would precede the tornado due to the line of thunderstorms before the tornado had formed html html b3&lat= &lon= &label=Joplin%2c%20MO b3&lat= &lon= &label=Joplin%2c%20MO Total number of strikes: 729 Before warning: 67 During warning: 132 During tornado: 202 After tornado: 328 Increasing trend in number of lightning strikes observed Rarely a lightning strike in the tornado itself Based on Google Earth lightning tends to be following the tornado instead of preceding it. Where the majority of the lightning struck in relation to the tornado Before warning: Northeast of where tornado hit During warning: North of where tornado hit During tornado: Highly concentrated over the Joplin area After tornado: South of where tornado hit The shift in lightning due to the moving storm track is supported by the radar. Hypothesis rejected Majority of lightning occurred after the tornado, not before as hypothesized It can be assumed that there are more thunderstorms after the tornado. Modification of research can be done by choosing shorter time frames. Based on this research there is no correlation between the lightning and tornado, although they need similar weather occurrences to form. Further research should be done using other tornadic events. Google Earth Images Before Warning ( UTC) During Warning ( UTC) During Tornado ( UTC) After Tornado ( UTC) 5:43 CDT5:48 CDT Radar over Joplin, Missouri UFAL Satellite System WWLLN Station at UFAL GPS Receiver for WWLLN at UFAL